Connect with us

Nevada

Death Valley opera house and hotel recovers from ‘unprecedented’ storm damage

Published

on

Death Valley opera house and hotel recovers from ‘unprecedented’ storm damage


The remnants of Tropical Storm Hilary didn’t spare the landmark opera house and hotel just outside Death Valley National Park.

It was a historic storm for the historic Amargosa Opera House and Hotel. Unfortunately for the century-old structure in the ghost town of Death Valley Junction, it also wrought historic damage, the property’s management said.

“Absolutely, this is the worst that I’ve ever seen, in terms of just the damage that was caused by the flooding and the mud, and the closure of the hotel as a result,” said Fred Conboy, president of the Board of Directors of the nonprofit Amargosa Opera House Inc. and also the de facto general manager of the property.

“It’s unprecedented,” said Conboy, who first started volunteering with the hotel and opera house in 2001, after meeting Marta Becket, the hotel’s longtime steward and resident performer who died in 2017.

Advertisement

The Amargosa is a long, low-slung, U-shaped adobe building that visitors heading to Death Valley by way of Pahrump see just before they turn on to California State Route 190, the main road into the park from the east. It’s about a 90-mile drive west of Las Vegas.

Hilary’s remnants roared over the Death Valley area Aug. 20, dumping a year’s worth of rain — 2.2 inches — on the park in a single day.

Death Valley National Park itself, which saw widespread damage to its roads, was shut down to visitors and remains closed, as does State Route 190. Park spokesperson Abby Wines said in an email Thursday that officials plan to reopen an entrance on the west side of the park on Oct. 15.

Wines said it’s not yet known when the park entrance on the Death Valley Junction side near the Nevada state line will reopen, and a California Department of Transportation spokesperson said in an email Friday there is no timeline for the road reopening.

“As soon as we have a timeline for when State Route 190 will reopen through to Death Valley Junction, we will share that with the public,” Christopher Andriessen said.

Advertisement

The Amargosa was closed for about three weeks, Conboy said at the reopened hotel Wednesday, but with the national park closed, business is hurting.

“When there is no access to the national park, it means that no one is booking rooms at our hotel,” Conboy said.

Although the property suffered relatively minor damage from three monsoons in 2021 and 2022, the damage from the Aug. 20 rain was far more significant. About 5 inches of rain collected in all of the rooms on the front side of the hotel, leading to a replacement of the carpets in those rooms, he said.

Nine of 15 rooms available to rent were damaged by flooding. Of those damaged rooms, two were also damaged by roof leaks.

About 5 inches of water also flooded the landmark opera house, a sort of desert Sistine Chapel where Becket spent six years painting murals that cover the walls and ceiling. Conboy describes it as a “magic carpet ride into the past.”

Advertisement

Mud caked the floor and some of the floorboards had to be replaced.

But the murals were unscathed, as were the historic art deco seats that were donated from an old theater in Boulder City about 45 years ago.

The downpour also coated the Amargosa’s driveway with a thick layer of mud. The desert sun has since dried it out into a layer of mud cracks, preventing cars from driving in or out on the opera house side. It’s something Conboy said they’ll have to clear out, likely with heavy equipment.

The closure resulted in about $5,000 to $7,000 in lost room revenue, Conboy said. And the total cost to fix everything was about $13,000. The hotel’s bills are about $10,000 to $12,000 a month, and the hotel tries to make about $15,000 a month to offset expenses, Conboy said. All while room bookings have “plummeted” because of the national park shutdown.

“It was an unexpected blow,” Conboy said.

Advertisement

Samantha Brady, a front-desk clerk at the hotel, spoke of something that is evident all over the Amargosa: Becket’s legacy. A dancer, actor, and artist, Becket’s story is intertwined with the opera house and hotel.

Becket took over the property — which formerly housed a collection of offices, employee dorms, and other facilities used by the Pacific Coast Borax Company — after discovering it in the late 1960s when she stopped at the old gas station across the street to have a flat tire fixed.

After transforming the building’s former social hall into the opera house, Becket performed there from 1968 until 2012. Her paintings adorn not only the opera house but the hotel and its rooms.

“I just genuinely love how kind she was and how devoted she was to her art,” said Brady, who is a pianist. “It’s honestly so inspiring to me.”

Jesse Cox, 63, lives in a cottage behind the hotel and does maintenance work there. He is Death Valley Junction’s only full-time resident, having lived there since 2010.

Advertisement

“I do like the quiet,” Cox said. “I do like the being away from the metropolis, the noise, the hubbub.”

It’s the effort to remain sustainable while preserving the history of Death Valley Junction as well as Becket’s legacy that is the long-term goal, Conboy said.

In addition to revenue from the hotel and opera house, which will host a wedding on Nov. 3 and a performance by the Seattle-based Tango Cowboys on Nov. 4, Amargosa also receives gifts and funding from individual donors as well as grants from government and foundations, Conboy said.

Now, he said, the hope is to find an investor or investors who would help overhaul and renovate the building and its infrastructure, even perhaps manage the hotel, while still allowing for Becket’s art and vision to live on.

“We want to create enough revenue and enough income to stay ahead of all the day-to-day expenses, but having said that, we’re looking for a transformational leap at this point,” Conboy said.

Advertisement

Contact Brett Clarkson at bclarkson@reviewjournal.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nevada

Motorcyclist identified in deadly south Las Vegas Valley crash

Published

on

Motorcyclist identified in deadly south Las Vegas Valley crash


LAS VEGAS, Nev. (FOX5) – A 68-year-old man died days after a south Las Vegas Valley crash, police said.

According to Nevada Highway Patrol, police responded to a crash on Friday, May 2, around 2:40 a.m. at southbound I-15 near mile marker 28.

Police said the rider of a black Honda VT750 Shadow motorcycle rode on I-15 south. The motorcyclist reportedly failed to stay in their lane.

The rider entered the right paved shoulder and hit the St. Rose Parkway overpass.

Advertisement

The motorcycle overturned and stopped on it’s left side.

Officials identified the rider as Timothy Edward Muniz. He was taken to the hospital where he died a little over a week later.

NHP says the death marks the 29th traffic related fatality for this year.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Stacey Dooley reveals she took her baby daughter to brothel in Nevada to film documentary about prostitution as she jokes: ‘She’ll be open minded if nothing else!’

Published

on

Stacey Dooley reveals she took her baby daughter to brothel in Nevada to film documentary about prostitution as she jokes: ‘She’ll be open minded if nothing else!’


Stacey Dooley has revealed she took her baby daughter to a brothel in Nevada, while she was filming a documentary about prostitution in the United States.

In the latest series of Stacey Dooley Sleeps Over USA, the presenter, 38, visited the oldest legal brothel in Nevada, the Mustang Ranch, to explore the lives of sex workers in the States.

But she has now revealed that her daughter, Minnie, came along for the visit, when she was just eight-months-old, joking ‘it sounds like a comedy sketch’.

Stacey recalled the story at the Hay Literary Festival in Wales, during a panel with journalist Emma Barnett, where she discussed how she juggled balancing motherhood and work.

Advertisement

The broadcaster explained that she brings her little girl, who she shares with boyfriend Kevin Clifton, along with her for filming – including to the more unusual locations.

From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail’s new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.

Stacey Dooley has revealed she took her baby daughter to a brothel in Nevada , while she was filming a documentary about prostitution in the United States (seen with daughter)

In the latest series of Stacey Dooley Sleeps Over USA, the presenter, 38, visited the oldest legal brothel in Nevada, the Mustang Ranch, to explore the lives of sex workers in the States (seen)

In the latest series of Stacey Dooley Sleeps Over USA, the presenter, 38, visited the oldest legal brothel in Nevada, the Mustang Ranch, to explore the lives of sex workers in the States (seen)

Advertisement

According to The Telegraph, she admitted: ‘There’s nowhere that child hasn’t been. When she was eight months we had this gig in the diary to go to the States to make a documentary about this legal brothel in Nevada. 

‘I’d sort of signed the contract and was like: oh, she’ll be eight months, that’ll be fine. Anyway, the trip comes, and I’m nowhere near comfortable leaving her so I take my eight-month-old child to this brothel in Nevada.

‘I have to ask the sheriff for special permission, because she’s under 18. It sounds like a comedy sketch, but it’s legit!’

Stacey explained that she had to rent a trailer for Minnie to stay in with dad Kevin and that the little girl would watch out the window while she was filming.

She hilariously recalled that when she returned to the trailer to breastfeed, the prostitutes at the brothel would greet her daughter with: ‘Morning Miss Minnie!’

Advertisement

The presenter quipped: ‘I’m like: she’ll be open minded if nothing else!’ 

In March, Stacey released a book called Dear Minnie, in which she wrote a heartfelt letter to her now two-year-old.

In the letter, she detailed the moment she realised she was expecting back in 2022, after taking a pregnancy test in the Selfridges toilet. 

But she has now revealed that her daughter, Minnie, came along for the visit, when she was just eight-months-old, joking 'it sounds like a comedy sketch' (seen with Minnie and Kevin)

But she has now revealed that her daughter, Minnie, came along for the visit, when she was just eight-months-old, joking ‘it sounds like a comedy sketch’ (seen with Minnie and Kevin)

She welcomed first child Minnie with professional dancer Kevin, 42, in January 2023, the pair fell for each other while competing on Strictly Come Dancing together in 2018 (pictured)

She welcomed first child Minnie with professional dancer Kevin, 42, in January 2023, the pair fell for each other while competing on Strictly Come Dancing together in 2018 (pictured)

Advertisement

She welcomed first child Minnie with professional dancer Kevin, 42, in January 2023, the pair fell for each other while competing on Strictly Come Dancing together in 2018.

Last month, Stacey admitted that her and Kevin’s sex life has taken a backseat since their daughter started sleeping in their bed. 

But she insisted she wasn’t bothered by the arrangement and poked fun about her lack of alone time with Kevin by quipping: ”We need to start remembering how to have sex.’

Kevin is currently touring the country as Billy Flynn in Chicago The Musical, with the tour running until August. 

But Stacey has no plans to change her bedtime routine before his return, as she loves having Minnie by her side overnight.

Advertisement

She explained: ‘Minnie is in our bed. I am sort of not really a***d. I know there’s such emphasis on getting kids in their own bed, but I think it’s because Kev is away so much anyway. 

‘What am I doing otherwise? Maybe when Kev is back on the scene, we will start remembering how you have sex. 

‘Then maybe I would think, “Minnie, you’re going to have to go and hang out in your own bedroom now”.’

Last month, Stacey admitted that her and Kevin's sex life has taken a backseat since their daughter started sleeping in their bed (pictured last year)

Last month, Stacey admitted that her and Kevin’s sex life has taken a backseat since their daughter started sleeping in their bed (pictured last year)

For now, Stacey is cherishing every moment with her little girl and even doesn't mind going to bed at 8pm to avoid disrupting Minnie's routine

 For now, Stacey is cherishing every moment with her little girl and even doesn’t mind going to bed at 8pm to avoid disrupting Minnie’s routine

Advertisement

For now, Stacey is cherishing every moment with her little girl and even doesn’t mind going to bed at 8pm to avoid disrupting Minnie’s routine. 

She shared on the Parenting Hell podcast with comedians Rob Beckett and Josh Widdicombe: ‘Of an evening we’ll have something to eat, then I’ll put her in the bath. 

‘We have a bit of a chat, put her PJ’s on and we just end up getting in my bed together. 

‘We watch one episode of Paddington then go to sleep. I am going to bed early, at 8pm. I love it, honestly!’ 

Minnie started getting used to sleeping with one of her grandmothers last year when they babysat while Stacey made her stage debut in 2:22 A Ghost Story in the West End.

Advertisement

Stacey added: ‘Now she is so used to being taken to bed – in a double bed – and having someone to sleep with. It was my mum or Kev’s mum and they were going to bed at 8 o’clock, too.’ 



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Locals oppose 'insane' plan to sell 500K acres of public lands for housing in Nevada and Utah

Published

on

Locals oppose 'insane' plan to sell 500K acres of public lands for housing in Nevada and Utah


Nevada’s congressional delegation, environmental groups, tribes and local officials see the late-night amendment to House Republicans’ budget reconciliation bill as a threat to the state’s water resources, tribal sovereignty and public engagement.

By Wyatt Myskow for Inside Climate News


For years, Nevada’s congressional delegation and leading Las Vegas officials have been pushing Congress to pass the Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act, which would allow tens of thousands of acres of public lands currently managed by the federal government to be sold at auction to cities and developers looking for space to expand.

So Republicans on the House Natural Resources Committee might have expected some applause when the committee passed a late-night amendment to the budget reconciliation bill that would do just that.

Advertisement

But the amendment, intended to help the federal government afford the Trump administration’s tax cuts, had none of the existing bill’s stipulations to benefit Nevadans and conserve other areas. Instead of accolades, it has drawn the ire of nearly every group backing the Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act. They have called the amendment a “land giveaway” to developers.

Reps. Mark Amodei (R-NV) and Celeste Maloy (R-UT) added amendments to the budget reconciliation bill just before midnight last Tuesday that would sell more than half a million acres of public land in Nevada and Utah for housing development in the two states. Opponents say the amendments would fuel unsustainable growth across Nevada and southern Utah that would not provide affordable housing, but would threaten tribal sovereignty by disposing of public lands bordering the Pyramid Lake Paiute Reservation, take more water out of the already declining Colorado River and set a path for the federal government to begin the sell-off of public lands across the country.

The amendment for Nevada would pave the way for the development of thousands of acres up to the boundaries of national monuments Avi Kwa Ame and Gold Butte, in addition to the Pyramid Lake Reservation.

A motorist enters the Gold Butte National Monument in April 2024 in Bunkerville, Nevada.

“Our two states are the test case,” said Mathilda Miller, the government relations director for Native Voters Alliance Nevada. “If this land grab goes through quietly, they’ll use the same exact playbook somewhere else. The amendment was dropped at midnight. It was dropped in a massive budget bill. And it was rushed through without meaningful public input. If they can do that near Avi Kwa Ame, Gold Butte and the boundaries of Pyramid Lake, then they can and they will do it to somebody else’s homelands.”

Amodei and Maloy, the amendment sponsors, did not respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement

Amodei told the Nevada Independent that he felt adding the amendment to the budget reconciliation bill was the only way to achieve the goals of the various Nevada lands bills, and that the House committee was excited about making money off sales of public lands.

“Not all federal lands have the same value,” Maloy said during the committee meeting before the bill advanced. “Some should not be available for disposal. We all agree on that. However, in both Democratic and Republican administrations, for decades, we’ve been disposing of appropriate lands in a manner that’s consistent with what I propose to do here.”

It’s the latest in attempts by some Republicans to transfer control of public lands managed by the federal government to states, a highly divisive political stance in the West, where most of those lands are located. Attempts to privatize public lands or give them to states date back decades, with the movements gaining momentum in the 1970s and 80s during the so-called “sagebrush rebellion.” The Trump administration and some Republicans in Congress have touted public-lands sales as a solution to the country’s housing shortage, but experts have disputed that claim. Even some Republican members of Congress have pushed back on recent attempts to sell off federal lands.

“We are not dealing with the same type of sagebrush rebel that we were dealing with in the 1970s,” said Kyle Roerink, the executive director of the Great Basin Water Network, a grassroots group that works in Nevada and Utah on freshwater issues and has opposed previous land bills. “The sagebrush rebels of today don’t drive cattle. They drive Porsches and Mercedes.”

“This continuous growth that we see year after year, day after day, decade after decade, does nothing to help preserve our souls, preserve our feelings and preserve the culture,” said Steven Wadsworth, chairman of the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe, during a press conference.

Advertisement
NevadaUtahLandSelloff1040px.png

The proposed sell-off in Utah has drawn less scrutiny than the disposal of public lands in Nevada has, though environmental groups also oppose sales there. The bill would allow public lands to be sold for development in southern Utah, primarily for the fast-growing city of St. George.

But that land follows the pathway of the planned Lake Powell pipeline, a decades-long and highly controversial attempt by Utah to pipe water from the dwindling Colorado River’s second-largest reservoir, which is roughly 33 percent full, to fuel growth in the state. Attempts to build the pipeline in the past have drawn intense scrutiny from both environmentalists and other states that depend on Colorado River water.

“It’s just another signifier that nobody actually wants to respect the signs that Mother Nature is sending to us, and that’s that our snowfalls are changing, our precipitation patterns are changing, our runoffs are changing,” Roerink said. “But we have people who want to continue doing business like it’s 1999 and everything’s peachy, and the reservoirs are full.”

The bill will be considered by the full House of Representatives in the coming weeks.

Public lands are managed by the federal government for the benefit of all Americans, allowing for the creation of national parks and wilderness areas, and for extraction of resources by logging, mining and energy companies. But in some cases, they can be disposed of—meaning sold—typically to developers for housing or extraction projects.


Related | Rural populations near federal lands worry job cuts will hurt their communities

Advertisement

Growth in Las Vegas, for example, has long relied on bills that dispose of public lands to expand, as the federal government owns roughly 85 percent of the land within the state’s borders, far more than in any other state. But those bills had conservation requirements, and the funds generated by the land sales were earmarked for conservation and local schools. The latest Clark County lands bill—the Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act—would also give land back to the Moapa Band of Paiutes and provide further protection for other public lands in Nevada.

Money from the sale of public lands authorized by the new amendment would go to the U.S. Treasury, rather than to local communities.

While Amodei’s amendment to sell off public lands in Nevada pulls from existing land bill proposals, it leaves out the conservation components. In a statement, U.S. Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), who proposed the Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act, called Amodei’s amendment “an insane plan that cuts funding from water conservation and public schools across Nevada.”

“This is a land grab to fund Republicans’ billionaire giveaway tax bill, and I’ll fight it with everything I have,” she said.

Even Clark County, home to Las Vegas, which would be a major beneficiary of the amendment, opposes it. Jennifer Cooper, a spokeswoman for the county, said in a statement that county officials “are concerned that this bill does not reflect the [Clark County Commission’s] priorities to facilitate responsible future development, especially as it relates to environmental conservation, water and public infrastructure.”

Advertisement

Related | Your camping plans may be kaput as Trump targets national parks


The Nevada Wildlife Federation has supported Nevada lands bills in the past, but opposes Amodei’s amendment. “You get all the land sales and nothing to secure that wildlife conservation in the future,” said Russell Kuhlman, executive director of the nonprofit organization. “So now we essentially lost our bargaining chip, right? Why would developers who now have what they want out of the deal come back to the table to discuss conservation?”

Not every environmental group in Nevada has supported land bills in the past. OIivia Tanager, the director of the Sierra Club’s Toiyabe Chapter, said the Clark County bill has divided Nevada’s environmental groups, with her group, the Great Basin Water Network and the Center for Biological Diversity opposing it.

There are no guarantees in either the lands bills or Amodei’s amendment that housing developed on disposed public lands will actually be affordable. On top of that, building on public lands, often in remote areas away from major urban centers, like the lands proposed near Las Vegas, would expand sprawl, forcing more people to commute long distances to and from work, Tanager said. That means more air pollution in communities of color or low-income areas along congested highways, on top of disruptions to wildlife, increasing water demand in an arid region and the buildout of more energy infrastructure to power homes—likely in the form of natural gas plants that increase ratepayers’ bills, she said.

“I hope this is the dawn of a new day,” Tanager said of the opposition to Amodei’s amendment, “where we all come together and refuse to sell off our public lands for corporate greed and at the expense of communities across the entire state of Nevada, but also across the country.”

Advertisement

Campaign Action



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending