Oregon
Is it legal to point security camera at a neighbor’s house in Oregon?
Why privacy advocates are ringing the alarm on doorbell cameras
The disappearance of Nancy Guthrie and a Super Bowl advertisement for Ring are bringing new attention to doorbell cameras and privacy concerns.
There are millions of homes and businesses with security cameras and the number is only growing.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, surveillance camera installations in the U.S. were expected to grow from 47 million in 2015 to about 85 million by 2021.
An estimated 10 million Amazon’s Ring doorbell cameras are in use nationwide, according to a 2023 report from Politico, and dozens of other companies have made their own doorbell cameras to jump on the craze.
At the same time, concerns over surveillance are on the rise. Ring ended its partnership with Flock, a Georgia-based tech surveillance company, in February. Throughout 2025, Eugene and Springfield residents fought back against the installation of Flock license-plate reader cameras, which led to them being taken down seven months later.
On your private property, what laws exist around security cameras and where they can point? The Register-Guard looked at state and municipal laws to find out.
Can you point a security camera at the street or sidewalk?
Yes. You can absolutely point security cameras located on your property at the street.
There are no laws around recording video in “public view.”
“Public view” is classified as any area that can be readily seen by normal, unaided vision when viewed from a public place, including streets.
Can you point a security camera at your neighbor’s house?
Usually, yes, your surveillance cameras can be pointed toward others’ homes. While there are no specific Oregon laws against installing security cameras that are directed at your neighbor’s home, you may want to be careful where exactly it’s pointed.
If you have a doorbell camera, for example, that points directly from your front door to your neighbor’s front door across the street, that’s completely legal.
Anything visible in “public view” is permissible to video as long as you remain on public or your own property.
According to a city of Eugene spokesperson, there are no city laws against a private party having a security camera and what direction it is pointing.
However, it can get tricky, depending on where exactly you point your cameras. For example, if you have a two-story home and you point your security camera into your neighbor’s backyard, that might be harder to defend in court. It all hinges on ORS 163.700 — Invasion of personal privacy.
Can you point a surveillance camera into your neighbor’s bedroom or bathroom?
Effectively, no. You cannot point a camera into your neighbor’s bedroom or bathroom without risking breaking Oregon law.
This would likely be a violation of ORS 163.700, constituting an invasion of personal privacy in the second degree.
The law extends to any recording of another person’s “intimate area” without consent in places where the person recorded has a “reasonable expectation of privacy concerning the intimate area.” As defined by Oregon law, “intimate area” includes nudity and undergarments typically covered by other clothing.
Because people typically change their clothing in bedrooms and bathrooms, a security camera pointed into those rooms would more than likely capture them nude or in their undergarments, which would violate Oregon law.
Where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy extends beyond bedrooms and bathrooms. According to Oregon law, it also includes, but is not limited to, locker rooms, tanning booths and any area where a person undresses in an enclosed space that is not open to public view.
Invasion of personal privacy in the second degree is a Class A misdemeanor, which can result in a fine up to $6,250.
Miranda Cyr reports on education for The Register-Guard. You can contact her at mcyr@registerguard.com or find her on X @mirandabcyr.
Oregon
Oregon one of first states to sue Trump for executive order restricting mail-in votes
PORTLAND, Ore. (KATU) — President Donald Trump signed an executive order Tuesday aimed at tightening voting rules, setting up a legal fight with states that rely heavily on mail ballots and prompting Oregon and Arizona to sue.
The order calls for the Department of Homeland Security, working with the Social Security Administration, to create lists of eligible voters in each state, according to the text released Tuesday.
It also seeks to bar the U.S. Postal Service from sending absentee ballots to people who are not on each state’s approved list, though voting law experts say the president likely lacks the power to mandate what the Postal Service does. The order also calls for ballots to have secure envelopes with unique barcodes for tracking.
“The cheating on mail-in voting is legendary. It’s horrible what’s going on,” Trump said as he signed the order, repeating false allegations about mail ballots. “I think this will help a lot with elections.”
Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read, a Democrat, said Oregon plans to challenge the order. “We don’t need decrees from Washington, D.C.,” Read said. “My message to the President: We’ll see you in court.”
In an interview with KATU News on Tuesday, Read called the order “another desperate, illegal power grab that shows a total lack of respect for the American people and our Constitution,” adding, “The Constitution is clear: states run elections. Oregon’s gold standard vote-by-mail elections are secure, fair, and accurate.”
Read said the executive order “is not going to go unchallenged,” and noted that Oregon has already prevailed in court against the Trump administration on election-related issues.
“We’ve already beaten the President twice when he succeeded his authority. When it comes to elections and we’re prepared to do that again,” Read said.
Read said the practical effect of the order would be to allow the federal government “to decide who gets to vote” and to “hold important election integrity and security dollars hostage.”
He called the order “irresponsible,” “reckless,” “expensive” and “unnecessary,” and said, “Oregon is not going to take this lying down.”
Asked about potential impacts with the primary 56 days away, Read said he did not see how county clerks could implement changes in the middle of an election cycle. “We’re in an election cycle already, so this is irresponsible,” he said.
Read also pushed back on Trump’s argument that the order is about election integrity. “There’s no evidence that there is any issue with election integrity,” Read said, adding that Oregon has been “running safe, accurate, fair elections in Oregon by mail for more than 25 years.”
Gov. Tina Kotek also criticized the order, saying, “Trump’s attacks on mail by vote, by mail are not about fraud. They are about silencing people. Oregon won’t back down from defending the system we trust to make our voices heard.”
U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden responded in a social media post: “Oregonians have successfully voted by mail for over thirty years, and we’ll be damned if we let Donald Trump change the way our state runs its elections. My message to the White House is this: if you come for Oregon’s vote-by-mail, you’ll have hell to pay.”
In Arizona, Secretary of State Adrian Fontes said the state’s vote-by-mail system was designed by Republicans and has delivered secure elections for decades, and that it is now used by 80% of voters. “Donald Trump is attempting to pick his desired list of voters in each state with the Social Security Administration’s help,” Fontes said. “We will not let this stand,” he added.
The executive order follows earlier legal fights between Oregon and the Trump administration.
In January, a federal judge threw out a lawsuit that would have required the state to share private voter data with the Trump administration. Another judge ruled in favor of Oregon and Washington in lawsuits against the Trump administration, blocking the administration’s first executive order from March 2025.
The order comes as the Save America Act, which would require voter ID and proof of citizenship to vote, has stalled in Congress.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Oregon
Oregon Ducks’ Most Important Returning Factor
The Oregon Ducks are returning 66 percent of their production from last season, according to ESPN. That’s the eleventh-highest in all of college football, but only the fifth-highest in the Big Ten Conference behind the No. 9 UCLA Bruins, No. 7 Minnesota Golden Gophers, No. 3 Nebraska Cornhuskers, and No. 2 Maryland Terrapins.
The most important returnees for fifth-year coach Dan Lanning and first-year defensive coordinator Chris Hampton in 2026 come out on the edge with arguably the sport’s most dangerous pass rush duo.
Matayo Uiagalelei and Teitum Tuioti
The 1-2 punch of the senior outside linebacker duo in Matayo Uiagalelei and Teitum Tuioti will be the faces of the defensive end room in Eugene, Oregon. That pair will be the foundation of the newly-appointed Hampton’s group in the middle.
Tuioti was awarded All-Big Ten Third Team honors in the 2025 season, while Uiagalelei was named All-Big Ten Honorable Mention. The two combined for 102 total tackles, 15.5 sacks, eight pass deflections, and two forced fumbles.
Jerry Mixon
Senior inside linebacker Jerry Mixon also announced that he would be returning to the Pacific Northwest with expectations of an even more expanded role.
Mixon has tallied 65 tackles (34 solo, 31 assisted), seven pass deflections, two interceptions, and 1.5 sacks throughout his collegiate career thus far. Based on the production in the given snaps this past season, he’s poised for a national breakout year inside Autzen Stadium alongside the tenacity of Uiagalelei and Tuioti.
A’Mauri Washington and Bear Alexander
Can’t forget to mention senior defensive lineman A’mauri Washington and redshirt senior defensive lineman Bear Alexander, each well over 300 pounds, who do heaps of the dirty work that goes unnoticed to the masses. Their explosiveness and overall physicality make them intimidating figures in their respective roles.
More Returning, New Pieces on Oregon’s Defensive Line
As for the promising underclassmen returning on the 2026 roster, there are plenty of them to go around.
- Sophomore outside linebacker Nasir Wyatt
- Redshirt sophomore outside linebacker Elijah Rushing
- Sophomore inside linebacker Gavin Nix
- Redshirt sophomore inside linebacker Brayden Platt
- Redshirt sophomore inside linebacker Dylan Williams
The Ducks will have some new faces from across the country on the defensive front, coming out of the NCAA transfer portal.
- North Carolina Tar Heels junior D’Antre Robinson
- Louisiana-Monroe Warhawks redshirt senior Jerome Simmons
- Howard Bison redshirt senior Derrick Brown Jr.
- Oregon State Beavers redshirt freshman Bleu Dantzler
Looking even further down the road with Oregon’s pressure on the ball, these are the names from the incoming 2026 recruiting class. The entire class, with all positions, is ranked No. 4 in the country and No. 3 in the Big Ten, according to Rivals.
- Four-star EDGE Anthony ‘Tank” Jones
- Four-star linebacker Braylon Hodge
- Four-star EDGE Prince Tavizon
- Four-star defensive lineman Tony Cumberland
- Three-star linebacker Tristan Phillips
- Three-star EDGE Dutch Horisk
- Three-star defensive lineman Anthony Jones
One can make the case that this whole group will be even stronger and deeper than last season’s team, which made the College Football Playoff semifinals, with a healthy mix of returning veterans acting as defensive leaders, experienced talent in the trenches, and skilled freshmen with untapped potential.
Sign up for our free newsletter and follow us on Facebook, X, and Instagram for the latest news.
Follow
Oregon
Central Oregon Community College employees prepare for strike as mediation continues
BEND, Ore. (KTVZ) — Classified employees at Central Oregon Community College could go on strike Thursday morning if ongoing negotiations with the college do not result in a new contract. The union representing custodians, administrative assistants, enrollment staff, and other hourly positions voted to authorize a strike, with the earliest possible start at 5 a.m. April 2. Mediation is continuing, with two sessions scheduled before the deadline, on March 30 and April 1.
The dispute centers on wages and benefits for the college’s lowest-paid employees. According to union representatives, many COCC staff are facing food and housing insecurity despite performing essential roles that directly impact students every day. “It is mind-boggling that the college is refusing to pay classified employees a living wage when their own CFO confirmed the funds are available,” said Scott Dove, president of the Classified Association of COCC. The union argues that its proposal, which includes higher wages and improved benefits, would better support employees while sustaining long-term financial stability.
COCC President Greg Pereira, who has been in the role for nine months, said the college is committed to a fair and sustainable agreement. “We respect the right of our classified employees to participate in this process,” Pereira said. “COCC remains committed to reaching an agreement that supports the long-term health of the college and the students we serve.” The college has proposed a three-year contract with a 19.1% wage and step increase, along with benefits improvements. Officials say essential student services, including financial aid, veteran benefits, advising, and food services, are expected to continue with limited to no disruption even if a strike occurs.
Union representatives argue that the strike is about more than money; it is about dignity and fair treatment. Classified staff make up 122 positions at the college, including groundskeepers, IT professionals, laboratory specialists, and student services staff. “The educational experience of COCC students should be the college’s top priority, but instead the board and administration are prioritizing political power over fairness,” Dove said. The union also noted that, unlike the first-ever Oregon community college strike at Portland Community College, COCC strikers are prepared to remain on strike longer if necessary, thanks to strike pay.
The college and union continue to work with mediators to avoid a walkout. COCC officials said they are coordinating with local law enforcement to ensure that any picketing is peaceful and lawful. Students and community members can track updates on negotiations at cocc.edu/negotiations.
-
South-Carolina3 days agoSouth Carolina vs TCU predictions for Elite Eight game in March Madness
-
Miami, FL6 days agoJannik Sinner’s Girlfriend Laila Hasanovic Stuns in Ab-Revealing Post Amid Miami Open
-
New Mexico1 week agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured
-
Culture1 week agoDo You Know the Comics That Inspired These TV Adventures?
-
Minneapolis, MN6 days agoBoy who shielded classmate during school shooting receives Medal of Honor
-
Education1 week agoVideo: Trader Joe’s Dip Head-to-Head Taste Test
-
Tennessee1 week agoTennessee Police Investigating Alleged Assault Involving ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson
-
Vermont3 days ago
Skier dies after fall at Sugarbush Resort