Connect with us

Nevada

State Senate to hear bill that would change the way North Las Vegas is governed

Published

on

State Senate to hear bill that would change the way North Las Vegas is governed


(KTNV) — Nevada’s state Senate is about to listen to a invoice that may revise the constitution for the Metropolis of North Las Vegas.

Senate Invoice 184 handed out of committee on Friday.

The invoice would improve the variety of current wards from 4 to 6 (including two metropolis council seats), require the town supervisor to stay within the Metropolis of North Las Vegas, and require the town to arrange an annual range examine of its workers.

In a earlier listening to, Rev. Robert Bush, president of the Las Vegas chapter of the Nationwide Motion Community, mentioned change is overdue for one of many fastest-growing cities within the nation.

Advertisement

“The outdated districts and metropolis council measurement — every overlaying, in accordance with the Census, 101.4 sq. miles — is a key motive why the federal government of North Las Vegas has gone tone deaf and simply does not appear to perform at most capability,” Bush advised lawmakers.

“It’s merely not doable for 4 folks to signify that broad of an space, and that many individuals, and nonetheless present the localized consideration that residents deserve from their metropolis council members,” Bush added. “Residents have all seen their voices silenced and high quality of life change due to a clumsy metropolis council that does not hearken to or have time to hearken to its residents.”

As of the 2020 Census, 274,000 folks stay in North Las Vegas. Bush cited statistics that present the town is among the fastest-growing in Nevada, and the fifth-fastest rising metropolis within the U.S.

State Sen. Pat Spearman, who is among the invoice’s sponsors and ran within the metropolis’s final mayoral election, claimed the town additionally lacks various illustration.

“By including two members to the town council, we may have extra voices and various views to assist construct a basis for future success,” Spearman mentioned on the listening to.

Advertisement

Mayor Pamela Goynes-Brown advised lawmakers they should belief metropolis management to make the precise choices for his or her constituents.

“Voters in Southern Nevada simply elected three new mayors over the past election, but this invoice singles out solely our metropolis and permits different mayors to start out working their metropolis at an area degree with out proposing important and shock adjustments to their charters,” Goynes-Brown mentioned.

A number of lawmakers on the committee mentioned the matter must be addressed on the native degree as an alternative of the state degree. However members of the Constitution Committee testified they weren’t receiving route from the town.

“On June 27, 2022, the North Las Vegas Constitution Committee was convened. On the assembly, the one agenda merchandise was ‘talk about doable constitution adjustments and staff-recommended adjustments and affirm suggestions to metropolis council relating to revisions to the North Las Vegas metropolis constitution,’” mentioned Sophia Romero, the vice chair of the constitution committee. “That’s an especially broad and form of imprecise agenda merchandise.”

She mentioned a number of members have requested to carry a number of conferences and it hasn’t occurred.

Advertisement

“After the committee adjourned, a number of members of the committee have requested to name a brand new assembly. Sadly, solely the town council or the chair can reconvene a gathering,” Romero mentioned. “That has form of been denied. There was no alternative for any of this to return earlier than the committee, as a result of we had been by no means allowed to reconvene.”

Goynes-Brown mentioned the committee is new and metropolis leaders are attempting their greatest.

“We’re getting our toes moist as we proceed via this course of,” Goynes-Brown mentioned. “It’s a course of that’s in movement. The constitution committee can select to satisfy or ask the council and request extra conferences.”

The opposite difficulty introduced up was price. Goynes-Brown mentioned including two metropolis council seats would depart much less cash for different tasks.

“Discovering the cash to cowl the prices of this invoice would influence our group. We’d be pressured to chop new tasks simply introduced, just like the Dolores Huerta Useful resource Middle,” Goynes-Brown mentioned. “I am sorry, however our group wants these sources greater than it must pay for extra politicians.”

Advertisement

Nevertheless, others argued the town may reduce prices from inside, utilizing the town supervisor’s wage for example.

Leilani Hinyard, chair of the North Las Vegas Democratic Membership, questioned why North Las Vegas’ metropolis supervisor made more cash than his counterpart within the Metropolis of Las Vegas.

“Our metropolis supervisor is paid $397,000, together with base pay and different pay. When you think about advantages, the whole compensation bundle is an astounding $563,000 of taxpayer cash,” Hinyard advised lawmakers. “North Las Vegas has a median family wage of $61,000 — and once more, he (the town supervisor) does not stay within the metropolis.”

By comparability, Hinyard mentioned the town supervisor of Las Vegas made $190,000 lower than North Las Vegas’ metropolis supervisor in 2021.

The invoice handed out of committee and now heads to the Senate ground.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nevada

Can Nevada ride out Russ Vought? • Nevada Current

Published

on

Can Nevada ride out Russ Vought? • Nevada Current


The semi-celebrities and quacks (not that they’re mutually exclusive) get a lot of attention, but one recent appointment announced by Donald Trump is cause for even more concern, and especially for historically anti-government states like Nevada.

Trump on Friday named Russ Vought his director of the Office of Management and Budget.

Of all the Project 2025 authors, none is more eager to create chaos within and dismantle much of the federal bureaucracy than Vought

“We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected,” Vought has declared. “When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains.”

Advertisement

Minimizing the the federal workforce and traumatizing what’s left of it is Vought’s raison d’etre.

That might sound all “ooh, cool, that’ll teach ’em” — until the federal government can’t competently distribute grandma’s monthly Social Security benefit or process your federal income tax refund.

In Nevada, there are many dedicated state and local government employees who work hard to deliver a vast array of programs and services – from nutrition programs for low-income families to processing tax abatements for multi-billion-dollar corporations.

As in every state, those myriad programs and services and initiatives are contingent on federal money, or federal cooperation, or clarity and timeliness of federal rules and regulations.

And while there are many dedicated Nevadans working to provide and/or administer government programs and services the best they can, there are very rarely enough of them. Nevada can be very generous to big business. But when it comes to financing government, Nevada has always been a notoriously cheap state – bottom of the good lists, top of the bad lists, etc.

Advertisement

Vought’s – and Trump’s – crusade against federal civil servants promises to wreak havoc on the delivery of programs and services in every state, red and blue alike.

All states will struggle to compensate for the carnage Vought vows to inflict on the United States civil service.

The states that will have the best fighting chance of safeguarding continued and competent delivery of vital services will be those with something approaching adequately funded and staffed state and local government. Nevada has never been one of those.

***

A pleasant (if short-lived) surprise. But back to the aforementioned quacks and semi-celebrities… it’s as if Trump has been deliberately debasing his own supporters, nominating obviously outlandish and offensive people to jobs they have no business being anywhere near, for the depraved satisfaction of watching his followers – both those who are elected and those within the electorate – obsequiously go along with whatever he says or does.

Advertisement

Initially it looked as if Republican senators were prepared to surrender unconditionally, and  grovel in submission while Trump insults their intelligence and rubs their noses in it.

So their willingness to tell Trump to shove his nomination of Matt Gaetz you know where, is a fine thing.

So that’s on the bright side.

On the not so bright side… Yes, though it’s a low bar – subterranean, even – Pam Bondi, the person Trump has named to be AG instead of Gaetz, is far more competent than Gaetz. But she’s also no less loyal to Dear Leader, meaning she could be even worse for the nation and the rule of law than Gaetz. And not surprisingly – her being an extreme Trump loyalist and all – she has documented dalliances with corruption (shielding the Trump University grift) and rejecting reality (election denier).

Stay strong, Republican senators,

Advertisement

Portions of this column were originally published in recent editions of the Daily Current newsletter, which is free and which you can subscribe to here.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

NEVADA VIEWS: Lessons from Nevada’s Question 3

Published

on

NEVADA VIEWS: Lessons from Nevada’s Question 3


A majority of Nevada voters rejected Question 3 on the Nov. 5 ballot. This complex amendment would have eliminated party primaries, advanced five candidates to general elections and introduced a new voting method in general elections

I moved to Nevada in 2021 to care for my aging mother. Before that time, I lived in Maine, where I led efforts that opened Maine’s primaries to all voters and protected the nation’s first statewide ranked-choice voting law.

My values and experience inform me that initiatives to change how we elect our leaders should make their way to voters as the result of home-grown and grassroots movements that are thoughtful, collaborative, strategic and patient.

I am dumbfounded that out-of-state donors and advocates would come into Nevada, steamroll stakeholders and potential allies, rush a constitutional amendment to ballot and spend millions to score a quick win for their preferred policy prescription to our political ills.

Advertisement

As a recent Review-Journal editorial noted, the national coalition behind Question 3 pushed similar initiatives in other states in 2024. Voters rejected each of these proposals.

Here are a few of my takeaways from these failed efforts:

■ Mission and strategy must align. Election reform is inherently hopeful and optimistic. Ramming through policy changes and seeking to buy elections are anti-democratic and deeply cynical approaches to politics. Coalitions with antithetical missions and strategies will almost always fail to achieve the real and lasting change that they seek.

■ Patience is practical. Process matters. How change is made can be as important as what change is made, especially when it comes to process reforms. Elections and voting reform initiatives must be organized by local leaders who will build coalitions and recruit volunteers to secure majority support for their cause, one voter and one conversation at a time. The proper role of national groups is not to lead or dictate, but to support.

■ There is no single solution to fix our broken politics. There are 50 states and more than 50 ways of conducting elections and voting in the United States. While policymakers and advocates should learn from one another, we should be skeptical of anyone or any group that promises a silver bullet or pushes a one-size-fits-all solution.

Advertisement

Voters aren’t stupid. We have a sense when politicians and special interests are trying to put one over on us. Question 3 didn’t pass the straight-face test.

That’s too bad because my experience with ranked-choice voting in Maine has taught me that it works to eliminate vote-splitting and ensure majority winners. You have the freedom to vote for the candidate you like best without worrying that your vote will be “wasted” or that you will help to elect the candidate you like least. In both Maine and Alaska, ranked-choice voting has stopped extreme candidates from winning congressional races.

Ranked-choice voting also increases voter turnout, reduces negative campaigning and encourages more women and minorities to run for office.

Surveys from the states and cities in which millions of Americans rank their vote indicate that voters find it to be simple and easy to use and preferable.

One of the most disappointing false attacks on ranked-choice voting is that communities of color might find it difficult to rank candidates. To suggest that white voters are intellectually superior to voters of color is a racist argument.

Advertisement

Nevadans are frustrated with politics as usual. We know that our system isn’t working like it should. We know that billionaires and corporations have too much power and influence over decisions that affect us all. We want to strengthen our democracy for future generations.

Had the national advocates behind Question 3 approached this effort differently, I believe that there might have been a different outcome.

Kyle Bailey moved to Nevada in 2021 and previously served in the Maine House of Representatives.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada high school football championships 2024: How to watch state finals online

Published

on

Nevada high school football championships 2024: How to watch state finals online


The Nevada state high school football championships are here. Here’s how you can watch any of the championship games online on NFHS network.

Watch: Nevada High School football championships

The NIAA state football championships will air from Nov. 23 to Nov. 26 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

How can I watch Nevada high school football? Fans can subscribe to NFHS Sports Network, a nationwide streaming platform for more than 9,000 high school sports. You can find the list of available schools here.

Advertisement

How much does an NFHS subscription cost? Is there a free trial to NFHS Network? An annual subscription costs $79.99, or you can pay monthly for $11.99 per month.

Can you watch NFHS on your phone or TV? NFHS Network is available on smart TVs like Apple TV, Roku, Amazon Fire and Google Chromecast, as well as on iOS and Android smartphones.

Nov. 23:

10 a.m. PT: 2024 NIAA 2A Football Championship Incline Vs. Pershing County

1:30 p.m. PT: 2024 NIAA 5A Div. II Football Championship Faith Lutheran Vs. Bishop Manogue

Advertisement

Nov. 25:

Noon PT: 2024 NIAA 5A Div. III Football Championship Galena Vs. Centennial

Nov. 26:

9 a.m. PT: 2024 NIAA 1A Football Championship Pahranagat Valley Vs. Tonopah

12:20 p.m. PT: 2024 NIAA 3A Football Championship Truckee Vs. SLAM Nevada

Advertisement

3:40 p.m. PT: 2024 NIAA 4A Football Championship Canyon Springs Vs. Mojave

7 p.m. PT: 2024 NIAA 5A Div. I Football Championship Arbor View Vs. Bishop Gorman

Advertisement

Thank you for relying on us to provide the journalism you can trust.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending