Connect with us

New Mexico

New Mexico cities must abandon their efforts to punish homelessness

Published

on

New Mexico cities must abandon their efforts to punish homelessness


Over the years, we’ve seen every manner of anti-panhandling law introduced, passed, revoked, and re-introduced in cities across New Mexico. Many of the laws that have come and gone were repealed because they were unconstitutional. But it hasn’t stopped cities from trying again and again to push unhoused people out of sight through the threat of arrest; city officials invariably tinker with the language and see if it passes muster.  

Right now, we’re seeing a new wave of these efforts, all under the auspices of public safety. The Santa Fe City Council is expected to soon vote on a bill that would make it illegal for people to sit or stand on a median that is less than 36 inches. It mirrors similar bans implemented in Albuquerque in 2023 and in Espanola in 2022. Last month, Alamogordo passed a bill that punishes people with up to $500 in fines and 90 days in jail for soliciting or giving donations from a median. At a recent Las Cruces City Council meeting, there were talks of introducing a new bill to curb panhandling, and Governor Lujan Grisham has doubled down on her efforts to pass a statewide ban.

As these bills catch fire in New Mexico, it begs the question: What if our elected leaders used the same dedication and ingenuity to address the root causes of homelessness, instead of concocting new ways to punish people who are unhoused?

Advertisement

When our cities respond to homelessness with police, unpayable fees, and jail time, it only entrenches homelessness. A person who asks for money because they are too poor to afford a meal or a night in a hotel cannot afford to pay hundreds of dollars in fines. Any time spent behind bars for their inability to pay exorbitant fees only compounds their hardships. That’s because the stigma of jail time and criminal records make it all but impossible to obtain employment or housing. It’s clear to see that criminal legal system involvement and homelessness are part of a vicious feedback loop.

The National Prison Policy Alliance found that people who have been to prison one time experience homelessness at a rate nearly seven times higher than the general public. People incarcerated more than once are 13 times more likely than the rest of the population to experience homelessness. 

To truly address homelessness, New Mexico’s elected leaders must confront the decades of policy failures that have led to a lack of safe and affordable housing, access to mental and physical healthcare, substance use treatment and other essential wrap-around services. While we’ve made big strides in these areas, we should not undo that progress by coupling real solutions with failed policies.

The difficult reality is that many New Mexicans – and families across the country – are just one bad circumstance away from finding themselves in a similar position to the people they drive past, holding up a sign for help. Housing and food costs in the last few years have skyrocketed, and wages have not kept pace. Our state is also grappling with an enormous housing shortage. These factors contributed to a 48% increase in homelessness from 2022-23. 

Advertisement

Addressing a collective failure to adequately invest in our communities is in everyone’s best interest. It will take time, but unlike laws that respond with punishment, doing so will pay off in the long run.

The question is: Will our elected leaders continue with the status quo, or will they show the courage, humanity, and fortitude to forge a different path? New Mexicans deserve elected leaders who will do the latter. 

Nayomi Valdez is the public policy director at ACLU-NM and Monet Silva is executive director at New Mexico Coalition to End Homelessness



Source link

Advertisement

New Mexico

New Mexico AG Wants to Know Where Epstein Records Are

Published

on

New Mexico AG Wants to Know Where Epstein Records Are



New Mexico’s top prosecutor says federal officials are slow-walking key Jeffrey Epstein files, and it may be costing the state its chance to build a case. In a sharply worded June 30 letter released on Thursday, Attorney General Raul Torrez accused the Justice Department of blocking access to unredacted records tied to Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, warning that evidence degrades and witnesses disappear with each passing day, reports CNN. The agency’s refusal to release the files “is causing real and escalating harm,” Torrez wrote in a letter last week to acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche, per the New York Times.


The state reopened its criminal probe in February after the federal release of millions of Epstein-related documents, including an unverified tip about two foreign girls allegedly buried near the property at the behest of Epstein and a “Madam G.” The DOJ says it responded to New Mexico last month and stands ready to assist if the state uncovers possible federal crimes, notes Reuters.

Advertisement


Torrez counters that his office has made six attempts since February to secure documents or at least an in-person meeting, calling the more than 130-day delay “unreasonable,” per CNN. The dispute unfolds as lawmakers condemn heavy redactions in the Epstein files and an internal DOJ watchdog reviews the process. Zorro Ranch, near Santa Fe, has been named by multiple survivors, including Chauntae Davies and the late Virginia Giuffre, as a site of sexual abuse.





Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

NM Delegation Demands Answers On Reports Of DEA Declining To Seize Massive Fentanyl Shipments, Calls For Immediate Reforms

Published

on

NM Delegation Demands Answers On Reports Of DEA Declining To Seize Massive Fentanyl Shipments, Calls For Immediate Reforms


U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) sent a letter demanding answers from U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance Cole on why the DEA allowed large quantities of fentanyl to circulate unseized in New Mexico communities.

Trafficking of fentanyl and other opioids poses one of the most severe — and often deadly — public health threats facing New Mexico and the nation. Illicit fentanyl, a Schedule I controlled substance, is an exceptionally potent synthetic opioid that can be fatal even in extremely small quantities. Illicitly manufactured fentanyl has been the primary driver of the overdose epidemic in the U.S.

Whistleblower complaints allege that Albuquerque-based DEA agents declined to interdict at least 1.8 million fentanyl pills between 2023 and 2025 in hopes of taking down a larger supply chain.

“We unequivocally assert that allowing fentanyl to go unseized creates an unconscionable risk to New Mexicans,” the lawmakers wrote to DEA Administrator Cole.

Advertisement

In 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and DEA established “Fentanyl Protocols” directing agents to “seize or otherwise prevent the distribution” of fentanyl “as soon as practicable” to protect public safety. In 2024, the DOJ revised those protocols to provide law enforcement with greater discretion, allowing agents to weigh public safety risks against “the benefits to be achieved through preserving the investigation.” A 2024 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigative summary further states that the U.S. Attorney’s Office acted reasonably in allowing certain drugs to remain unseized and concluded that doing so posed no “specific danger to public health and safety.”

“We adamantly disagree with this internal assessment, and we urge your agency to immediately revert fentanyl protocols to the 2017 standard of seize or otherwise prevent the distribution of fentanyl as soon as practicable,” the lawmakers underscored. “We will be taking all necessary actions in Congress to better ensure the safety of New Mexicans and expect that you will stand with us in those efforts.”

The lawmakers concluded their letter by demanding responses to a request for written documentation on all instances where the DEA declined to interdict fentanyl, and the following questions on the DEA’s fentanyl interdiction policies, investigative protocols, and enforcement practices:

  1. Provide comprehensive written documentation of all individual instances, occurring in New Mexico since January 2017, including dates, locations and amount of suspected contraband, during which DEA has declined to interdict fentanyl in the course of a Title III or electronic surveillance investigation. Please also indicate the extent to which fentanyl involved in these investigations was ultimately recovered.
  1. What are DEA’s current internal directives and guidelines dictating how federal agents manage active drug-trafficking investigations involving fentanyl? Specifically, what protocols instruct agents on whether to seize a shipment of fentanyl immediately or allow it to pass temporarily under surveillance?
  1. What internal DOJ or DEA documentation determines, or may supersede, official fentanyl interdiction and operational protocols both as a matter of agency-wide policy and also with regards to individual drug-trafficking investigations? How are these changes to operational protocols communicated to agents in the field? Please provide all such documentation since January 2017.
  1. Under what circumstances are DEA agents permitted to exercise discretion, abandoning any presumption of interdiction, allowing a fentanyl transaction to proceed without immediate seizure? What safeguards are in place to protect communities when fentanyl shipments are allowed to continue as part of an ongoing investigation?
  1. Must agents possess a guaranteed, continuous ability to seize the substance immediately if the operational environment changes? How is the likelihood of losing operational surveillance, and the potential number of lives impacted if the substance enters the illicit supply chain, measured against the benefits of a successful investigation?
  1. What circumstances mandate when fentanyl must be safely interdicted, or swapped for a controlled delivery with a substituted substance, before it is allowed to advance within the supply chain? What levels of approval within your command structure are required to bypass immediate interdiction?
  1. What other tactics such as controlled deliveries, enhanced surveillance, contraband substitution are available to your agency to facilitate long-term, high-level investigations without an unacceptable risk to public safety? What resources can we provide to make these tactics of more common use to your agency?
  1. What is the reassignment status of DEA personnel based in New Mexico to out-of-state enforcement efforts since January 2025? During the same period, have DEA agents in New Mexico maintained their primary focus on drug-trafficking investigations or have any participated in joint immigration enforcement operations not limited to ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations?

For more information on the N.M. Delegation’s work to tackle the opioid crisis, click here.

The full text of the letter is here and below:

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

Isolated storm chances continue for parts of New Mexico this weekend

Published

on

Isolated storm chances continue for parts of New Mexico this weekend


Josh’s Friday Night Forecast

Drier air and hotter temperatures have continued to spread across northern New Mexico today. This has brought very fewer thunderstorms to northern and northwestern parts of the state this afternoon. A few storms across northeastern New Mexico have become strong this afternoon, while isolated storms have developed across southern and southeastern New Mexico.

Temperatures will remain just as hot Saturday afternoon. Rain and thunderstorm chances will increase across the eastern half of the state, while much of western, northern, and central New Mexico stays mostly dry.

Advertisement

High temperatures will cool a few degrees Sunday and Monday as a large area of high pressure remains well north of New Mexico. This will also allow a surge of monsoon moisture to move in from the east and southeast. While low-level moisture will increase across the state, forecast models have trended drier in the mid and upper levels of the atmosphere. Storms are still expected to develop Sunday and Monday afternoon, but coverage may not be as widespread as earlier forecasts suggested. Storms will also begin moving from east to west during the afternoon and evening. This pattern is expected to continue through the middle of next week, with drier air returning in the mid-levels and potentially limiting thunderstorm coverage.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending