Oregon
Oregon bill that challenges book bans in schools passes Senate; Democrats reject Knopp move to wait, discuss in future sessions – KTVZ
SALEM, Ore. (KGW/KTVZ) — A bill that aims to push back against a rise in book bans in Oregon school districts has passed the Senate, KGW reported.
Senate Bill 1583 says that “that a school official cannot prohibit materials because the materials concern a class of people identified in our education anti-discrimination laws. In other words, you cannot ban a book because the book involves folks from marginalized communities,” according to bill sponsor Sen. Lew Frederick, D-Portland.
“If you are not allowing kids to have books, and you are telling them what books they have to read or what books they can’t read, you are basically setting them up for not understanding the world we have around us,” Frederick said.
Earlier this month, several librarians, teachers and parents expressed support for the bill, with one teacher saying, “Students don’t need to be protected from the truth. Rather, they need to learn the truth in order for them to navigate a complex world, and if they understand historical injustices, they’re better prepared to recognize, address and repair injustice they encounter today.”
Meanwhile, opponents claimed that bill would take away power from school boards and parents to determine what’s appropriate for kids.
On Tuesday, Senate Republicans voted as a bloc against the ban, with Senate Republican Leader Tim Knopp, R-Bend, proposing a minority report that would have given more time to discuss the issue in future sessions, according to a press release. That was voted down by Democrats.
“Democrats framed this bill as an issue of discrimination, but the bigger picture is ensuring Oregon schools provide appropriate reading material to their students to enhance their educational experiences. Our minority report recognized that discrimination is wrong, and so is providing children explicit content harmful to their development,” said Knopp in a statement.
On the Senate floor Tuesday, Republican lawmakers said the state should not try to control the decisions of local school districts, claiming that this may allow inappropriate content to slip through the cracks.
“I don’t think that it is this body’s responsibility to tell a school district what they can and cannot make available,” said Sen. Daniel Bonham, R-The Dalles. “I want to be clear that books still exist, whether they are not in the schools’ libraries. We are not burning books. We are not banning books. We are just saying this is probably not something that a child should be encouraged to read.”
“Book banning is a widespread tool used to oppress free speech and thought in Oregon and nationwide,” said Frederick in a statement. “All kids deserve the opportunity to see themselves, their families, and members of their community represented in the books they read. Oregonians should get to decide what they personally read, not political agendas.”
Meanwhile, Emily O’Neal, the chair of the Intellectual Freedom Committee with the Oregon Library Association, also expressed support for the bill, citing a 2023 incident where the Canby School District removed all copies of “Lolita,” despite parental protests.
Complaints from two community members had spurred the district’s decision to temporarily remove 35 books in total from school libraries a few months ago, pending review, which Canby students turned out to protest. Members of the Oregon Library Association said proper protocol wasn’t followed in removing “Lolita,” as well as restricting the other 34 books.
The bill moved to the House Rules Committee, where people who are either for, against or neutral had another opportunity to testify in front of lawmakers on Thursday.
—
News release Tuesday from Senator Lew Frederick:
Protecting Free Speech, Thought in Oregon Schools
Senate Bill 1583 will protect free speech by prohibiting book bans, keeping appropriate, educational material available for all Oregonians
SALEM, Ore. — Today, Senate Bill 1583 passed the Oregon Senate. This legislation will protect free speech by prohibiting politically-motivated book bans, keeping appropriate, educational material available for all Oregonians.
SB 1583 will prohibit book bans on the basis of race, gender identity, country of origin, sexual orientation, disability and immigrant status, protecting all Oregonians’ right to free speech, and keeping culture wars out of our public schools and libraries. This legislation protects parents’ right to decide what their children read, free from political interference.
“Book banning is a widespread tool used to oppress free speech and thought in Oregon and nationwide,” said Senator Lew Frederick (D- Portland), chief sponsor of this legislation. “All kids deserve the opportunity to see themselves, their families, and members of their community represented in the books they read. Oregonians should get to decide what they personally read, not political agendas.”
The bill now goes to the Oregon House of Representatives for consideration.
—
News release Tuesday from Oregon Senate Republican Caucus:
Senate Republicans Defend Age-Appropriate Reading Material in Schools, Urge Democrats to Give This Polarizing Issue More Discussion in Future Sessions
SALEM, Ore. – Today, Senate Republicans voted to support age-appropriate reading materials for K-12 students in the Oregon public education system. Senate Republican Leader Tim Knopp (R-Bend) made a motion to adopt a minority report in place of SB 1583, which was voted down by all 17 Senate Democrats. It would have given more time to study and discuss this contentious issue in future sessions.
“The topic of what reading materials are available to students in public schools has been politicized across the country in recent years. One only need do a quick Google search to see what has occurred at school board meetings. We’ve seen angry parents, exasperated school board members and administrators, frustrated members of the public, and even the regular presence of law enforcement to stop entire meetings from becoming outright brawls,” said Senator Suzanne Weber (R-Tillamook), a former educator. “I am disappointed in the Democrats’ decision to reject our minority report which gave more time and attention to this issue. Instead, they passed SB 1583 on party lines.”
“We have heard from hundreds and hundreds of Oregonians who are deeply concerned about SB 1583. Instead of rushing into passing a contentious bill during a short session meant to address emergencies, Republicans wanted to give the discussion more time and input from parents and the public in future sessions,” said Leader Knopp. “Democrats framed this bill as an issue of discrimination, but the bigger picture is ensuring Oregon schools provide appropriate reading material to their students to enhance their educational experiences. Our minority report recognized that discrimination is wrong, and so is providing children explicit content harmful to their development.”
Oregon
New Data Shows Oregon E-Scooter Injuries on the Rise
Data released by the Oregon Health Authority this week suggests Oregonians are getting hurt on electric scooters more every year.
In recent years, according to OHA, an “e-scooter-specific code” was developed for health care tracking purposes.
From 2021 to 2024, annual injury reports under this code from Oregon hospitals and emergency departments jumped from 211 to 418.
And in just the first nine months of 2025, there had been 509 such reports.
“These injuries are not minor scrapes,” said Dagan Wright, an OHA epidemiologist, in a written statement. “They often involve head injuries, broken bones, and other serious trauma that requires emergency or inpatient care.”
The city of Portland signed contracts with three e-scooter rental companies in 2018, as the transportation craze spread across the country. But e-scooter injury diagnosis codes are relatively new in health care reporting, Wright said in the OHA statement.
“While the overall numbers remain smaller than for other transportation-related injuries, the rapid increase over a short period of time is a clear safety signal,” OHA added.
The agency highlighted the story of Portland e-scooter commuter Daniel Pflieger, who it says was riding a scooter home when he reportedly slid on ice. He bruised several ribs.
Sometimes outcomes are worse. OHA identified 17 deaths linked to electric or motorized scooters since 2018, and seven of those occurred in 2025.
OHA says that e-bikes raise many similar safety concerns as e-scooters. The first full year for which e-bike injuries were coded for reporting was 2023. State data shows 392 reported e-bike injuries that year, 683 in 2024, and 760 in the first nine months of 2025.
“Injuries involving e-bikes and e-scooters share common risk factors—speed, lack of helmet use, roadway design, and interactions with motor vehicles,” Wright said.
Willamette Week’s reporting has concrete impacts that change laws, force action from civic leaders, and drive compromised politicians from public office.
Support WW
Oregon
Oregon women’s basketball playing for March Madness seeding vs. Purdue
Hear Oregon women’s Graves, Etute and Fiso after loss to Washington
The Oregon Ducks women’s basketball team finishes the regular season with a March 1 home loss to Washington.
At times, the Oregon women’s basketball team has certainly made things much harder on themselves than it needs to be. The team has also produced some miraculous comeback victories, putting itself in position to make women’s March Madness for the second straight season.
March 1, in their final regular season game, the Ducks (20-11, 8-10 Big Ten) finished on the wrong end of yet another tight game to Washington, 70-69. It’s the second time this season Oregon has come back from a double-digit deficit, but ended up losing to the Huskies (20-9, 10-8).
Those aren’t the only times Oregon has come back from a double-digit deficit, like it did in wins vs. Nebraska and USC. The No. 11-seed Ducks are hoping they won’t need heroics in a Big Ten tournament first-round game against No. 14 Purdue this Wednesday.
Watch Oregon basketball on Peacock
“I think our biggest weakness this year has been our inconsistency,” coach Kelly Graves said, “something we’ve battled all year. The great thing is our kids know, regardless of the score, we’ve got a chance. We’ll make it a game at some point. As a coach, it drives you nuts. Hopefully we can figure it out and play more consistent basketball.”
Oregon’s volatility has seen it earn three double-digit comeback wins this year, but also blow several games in the final moments.
Against Wisconsin, the Ducks held a 6-point lead with less than a minute remaining, but lost in overtime. Against Illinois, Oregon held a 21-point lead at halftime, blew it in the third quarter, trailed by eight with minutes to play and somehow eked out a win.
That makes UO somewhat of a wild card heading into the conference tournament this week at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis.
“It’s definitely (been) a rollercoaster,” guard Katie Fiso said. “A lot of highs and a lot of lows. But one thing that I try to see through all games is our grittiness and our toughness. One thing that stays consistent throughout the season is our toughness and our grittiness. The game isn’t over until the last bell rings.”
The Ducks will be taking on a Boilermakers (13-16, 5-13) team that has struggled against most of the top competition in the league, but played Oregon tight in a Feb. 25 Ducks win.
Graves said when the Ducks went throughout the postgame handshake line after, the Boilermakers felt like their season would end after the regular season. Thanks to some upsets, Purdue is in the Big Ten Tournament as the No. 14 seed.
“We’re playing a team that probably feels like it’s playing with house money,” Graves said. “We’ve got to pick ourselves back up and get it done.”
What channel is Oregon vs. Purdue on today in Big Ten tournament?
Oregon will tip off vs. Purdue on Peacock, with no TV option to watch the game.
Oregon vs. Purdue start time in Big Ten tournament
- Date: Wednesday, March 4
- Time: Around 5:30 p.m. PT
Oregon and Purdue will play around 5:30 p.m. PT at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. The first game of the day begins at 12:30 p.m. PT, with the next game 25 minutes after the first game ends, and so on. The Ducks play in the third game of the day, so no official tip time is listed.
Oregon women’s basketball schedule 2025-26
Below are the past five games of Oregon’s 2025-26 basketball season. For the full schedule, click here.
| Feb. 15 | Washington 51, Oregon 43 |
| Feb. 19 | Oregon 80, Nebraska 76 |
| Feb. 22 | Indiana 72, Oregon 65 |
| Feb. 25 | Oregon 71, Purdue 65 |
| March 1 | Washington 70, Oregon 69 |
| March 4 | Oregon vs. Purdue (Big Ten tournament) |
Purdue women’s basketball schedule 2025-26
Below are the past five games of Purdue’s 2025-26 basketball season. For the full schedule, click here.
Feb. 14
Purdue 72, Rutgers 57
Feb. 19
Iowa 83, Purdue 74
Feb. 22
Maryland 99, Purdue 66
Feb. 25
Oregon 71, Purdue 65
March 1
Purdue 67, Northwestern 62
March 4
Oregon vs. Purdue (Big Ten tournament)
Alec Dietz covers University of Oregon football and women’s basketball for The Register-Guard. You may reach him at adietz@registerguard.com.
Oregon
Oregon lawmakers advance one-year moratorium on tax breaks for data centers
Written by Alma McCarty & KGW:
SALEM, Oregon — In the final week of Oregon’s legislative short session, lawmakers in Salem discussed regulating data centers — specifically, placing a one-year moratorium on certain tax breaks.
Governor Tina Kotek has been looking to expand the state’s enterprise zone program, which is intended to grow Oregon companies and attract new ones. Businesses that locate or expand within designated zones can qualify for property tax exemptions on new investments if they meet eligibility requirements.
However, some advocates argue that extending incentives to data centers may not be sustainable long term.
“Data centers have been around for a while,” said Kelly Campbell, policy director for Columbia Riverkeeper. “Data centers are getting bigger and bigger. Some of these new AI hyperscale data centers are exponentially bigger than those tiny ones. They’re really just using a lot of energy, a lot of water.”
However, some advocates argue that extending incentives to data centers may not be sustainable long term.
“Data centers have been around for a while,” said Kelly Campbell, policy director for Columbia Riverkeeper. “Data centers are getting bigger and bigger. Some of these new AI hyperscale data centers are exponentially bigger than those tiny ones. They’re really just using a lot of energy, a lot of water.”
Last week, Columbia Riverkeeper released a report examining data centers operating or planned along the Columbia River in Oregon and Washington.
“I think the question becomes, do we want to stick to our climate goals of getting to 100% renewable? Or do we want to have these big, mega data centers owned by big tech companies — some of the wealthiest corporations in the world — getting to use whatever energy they want? We would say, no, that’s not OK,” Campbell said.
On Monday, lawmakers amended an economic incentives bill to block new data centers from qualifying for certain tax breaks for one year.
“I think this moratorium is a pretty short pause to give the advisory council time and space to do their work,” said Rep. Nancy Nathanson, D-Eugene, during a subcommittee meeting Monday morning.
The Data Center Advisory Committee, convened by Kotek, held its first meeting Friday. The group’s goal is to develop policy recommendations addressing the rapid growth of data centers.
“There are some businesses that will need them, but freestanding data centers, the way we’ve been growing in the state, is not sustainable,” the Governor told reporters during a press conference last week.
On Monday, her office sent KGW a statement regarding the moratorium:
“The moratorium will address immediate concerns and also allow for the Governor’s Data Center Advisory Committee to develop recommendations to strategically pursue economic development opportunities while ensuring utility costs, infrastructure investments, and environmental impacts remain sustainable and equitable for all residents.”
Supporters of data center growth, particularly in rural communities, also spoke during work sessions.
“This moratorium will have a disparate impact on communities east of the Cascades — communities like Prineville, Hermiston and Redmond that have leveraged enterprise zones and data centers to bring hundreds of living-wage jobs to their communities,” said Alexandra Ring, a lobbyist for the League of Oregon Cities.
“While data centers may be seen as a nuisance or inconvenient in Washington County, they are not in Crook County. They are not in Morrow County, in Umatilla County,” said Sen. Mark McLane, who represents several Eastern Oregon counties, including Baker, Crook, Grant and Harney.
Even if the House and Senate ultimately approve the moratorium, it would apply only to new data centers — not those that already receive tax breaks or projects currently underway.
-
World1 week agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Wisconsin3 days agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Maryland4 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Denver, CO1 week ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Florida4 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Oregon6 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Massachusetts2 days agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks