Connect with us

West

Newsom vetoes bill to establish first-in-nation AI safety regulations in California

Published

on

Newsom vetoes bill to establish first-in-nation AI safety regulations in California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, on Sunday vetoed a bill to create safety measures for large artificial intelligence models, which would have been the first such law in the nation.

The governor’s veto delivers a major setback to attempts to create guardrails around AI and its rapid evolution with little oversight, according to The Associated Press. The legislation faced staunch opposition from startups, tech giants and several Democratic lawmakers.

Newsom said earlier this month at Dreamforce, an annual conference hosted by software giant Salesforce, that California must lead in regulating AI as the federal government has failed to put safety measures in place, but that the proposal “can have a chilling effect on the industry.”

S.B. 1047, the governor said, could have hurt the homegrown industry by setting up strict requirements.

DEMOCRAT SENATOR TARGETED BY DEEPFAKE IMPERSONATOR OF UKRAINIAN OFFICIAL ON ZOOM CALL: REPORTS

Advertisement

California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill to create safety measures for large artificial intelligence models in the Golden State. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

“While well-intentioned, SB 1047 does not take into account whether an AI system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data,” Newsom said in a statement. “Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions — so long as a large system deploys it. I do not believe this is the best approach to protecting the public from real threats posed by the technology.”

Newsom announced instead that the state will partner with several industry experts to develop safety measures for powerful AI models.

S.B. 1047 would have required companies to test their models and publicly disclose their safety protocols to prevent the models from being manipulated for harmful purposes, such as, for example, wiping out the state’s electric grid or helping to build chemical weapons, scenarios that experts say could be possible in the future as the industry continues to rapidly evolve.

The legislation also would have provided whistleblower protection to industry workers.

Advertisement

Democratic state Sen. Scott Weiner, who authored the bill, said the veto was “a setback for everyone who believes in oversight of massive corporations that are making critical decisions that affect the safety and the welfare of the public and the future of the planet.”

“The companies developing advanced AI systems acknowledge that the risks these models present to the public are real and rapidly increasing,” he said in a statement. “While the large AI labs have made admirable commitments to monitor and mitigate these risks, the truth is that voluntary commitments from industry are not enforceable and rarely work out well for the public.”

Wiener said the debate around the bill has helped put a spotlight on the issue of AI safety, and that he would continue pushing to advance safety measures around the technology.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk supported the measure.

800-PLUS BILLS LEFT ON NEWSOM’S DESK ILLUSTRATE CALIFORNIA’S OVERREGULATION PROBLEM: EXPERTS

Advertisement
Newsom in Michigan

Newsom announced that, rather than adopt the legislation, the state will partner with several industry experts to develop safety measures for powerful AI models. (Don Campbell/The Herald-Palladium via AP)

The proposal is one of several bills passed by the state Legislature this year seeking to regulate AI, combat deepfakes and protect workers. State lawmakers said California must take actions this year, pointing to the results of failing to rein in social media companies when they might have had an opportunity.

Supporters of the bill said it could have presented some transparency and accountability around large-scale AI models, as developers and experts say they still do not have a full understanding of how AI models behave.

The bill sought to address systems that require a high level of computing power and more than $100 million to build. No current AI models have met that criteria, but some experts say that could change within the next year.

“This is because of the massive investment scale-up within the industry,” Daniel Kokotajlo, a former OpenAI researcher who stepped down earlier this year over what he described as the company’s disregard for AI risks, told The Associated Press. “This is a crazy amount of power to have any private company control unaccountably, and it’s also incredibly risky.”

The U.S. is behind Europe in regulating the growing technology that is raising concerns about job loss, misinformation, invasions of privacy and automation bias, supporters of the measure said. The California bill was not as comprehensive as regulations in Europe, but the supporters say it would have been a step in the right direction.

Advertisement

Last year, several leading AI companies voluntarily agreed to follow safeguards set by the White House, which include testing and sharing information about their models. The California bill, according to its supporters, would have required AI developers to follow requirements similar to those safeguards.

But critics of the measure argued that it would harm tech and stifle innovation in the Golden State. The proposal would have discouraged AI developers from investing in large models or sharing open-source software, according to the critics, which include U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Two other AI proposals, which also faced opposition from the tech industry, did not pass ahead of a legislative deadline last month. The bills would have required AI developers to label AI-generated content and prohibit discrimination by AI tools used to make employment decisions.

California state senator

California state Sen. Scott Wiener said the debate around the bill has helped put a spotlight on the issue of AI safety. (Scott Wiener )

California lawmakers are still considering new rules against AI discrimination in hiring practices.

The governor previously said he wanted to protect the state’s status as a global leader in AI, citing that 32 of the world’s top 50 AI companies are in the Golden State.

Advertisement

Newsom has said California is an early adopter of AI, as the state could deploy generative AI tools in the near future to combat highway congestion, provide tax guidance and streamline homelessness programs.

Earlier this month, Newsom signed some of the strictest laws in the country to fight against election deepfakes and adopt measures to protect Hollywood workers from unauthorized AI use.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

Montana Senate Candidates Spent 7 Minutes Sparring Over 1 Issue

Published

on

Montana Senate Candidates Spent 7 Minutes Sparring Over 1 Issue


Montana Democratic Sen. Jon Tester and Republican challenger Tim Sheehy spent a full seven minutes of Monday night’s one-hour debate sparring over the issue of federal public lands.

Tester, who is running for a fourth term in a pivotal race that could ultimately decide which party controls the Senate next year, repeatedly painted Sheehy as a threat to America’s public lands and the Montana way of life.

He referred multiple times to HuffPost’s reporting that first revealed Sheehy called for federal lands to be “turned over” to states or counties; failed to disclose his post on the board of the Property and Environment Research Center, a Bozeman-based property rights and environmental research nonprofit with a history of advocating for privatizing federal lands; and appeared to doctor a recent TV ad to remove PERC’s logo from the shirt he was wearing.

Sheehy largely avoided engaging in the specifics of Tester’s attacks, instead continuing a muddled effort to rewrite his record on the issue and accusing Tester of trying to tear down any organization he has been affiliated with.

Advertisement

The extensive back-and-forth came after Montana PBS journalist John Twiggs asked the candidates which entities are best equipped to manage the approximately 27 million acres of federal lands in Montana while maintaining public access.

“Bottom line: Public lands belong in public hands,” Sheehy said.

Tester marveled at what he described as Sheehy’s “incredible transformation on this issue” while warning voters to “watch out what people say in back rooms.”

“What they say in back rooms, when they don’t think the recorder is going or the camera is running, is usually what they think,” he said. “And Tim said we need to turn our lands over to either his rich buddies or county government. That’s not protecting public lands.”

Montana Democratic Sen. Jon Tester speaks at a rally Sept. 5 in Bozeman, Montana.

William Campbell via Getty Images

Advertisement

Tester was referring to comments Sheehy made to a ranching podcast last October, shortly after launching his Senate bid. As HuffPost first reported, Sheehy told the “Working Ranch Radio Show” that “local control has to be returned, whether that means, you know, some of these public lands get turned over to state agencies, or even counties, or whether those decisions are made by a local landlord instead of by, you know, federal fiat a few thousand miles away.”

While Sheehy has spent the past year doing damage control on this issue, claiming he opposes the sale or transfer of federal lands despite his own words to the contrary, his comments Monday make clear that when he says “public hands,” he means the hands of Montanans only.

“Public lands belong to the public, that’s you — the people of Montana,” Sheehy said. “Public lands belong to the people, especially those who live amongst them. And I believe that if you’re a Montanan and you share a fence line with National Forest property, if you’re a rancher who has a [Bureau of Land Management] grazing lease, if you live next to state trust land, you should have more input into what happens on that land than bureaucrats 3,000 miles away.”

Sheehy, a former Navy SEAL and multimillionaire businessman, owns a sprawling ranch in Martinsdale, Montana, that, notably, shares a fence line with Forest Service land and once offered high-dollar hunting excursions with what it called “private access to over 500,000 acres of National Forest.”

Sheehy’s position — that federal agencies are poor stewards of the federal estate and that locals know best how to manage federal lands — disregards the fact that federal lands, in Montana and everywhere else, are held in trust for all Americans, regardless of where they live, not just those who happen to live next door.

Advertisement

“I, absolutely, will every day advocate for more local control of those lands, because I believe they belong to you, not the government,” Sheehy said.

Montana Republican U.S. Senate candidate Tim Sheehy walks up to the stage during a rally for Republican presidential nominee and former President Donald Trump at the Brick Breeden Fieldhouse at Montana State University on Aug. 9 in Bozeman, Montana.
Montana Republican U.S. Senate candidate Tim Sheehy walks up to the stage during a rally for Republican presidential nominee and former President Donald Trump at the Brick Breeden Fieldhouse at Montana State University on Aug. 9 in Bozeman, Montana.

Michael Ciaglo via Getty Images

Sheehy is walking the same fine line as many members of the GOP. Republicans in Western states have spent decades working to wrest control of federal lands from the federal government. But broad public support for protecting public lands has forced them to largely abandon calls for outright transfer and sale and instead advocate for giving states broad management authority — a move that would ultimately allow them to achieve many of the same industry-friendly goals that would come with stripping lands from federal control.

Again and again, Tester brought the conversation back to Sheehy’s record.

“Tim even served on a think tank, on their board of directors, that’s job was to privatize our public lands,” Tester said. “In Tim’s case, his view of turning these lands over to counties or opening ’em up for his rich friends to buy them, is just the wrong direction to go for Montana.”

Sheehy defended himself with a false claim about PERC: “No one, including myself, in that organization has ever advocated for selling our public lands — never have, never will.”

Advertisement

In fact, in a 1999 policy paper titled “How and Why to Privatize Federal Lands,” PERC’s then-director, Terry Anderson, and others laid out what they called “a blueprint for auctioning off all public lands over 20 to 40 years.” (PERC previously told HuffPost that that paper “is not representative of PERC’s current thinking.”)

“Tim, it’s time to be honest with the people of Montana,” Tester fired back. “You were on a board of an organization that wanted to privatize our public lands. In fact, you even dulled out a badge on one of your ads of a shirt that you wore that was promoting that group. When you found out that badge was on there you said, ‘Hey we can’t be doing that because these guys, I served on their board and they want to get rid of our public lands.’”

“You also didn’t even disclose to the public when you filed for this position that you belonged on that board,” Tester added. “Why? It wasn’t because they were a great organization doing great things for our public lands. It was because they wanted to get rid of our public lands and you were a part of that organization and you didn’t want anybody to know about it.”

As HuffPost first reported, Sheehy failed to include his post on PERC’s board in his Senate financial disclosure — a violation of Senate rules that Sheehy’s campaign chalked up to an “oversight.” Since its founding in 1980, PERC has called for privatizing federal lands, including national parks, and been a staunch opponent of Montana’s unique stream access laws, which provide anglers and recreationists virtually unlimited access to the state’s rivers and streams, including those that flow through private property.

Sheehy’s pro-transfer comments and ties to PERC have been a consistent thorn in the side of his campaign, which over the past year has run a damage-control effort aimed at recasting Sheehy as a champion of public lands. Sheehy’s campaign recently aired a public lands-focused TV ad that featured a current PERC board member, and last month sent out public land mailers to Montana voters that included a picture of Sheehy wearing a flannel shirt with the PERC logo clearly visible on one sleeve. More recently, Sheehy’s team doctored a TV advertisement to remove PERC’s logo from the shirt he was wearing.

Advertisement

At Monday’s debate, Sheehy said Tester’s attacks against PERC are part of a pattern.

“The reason that organization has been criticized by Jon Tester is simply because I was affiliated with it,” he said. “And this has been their plan this entire campaign. If Tim Sheehy is affiliated with anything, attack it, tear it down, smear it.”

If Monday’s debate shined light on anything, it’s that Sheehy has gotten an earful from Montana voters who support protecting and preserving federal public lands. But unlike Rep. Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.), who credited voters with changing his mind on transferring federal lands to states when he ran against Tester in 2018, Sheehy is refusing to acknowledge the reason for having walked back, or disguised, his anti-federal land views.

Whether Sheehy’s newfound opposition to pawning off public lands would survive a six-year Senate term remains to be seen — if he manages to defeat Tester in November.

During the debate, the Montana Republican Party took to X, formerly Twitter, to defend their candidate against Tester’s repeated swings.

Advertisement

@SheehyforMT will work to preserve and expand public access to your public lands and he will KEEP PUBLIC LANDS IN PUBLIC HANDS!” the party wrote.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Advertisement

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost

Just three months ago, the Montana GOP — the party Sheehy is seeking a leadership role in — adopted a party platform that explicitly calls for the “granting of federally managed public lands to the state, and development of a transition plan for the timely and orderly transfer.”

Advertisement

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

Advertisement

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Peter Costa, 2024 Alumnus of the Year: Finding his purpose | University of Nevada, Reno

Published

on

Peter Costa, 2024 Alumnus of the Year: Finding his purpose | University of Nevada, Reno


He’s a very lucky man, I remember thinking as Peter Costa ’84, ’88 M.D. described a small ritual he enjoys during evening strolls across campus with his wife, Inge — pulling weeds from the planters. It reminded me of something my father would say whenever he saw our neighbor caring for his planters, “He’s a lucky man because he does it with joy.”

Peter has all the makings of a longtime, die-hard University of Nevada, Reno supporter. He earned both a bachelor’s degree in community, social and health resources and a medical degree from the University. He’s established three endowments — two for scholarships and one supporting University libraries. He’s a member of the Legacy Society, and Inge, who also attended the University, describes him as someone who “bleeds silver and blue.”

I’m surprised when Peter tells me he never imagined he’d become deeply involved with the University later in life. So, how did that happen?

In front of Lincoln Hall. Photo by Brin Reynolds.

Finding his community

Born in Reno and raised in Carson City, Peter is a fourth-generation Nevadan with strong University ties. His father, James P. Costa ’54; mother, Norma Jeanne Annett Costa ’59; and several cousins are part of his legacy. However, Peter was especially influenced by his grandfather, Norman T. Annett ’32, a mining engineering graduate.

Advertisement

“He’d drive me around in an old Jeep, prospecting in the hills,” Peter said. “I spent a lot of time with him and wanted to be like him.”

In Peter’s own words, his choice of attending the University was driven by both family tradition and opportunity, as his interest in sports medicine aligned with the University’s relatively new School of Medicine, which was established in 1969.

“I applied to several universities, but there was never much doubt about where I wanted to go,” Peter said.

His experience as an undergraduate student living in White Pine Hall was not just books and studies, though. With a smile on his face, he told me about the day when, as a prank, he and his friends carried a dormmate’s Volkswagen bug halfway across campus, placing it on the library steps for no other reason than a laugh.

“The friendships you make on campus form bonds that last forever,” – Peter Costa.

Advertisement

These relationships influenced Peter’s professional life. One such friendship led him to an exchange program at UMass Amherst, where he gained new appreciation for art, jazz and diversity. He is understandably proud of the lasting relationships he maintains to this day.

Finding his calling

It was during an ethics and health systems class with Barbara Thornton ’57, now professor emerita, when a seed was planted that began to point Peter toward his future.

“When you’re that young, you can’t see past next weekend,” Peter said.

“You don’t necessarily think about ethics when you’re preparing for medical school, but I found it fascinating.” – Peter Costa

His interest led him to become a teaching assistant for Professor Thornton, where he gained insights into health inequities and disparities — lessons that shaped his career. He carried these lessons into his residency in physical medicine and rehabilitation at Loma Linda University Medical Center, where he experienced one of his most memorable interactions as a physician.

Advertisement

“One of my patients was a young man who was a professional motocross racer,” Peter said. “He had a tragic accident, broke his spine and was paraplegic. He was dealing with a lot of anger and depression, but he still completed his rehabilitation program. He left the unit in a wheelchair.”

“Then one day, after I hadn’t seen him for a while, I’m walking across the parking lot toward the outpatient rehabilitation facility, and I see this wheelchair flying out the front door. It’s the same young man with a big smile on his face, just whipping his wheelchair through the parking lot. He pulls up next to this big old wheel drive pick-up truck, and in one movement, he opens the door and pulls himself up, grabs the wheelchair and puts it in the back of the pickup, shuts the door and hits the driveway.

“He was in a much better place,” Peter recalled with emotion. “As a physician, that sticks.”

After completing his residency,  Peter and Inge moved to Medford, Oregon, in 1993, where he treated patients with brain injuries, strokes and spinal cord injuries, and served as team physician for several local high schools.

Yet, even during this time, his heart remained tied to Nevada. When Peter and Inge, welcomed a daughter in 1995, they named her Carson in honor of their Nevada roots.

Advertisement
Peter and his wife, Inge posing during their daughter's graduation, Carson.
Peter and his wife, Inge, celebrate the graduation of their daughter, Carson Costa ’18.

Finding his way home 

In 1996, the Costa family relocated to Nevada for Peter’s “dream job” at Tahoe Fracture and Orthopedic Medical Clinic. By 2000, he had become a U.S. Ski and Snowboard team physician, and in 2001, the director of the U.S. Ski and Snowboard Team (USSA) Spine Program. The Tahoe Daily Tribune wrote about Peter: “It takes precision, ability and courage to be a member of the U.S. Ski Team; it takes a unique person to be responsible for the care and health of the athletes.”

Peter’s role took him around the world with elite athletes, though he always felt particularly rewarded when treating the people of Nevada and the Eastern Sierra. Peter also mentored several University of Nevada medical students, who completed clerkships with him.

The passing of his grandparents brought about a shift for Peter.

“After my grandparents passed, I wanted to do something to honor them,” Peter said. “They supported me in many ways throughout my education. They supported the University, but they weren’t that close to it. However, the University paved the way for my grandfather with his mining engineering degree. It led me being here, and it led to us being here. My wife and I wanted to honor that, so we started an endowed scholarship for mining engineering and agriculture students in my grandparents’ honor.

“After my grandparents passed, I wanted to do something to honor them,” – Peter Costa.

“Our experience was so positive that we decided to honor my parents in the same way.”

Advertisement

Peter and his brother, Paul — along with Inge and Paul’s wife, Julie — started an endowed scholarship for graduates of the high schools where their father had taught or served as a principal, as well as an endowed fund to support University libraries in honor of their mother.

Peter’s involvement with the University has continued to grow. He served on the Nevada Alumni Council from 2014 to 2020. Now retired from medical practice, he serves as a Foundation Trustee and on several campus committees. Peter and Inge regularly attend performing arts and athletic events, on-campus lectures and presentations. They are members of the Legacy Society, ensuring their support for future generations through planned giving.

Peter posing in front of the “N” on Peavine Mountain.
Peter proudly poses at the “N” on Peavine Mountain.

Peter stays engaged by learning how much more work is left to do and hearing stories of other people who are contributing toward the same mission.

“I really don’t think I have given more than anybody else,” Peter said. “And really, one of the things I enjoy the most is that my wife has been by my side in doing all these things. When it comes to supporting, the University is at the top of her list, too, and I’m very proud of what we have accomplished. Education offers an opportunity for people to build their lives, which benefits our community, our region and our state.”

When he is not cheering for the Wolf Pack, you may find him picking up litter downtown, removing sagebrush from the “N” on the hill (so it doesn’t look like “Swiss cheese”) or walking across campus with Inge, pausing to pull the occasional weed.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

NMSU Extension’s Anna, Age Eight Institute nominated for Emmy Award

Published

on

NMSU Extension’s Anna, Age Eight Institute nominated for Emmy Award


The Anna, Age Eight Institute, part of the Department of Extension Family and Consumer Sciences at New Mexico State University, has been nominated for a Rocky Mountain Emmy Award. The documentary, “On the Road to 100% Chaves,” was nominated in the category “Special Concerns Content.” The award presentation will be held Nov. 16 in Phoenix, Arizona.

On the Road to 100% Chaves” is part of a series focusing on NMSU’s 100% New Mexico initiative, which identifies challenges facing New Mexicans and showcases local champions uniting to create innovative solutions.

“Our hope is that the video series brings much-needed attention to the root causes of so many of the problems we face in New Mexico: Adverse Childhood experiences and Social Determinants of Health,” said Katherine Ortega Courtney, Anna, Age Eight co-director. “Our ‘The Road to 100%’ video series showcases the amazing work that our county initiatives are taking on as we start this journey toward 100%. These videos really capture the energy and sense of community that fuel the 100% New Mexico initiative.” 

Developed by the 100% New Mexico initiative co-creators Courtney and Dominic Cappello and directed by Vladimir Chaloupka of VladFilms, the documentary highlights the importance of socially engaged filmmaking in addressing societal challenges.

Advertisement

“The 100% New Mexico initiative is an innovative framework that operationalizes the social determinants of health in an understandable and accessible way,” Courtney said. “The 100% New Mexico initiative is active in over half of the counties in New Mexico. The initiative aims to ensure that all families have access to 10 essential services crucial for surviving and thriving – services that are currently inaccessible to many children, students and families in the state. Eliminating the barriers to these services is the best way to improve health, education and well-being outcomes for kids and families in New Mexico.”

To learn more about NMSU’s Anna, Age Eight Institute, visit https://annaageeight.nmsu.edu/index.html.
 

-30-

CUTLINE: A documentary from New Mexico State University’s Anna, Age Eight Institute, “On the Road to 100% Chaves,” was nominated for a Rocky Mountain Emmy Award. Director Vladimir Chaloupka, from left, Katherine Ortega Courtney and Dominic Cappello, 100% New Mexico initiative co-creators, developed the documentary. (Courtesy photo)

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending