Connect with us

New Mexico

Governor’s call for panhandling crackdown raises concerns – NM Political Report

Published

on

Governor’s call for panhandling crackdown raises concerns – NM Political Report


By Gabrielle Porter, The Santa Fe New Mexican

Lori Sena stood in the median of Paseo de Peralta late Thursday morning, holding out a cardboard sign that read, “Help us, please.”

She occasionally stepped toward drivers who stopped at the light on St. Francis Drive and held money out their windows for her. Sena was hoping to get enough money to buy food for herself, her husband and her dog, Reina.

Typically, they can get by on $20 to $50 per day, according to the 40-year-old, who grew up just around the corner on Alto Street.

Advertisement

If she gets a little extra, Sena said, they sometimes stay in a motel.

“It’s been harder and harder,” she said. “… People can be very mean.” 

Sena is one of many New Mexicans who would be affected by a statewide crackdown on panhandling Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham proposed and urged lawmakers to consider earlier this week during her annual State of the State address. The governor referred to panhandling as a safety risk. 

“We have one of the highest pedestrian fatality rates in the entire country and a situation where drivers and their children as passengers are at increased risk,” Lujan Grisham said in her speech Tuesday at the Roundhouse. “It’s not tenable, and we can do something about it.”

While advocates say they agree panhandlers being in the roadway or on a narrow median can become a safety issue, several said they have concerns about the details of a statewide measure, especially when it comes to the ways people might be punished for continuing to panhandle.

Advertisement

“Generally, we’re all pretty concerned that the end goal here is to incarcerate people who are unhoused,” said Nayomi Valdez, director of public policy for the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico. The statewide organization and local chapters have successfully challenged a number of municipal panhandling statutes in court.

“That’s not a solution,” Valdez said of the proposed ban, “and in fact, that will cause deeper harm and long-term harm.”

‘Free speech and peaceful protest’

Efforts to ban or limit panhandling are nothing new in New Mexico or around the country. The ACLU has argued, however, against those they say violate First Amendment rights.

“People have a constitutional right to stand in public spaces and to solicit donations … regardless of whether they’re looking for money to buy their next meal or … firefighters out trying to fill the boot,” Valdez said. 

Advertisement

Sean Baity, who was soliciting donations Thursday from the median of St. Francis Drive near Cerrillos Road, said he views panhandling as a protest of sorts.

“It’s a matter of free speech and peaceful protest,” said the 45-year-old, California-born painter, who has been in New Mexico about a year. “All you’re doing is protesting that you don’t have a home and money.”

Local leaders in recent years have cast the issue primarily as a safety risk, especially against the backdrop of New Mexico’s dismal pedestrian fatality rate — the highest in the nation in 2022, according to a Governors Highway Safety Association study, with 4.4 deaths per 100,000 people. 

Albuquerque city leaders went through several rounds of revisions and court battles in recent years before ultimately landing on the city’s current iteration of a panhandling ordinance: a measure that, among other things, prohibits people from occupying medians less than 4 feet wide on roads with a speed limit of 30 mph or faster. 

A statute now on the books in Española takes a similar approach, restricting solicitors from standing on medians that are narrower than 3 feet wide. And Santa Fe forbids panhandling “in an aggressive manner” or in certain locations, including on private property.

Advertisement

While no bill for a statewide measure has been introduced following Lujan Grisham’s speech, a Governor’s Office spokeswoman said the proposal would be modeled after Española’s, noting it “did withstand judicial scrutiny.” 

“Panhandling on our streets, especially in narrow medians at busy intersections, creates a dangerous situation for both panhandlers and drivers,” spokeswoman Maddy Hayden wrote in an email Thursday. “… In addition to protecting New Mexicans, a statewide law would provide a clear standard of safety for law enforcement who have jurisdiction in multiple municipalities, counties or statewide.”

‘Putting themselves at risk’

Korina Lopez, executive director of the Interfaith Community Shelter at Pete’s Place in Santa Fe, said she “absolutely” understands the physical dangers panhandling presents. 

“Sometimes it’s scary if people aren’t paying attention and they’re in a really narrow median,” she said, adding she often hears of people getting hit by cars while in the median, though she said she doesn’t know if those people are panhandling at the time. “… Even if they’re collecting money, they’re kind of putting themselves at risk with the traffic.”

Advertisement

Nechay Gustobov, who has lived without a permanent house for decades in the Santa Fe area and is a member of the city’s Lived Experience Advisory Board, said panhandling isn’t just a risk because of cars.

“Traffic does become a major issue for safety, but it’s also the weather,” Gustobov said. “It’s a good chance of them getting hypothermia. … In summer, you can be standing there and be dehydrated.”

Valdez said she agrees the trend of rising pedestrian deaths is concerning.

But, she added, “I don’t think it’s completely fair or accurate to attribute that to panhandling per se. We have a distracted driver problem in this country. … People are driving really fast. They’re on their phone.”

Lopez, Gustobov and Valdez all said despite those risks, they’re worried a crackdown on panhandling could mean driving already vulnerable people into the criminal justice system. That could include fines and jail time as a punishment or for missing court dates. 

Advertisement

“If you get a fine, typically people are panhandling because they don’t have regular income,” Lopez said. “It’s kind of like a Catch-22, where they’re panhandling to make money, and then you get the fine, so you’re going to have to earn the money to pay the fine; if not you’ll end up with a warrant. … It becomes this weird cycle.”

Gustobov noted some people panhandle because they think it’s easier than finding a job, but many do it because they are not capable, physically or mentally, of working.

He doesn’t think a crackdown on panhandling will change behavior.

“They can go to jail, they can get out of jail. They can get a fine,” he said. “The attitude is: ‘Big deal. So it’s against the law to panhandle. I’m going to do it anyway.’ … Punishing people because they’re panhandling is not a long-term solution.”

Valdez said she believes trying to push through a statewide statute on panhandling could be a waste of taxpayer funds if it ends up posing a constitutional threat that’s later challenged. She pointed to cities like Albuquerque that spent considerable time and money fighting challenges in court.

Advertisement

“That money could be going toward housing people … toward building a behavioral health pipeline,” Valdez said. “That money could be going toward a whole number of things that actually get at the root cause of homelessness.”

‘Like dominoes’

Panhandling wasn’t Sena’s plan for her life. She hoped at one point to go to college, to learn automotive repair. She had a job she enjoyed for years as a cashier at a carwash. Then her mom died, and Sena took over raising her siblings. Later, she said, she got ovarian cancer and couldn’t work anymore. 

“It just [was] like dominoes,” said Sena, adding that, all told, she’s been homeless for about 10 years. “It went from losing my apartment to my savings to losing my car. … This is where we got stuck at.” 

Sena said she would like to go back to work. She’s applied to jobs, but her lack of an address has been an issue for employers. She said she’s on good terms with her old boss at the carwash, and she might try to go back to work there.

Advertisement

But, Sena said, it’s also hard to go to work every day when she doesn’t have somewhere to live and to shower — and housing is more expensive than ever. 

“With the rent going up to, geez louise, $2,000 for a one-bedroom, two-bedroom house?” Sena said. “It’s ridiculous.” 

Sena said she and her husband put their names down on a list for one of the Pallet shelters the city is installing, but they haven’t heard back. 

If she’s restricted from panhandling, she said, it will be difficult to get enough money to eat. She also thinks cities will see other problems start to increase as people get more desperate. 

“Guaranteed, the crime is going to go up. People are going to start getting into cars more and breaking into houses and robbing people,” Sena said. “It’s not all of us. … [But] it’s going to get bad. It’s going to get worse than it already is.”

Advertisement

She said leaders considering a crackdown on panhandling should consider her experiences of becoming homeless and trying to survive.

“Walk a mile in my shoes, and let’s see if you can do it,” Sena said. “I give you guys three days.”



Source link

New Mexico

Future of free childcare for all families in New Mexico remains uncertain

Published

on

Future of free childcare for all families in New Mexico remains uncertain


Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham has no regrets about universal childcare.

As she approaches the end of her second term in New Mexico’s top office, she acknowledges there are some things she would have done differently. In a recent interview, she called 20/20 hindsight a “very powerful tool” that not enough politicians put to good use.

Moving the state toward a free childcare system — open to all New Mexico families regardless of income — isn’t on that list, however. The issue has turned into one of the defining public policy issues of Lujan Grisham’s tenure — which will come to an end later this year. The state’s heavily Democratic Legislature, initially wary of the program, has since voiced support and created a funding stream to continue the initiative for the next five years.

Advertisement

‘You have to start there’

Childcare costs, benefits

Advertisement

‘We have to get it right’

GOP might ‘peel back’ scope

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Mexico

Opinion: Applauding Heinrich for bi-partisan permitting reform work – New Mexico Political Report

Published

on

Opinion: Applauding Heinrich for bi-partisan permitting reform work – New Mexico Political Report






Opinion: Applauding Heinrich for bi-partisan permitting reform work – New Mexico Political Report












Advertisement



Advertisement





Skip to content

Advertisement


Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

New Mexico lawmakers, leaders respond to federal lawsuit

Published

on

New Mexico lawmakers, leaders respond to federal lawsuit


ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — State lawmakers and leaders released the following statements in response to the federal lawsuit against New Mexico and the City of Albuquerque.

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez

“House Bill 9 is a constitutional exercise of state authority, and this office will defend it.  

The New Mexico Legislature passed this law after extensive consideration of documented harms occurring in immigration detention facilities operating in this state — inadequate medical care, deaths in custody, and conditions that fell well below acceptable standards. The Legislature made a considered judgment that New Mexico’s government, its employees, and its publicly funded facilities should not be instruments of a detention system that has caused serious and preventable harm to people held within our borders. That is precisely the kind of policy judgment that belongs to the states.  

Advertisement

The Constitution reserves to the states the power to govern their own affairs — including how state and local personnel are deployed and how publicly funded facilities are used. Federal agents remain free to enforce federal immigration law. They may make arrests, conduct investigations, and carry out removals. What they may not do is compel New Mexico’s officers, employees, and institutions to administer federal enforcement priorities the state has chosen not to adopt. The federal government has its own personnel and its own resources. It does not have a constitutional right to New Mexico’s.  

This lawsuit asks a federal court to override a democratically enacted state law because the administration disagrees with the policy choice the Legislature made. That is not a constitutional argument. It is an attempt to use federal litigation to reverse an outcome the administration dislikes. We will see them in court.” 

Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller

“I will always stand up for the safety, rights, and dignity of Albuquerque residents. Our policies ensure ALL families can call 911, send their kids to school, and access City services without fear, while making clear that City resources are not tools for federal immigration raids. We are ready to defend our community, our values, and our public safety in court,”

City Councilor Dan Lewis

Advertisement

“Mayor Keller deserves to be sued for his reckless promotion of dangerous sanctuary policies that undermine cooperation between law enforcement agencies and put everyone at risk. Sanctuary laws don’t protect; they create more victims. I opposed Keller’s so-called ‘Safer Community Places’ ordinance from the beginning. It’s nothing more than obstruction of law enforcement and this mayor chose his radical ideology over public safety. Most people in our City agree that there is a public safety benefit when local, state and federal law enforcement work together to enforce the law and protect innocent people.”

Deb Haaland

“As ICE continues threatening communities across the country, the state is the first line of defense against the Trump administration. In New Mexico, we are lucky that the state and localities worked to lawfully pass legislation to protect New Mexicans and their families from ICE. We can’t let the federal government continue to exert their will on New Mexico and we won’t let them intimidate us. We are a multicultural state, we must stand strong with our neighbors. That means as governor, I will do anything in my power to stop ICE from tearing families apart and committing crimes in our streets while advocating for strong, common sense immigration and border security reform.”

The Democratic Party of New Mexico

“The Immigrant Safety Act passed both legislative chambers and was signed into law constitutionally, within our rights as a state, concerning New Mexico’s own personnel, facilities, and resources. The Trump Administration may not like that New Mexico stands for the safety of all the families in our communities and against inhumane and dangerous conditions in for-profit detention centers, but they have to respect our rights as a state.  

Advertisement

The fact of the matter is that the Trump Administration is overstepping its authority as they continue to force a violent, clumsy immigration agenda onto communities it has terrorized across the country against their will.”   

Republican Party of New Mexico

“The lawsuit filed by the United States against the State of New Mexico, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, Attorney General Raul Torrez, the City of Albuquerque, and Mayor Timothy Keller confirms what many New Mexicans have feared for months — that House Bill 9 and Albuquerque’s Safer Community Places Ordinance were driven by partisan politics rather than the safety, stability, and economic well-being of our communities.

Legislators who pushed HB9 chose political ideology over common sense and over the people they were elected to represent. This legislation appears to have been crafted not to improve public safety or immigration outcomes, but to advance an anti-Trump political agenda at any cost. In doing so, they ignored the serious consequences these policies would have on New Mexico families, local economies, county governments, and the very immigrants they claim to protect.

The federal government’s complaint makes clear that these laws threaten decades-long partnerships between local governments and federal authorities that have been essential to maintaining public safety and enforcing immigration law. These partnerships support jobs, economic activity, and critical infrastructure in communities like Otero County, where nearly 300 jobs are now at risk because of these reckless political decisions.

Advertisement

New Mexico legislators also failed to consider the financial burden these measures place on counties and municipalities already struggling with limited resources. Instead of working collaboratively to address immigration challenges responsibly and humanely, they chose confrontation and obstruction.

Most troubling is the complete disregard for the safety of New Mexicans. Policies that intentionally interfere with federal immigration enforcement risk creating greater instability, undermining law enforcement cooperation, and putting thousands of residents at risk. At the same time, these policies do nothing to improve the care, processing, or long-term outcomes for immigrants being housed in detention and processing facilities.

The people of New Mexico deserve leadership focused on public safety, economic security, and lawful solutions — not political theater designed to score partisan points. When elected officials prioritize ideology over citizens, communities suffer. The consequences of HB9 and related sanctuary-style policies are now being challenged in federal court, and New Mexicans are left to deal with the damage caused by leaders who appeared more interested in opposing President Trump than protecting the people of this state.

And now, after advancing policies that threaten jobs, hurt counties financially, undermine law enforcement cooperation, and divide communities, these same legislators want taxpayers to pay them for their failing policies. Instead of moving New Mexico forward, too many elected officials have focused solely on advancing their own political agendas while ignoring the real needs of working families, local governments, and public safety.

This election season, New Mexicans have an opportunity to speak loudly at the polls. The primary elections matter, and voters must carefully choose strong Republican candidates willing to go to Santa Fe and fight against harmful policies that put politics above people. New Mexico deserves leaders who will protect communities, strengthen the economy, support law enforcement, and put citizens first — not politicians who continue to gamble with the future of this state.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending