Nevada
Nevada needs election integrity. Who will step up?
To paraphrase the 1960s saying, “suppose they gave a war and nobody came” — suppose we had a November 2024 election and many Nevadans didn’t bother to vote? Or even worse, what if many of those who did don’t accept the results?
Free and fair elections have been the cornerstone of America’s republic. As the saying goes, “We do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.” It’s also been suggested that it’s not the voting that’s democracy — it’s the counting that is.
Questioning election legitimacy for a quarter-century
For most of the U.S.’s 236-year history of presidential elections, the results have been uncontested and the transition of power from one individual or political party to another has been relatively smooth. Lately, not so much.
Concern about the integrity of American elections didn’t just start with Donald Trump’s election in 2016, which opponent Hillary Clinton called “illegitimate,” or the most recent presidential contest in 2020, where President Trump has refused to accept an election defeat. The contemporary tipping point that challenged voting integrity was the 2000 Bush v. Gore Florida vote count. This contested election deepened party polarization over the rules of the game and began the current erosion of trust in the American electoral process.
Growing concerns about the security and inclusiveness of the voting process is deeply dividing Americans. Both major political parties share the blame for this. Politicians representing the two major parties have managed to make matters worse.
Anyone who’s been reading “Memo from the Middle” for the past three years knows I’m not quick to judge one side over the other on most issues. But in the case of the situation surrounding America’s election integrity, I think both political parties are guilty of eroding the public’s trust. It’s a serious matter for the survival of freedom. As Founding Father and second president of the U.S. John Adams warned, “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”
Consequences of a principled stand
If it’s true that America is on the verge of the self-inflicted demise of democracy — then I’d say an “intervention” is needed, and it’s needed now.
Let’s start with the Republicans, my previous party. Their all-but-certain presidential candidate, Donald Trump, has a history of denying the outcome of elections he’s previously lost. Before becoming the GOP nominee in 2016, Trump accused fellow Republican Ted Cruz of stealing the Iowa caucus race he entered, tweeting at the time, “Ted Cruz didn’t win Iowa, he stole it,” and later, “Based on the fraud committed by Sen. Cruz, either a new election should take place or Cruz results nullified.”
The former president went on to win the Republican nomination and the presidency in 2016, losing the popular vote to Hillary Clinton but winning the Electoral College. After his election, he began making claims of fraud more regularly.
“I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally,” he claimed.
Trump then went on to announce to his supporters months before his campaign against Joe Biden, including at Nevada rallies, that “the only way we’re going to lose this election (in 2020) is if the election is rigged.” It’s a belief Trump and his party faithful have maintained to this day, and which prompted the large Capitol Hill protest that got out of hand on Nov. 6, 2020.
No court in the U.S. has substantiated the former president’s allegations of significant voter fraud in 2020, and Nevada’s Secretary of State at the time, Barbara Cegavske — herself a conservative Republican — said after investigating Trump’s charges her office found no evidentiary support for his allegations of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election. Cegavske was subsequently shown the door by the Nevada GOP for the principled stand she took.
What can we agree on?
Presidential candidates of both parties have historically been gracious in accepting electoral defeat. One of the hallmarks of America’s representative democracy has been the smooth transition of power by the two major parties. Today’s polarizing populism, embodied by former President Trump, makes that proposition seem less likely. As author Steven Levitsky has written in “How Democracies Die,” “Democracies may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders — presidents or prime ministers who subvert the very process that brought them to power … More often, though, democracies erode slowly, in barely visible steps.”
A number of those steps have also been taken by the other political party, the Democrats. With the benefit of one-party control of Carson City in 2021, Democrats pushed through election “reforms” that Capitol political observers knew to favor Democrats’ partisan agenda. Cegavske wasn’t consulted, nor was she invited to the table to testify in any meetings. Slam-dunk partisan politics were on full display when Democrats powered through legislation that enshrined mail-in ballots and “ballot harvesting” into law during a special session of the Legislature. Provisions by Cegavske to further regulate voting security were rebuffed in a “legal” or “rigged” manner, depending on your perspective. The nonpartisan magazine Governing reported that the mail-in voting method “tends to favor Democratic candidates.”
Despite the convenience of mail-in ballots, problems are surfacing, as voiced recently by interim Washoe County election chief Cari-Ann Burgess, who told the RGJ, “It’s going to be terrible on our elections,” referring to the U.S. Postal Service’s plans to move mail-sorting operations to Sacramento before ballots are returned to Reno for official counting. Imagine the stink conspiracy-minded individuals are going to make over this not-so-brilliant move.
The one issue insuring voting integrity that you would think most Nevadans would agree on would be voter I.D. And in fact, they do. A poll commissioned by the Nevada Independent in 2023 found that “74% of Nevadans (including 62% of Democrats) supported requiring voters to show identification when they cast their ballot.”
Even so, Democratic leadership in Nevada has vehemently opposed any voter I.D. measures, with Attorney General Aaron Ford saying, “I can tell you this, that this attorney general will not abide by an unconstitutional act like voter ID here in this state.” More than 30 other states have photo ID requirements in their laws, and even former Democratic President Jimmy Carter’s Center has said “requiring a photo ID either for in-person or absentee balloting can be an important safeguard for election integrity, and the Supreme Court has ruled that such a requirement is not unconstitutional.”
Democrats in Nevada have rejected serious debate on the matter. Like Donald Trump, who refuses to accept any electoral outcome other than his “winning big” as a possibility, Democrats appear to want to preserve any political advantage they have — when given the power to do so.
Turn the tide
No constitutional office in Nevada is more important to the nonpartisan integrity of the election process than the Secretary of State. Current Democrat officeholder Cisco Aguilar received the support of many Republicans, and former ones like myself, who endorsed him in the hopes he would act in a nonpartisan way when it came to election integrity in Nevada.
Aguilar and others, both Democrat and Republican, have the chance to demonstrate they can become statesmen, and not mere partisans. Between now and the November election, and especially during the next legislative session, Aguilar in particular has the chance to turn the tide of divisiveness.
Voting should be easy. Cheating should be hard. Nevada can do better. Please send me your thoughts at tahoeboy68@gmail.com.
“Memo from the Middle” is an opinion column written by RGJ columnist Pat Hickey, a member of the Nevada Legislature from 1996 to 2016.
Have your say: How to submit an opinion column or letter to the editor
Nevada
AC problems spike as temps rise; Nevada Legal Services shares what tenants should know
LAS VEGAS (FOX5) — As temperatures rise, FOX5 hears from more viewers dealing with air conditioning problems at home.
For tenants, those issues can quickly turn into questions about safety, repairs and what to do if a landlord doesn’t respond.
Nevada Legal Services said it also sees a spike in tenant complaints when it gets hotter.
Attorneys there said tenants do have rights, but warned that there are certain steps people should take — and others they should avoid — because making the wrong move in Nevada can lead to serious problems.
‘Pretty common, especially in the summer’
John Brogden, a senior attorney with Nevada Legal Services, said air conditioning issues are one of the most frequent problems he sees when the weather heats up.
“It’s pretty common, especially in the summer. We get a lot of air conditioning issues,” Brogden said.
MORE: No AC for 24 days: Las Vegas family reaches out to FOX5 for home warranty help
Brogden said extreme heat in Southern Nevada can put extra stress on homes and apartments, making repairs a common issue this time of year.
Two key categories: habitability vs. essential services
Brogden said Nevada law generally breaks these types of problems into two categories: habitability issues and essential services issues.
“There’s a lot of overlap in the language of the two statutes, but the way that I look at it is essential services,” Brogden said. “It’s something that, without it, that unit’s pretty much uninhabitable… like you would not want to live there.”
He said habitability issues can be problems that still affect a tenant’s ability to live safely in a unit, such as a slow leak coming through the wall.
The difference matters because it can change how a tenant should respond.
Withholding rent can be risky in Nevada
Brogden said one of the first things many people consider is withholding rent, but he warned that can be risky in Nevada.
“In which case, the landlord may or may not fix the issue and the person is out on the street for however long,” Brogden said. “The eviction process here is very quick. It’s not like California.”
For a habitability issue, Brogden said tenants may have to wait 14 days for a landlord to make a reasonable effort to fix the problem.
And if a tenant chooses to withhold rent, Brogden said it is not as simple as just not paying.
“If it’s a habitability issue, they are required to put that money into escrow with the court,” Brogden said. “At the time they file their answer and say, ‘Hey, this is the reason I withheld my rent.’ It’s not that I just don’t want to pay my rent. So, they have to, in good faith, give that money to the court.”
Essential services: 48-hour window (excluding weekends/holidays)
When it comes to an essential service, Brogden said landlords are generally required to take a reasonable step within 48 hours — not including holidays or weekends.
Other options may include paying for certain repairs and deducting the cost from rent or, in some cases, terminating the lease — which can be complicated.
What tenants should do first
Brogden said the first step in either case is to notify the landlord in writing, contacting them using the method outlined in the lease, if available.
He emphasized that every situation is different and whether something counts as a habitability issue or an essential services issue depends on the facts of the case.
Brogden said tenants should get legal advice — including through Nevada Legal Services — before taking action.
Nevada Legal Services warning: Don’t use AI for legal demands
Nevada Legal Services also warned tenants not to rely on AI chatbots to draft legal claims or demands to landlords.
Attorneys said they have been seeing more of that and that chatbots can misstate Nevada law, hurt a tenant’s credibility or create problems later in court.
Copyright 2026 KVVU. All rights reserved.
Nevada
Nevada Lt. Gov. Anthony fined $3K in trans-athlete ethics case
Anthony used staff time, government equipment to promote ‘Protect Women’s Sports’ task force
Trans athletes in college continues to be a hotly debated issue
The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case in its next term about transgender college athletes. That given the issue new political life.
A Nevada ethics panel fined Lt. Gov. Stavros Anthony $3,000 over use of state resources to promote a task force to keep trans athletes out of women’s sports.
Anthony, a Republican, is running for reelection.
The March 18 vote against Anthony was 3 to 2 by the Nevada Commission on Ethics.
In addition to the fine, he’s required to obtain ethics training within 60 days and develop a social media policy for his office.
Anthony created the “Task Force to Protect Women’s Sports” in late 2024 after the Nevada women’s volleyball team made national news by refusing to play San Jose State University for having a transgender player on its team.
“I decided I was very passionate about protecting female athletes,” he testified before the Nevada Legislature in February 2025. “I wanted to support the University of Nevada, Reno volleyball team who came out very courageously on their stand. That is why I created this task force.”
Anthony’s official government X account shared posts about task force events, and staff from the state’s Office of Small Business Advocacy — under Anthony’s authority — sent out emails about the task force. Anthony’s chief of staff testified the task force was not a function of the office.
The ethics commission’s vote served to “admonish the lieutenant governor for his actions in violation of the ethics law,” its motion said.
The Reno Gazette Journal contacted Anthony and his attorney, the ethics commission and Lindsey Harmon, a reproductive rights advocate who made the initial ethics complaint, for comment. None immediately responded.
Stavros Anthony’s defense of his actions
Anthony’s attorneys argued in legal filings that he did not violate any state laws “because there are no statutes, rules, regulations, policies or other authority prohibiting Mr. Anthony from advocating on political issues, supporting political causes, or from forming the Task Force.”
They added he had no financial interest in the task force, and that elected officials should be allowed to advocate for political positions.
“Under such a standard as urged by the Director (Ross Armstrong of the ethics commission), a public officer, for example, speaking at an official function or writing in official correspondence, stating that he or she is passionate about such issues as veterans’ rights or health care could be found to have violated ethics laws,” his attorneys wrote in a filing.
Ethics director’s argument against Anthony
Armstrong responded in a filing that the case was not about being able to advocate for causes one believes in.
“It’s about the undisputed use of specifically allocated taxpayer funds through staff, time, property and equipment on his significant personal interest rather than the government interests of the Office of the Lieutenant Governor and the Office of Small Business Advocacy,” Armstrong wrote. “Doing so violates the Ethics Law.”
He noted that Anthony’s government staff used state email systems to set up and coordinate efforts of the task force, promoted it on their government X feeds, and created talking points, press releases and other materials supporting it.
Armstrong added Anthony “used influence over subordinates to benefit the Task Force.”
Mark Robison is the state politics reporter for the Reno Gazette Journal, with occasional forays into other topics. Email comments to mrobison@rgj.com or comment on Mark’s Greater Reno Facebook page.
Nevada
Southern Nevada Tax Assistance offers free filing help for Latino families this tax season
LAS VEGAS (FOX5) — Tax season is underway, but some Latino families in the Las Vegas area say they have questions and concerns before getting started — and trust is a central part of the conversation this year.
Organizers at Southern Nevada Tax Assistance say their goal is to help families file safely and correctly. But this year, they say they are seeing something different: hesitation.
Hesitation and distrust on the rise
Nonprofit organization Somos Votantes, which focuses on helping Latinos in the community, says it is hearing from more families who are unsure who they can trust when it comes to filing.
“That’s why Southern Nevada Tax Assistance — they’re a group of IRS-certified volunteers,” said Angel Lazcano.
Somos Votantes held a free filing event Wednesday to connect families with trusted, no-cost help. Volunteers said the stress of tax season is something many in the community have long felt.
“Personally, growing up, I’ve always heard how much, how stressful it is around this time of year, especially getting closer and closer to tax day,” one volunteer said.
Ghost preparers a recurring threat
That concern is not new. Connie Buckley, founder of Nevada Tax Assistance, said every year scammers known as ghost preparers target people who may not fully understand the filing process or whose first language may not be English.
“They create fraudulent tax returns. People don’t know what to expect on their taxes, so they don’t know that it’s wrong. And then two or three years later, the IRS sends them a letter that says something’s not right here,” Buckley said.
Fears about sharing personal information
For many Latino families, concerns this year go beyond scams, with some expressing fears about sharing personal information when filing.
Buckley addressed those concerns directly. “The recommendation always is — let me put it this way — when you get your tax forms from your employer, like the W-2s, the 1099s, those are also transmitted to the IRS. So the IRS knows that you made money and they are expecting to see your tax return to reconcile that,” she said.
Buckley also warned that choosing not to file can create larger problems. “If you owe taxes, there are a lot of penalties that they will assess against you, against what you owe. And now you’ve got yourself into an even bigger hole than you would have been in if you just filed your taxes when they were due,” she said.
Organizers say that no matter a person’s status, filing taxes remains important, and they want to make sure families can do it safely. Free tax filing help is available across the Las Vegas Valley for those who need it.
Copyright 2026 KVVU. All rights reserved.
-
Detroit, MI2 days agoDrummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
-
Oklahoma6 days agoFamily rallies around Oklahoma father after head-on crash
-
Nebraska1 week agoWildfire forces immediate evacuation order for Farnam residents
-
Georgia4 days agoHow ICE plans for a detention warehouse pushed a Georgia town to fight back | CNN Politics
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMassachusetts community colleges to launch apprenticeship degree programs – The Boston Globe
-
Alaska5 days agoPolice looking for man considered ‘armed and dangerous’
-
Colorado1 week ago‘It’s Not a Penalty’: Bednar Rips Officials For MacKinnon Ejection | Colorado Hockey Now
-
Southwest1 week agoTalarico reportedly knew Colbert interview wouldn’t air on TV before he left to film it