Connect with us

Nevada

COMMENTARY: Rent control would be bad for Nevada

Published

on

COMMENTARY: Rent control would be bad for Nevada


As Nevada legislators tackle crucial state issues during the 2025 legislative session, we can’t help but reflect on the words of John F. Kennedy, who said: “Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer.” We are hopeful that Nevada legislators will do what we, as Nevadans, always do — and what sets us apart from the rhetoric in Washington D.C.: come together to pass bipartisan solutions for the good of all Nevadans.

Nevada, particularly our largest population hubs of Las Vegas, Henderson and Reno, has seen a steady influx of new residents due to a number of factors, including California emigration and economic diversification. But this economic and population growth doesn’t come without its challenges — and one that tops that list is housing.

Nevada has a housing supply and demand problem. Population growth and migration have been outpacing construction, straining prices and making access to the American dream of owning one’s own home out of reach for many. In recent years, the issue of rent control has become a divisive topic across the United States, and Nevada is no exception.

Economic theory on rent control has been nearly unanimous over the past 100 years. Empirical evidence and modeling across the political spectrum expose rent control as a destructive public policy that discourages investment, decreases property tax, harms mom-and-pop landlords, leads to property deterioration and results in fewer housing options overall. As a result, more than two-thirds of the states prohibit rent control.

Advertisement

In November, California voters rejected a statewide rent-control ballot initiative for a third time. Even Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, said, “The data shows that overly aggressive rent control can actually hurt the economy and reduce the housing stock we need.” Cities such as St. Paul, Minnesota, have repealed rent control, hoping to spark the kind of growth and reinvestment Massachusetts experienced after doing the same.

In Massachusetts, after rent control was repealed, developer investments increased by 45 percent. This resulted not only in the construction of homes, but of the surrounding infrastructure generating the subsequent impact fees that pay to pave roads, create parks and build schools.

As Nevadans grapple with the housing affordability crisis, it is crucial to approach this issue with a bipartisan mindset. By working together, regardless of political affiliation, lawmakers, community leaders and stakeholders can develop policies that address the root causes of the problem rather than relying on flawed policies such as rent control that may sound good but have devastating unintended consequences.

Ultimately, the housing crisis in Nevada is a complex challenge that requires nuanced and collaborative solutions. Rent control may offer a temporary sense of relief for a select few, but its long-term consequences could hinder the state’s economic growth and exacerbate housing shortages. Nevada’s leaders can tackle this issue head-on, crafting policies that promote affordability, protect vulnerable populations and ensure a thriving housing market for generations to come.

We both love Southern Nevada and want to see all who live and work here thrive. Rent control only stifles communities. To preserve the flourishing spirit of Las Vegas, Henderson and the entire state of Nevada, it is our hope that state legislators will come together to alleviate our housing issues without entertaining the already proven failed policy of rent control.

Advertisement

Shelley Berkley, a Democrat, is the mayor of Las Vegas. Michelle Romero, a Republican, is the mayor Henderson and chairwoman of the Nevada League of Cities.



Source link

Nevada

Court OK’s counting late-arriving mail ballots in Nevada, 29 other states

Published

on

Court OK’s counting late-arriving mail ballots in Nevada, 29 other states


LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — Nevada’s laws allowing the counting of mail-in ballots that arrive up to four days after Election Day — so long as they are postmarked by that date — is constitutional under a Monday ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a 5-4 ruling, justices upheld a challenge to a Mississippi law that’s similar to Nevada’s statute. Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts joined with the court’s three liberal members, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Katanji Brown Jackson, to uphold the law.

Conservatives Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch dissented.

The ruling affects 30 states, all of which allow some ballots received after Election Day to be counted. That includes Nevada, which allows ballots postmarked by Election Day to be received and counted up to four days later, and ballots without a postmark to be received and counted up to three days later.

Advertisement

Plaintiffs in the case — including the Republican National Committee and the Mississippi Republican Party — had contended that federal laws referring to “elections” mean both the casting and counting of ballots, which they said must occur on Election Day.

“The federal election-day statutes do not preempt Mississippi’s law because the defining element of an ‘election’ has always been the electorate’s choice of candidate,” the case summary reads. “And a related federal statute — the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act — confirms that while federal law dictates when ballots must be cast, state law governs when they must be received.”

In Nevada, critics have contended that late-arriving ballots erode confidence in elections, because they delay learning final election results for days and, in some close races, can change the outcome.

Gov. Joe Lombardo has called the weeklong wait for final, unofficial results “a national embarrassment.”

Plaintiffs in the case made similar arguments, but were turned away by the court: “Finally, plaintiffs policy arguments about election integrity and voter confidence are properly addressed to legislatures, not courts,” the case summary reads.

Advertisement

Several attempts to require ballots to be received by Election Day have been introduced in Nevada’s Legislature, but none have been successful in the Democratically controlled body.

Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar has argued that the overwhelming majority of ballots are in and counted by Election Day, and only the closest races may be changed by late-arriving ballots. He’s advocated for more resources for county clerks and voter registrars to be able to count mail ballots more quickly.

Under the ruling, nothing will change for Nevada voters going to the polls in four months to vote in the November election. But officials still encourage voters to send in their mail ballots early, or to put them in drop boxes at voting centers during early voting or on Election Day.

Supreme Court upholds late-arriving mail ballots in Mississippi

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

One dead, four hospitalized after head-on crash on I-15 in Clark County

Published

on

One dead, four hospitalized after head-on crash on I-15 in Clark County


LAS VEGAS (FOX5) — Nevada Highway Patrol responded to a two-vehicle crash on Interstate 15 near mile marker 94 Sunday evening.

The crash was reported at 6:43 p.m. on June 28.

MORE ON FOX5: Driver sustains life-threatening injuries in Las Vegas multi-vehicle crash

A passenger sedan and a pickup truck were involved in the crash. One vehicle was traveling southbound, lost control, crossed through the median, and struck the other vehicle head-on in the northbound travel lane.

Advertisement

One adult male died at the scene. Two people were transported by ground ambulance, and two others were transported by life flight to a local hospital.

Road closures

All northbound I-15 travel lanes were closed at mile marker 94, but have since opened as of Sunday night.

Nevada Highway Patrol said further information will be provided following the preliminary investigation.

Copyright 2026 KVVU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Officials elevate response efforts to combat eastern Nevada wildfires

Published

on

Officials elevate response efforts to combat eastern Nevada wildfires












Advertisement





Officials elevate response efforts to combat eastern Nevada wildfires | Local Nevada | Local























Advertisement





Advertisement