Connect with us

Nevada

Public Option Bodes Ill for Nevada Taxpayers and Constitution – Nevada Globe

Published

on

Public Option Bodes Ill for Nevada Taxpayers and Constitution – Nevada Globe


This year, one issue sure to be discussed among citizens and candidates across Nevada is affordable health care. But is a taxpayer-backed health insurance system that will bring higher costs really the solution to Nevada’s challenges?

The answer is no.

Nevada’s so-called “public option” will threaten patients’ access to care while exposing taxpayers to unneeded risk — and state legislators rushed into the idea so quickly that it might not even be legal.

In 2021, Nevada lawmakers pushed through Senate Bill 420 to create the public option despite warnings from health care leaders that it would hurt access and affordability and burden providers.

Advertisement

With the bill moving toward implementation, it is critical for Nevadans to understand that, in addition to the negative consequences SB420 will have for health coverage and care, it was also enacted in violation of the state constitution.

That is why we recently joined together to file a lawsuit challenging SB420. Our lawsuit, which asks the court to stop the implementation of SB420, because it violates three provisions of the Nevada Constitution: the requirement for a two-thirds majority in both chambers of the legislature to pass a bill that increases public revenue, the appropriations clause, and the separation of powers principle. 

While Nevada’s current administration has proposed moving ahead with SB420’s implementation via a market stabilization program, this approach does not change the fundamental problems with the bill and how it was enacted.

As federal regulators consider the state’s proposal to move ahead with this risky, unaffordable new health insurance system, we will continue pursuing our case in court.

Nevadans deserve access to high-quality, affordable health coverage and care — and they also deserve to have their constitutional rights upheld. SB420 fails on both fronts. Nevada can do better.

Advertisement

This opinion editorial is authored by Nevada State Senator Robin Titus (SD-17) and Pete Sepp, President of the National Taxpayers Union.





Source link

Nevada

Terrible’s takeover of Primm gets Nevada regulatory approval

Published

on

Terrible’s takeover of Primm gets Nevada regulatory approval


Nevada regulators have given the green light to Terrible’s takeover of Primm casinos and rest stop operations, averting a closure of the state line enclave.

The Nevada Gaming Control Board and Gaming Commission voted Thursday to grant Terrible’s a non-restricted license to operate the three casinos: Primm Valley Resort, Whiskey Pete’s and Buffalo Bill’s.

Terrible’s reached an agreement with the Primm family, which owns the land, and Affinity Gaming, which had been operating the casinos, to assume operations.

Affinity planned to close the resorts, the Flying J gas station, the Primm Travel Center, and a lottery store in California by July 4. A total of 344 employees would have been terminated, many of whom live in apartments in Primm.

Advertisement

Scott Butera, CEO of Affinity, told regulators in May that business has been declining for years, despite efforts to invest in the resorts with new slot machines and a new digital sign. Only Primm Valley Resort has been operating on a full-time basis in recent months.

The Gaming Control Board said they still had serious concerns about the closures, however, particularly with how it would affect employees.

On Thursday, Tim Herbst, president and CEO of Terrible Herbst, told the Gaming Control Board that the deal to transfer control is unorthodox. He said Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo and Clark County Commissioner Michael Naft reached out to avert the closure and keep the workers employed.

“It all comes down to Nevadans helping Nevadans,” Herbst said.

He said the Primm family and Affinity are still in negotiations regarding what will be left behind, but Terrible’s is ready to assume control of non-gaming assets by July 4.

Advertisement

On Primm’s future, Herbst said he believes the Brightline West train and a supplemental airport would help revitalize the town.

“I think it’s a bright future for the Primm family,” Herbst said. “I think there’s a lot going on there. It may take a little time to figure out the family’s objectives and long-term ranges out there, but I can’t imagine – they’re a smart group of people. I think the state of Nevada and Clark County and the industry will all look favorable about what happens there soon.”

Gaming Control Board member George Assad said the goal was to make sure nobody in Primm lost their job.

“It’s just an example of how we can all move together and move forward and do the right thing,” Assad said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada Secretary of State calls court ruling on Trump election order a ‘big victory’

Published

on

Nevada Secretary of State calls court ruling on Trump election order a ‘big victory’


CARSON CITY, Nev. (KOLO) -Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar is calling a federal court ruling against the Trump administration a “big victory” after a judge struck down a presidential executive order tied to voter “election requirements.”

The ruling blocks an executive order that would have mandated states require voters to provide proof of citizenship to register.

Aguilar said the decision is a recognition that states have the responsibility to run their elections.

“The constitution is very clear in that states have that duty and obligation,” Aguilar said.

Advertisement

Nevada and 18 other states described the ruling as an overwhelming victory in court.

The court also stopped threats to withhold funding from states that refused to comply with proof-of-citizenship requirements and it throws out a demand for states not to count ballots received after Election Day. However the Supreme Court is expected to make a ruling on the latter of the two in the coming days.

Aguilar said the executive orders were intended for partisan gain.

“I think the fact the president is trying to federalize elections shows he’s trying to influence the election, and again that’s wrong,” Aguilar said. “Voters should decide elections, the president should not choose his voters for our elections.”

Aguilar also said the cost to taxpayers if the executive orders had remained in place would have been an unfair burden.

Advertisement

“To hold states hostage from resources I think is detrimental to the overall responsibility of the federal government,” he said.

Copyright 2026 KOLO. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

NV Energy issues PSOM watch for northern, eastern Nevada amid elevated fire weather

Published

on

NV Energy issues PSOM watch for northern, eastern Nevada amid elevated fire weather


NV Energy has issued a Public Safety Outage Management (PSOM) watch for multiple regions in northern and eastern Nevada, warning customers of potential proactive power shutoffs this weekend due to elevated fire weather conditions.

In the Carson City and Genoa areas, a temporary power outage is possible on Saturday, June 27, from approximately 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. The impacted zones include South Carson City/Jacks Valley and South Carson City/Clear Creek.

Meanwhile, a separate 24-hour PSOM watch has been issued further east for parts of Elko County. Residents in East Elko and Spring Creek could experience proactive outages beginning Saturday, June 27, at 10 a.m. through Sunday, June 28, at 10 a.m.

NV Energy officials stated they are actively monitoring local fire weather and will provide regular status updates to affected customers. The utility provider noted that any customers currently experiencing a power outage outside of these designated PSOM zones should report it directly via NV Energy’s online Outage Center.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending