Oregon State Police are asking for the public’s help in finding a woman who went missing after getting into a person’s vehicle when she ran out of gas on Highway 22 on March 28.

Maria Linda Jade Kilmer, 28, was driving from Lyons to Salem when her car ran out of fuel near milepost 15 just west of Stayton at 9 p.m. A passenger who was traveling with Kilmer told police she left with an unidentified motorist who stopped at the scene.

Police describe Kilmer as having dark hair, blue eyes and is approximately 5-feet-8-inches tall. She weighs 180 pounds. She frequents areas in the Willamette Valley from Salem to Portland, an OSP spokesperson said, and has a piercing in the middle of her lower lip.

Kilmer left her keys, purse, identification, phone and other belongings. She has not been seen since.

Police ask anyone with information to call 911 or Oregon State Police dispatch at *677.

Eder Campuzano is the local news editor for the Statesman Journal. He can can be reached at ecampuzano@statesmanjournal.com. Find him on Bluesky at @ederc.bsky.social or Threads @ederc.

• The number of security cameras in the U.S. is growing, with an estimated 85 million installed by 2021.
• In Oregon, it is legal to point security cameras on your property toward public areas like streets and sidewalks.
• While you can generally point a camera at a neighbor’s house, aiming it into private areas like bedrooms or bathrooms is illegal.

There are millions of homes and businesses with security cameras and the number is only growing.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, surveillance camera installations in the U.S. were expected to grow from 47 million in 2015 to about 85 million by 2021.

An estimated 10 million Amazon’s Ring doorbell cameras are in use nationwide, according to a 2023 report from Politico, and dozens of other companies have made their own doorbell cameras to jump on the craze.

At the same time, concerns over surveillance are on the rise. Ring ended its partnership with Flock, a Georgia-based tech surveillance company, in February. Throughout 2025, Eugene and Springfield residents fought back against the installation of Flock license-plate reader cameras, which led to them being taken down seven months later.

On your private property, what laws exist around security cameras and where they can point? The Register-Guard looked at state and municipal laws to find out.

Can you point a security camera at the street or sidewalk?

Yes. You can absolutely point security cameras located on your property at the street.

There are no laws around recording video in “public view.”

“Public view” is classified as any area that can be readily seen by normal, unaided vision when viewed from a public place, including streets.

Can you point a security camera at your neighbor’s house?

Usually, yes, your surveillance cameras can be pointed toward others’ homes. While there are no specific Oregon laws against installing security cameras that are directed at your neighbor’s home, you may want to be careful where exactly it’s pointed.

If you have a doorbell camera, for example, that points directly from your front door to your neighbor’s front door across the street, that’s completely legal.

Anything visible in “public view” is permissible to video as long as you remain on public or your own property.

According to a city of Eugene spokesperson, there are no city laws against a private party having a security camera and what direction it is pointing.

However, it can get tricky, depending on where exactly you point your cameras. For example, if you have a two-story home and you point your security camera into your neighbor’s backyard, that might be harder to defend in court. It all hinges on ORS 163.700 — Invasion of personal privacy.

Can you point a surveillance camera into your neighbor’s bedroom or bathroom?

Effectively, no. You cannot point a camera into your neighbor’s bedroom or bathroom without risking breaking Oregon law.

This would likely be a violation of ORS 163.700, constituting an invasion of personal privacy in the second degree.

PORTLAND, Ore. (KATU) — President Donald Trump signed an executive order Tuesday aimed at tightening voting rules, setting up a legal fight with states that rely heavily on mail ballots and prompting Oregon and Arizona to sue.

The order calls for the Department of Homeland Security, working with the Social Security Administration, to create lists of eligible voters in each state, according to the text released Tuesday.

It also seeks to bar the U.S. Postal Service from sending absentee ballots to people who are not on each state’s approved list, though voting law experts say the president likely lacks the power to mandate what the Postal Service does. The order also calls for ballots to have secure envelopes with unique barcodes for tracking.

“The cheating on mail-in voting is legendary. It’s horrible what’s going on,” Trump said as he signed the order, repeating false allegations about mail ballots. “I think this will help a lot with elections.”

Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read, a Democrat, said Oregon plans to challenge the order. “We don’t need decrees from Washington, D.C.,” Read said. “My message to the President: We’ll see you in court.”

In an interview with KATU News on Tuesday, Read called the order “another desperate, illegal power grab that shows a total lack of respect for the American people and our Constitution,” adding, “The Constitution is clear: states run elections. Oregon’s gold standard vote-by-mail elections are secure, fair, and accurate.”

Read said the executive order “is not going to go unchallenged,” and noted that Oregon has already prevailed in court against the Trump administration on election-related issues.

“We’ve already beaten the President twice when he succeeded his authority. When it comes to elections and we’re prepared to do that again,” Read said.

Read said the practical effect of the order would be to allow the federal government “to decide who gets to vote” and to “hold important election integrity and security dollars hostage.”

He called the order “irresponsible,” “reckless,” “expensive” and “unnecessary,” and said, “Oregon is not going to take this lying down.”

Asked about potential impacts with the primary 56 days away, Read said he did not see how county clerks could implement changes in the middle of an election cycle. “We’re in an election cycle already, so this is irresponsible,” he said.

Read also pushed back on Trump’s argument that the order is about election integrity. “There’s no evidence that there is any issue with election integrity,” Read said, adding that Oregon has been “running safe, accurate, fair elections in Oregon by mail for more than 25 years.”

Gov. Tina Kotek also criticized the order, saying, “Trump’s attacks on mail by vote, by mail are not about fraud. They are about silencing people. Oregon won’t back down from defending the system we trust to make our voices heard.”

U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden responded in a social media post: “Oregonians have successfully voted by mail for over thirty years, and we’ll be damned if we let Donald Trump change the way our state runs its elections. My message to the White House is this: if you come for Oregon’s vote-by-mail, you’ll have hell to pay.”

In Arizona, Secretary of State Adrian Fontes said the state’s vote-by-mail system was designed by Republicans and has delivered secure elections for decades, and that it is now used by 80% of voters. “Donald Trump is attempting to pick his desired list of voters in each state with the Social Security Administration’s help,” Fontes said. “We will not let this stand,” he added.

The executive order follows earlier legal fights between Oregon and the Trump administration.

In January, a federal judge threw out a lawsuit that would have required the state to share private voter data with the Trump administration. Another judge ruled in favor of Oregon and Washington in lawsuits against the Trump administration, blocking the administration’s first executive order from March 2025.

The order comes as the Save America Act, which would require voter ID and proof of citizenship to vote, has stalled in Congress.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.