Connect with us

Nevada

28 percent of Nevada’s budget at risk with federal cuts

Published

on

28 percent of Nevada’s budget at risk with federal cuts


Nevada’s largest share of funding comes from the federal government, and with efforts to curb spending in Washington, D.C., those pending cuts could affect programs in the Silver State.

A Nevada nonpartisan policy research center released a report last week detailing how much federal funding the Silver State receives and the programs it covers, raising questions about programs’ sustainability.

The Kenny Guinn Center for Policy Priorities found that 27.7 percent of Nevada’s 2023-2025 funding came from federal sources, or roughly $14.8 billion out of the $53.4 billion state budget.

Most of those federal dollars support programs within the Department of Health and Human Services. About 65 percent of the department’s budget goes to the state and federally funded Medicaid program, which provides coverage to nearly 822,000 Nevadans, according to the report.

Advertisement

Federal funding also supports at least 40 percent of the budgets for other state agencies, including the Department of Agriculture and Veterans Services. Federally-funded programs include the children’s health insurance program Nevada Check Up and the Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer Program, which provides food to approximately 310,000 children during summer months.

The report’s authors conclude that changes at the federal level to funding received by state and local agencies present a challenge to Nevada policymakers over the continuation of the programs that rely on federal funding.

President Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans have prioritized cutting federal spending to curb the nation’s $1.8 trillion deficit and make room for extending Trump’s tax cuts and enacting his other policy proposals.

Already Nevada has seen some impacts, including cuts to funds for food banks, the announced closure of a health service office for rural Native Americans, and the planned move of a Social Security Administration office into a federal space.

A Medicaid expansion program in Nevada could also be on the chopping block.

Advertisement

A House Republican budget plan directs the House Energy and Commerce Committee — which oversees Medicaid — to find ways to cut the federal deficit by at least $880 billion over the next decade. Though Republicans said they have no intention of cutting Medicaid, Democrats claim it would be impossible to meet that $880 billion goal without cutting the service that provides free health care to low-income people.

Other budget proposals from Congressional Republicans call for between $1 billion and $2 trillion in cuts.

What could happen to Nevada programs if federal funds wane?

Legislators recently passed the halfway point of Nevada’s 120-day legislative session, where they’ve been hearing bills that may require additional funds that the state may not have the ability to spend if federal cuts go through.

Nevada lawmakers could meet again for a special session if Republicans in Congress successfully implement the cuts, according to Senate Majority Leader Nicole Cannizzaro.

Advertisement

“The hard reality is that if these cuts happen, the Governor will be calling the Legislature into special session later this year to present his plan to kick people off their health care and cut services for working families, seniors, students, and people who need food assistance,” Cannizzaro, D-Las Vegas, said in a statement.

She urged Nevada Republicans to speak out against the administration’s plans and stop the cuts before they’re enacted.

Senate Minority Leader Robin Titus, R-Wellington, thinks a special session can be avoided.

The state has known these cuts could be coming, since Trump campaigned on them, she said. Titus and other legislators have spent the session looking at additional funding requests and which ones are the most necessary while making sure agencies spend all the money appropriated to them through the American Rescue Plan Act.

Nevada will see an impact with federal cuts, but it is prepared to cover programs affected that are necessary through the state’s Rainy Day Fund, Titus said.

Advertisement

“We don’t want kids to go hungry; we don’t want people to go without health care, and the people that are truly in need of these services, we’re going to figure out how we can take care of these folks,” she said.

Nevada’s Rainy Day Fund, which is projected to reach $1.6 billion by the end of the 2025 to 2027 biennium, would cover three months of operating expenditures if Nevada’s revenues were a net-zero. The financial reserve can be tapped into during revenue shortfalls, unexpected deficits or if the Nevada Legislature deems appropriate. Funding in the account can’t exceed 26 percent of operating appropriations, and any allocation would be one-time appropriation.

Contact Jessica Hill at jehill@reviewjournal.com. Follow @jess_hillyeah on X.

A report from the Guinn Center found nearly 28 percent of Nevada’s budget comes from federal funds and provides support for health and human services programs. With looming cuts, legislators may have to meet to deal with a smaller budget.

Advertisement



Source link

Nevada

Court OK’s counting late-arriving mail ballots in Nevada, 29 other states

Published

on

Court OK’s counting late-arriving mail ballots in Nevada, 29 other states


LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — Nevada’s laws allowing the counting of mail-in ballots that arrive up to four days after Election Day — so long as they are postmarked by that date — is constitutional under a Monday ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a 5-4 ruling, justices upheld a challenge to a Mississippi law that’s similar to Nevada’s statute. Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts joined with the court’s three liberal members, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Katanji Brown Jackson, to uphold the law.

Conservatives Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch dissented.

The ruling affects 30 states, all of which allow some ballots received after Election Day to be counted. That includes Nevada, which allows ballots postmarked by Election Day to be received and counted up to four days later, and ballots without a postmark to be received and counted up to three days later.

Advertisement

Plaintiffs in the case — including the Republican National Committee and the Mississippi Republican Party — had contended that federal laws referring to “elections” mean both the casting and counting of ballots, which they said must occur on Election Day.

“The federal election-day statutes do not preempt Mississippi’s law because the defining element of an ‘election’ has always been the electorate’s choice of candidate,” the case summary reads. “And a related federal statute — the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act — confirms that while federal law dictates when ballots must be cast, state law governs when they must be received.”

In Nevada, critics have contended that late-arriving ballots erode confidence in elections, because they delay learning final election results for days and, in some close races, can change the outcome.

Gov. Joe Lombardo has called the weeklong wait for final, unofficial results “a national embarrassment.”

Plaintiffs in the case made similar arguments, but were turned away by the court: “Finally, plaintiffs policy arguments about election integrity and voter confidence are properly addressed to legislatures, not courts,” the case summary reads.

Advertisement

Several attempts to require ballots to be received by Election Day have been introduced in Nevada’s Legislature, but none have been successful in the Democratically controlled body.

Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar has argued that the overwhelming majority of ballots are in and counted by Election Day, and only the closest races may be changed by late-arriving ballots. He’s advocated for more resources for county clerks and voter registrars to be able to count mail ballots more quickly.

Under the ruling, nothing will change for Nevada voters going to the polls in four months to vote in the November election. But officials still encourage voters to send in their mail ballots early, or to put them in drop boxes at voting centers during early voting or on Election Day.

Supreme Court upholds late-arriving mail ballots in Mississippi

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

One dead, four hospitalized after head-on crash on I-15 in Clark County

Published

on

One dead, four hospitalized after head-on crash on I-15 in Clark County


LAS VEGAS (FOX5) — Nevada Highway Patrol responded to a two-vehicle crash on Interstate 15 near mile marker 94 Sunday evening.

The crash was reported at 6:43 p.m. on June 28.

MORE ON FOX5: Driver sustains life-threatening injuries in Las Vegas multi-vehicle crash

A passenger sedan and a pickup truck were involved in the crash. One vehicle was traveling southbound, lost control, crossed through the median, and struck the other vehicle head-on in the northbound travel lane.

Advertisement

One adult male died at the scene. Two people were transported by ground ambulance, and two others were transported by life flight to a local hospital.

Road closures

All northbound I-15 travel lanes were closed at mile marker 94, but have since opened as of Sunday night.

Nevada Highway Patrol said further information will be provided following the preliminary investigation.

Copyright 2026 KVVU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Officials elevate response efforts to combat eastern Nevada wildfires

Published

on

Officials elevate response efforts to combat eastern Nevada wildfires












Advertisement





Officials elevate response efforts to combat eastern Nevada wildfires | Local Nevada | Local























Advertisement





Advertisement