West
Oregon Gov. Kotek calls for halt to Portland interstate tolling plan
- Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek has halted the Regional Mobility Pricing Project for Interstate 5 and Interstate 205 toll implementation in Portland.
- Kotek voiced uncertainties about tolling’s feasibility and said growing challenges outweigh expected benefits.
- Kotek’s letter came a few weeks after a survey found a majority of Oregon voters opposed the Regional Mobility Pricing Project tolls.
Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek wants to scrap a plan to implement tolls on large sections of two Portland-area interstates, she said Monday.
Kotek sent a letter to the Oregon Transportation Commission on Monday saying the Regional Mobility Pricing Project for Interstate 5 and Interstate 205 should be halted, KGW-TV reported.
Kotek said in the letter that the “state’s path toward implementing tolling in the Portland metro area is uncertain, at best,” and that the challenges associated with the plan “have grown larger than the anticipated benefits.”
OREGON GOV. TINA KOTEK DIRECTS STATE POLICE TO CRACK DOWN ON FENTANYL DISTRIBUTION, HOLD SELLERS ACCOUNTABLE
“Therefore, I believe it is time to bring the agency’s work on RMPP to an end,” she wrote.
Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek speaks during a signing ceremony on Feb. 23, 2024, in Washington. Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek is scrapping a plan to implement tolls on large sections of two Portland-area interstates, she said on Monday. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)
In 2017, the state Legislature directed the Oregon Department of Transportation to start exploring tolling as a traffic congestion management tool that could be part of a major transportation funding package, but the plans have drawn increasing criticism as they’ve become clearer.
Kotek’s letter came a few weeks after a survey found a majority of Oregon voters opposed the Regional Mobility Pricing Project tolls, KOIN-TV reported.
The move also came after the Oregon Department of Transportation produced a report on the equity impacts of tolling and the agency’s plan to mitigate the impacts on low-income Portlanders. Kotek wrote in her letter that the report showed “a toll program which keeps toll rates low enough for working families and raises enough funding for major projects would fail to meet expectations for local project funding and revenue sharing.”
The state transportation agency is facing funding challenges because of a projected decline in revenue from the state’s gas tax, and Kotek said she expects the Legislature to tackle that issue in the 2025 session.
The governor said in the letter she is “confident that a more robust conversation on funding options will yield greater understanding and direction for our future moving forward.”
Oregon Transportation Commission Chair Julie Brown and Vice Chair Lee Beyer, as well as Oregon Department of Transportation Director Kris Strickler, all released statements later Monday suggesting they agree with Kotek.
OREGON GOVERNOR TO SIGN BILL RECRIMINALIZING ILLICIT DRUGS, ENDING LIBERAL EXPERIMENT
Beyer said “metro leadership views on tolling have changed” and “local and regional opposition to tolling makes clear that Oregon is not ready for regional tolling.” Strickler said “it is clear the toll program cannot be designed in a way that meets the needs expressed by our local partners while also meeting the needs of Oregonians statewide.”
Brown said she looked forward to conversations about other funding sources but added that while she didn’t believe tolling should be the only tool to solve challenges, “as a steward of our state’s transportation system, I believe it should be one of our tools.”
Kotek said this move should not impact the planned collection of toll revenue on the interstate highway bridge between Oregon and Washington that’s set to be replaced as part of a multibillion-dollar project supported by federal funding.
Read the full article from Here
San Francisco, CA
Exclusive: San Francisco Police Department investigating Zoox collision with a parked car | TechCrunch
The San Francisco Police Department is investigating an accident involving a Zoox autonomous vehicle that crashed into the driver’s side door of a parked car, TechCrunch has learned.
Officers responded to the crash, which occurred at around 2 p.m. local time on January 17 near the intersection of 15th and Mission Streets, according to the department. The Zoox robotaxi was traveling along 15th street when a street ambassador named Jamel Durden opened the driver’s-side door of his 1977 Cadillac Coupe DeVille, according to MissionLocal, which first reported the crash.
Durden’s hand was reportedly smashed during the crash, and the Zoox vehicle suffered damage to its glass doors. The San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) told TechCrunch the Zoox vehicle was carrying a passenger at the time, which has not been previously reported. That passenger was an employee of Zoox, according to the company, and was not injured, which the SFPD confirmed.
The police department declined to provide TechCrunch with an incident report “[d]ue to the fact it is still an open investigation.” Zoox filed its own police report about the incident, the company told TechCrunch, but said no additional details have been requested. In a statement on January 20, Zoox said it was “cooperating with local authorities to provide an accurate account of the incident.”
The California Department of Motor Vehicles, which regulates autonomous vehicles in the state, has also met with Zoox about the January 17 crash. The DMV told TechCrunch that Zoox filed a crash report “in compliance with California regulations.” That report is not yet publicly available.
Zoox is in the early stages of building out its robotaxi service in San Francisco. In November, the company started offering free rides to members of the public who are part of the “Zoox Explorer” early-rider program. The company is operating a similar program in Las Vegas, Nevada.
This rollout has come with challenges. The Amazon-owned company issued a recall in December to fix an issue where some of its vehicles were crossing center lanes and blocking crosswalks. (Zoox also issued two different software updates during recalls earlier in 2025 before it started offering public rides.)
Techcrunch event
San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026
The January crash in San Francisco happened when Durden “suddenly opened” the door of his car into the path of the robotaxi, according to Zoox. The company said the robotaxi “identified the opening door and tried to avoid it but contact was unavoidable.” (Durden’s employer could not be reached for comment.)
Zoox also said it offered medical attention to Durden, who allegedly declined. According to MissionLocal, Durden refused medical treatment until his car was towed.
“Safety and transparency are foundational to Zoox, and we are cooperating with local authorities to provide an accurate account of the incident,” the company said in a statement.
Denver, CO
Huge new $27 million Denver bathhouse would include sauna, cold plunges
Memphis Orion’s steamy vision of Denver includes state-of-the-art saunas and cold plunges, salt scrubs, solariums, and towel-whipping “aufgussing” rituals.
For now, however, the amenities for his new business are limited to a steel-frame trailer behind a gutted industrial building. His custom-built, solar-powered mobile sauna, or Cobacita, fits a little over a dozen people on its wooden benches. That’s a far cry from from the hundreds Orion envisions inside his $27 million Coba Bathhouse project just a few feet away.
“I’m a connoisseur of the world of bathhouses, and I love the different technologies emerging around the world for it,” said Orion, the CEO of Coba. “The modern bathhouse is taking these traditional (forms) and updating them and bringing them to together for people who are moving away from bars and alcohol being the center of social life.”
Consisting of three buildings connected by gardens and outdoor seating areas, Coba — a combination of Colorado and bathhouse — is a concept of extreme, immersive proportions backed by veterans of the art and entertainment worlds. When it’s finished in 2027, it will sit across from the Auraria Campus on West Colfax Avenue in Denver, just south of Domo Japanese restaurant in the La Alma neighborhood.
Orion sees it employing 90 to 100 people and fitting about 400 guests at any one time. If all goes well, its founders believe it will draw roughly 300,000 people per year.
Day passes will cost $50 to $75, with $220 monthly memberships, although prices are preliminary. It’s about the cost of a casual dinner out, chief strategy officer Adam Lerner said, and arguably a value for a theme park’s-worth of wellness attractions. Lush urban gardens, tea ceremonies, wood-burning firepits, steam rituals like aufgussing (a towel-whipping, dancing group experience) and group-soaking pools are on the menu.

Coba’s buildings, including a former asphalt factory that lacks electricity or running water, are, for now, a staging area and proving ground still in need of permits, excavators and carpenters before they can match the elaborate renderings Orion and his partners have been floating to investors.
The project is slated to cost about $27 million, Orion said, with $3.5 million of that going toward the land purchase. He received a $526,200 state tax credit, since the project will include a thermal energy network, with an 800-foot-deep geothermal well planned for underneath the parking lot. The technology will use the consistent temperature deep underground to draw and disperse heat and cold as part of Coba’s electricity-hungry infrastructure.
Orion’s confident the “landmark” bathhouse will draw Denverites who are hungry for new experiences. In this case, that’s an upscale version of downregulation, a.k.a. chilling and steaming one’s way to relaxation, happiness and social well-being.
Orion, an industrial engineering and renovation expert, is surrounded by a pool of expertise. His co-founder in Coba, and the company’s chief commercial officer, is Jon Medina, a designer and producer who has worked with Meow Wolf, AEG Presents and Outside Magazine. Also from Meow Wolf: Coba’s chief financial officer Carl Christensen, the former co-CEO and chief financial officer of Meow Wolf. That immersive-entertainment company just happens to have an outpost about a mile away from Coba.

Chief strategy officer Lerner formerly led the Museum of Contemporary Art Denver. Meow Wolf co-founder Vince Kadlubek, architect Paul Andersen and others continue to advise on the project. The balance of art and culture veterans should ensure that Coba has a strong cultural appeal, its founders believe, with an emphasis on memorable experiences.
“We wanted to take the mundane and make it more adventurous,” Medina said, citing the “rain room,” where water follows people as they walk through it (a nicer version, perhaps, of the cartoon raincloud that follows around someone in a bad mood).
Coba’s layout is designed to circulate guests through the environments until they find their comfort zone(s). There’s a giant cold plunge pool that fits about 30 people — and one with even colder temps that fits 6 to 10. There’s the 60-seater room called the Ritual Sauna, water massages, a dark and silent sauna meant for solo introversion, floating pools, a rooftop garden and rentable “thermal suites.”
Renderings of the finished Coba look like a psychedelic hall of justice, albeit with Art Deco arches replaced by wavy roof lines. They conceal not just internal wellness features but also a café, space for musical performances and workshops, and lockers and common areas.

“Here the idea is to create something that maybe draws from history, but is not a direct reference to it,” architect Andersen said. “This is something very different, even otherworldly.”
Coba’s success may turn on how transported its guests feel, since it’s being pitched as a respite from stress and an excuse to put down your phone and bond with neighbors.
“We wanted to create a place that has this combination of feeling connected to nature but also modern life,” Lerner said. “Because this is not a retreat. This is actually a place that is integrated into your weekly routine. The kind of place you go to four times a month. Which is why a bathhouse differentiates itself from, say, a spa, which is a luxury indulgence.”

Lerner first met Orion at the ritualistic, art-driven Burning Man Festival in Nevada, and has maintained a friendship that dovetailed into the one-acre Coba project. Their connections are coming in handy as they hold small sessions and continue to raise funds for construction. They even recruited Denver Mayor Mike Johnston and Zach Neumeyer, the chairman of Sage Hospitality, to make remarks on their Jan. 22 “civic preview.”
Coba has the potential to outlast fads in biohacking and contrast therapy meant to tame and train the body, said Denver journalist and author Scott Carney. He’s written extensively on how the body can be conditioned to extreme environments, and his Jan. 22 visit to Coba convinced him of its pure intentions.
“There are a few other contrast therapy spots that have popped up around Denver, from mobile saunas and river jumps at the Golden library, to the sauna/plunge combos at Nurture and Archipelago, as well as SWTHZ on Tennyson,” he wrote via email. “But they are all smaller and … more specifically health-oriented. People go there for their quick hot and cold fix and then move on.”
Coba may endure because it’s social, he said, instead of just service-oriented.
Or as Coba’s founders write in their 27-page investor pitch: “Bring a swimsuit if you’d like to participate. Dress is casual. The person next to you may be in swimwear.”
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter, In The Know, to get entertainment news sent straight to your inbox.
Seattle, WA
Seattle Leads Nation in Affordable Apartment Production » The Urbanist
Affordable housing production is trending upward across the United States, and Seattle is leading the way. A new report from RentCafe found the Seattle metropolitan area has produced 14,290 affordable apartments over the previous five years, more than any other metro region.
Seattle’s total narrowly edged out New York City, which produced 14,240 affordable apartments in the same time period from 2020 to 2024, and Austin, Texas, which produced 13,342. Minnesota’s Twin Cities metro came in fourth with 10,722 apartments produced, followed by Atlanta, Denver, Los Angeles, and the “Bay Area.”
Note: San Francisco (along with the North Bay) was broken out a separate category from the East and South Bay Area in this study. Combined, the two Bay Area listings accounted for 16,301 affordable apartments, a total which would have led the list.
RentCafe’s analysis included only apartments in 100% affordable buildings, which does leave out a small subset of the data from mixed-income buildings. The study only counted apartments, not affordable homeownership projects, which also represents a small fraction of overall production.
With the growth in production, affordable apartments are a growing share of overall apartment production. “Affordable housing for renters accounted for one-quarter of the [Seattle] metro’s total of 59,000 new apartment buildings during this time,” RentCafe’s Florin Petrut noted.
Affordable housing composed 31.7% of overall apartments in New York over the past five years, since the region produced fewer apartments than Seattle. New York’s share trailed only San Francisco, where over a third of apartments were affordable since 2020. San Francisco produced fewer total apartment units than any other top 20 city, while Seattle outpaced the vastly larger New York market by nearly one-third.

” data-medium-file=”https://i0.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-39.png?ssl=1″ data-large-file=”https://i0.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-39.png?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i0.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-39.png?ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-205112″ srcset=”https://i0.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-39.png?ssl=1 883w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-39-768×645.png 768w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-39-500×420.png 500w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-39-696×585.png 696w” sizes=”(max-width: 883px) 100vw, 883px”/><figcaption class=)
For some regions the uptick in affordable housing was dramatic, but less so for Seattle, where the five-year time period was up nearly 40% over the previous five years — one of the smallest increases in the dataset. That means Seattle’s affordable housing sector was also the leader over the entire decade, not just the last five years. Metro Seattle produced more than 24,000 affordable apartments over the decade.
Most metros have momentum in affordable sector
On the other hand, if trendlines continue for fast-building metros, Seattle could get its title stolen in the decade ahead. For example, San Antonio’s affordable housing production was up 222%, Phoenix’s was up 206%, and New York City was up 185%. Although, in Phoenix’s case, that still amounted to just 4,626 affordable apartments, which shows how anemic affordable construction had been previously.

” data-medium-file=”https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/4.-Lincoln-Apt-Tacoma-by-Kevin-Le.jpg” data-large-file=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/4.-Lincoln-Apt-Tacoma-by-Kevin-Le-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/4.-Lincoln-Apt-Tacoma-by-Kevin-Le-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-185822″ srcset=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/4.-Lincoln-Apt-Tacoma-by-Kevin-Le-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1 1024w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/4.-Lincoln-Apt-Tacoma-by-Kevin-Le-768×576.jpg 768w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/4.-Lincoln-Apt-Tacoma-by-Kevin-Le-560×420.jpg 560w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/4.-Lincoln-Apt-Tacoma-by-Kevin-Le-696×522.jpg 696w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/4.-Lincoln-Apt-Tacoma-by-Kevin-Le-265×198.jpg 265w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/4.-Lincoln-Apt-Tacoma-by-Kevin-Le.jpg 1280w” sizes=”(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px”/><figcaption class=)
“Notably, affordable housing is starting to make up a larger portion of all new apartment construction,” Petrut noted. “In 2024, nearly 14% of all new apartments were income-restricted — up from just under 9% ten years earlier — indicating a growing emphasis on affordability in new development.”
A few regions bucked that trend, and continue to emphasize market-rate apartment development to a large degree. For example, just 5% of the more than 107,000 apartments produced in the Dallas metro from 2020 to 2024 were income-restricted affordable units. The Chicagoland area also produced just over 107,000 apartments, and just 6.6% were affordable. Houston did not even crack the top 20, despite being the sixth-most populous metro in the country.

” data-medium-file=”https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/span-style-display-block-width-100-text-align-center-margin-top-15px-b-style-color-585859-how-affordable-apartment-construction-changed-in-the-last-10-years-b-span-.png” data-large-file=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/span-style-display-block-width-100-text-align-center-margin-top-15px-b-style-color-585859-how-affordable-apartment-construction-changed-in-the-last-10-years-b-span–1024×935.png?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/span-style-display-block-width-100-text-align-center-margin-top-15px-b-style-color-585859-how-affordable-apartment-construction-changed-in-the-last-10-years-b-span–1024×935.png?ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-205117″ srcset=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/span-style-display-block-width-100-text-align-center-margin-top-15px-b-style-color-585859-how-affordable-apartment-construction-changed-in-the-last-10-years-b-span–1024×935.png?ssl=1 1024w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/span-style-display-block-width-100-text-align-center-margin-top-15px-b-style-color-585859-how-affordable-apartment-construction-changed-in-the-last-10-years-b-span–768×701.png 768w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/span-style-display-block-width-100-text-align-center-margin-top-15px-b-style-color-585859-how-affordable-apartment-construction-changed-in-the-last-10-years-b-span–460×420.png 460w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/span-style-display-block-width-100-text-align-center-margin-top-15px-b-style-color-585859-how-affordable-apartment-construction-changed-in-the-last-10-years-b-span–696×636.png 696w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/span-style-display-block-width-100-text-align-center-margin-top-15px-b-style-color-585859-how-affordable-apartment-construction-changed-in-the-last-10-years-b-span-.png 1220w” sizes=”(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px”/><figcaption class=)
Nationwide, 2024 was a banner year, delivering 91,000 affordable units, the highest total in decades. “Nearly 310,000 affordable apartments have been built nationwide since 2020, accounting for 12.6% of all new apartment buildings,” Petrut wrote. “Affordable housing construction rose 73% compared to 2015–2019, outpacing overall apartment building growth.”
Part of the credit for the affordable housing surge goes to the pandemic response strategy engineered under President Joe Biden: “The American Rescue Plan has helped move things forward by directing billions of dollars into housing through State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds,” Petrut wrote. “On top of that, many states introduced or expanded their own tax credit programs. These efforts helped developers cover rising costs and move projects across the finish line faster while simultaneously keeping rents affordable for the long term.”
How Seattle invests in affordable housing
Seattle goes beyond many other American cities in directly funding affordable housing production. The City of Seattle is spending nearly $350 million per year on affordable housing, which comes from a variety of revenue sources.
Since the 1980s, the Seattle Housing Levy has augmented affordable housing creation. The 2023 renewal tripled the size of the levy to a $970 million seven-year package, and it passed by a wide margin. At its new level, the levy provides $139 million in annual funding.
On November 30, New Hope Community Development Institute and LIHI hosted a groundbreaking ceremony that included newly elected Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson, who made affordability the centerpiece of her campaign. Wilson helped shepherd the JumpStart payroll tax to passage. (Doug Trumm)In 2020, Seattle also passed the “JumpStart” payroll tax on the largest companies in the city. Initially the revenue stream provided Covid relief, but over the longer-term the tax was intended to focus a majority of investments on affordable housing — at least when mayors and councils aren’t raiding it to plug budget holes and fund pet projects. The payroll tax pulled in $360 million in 2024, but only $142 million of that ended up going to the Office of Housing, a figure which was further cut in 2025.
Seattle’s Mandatory Housing Affordability or MHA program — an inclusionary zoning regime that traded upzones allowing larger apartment buildings for new affordability requirements — also raises affordable housing funds via in-lieu payments from builders who opt out of providing income-restricted homes on-site. As a developer fee, MHA revenue is volatile and varies with the pace of construction activity, which has been slowing recently in Seattle, especially in the office sector. MHA topped out at $74 million in collections in 2021, but has declined since, settling out around $22 million in 2025 and in 2026 projections.

” data-medium-file=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-40.png?ssl=1″ data-large-file=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-40.png?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-40.png?ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-205129″ srcset=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-40.png?ssl=1 963w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-40-768×475.png 768w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-40-680×420.png 680w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-40-696×430.png 696w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image-40-356×220.png 356w” sizes=”auto, (max-width: 963px) 100vw, 963px”/><figcaption class=)
In 2025, Seattle voters approved another dedicated revenue source, this time focused on social housing. An “excess compensation” tax hitting high earners who make more than $1 million per year is expected to raise more than $50 million annually for the recently launched Seattle Social Housing Developer, which is pursuing a mixed-income model popularized in cities like Vienna.
Other jurisdictions in the region lag far behind Seattle in affordable housing investments, but most are taking strides to boost production. The Washington State Legislature has also steadily grown the size of the state Housing Trusting Fund, setting a new record with $400 million allocated in 2024, which has also helped get more affordable housing projects off the ground.

” data-medium-file=”https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/IMG_2467.jpg” data-large-file=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/IMG_2467-1024×682.jpg?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/IMG_2467-1024×682.jpg?ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-195531″ srcset=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/IMG_2467-1024×682.jpg?ssl=1 1024w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/IMG_2467-768×512.jpg 768w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/IMG_2467-630×420.jpg 630w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/IMG_2467-696×464.jpg 696w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/IMG_2467.jpg 1280w” sizes=”auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px”/><figcaption class=)
King County has flirted with a billion-dollar bond for workforce housing — although it’s not clear how soon such an initiative could materialize after a study found the County would need to back the bonds with a dedicated funding source or risk its general fund.
The region’s largest employers — including Amazon and Microsoft — have also made large pledges of housing grants and low-interest loans to aid nonprofit builders. Two top executives at Microsoft and Amazon shared a Seattle Times op-ed byline this week arguing the state “must make it easier to build our way out of the housing crisis” — and touting that “together, our two companies have committed $1.6 billion to preserve and build more than 26,000 affordable homes.”
Growth in affordable housing production has also brought its own problems. By 2025, vacancy rates at affordable apartments in King County had climbed above 10%, which is reportedly threatening to bankrupt some buildings and providers and has already led to bailouts. While demand remains high for low income housing, overproduction in the higher income segments (e.g., around 60% of area median income) has emerged an issue, at least in some parts of the region.
Still not enough
Leading the nation in affordable housing production is a feather in Seattle’s cap, but local housing advocates would be the first to admit it’s far from enough. In 2018, King County’s Affordable Housing Task Force projected that the county would need to add 244,000 net new affordable homes by 2040.
“According to our estimates, we need 156,000 more affordable homes today and another 88,000 affordable homes by 2040 to ensure that no low-income or working households are cost burdened,” the task force wrote. “That means we need to build, preserve or subsidize a total of 244,000 net new homes by 2040 if we are to ensure that all low-income families in King County have a safe and healthy home that costs less than 30 percent of their income.”
To meet the goal would have required a 11,000 affordable homes per year pace, which the region has not met thus far, even with its nation-leading production. To make up for its slow start out of the gates, King County would need to average 15,000 net new affordable homes annually from 2026 through 2040 to meet its target.
And state leaders are projecting that solving the housing crisis will also take robust market-rate production, setting a target of 1 million additional housing units over the next 20 years, or 50,000 per year.
More work remains to hit housing targets, and simply outproducing peer cities may not be enough, if Seattle wants to solve its affordability crisis.
Doug Trumm is publisher of The Urbanist. An Urbanist writer since 2015, he dreams of pedestrian streets, bus lanes, and a mass-timber building spree to end our housing crisis. He graduated from the Evans School of Public Policy and Governance at the University of Washington in 2019. He lives in Seattle’s Fremont neighborhood and loves to explore the city by foot and by bike.
-
Illinois6 days agoIllinois school closings tomorrow: How to check if your school is closed due to extreme cold
-
Sports1 week agoMiami’s Carson Beck turns heads with stunning admission about attending classes as college athlete
-
Pittsburg, PA1 week agoSean McDermott Should Be Steelers Next Head Coach
-
Pennsylvania2 days agoRare ‘avalanche’ blocks Pennsylvania road during major snowstorm
-
Lifestyle1 week agoNick Fuentes & Andrew Tate Party to Kanye’s Banned ‘Heil Hitler’
-
Sports1 week agoMiami star throws punch at Indiana player after national championship loss
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoNortheast Ohio cities dealing with rock salt shortage during peak of winter season
-
Technology6 days agoRing claims it’s not giving ICE access to its cameras