Nevada
The chances of Chasing Horse case getting dismissed by Nevada Supreme Court ‘slim to none’
LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — The Nevada Supreme Court has set a date to consider the case against Nathan Chasing Horse.
On November 15th, the state’s high court will hear oral arguments as to whether Chasing Horse’s case should be dismissed.
The former actor and accused cult leader faces several felony charges, including sexual assault and kidnapping. Chasing Horse is accused of using his tribal status as a “medicine man” to sexually assault several women, including minors.
In February, a grand jury indicted 47-year-old Chasing Horse on 19 felony charges. A Las Vegas judge later dismissed a drug trafficking charge.
In May, his defense team petitioned the Nevada Supreme Court asking to dismiss the case, citing constitutional error by the Eighth Judicial District Court.
According to the petition, the defense argues there is a lack of evidence to prove Chasing Horse’s sexual encounters with the women were not consensual. They argue evidence gathered by the state proving otherwise was either illegally obtained or was not disclosed as required.
They also argue some of the alleged crimes occurred outside Nevada’s jurisdiction.
“The Nevada Supreme Court is always reluctant to get involved in cases until after a conviction,” said Former Clark County District Attorney David Roger. “The chances of this case getting tossed out at this stage of the proceedings is slim to none.”
MORE: New court documents reveal extent of Nathan Chasing Horse’s alleged abuse
Roger said it is rare for the state’s high court to get involved in a case before conviction because it could delay the district court hearings.
“If everybody had the opportunity to stop the proceedings, to take it to the Nevada Supreme Court, the criminal justice system would come to a grinding halt,” said Roger.
In June, the state filed a reply to the Chasing Horse petition defending the validity of the evidence that proves the alleged victims didn’t willingly consent to sexual acts, especially since one of them was only 14 years old.
The state also argues Chasing Horse “hatched his scheme” in Nevada to take at least one alleged victim out of state for sexual purposes. According to Nevada law, if a crime begins in Nevada but ends in a different state, it can still be prosecuted in the state of Nevada.
As for now, Roger expects it is unlikely the Nevada Supreme Court will dismiss the case, and he expects Chasing Horse will head to trial in district court.
Chasing Horse is scheduled for a status check in district court on October 30.
Nevada
Can Nevada ride out Russ Vought? • Nevada Current
The semi-celebrities and quacks (not that they’re mutually exclusive) get a lot of attention, but one recent appointment announced by Donald Trump is cause for even more concern, and especially for historically anti-government states like Nevada.
Trump on Friday named Russ Vought his director of the Office of Management and Budget.
Of all the Project 2025 authors, none is more eager to create chaos within and dismantle much of the federal bureaucracy than Vought
“We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected,” Vought has declared. “When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains.”
Minimizing the the federal workforce and traumatizing what’s left of it is Vought’s raison d’etre.
That might sound all “ooh, cool, that’ll teach ’em” — until the federal government can’t competently distribute grandma’s monthly Social Security benefit or process your federal income tax refund.
In Nevada, there are many dedicated state and local government employees who work hard to deliver a vast array of programs and services – from nutrition programs for low-income families to processing tax abatements for multi-billion-dollar corporations.
As in every state, those myriad programs and services and initiatives are contingent on federal money, or federal cooperation, or clarity and timeliness of federal rules and regulations.
And while there are many dedicated Nevadans working to provide and/or administer government programs and services the best they can, there are very rarely enough of them. Nevada can be very generous to big business. But when it comes to financing government, Nevada has always been a notoriously cheap state – bottom of the good lists, top of the bad lists, etc.
Vought’s – and Trump’s – crusade against federal civil servants promises to wreak havoc on the delivery of programs and services in every state, red and blue alike.
All states will struggle to compensate for the carnage Vought vows to inflict on the United States civil service.
The states that will have the best fighting chance of safeguarding continued and competent delivery of vital services will be those with something approaching adequately funded and staffed state and local government. Nevada has never been one of those.
***
A pleasant (if short-lived) surprise. But back to the aforementioned quacks and semi-celebrities… it’s as if Trump has been deliberately debasing his own supporters, nominating obviously outlandish and offensive people to jobs they have no business being anywhere near, for the depraved satisfaction of watching his followers – both those who are elected and those within the electorate – obsequiously go along with whatever he says or does.
Initially it looked as if Republican senators were prepared to surrender unconditionally, and grovel in submission while Trump insults their intelligence and rubs their noses in it.
So their willingness to tell Trump to shove his nomination of Matt Gaetz you know where, is a fine thing.
So that’s on the bright side.
On the not so bright side… Yes, though it’s a low bar – subterranean, even – Pam Bondi, the person Trump has named to be AG instead of Gaetz, is far more competent than Gaetz. But she’s also no less loyal to Dear Leader, meaning she could be even worse for the nation and the rule of law than Gaetz. And not surprisingly – her being an extreme Trump loyalist and all – she has documented dalliances with corruption (shielding the Trump University grift) and rejecting reality (election denier).
Stay strong, Republican senators,
Portions of this column were originally published in recent editions of the Daily Current newsletter, which is free and which you can subscribe to here.
Nevada
NEVADA VIEWS: Lessons from Nevada’s Question 3
A majority of Nevada voters rejected Question 3 on the Nov. 5 ballot. This complex amendment would have eliminated party primaries, advanced five candidates to general elections and introduced a new voting method in general elections
I moved to Nevada in 2021 to care for my aging mother. Before that time, I lived in Maine, where I led efforts that opened Maine’s primaries to all voters and protected the nation’s first statewide ranked-choice voting law.
My values and experience inform me that initiatives to change how we elect our leaders should make their way to voters as the result of home-grown and grassroots movements that are thoughtful, collaborative, strategic and patient.
I am dumbfounded that out-of-state donors and advocates would come into Nevada, steamroll stakeholders and potential allies, rush a constitutional amendment to ballot and spend millions to score a quick win for their preferred policy prescription to our political ills.
As a recent Review-Journal editorial noted, the national coalition behind Question 3 pushed similar initiatives in other states in 2024. Voters rejected each of these proposals.
Here are a few of my takeaways from these failed efforts:
■ Mission and strategy must align. Election reform is inherently hopeful and optimistic. Ramming through policy changes and seeking to buy elections are anti-democratic and deeply cynical approaches to politics. Coalitions with antithetical missions and strategies will almost always fail to achieve the real and lasting change that they seek.
■ Patience is practical. Process matters. How change is made can be as important as what change is made, especially when it comes to process reforms. Elections and voting reform initiatives must be organized by local leaders who will build coalitions and recruit volunteers to secure majority support for their cause, one voter and one conversation at a time. The proper role of national groups is not to lead or dictate, but to support.
■ There is no single solution to fix our broken politics. There are 50 states and more than 50 ways of conducting elections and voting in the United States. While policymakers and advocates should learn from one another, we should be skeptical of anyone or any group that promises a silver bullet or pushes a one-size-fits-all solution.
Voters aren’t stupid. We have a sense when politicians and special interests are trying to put one over on us. Question 3 didn’t pass the straight-face test.
That’s too bad because my experience with ranked-choice voting in Maine has taught me that it works to eliminate vote-splitting and ensure majority winners. You have the freedom to vote for the candidate you like best without worrying that your vote will be “wasted” or that you will help to elect the candidate you like least. In both Maine and Alaska, ranked-choice voting has stopped extreme candidates from winning congressional races.
Ranked-choice voting also increases voter turnout, reduces negative campaigning and encourages more women and minorities to run for office.
Surveys from the states and cities in which millions of Americans rank their vote indicate that voters find it to be simple and easy to use and preferable.
One of the most disappointing false attacks on ranked-choice voting is that communities of color might find it difficult to rank candidates. To suggest that white voters are intellectually superior to voters of color is a racist argument.
Nevadans are frustrated with politics as usual. We know that our system isn’t working like it should. We know that billionaires and corporations have too much power and influence over decisions that affect us all. We want to strengthen our democracy for future generations.
Had the national advocates behind Question 3 approached this effort differently, I believe that there might have been a different outcome.
Kyle Bailey moved to Nevada in 2021 and previously served in the Maine House of Representatives.
Nevada
Nevada high school football championships 2024: How to watch state finals online
The Nevada state high school football championships are here. Here’s how you can watch any of the championship games online on NFHS network.
Watch: Nevada High School football championships
The NIAA state football championships will air from Nov. 23 to Nov. 26 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
How can I watch Nevada high school football? Fans can subscribe to NFHS Sports Network, a nationwide streaming platform for more than 9,000 high school sports. You can find the list of available schools here.
How much does an NFHS subscription cost? Is there a free trial to NFHS Network? An annual subscription costs $79.99, or you can pay monthly for $11.99 per month.
Can you watch NFHS on your phone or TV? NFHS Network is available on smart TVs like Apple TV, Roku, Amazon Fire and Google Chromecast, as well as on iOS and Android smartphones.
Nov. 23:
10 a.m. PT: 2024 NIAA 2A Football Championship Incline Vs. Pershing County
1:30 p.m. PT: 2024 NIAA 5A Div. II Football Championship Faith Lutheran Vs. Bishop Manogue
Nov. 25:
Noon PT: 2024 NIAA 5A Div. III Football Championship Galena Vs. Centennial
Nov. 26:
9 a.m. PT: 2024 NIAA 1A Football Championship Pahranagat Valley Vs. Tonopah
12:20 p.m. PT: 2024 NIAA 3A Football Championship Truckee Vs. SLAM Nevada
3:40 p.m. PT: 2024 NIAA 4A Football Championship Canyon Springs Vs. Mojave
7 p.m. PT: 2024 NIAA 5A Div. I Football Championship Arbor View Vs. Bishop Gorman
Thank you for relying on us to provide the journalism you can trust.
-
Business1 week ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
Science5 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics7 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology6 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle7 days ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World7 days ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government
-
News6 days ago
They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony
-
News7 days ago
Gaetz-gate: Navigating the President-elect's most baffling Cabinet pick