Montana
When will it count? Cascade County’s Nov. 7 election results still in limbo
Nearly three weeks after all the votes were cast, and a week beyond a Montana-mandated deadline, the results of the Nov. 7 municipal elections in Cascade County still remain uncertified.
The impasse threatens to draw a rebuke from the Secretary of State’s Office and has already focused more unwanted attention of dysfunction within the Cascade County Elections Office and tensions between Cascade County commissioners.
By state law, counties across Montana are required to certify and submit their election results no later than 14-days after the conclusion of an election. That deadline expired on Nov. 21, and at this point is seems unlikely that the final election certification process will be completed before Tuesday, Nov. 28.
The most recent delay came Wednesday night on the eve of the Thanksgiving holiday. As most people were hurriedly making their way home, Cascade County Commissioners and Elections Office staff remained in commission chambers laboriously tabulating precinct returns by hand.
What happened at Nov. 22 election canvas in commission chambers?
The process began at 3:30 p.m. and lasted close to six hours but remains incomplete. The meeting was attended by a standing-room only crowd who watched as commissioners silently tabulated the election results. It was roughly equivalent to watching a board of tax preparers sift through itemized deductions, and as the night pressed on, more and more of the observers drifted away.
Sometime after 9 p.m. commissioners passed a motion to table a final vote to certify the election results until discrepancies between reports from the Cascade County Elections Office and the Secretary of State’s Office could be resolved.
“Looking at (the Secretary of State’s) report and comparing it to the tabulator machine results for the town of Belt and the town of Cascade – the numbers of ballots received did not match,” explained Commissioner Rae Grulkowski. “Commissioner Briggs made a motion to table until the Secretary of State’s Office could be reached to conclude why those numbers were different.”
The problems certifying the results of the municipal elections that took place three weeks ago is only the latest iteration of the controversy that has plagued the Cascade County Election Office since last May.
In the past, certifying elections in Cascade County has been fairly routine. Commissioners were presented with a detailed overview of the election’s results by the election administrator and given the opportunity to dig in and inspect the numbers from individual voting districts to look for any inconsistencies. They were not asked to hand tabulate dozens of pages of results and match them against machine count totals.
“Normally you would see it by precinct,” said former Cascade County commissioner Jane Weber of the canvass. “This is how many voters were eligible, this is how many ballots were sent. This is how many ballots that were returned as undeliverable, this is how many ballots were returned as voted, these are how many votes cast for each candidate.”
On Wednesday, commissioners were presented three folders, each containing dozens of pages of precinct results.
“We’ve done a little bit in the past just to check,” Webber added, “but not pages and pages of that. It never happened like that before, never.”
“In these packets are our machine results, and from those results we tally for ourselves each precinct,” Elections Administrator Sandra Merchant told commissioners at the Wednesday meeting. “What we’re looking at is doing our own tallies as law would dictate and coming to a matching conclusion as a board.”
“Why are we writing down here what we already have?” Commissioner Jim Larson asked.
“We’re verifying,” Grulkowski responded. “We’ve got to do this same process that she (Merchant) has completed. Each board member does that.”
“Well this is something new,” Larson said. “It was explained to us that we don’t have to repeat what’s already here.”
While all votes are machine counted following closing of the polls on election night, those results do not become official until the Elections Office has cross-referenced them against individual precinct returns and then presented its conclusions to the county commissioners for a final review referred to as a “canvass.” The last step is for commissioners to certify the results, at which point they become official.
“The canvass is a process that ensures the number of ballots voted are the number of ballots counted, and that no ballots are missing or counted more than once,” the Montana Secretary of State’s Office explains.
Originally planned for Nov. 20, the municipal election canvass meeting was put on hold when commissioners Joe Briggs and Jim Larson refused to certify the election results. According to county attorney Josh Racki, the Nov. 20 meeting would have likely violated Montana open meeting laws because the public hadn’t been given enough notice.
About Montana’s open meeting laws
Montana’s open meeting laws are based on two fundamental rights contained in Montana’s Constitution; the public’s right to know and the right of citizens to participate in their government. State law demands that government agencies at all levels “develop procedures for permitting and encouraging the public to participate in agency decisions.”
Montana’s open meeting laws contain no specific notice requirement. Instead, they only demand agencies “ensure adequate notice and assist public participation before a final agency action is taken that is of significant interest to the public.”
Racki told KRTV news that for the last 18-20 years it has been the policy in Cascade County that the notice of a meeting be made public at least 48 business hours prior to the meeting coming to order. Weekends don’t count.
The notice for the proposed Nov. 20 meeting was posted late Friday afternoon, 24-hours too late to meet Cascade County’s well established open meetings policy.
After learning of the meeting’s schedule, Briggs and Larson declared they would not attend the Monday meeting because it violated the law. Without the two commissioners, Monday’s meeting would have lacked a quorum, and could therefore not certify the election results. The canvass meeting was then postponed until Wednesday, Nov. 22 to meet open meeting law requirements – and has been postponed once again to resolve discrepancies between the Secretary of State’s ballot count against those of the Cascade County Election Office.
Grulkowski, the commissioner who is serving as the chairperson, blamed the impasse on miscommunication with an office staffer for the meeting’s late scheduling.
“It was a long night and I don’t think any of us enjoyed that,” Grulkowski said of the Nov. 22 canvass meeting. “The Board of Canvassers is a work session, it’s not just a meeting. We have to actually do work.”
The failure to certify the Nov. 7 election results is indicative of a broader divide within and among Cascade County Commissioners. All three commissioners identify as Republican, yet there is a clear conflict between commissioners, with Briggs and Larson on one side and Grulkowski on the other.
At the Nov. 14 regular meeting of the commission, Larson proposed an ordinance to change how the County Commission’s chair is selected. Currently it is an automatic rotation with each commissioner serving as chair in turn.
Larson’s proposal would make the chair a position elected by a vote of all three commissioners. The second reading of Larson’s proposal will take place at the Cascade County Commission’s next regular meeting on Nov. 28.
“Our entire governmental system is based upon trust in the election process,” Briggs told KRTV. “That has been ongoing now for almost two years that we have had various groups of people questioning the integrity of the elections process. That is not something that we continue to allow. We’ve got to get things fixed. We’ve got to get things isolated from politics so that people trust that when they cast their ballot, it’s counted and it’s counted correctly.
“It started out being one section of the electorate, the far right, for lack of a better term,” Briggs added. “Now it is the folks on the Democratic side of the aisle who are questioning what’s going on. We’ve got to get to where everybody agrees that elections are safe and secure.”
“Last year and the years before it was just a – bring your cup of coffee and we’ll talk about this,” Grulkowski said of the election canvass process. “There weren’t even any motions made to approve the canvass. I knew our meetings were not proper. This year it was clumsy, but now we have a meeting that fully abides by the law for the canvass, that puts motions in place and it’s structured.
“The commissioners’ office has troubles, large troubles,” Grulkowski added. “I have asked at least twice for us to sit down and figure it out. It’s falling on deaf ears, and that should not be tolerated anywhere. There’s a lot going on here.”
Montana
Brawl of the Wild Replay: No. 9 Montana at No. 2 Montana State
BOZEMAN — Second-ranked Montana State was seeking regular-season perfection when it welcomed rival Montana to Bobcat Stadium on Saturday, Nov. 23, 2024.
The Bobcats entered the 123rd Brawl of the Wild with an 11-0 overall record with a chance to finish 12-0 for the first time in program history and also win the outright Big Sky Conference championship.
The ninth-ranked Grizzlies, meanwhile, were 8-3 and aiming to play spoiler for Montana State while also improving their own seeding for the FCS playoffs.
Watch a condensed replay of the game between No. 2 Montana State and No. 9 Montana in the video above.
Montana
‘Yellowstone’ highlights influence behind a changing Montana
The popular “Yellowstone” TV series, set and filmed in Montana, taps into a lesser-known chapter of the state’s history: its settlement by Confederates and ex-Confederates during and after the Civil War.
I come to this story with a unique perspective. I’m a fourth-generation Montanan. I’m also a scholar of U.S. Western literary and cultural studies and left the state in my 20s to pursue a career in academia.
Then, during the pandemic, I returned to Montana for a time to lead a statewide cultural organization that connects Montana’s history and literature to its modern-day residents.
That’s why, for me, the story of the show’s protagonist, John Dutton III, who heads a wealthy-but-embattled Montana ranching family, is not just a cultural phenomenon. Rather, “Yellowstone” offers insights into the dynamics that are currently influencing a changing Montana.
Montana’s little-known legacy
One of the series’ prequels, “1883,” provides the crucial backstory for the Dutton family’s journey to Montana.
James Dutton, portrayed by Tim McGraw, was a former Confederate captain; his wife, Maggie, was a nurse for the Confederate Army. In leaving behind their war-torn lives to seek new opportunities, they mirror the historical trend that saw Confederate settlers moving West during and after the Civil War.
According to Montana historian and scholar Ken Robison, Confederate prisoners of war languishing in Union prisons were paroled to western territories like Montana. By 1864, two such parolees had discovered gold in what is still called Confederate Gulch, at the time one of the largest settlements in Montana Territory. Other settlements, such as Dixie Town and Jeff Davis Gulch, dotted the landscape. Montana’s territorial capital was briefly called Varina, named after the Confederate president’s wife.
Although there is no way to know for certain, it’s possible that during the latter half of the war, half of Montana Territory’s residents — maybe 30,000 — were pro-secession. Some had been in Confederate service; the rest shared their sentiments.
After the war, many of those Confederates stayed. By the late 1800s, Montana was home to 13 United Confederate Veterans organizations totaling 176 members. In 1916, the Montana Chapter of the Daughters of the Confederacy erected a Confederate memorial in Helena, the state capital; it stood for a century. The 1920s saw the rise of about 40 Ku Klux Klan chapters across the state to promote xenophobic policies against immigrants and racist policies against nonwhites. Today, Montana remains one of the whitest states in the U.S. — about 85% of Montanans are white; less than 1% are Black.
Recasting the ‘Lost Cause’
Numerous historical echoes surface briefly in “Yellowstone.”
In Season 2, there’s a violent confrontation involving a militia group that displays Confederate and “Don’t Tread on Me” flags. This subplot speaks to Montana’s long history as a hub for populist and anti-government movements. The Southern Poverty Law Center reports that Montana has 17 hate and anti-government groups, which include three defined as white supremacist or neo-Nazi.
This depiction of militia groups in “Yellowstone” represents the broader history of populist resistance in the American West. From the Sagebrush Rebellion of the 1970s to the Montana Freemen’s standoff with federal agents in the 1990s, Westerners have often resisted federal control over land and resources — tensions that perhaps trace back to the Confederacy’s own secession, a resistance rooted in defiance of federal authority, particularly over slavery.
After the Confederacy’s defeat, the “Lost Cause” narrative, in an attempt to preserve Southern pride, recast the South’s secession as a fight for states’ rights, and not a defense of slavery.
Those Lost Cause connections reverberate through John Dutton III’s relentless battle to preserve his family’s ranch. Fighting overwhelming political and economic pressures, Dutton remains steadfast in his determination to hold onto the land, even when it goes against his best interests.
This tenacity reflects the Lost Cause mindset — a clinging to a nostalgia-tinged, yet unattainable, past. Dutton embodies the archetype of the “aggrieved white man,” a figure central to many populist movements, who feels displaced from his former position of power in politics, work and family life.
Populist contradictions
It’s hard to discern to what degree recent changes in Montana can be attributed to “Yellowstone.” What is certain: Today’s longtime Montana residents find themselves exposed to a fresh set of political, economic and cultural forces.
Tourism and the local economy are up, due in part to the “Yellowstone” effect. But so are concerns about the rising costs of most everything, particularly houses.
These trends have been spurred, in part, by outsiders moving to Montana — newcomers who romanticize the state’s hardscrabble past and what they perceive as its current rough-hewn lifestyle.
What’s more, Montana has morphed from a purple state known for its political independence into a reliably conservative stronghold.
The drastic shift from purple to red solidified in 2020 with the election of a Republican governor after 16 years of Democratic leadership. It was further underscored by the defeat of Democratic Sen. Jon Tester by Republican Tim Sheehy in the 2024 election.
In “Yellowstone,” as Dutton is sworn in as Montana’s new Republican governor, he tells his constituents that he is “the opposite of progress” in response to changes that outside influences are bringing to the state.
Yet the politics of “Yellowstone” are “hard to pin down,” and the Duttons themselves espouse various versions of left- and right-wing populism as they simultaneously battle and embody the political and economic elite.
By the same token, Montanans resent wealthy outsiders but have given them political power by voting them into office.
Montana’s current governor, Greg Gianforte, is a tech millionaire, originally from Pennsylvania; Sheehy, similarly, is a wealthy out-of-stater.
Neither one might approve of the fictional Gov. Dutton’s proposed policy of doubling property and sales taxes for out-of-state “transplants” — though many Montanans probably would. For some, the rapid changes of the past few years have been, like life for the Dutton family, a challenge.
Randi Lynn Tanglen served as professor of English at Austin College in Texas (2008-2020), executive director of Humanities Montana (2020-2022), and is currently vice provost for faculty affairs at the University of North Dakota (2023-present). She holds degrees from Rocky Mountain College, the University of Montana and the University of Arizona.
Montana
No. 2 Montana State whips No. 9 Montana 34-11, clinches 12-0 regular season
BOZEMAN — The only thing that could have made this football season any sweeter for Montana State was the one thing that remained on its list of regular-season expectations.
Against their arch nemesis on Saturday, the Bobcats didn’t blink.
Adam Jones rushed for 197 yards and two touchdowns, the defense rose up and No. 2-ranked MSU took care of ninth-ranked Montana 34-11 to win the 123rd Brawl of the Wild at Bobcat Stadium.
With the win, the Bobcats clinched a perfect regular season at 12-0, won the outright Big Sky Conference title with an 8-0 league mark and in all likelihood secured a top-two seed and home-field advantage for the upcoming FCS playoffs — if not the overall No. 1 seed.
Though their running back corps was diminished with both Scottre Humphrey and Julius Davis in street clothes on the sideline, the Bobcats still rushed for 326 yards with Jones, a redshirt freshman out of Missoula Sentinel, leading the way.
The home team has now won five in a row in the storied history of the Cat-Griz rivalry, and Montana State has still not lost a regular-season home game in the four-year tenure of coach Brent Vigen.
The Bobcats established their running game at the outset by marching 75 yards on 14 plays, 12 of which were runs. Mellott capped the drive with a 5-yard touchdown run on what appeared to be a broken play to put MSU ahead 7-0.
MSU converted two third downs on that drive and took nearly nine minutes off the clock.
A promising Griz drive was slowed by penalties in the second quarter, but Ty Morrison got Montana on the board by splitting the uprights on a 47-yard field goal to make the score 7-3.
But the Bobcats stretched their lead on the next possession when Mellott dropped a pretty pass over the top to tight end Rohan Jones for a 35-yard touchdown at the 10:16 mark of the second quarter.
Toward the end of the first half, the Bobcats got a 27-yard field goal from Myles Sansted to extend the lead to 17-3. With an even bigger kick, Sansted drilled a 49-yarder as time expired at halftime to extend it to 20-3.
Each team’s defense rose up in the second half as the offenses combined for five consecutive fruitless possessions. But with the Bobcats backed up on their own 5-yard line, Adam Jones exploded took a handoff and exploded through the line for an 88-yard gain.
Two plays later Jones punched it into the end zone from the 3 to put the Bobcats ahead 27-3 toward the end of the third quarter.
As the weather started to take a turn with strong wind and snow flurries, Montana scored its first touchdown early in the fourth on a 1-yard rush by Eli Gillman. Sawyer Racanelli then made a one-handed catch while being interfered with for a two-point conversion.
Jones, though, capped a 9-play, 71-yard drive with a 2-yard TD run with 4:49 remaining to ice the game.
The Grizzlies own the all-time series with a 74-43-5 record, but the Bobcats now have the edge with an 11-10 mark since 2002.
Turning point: The game had hit a defensive standstill in the third quarter until Jones’ 88-yard burst to the UM 7. Griz safety Jaxon Lee prevented a touchdown, but two plays later Jones was in the end zone and the Bobcats had a 27-3 lead with 1:55 remaining in the third.
Stat of the game: The Bobcats rushed for more than 300 yards again, but perhaps more important was the defense’s ability to get off the field on third down.
MSU’s defense held the Grizzlies to a 2 for 12 success rate on third down and forced seven punts. In the end, the Bobcats limited Montana’s offense to 234 total yards.
Game balls: MSU RB Adam Jones (Offense). Davis was injured in the first quarter and didn’t return and Humphrey had just one attempt, so Jones was called up on to take the brunt of the carries. He delivered with a standout performance.
MSU S Rylan Ortt (Defense). The Bobcats defense played a great game overall, and Ortt was one of the ringleaders with 11 tackles (eight solo), was in on a tackle for loss and had one quarterback hurry.
MSU PK Myles Sansted (Special teams). Sansted hit both of his field goal tries, and his 49-yarder as time expired in the first half allowed MSU to take a 17-point lead into the locker room.
What’s next: With a 12-0 record, Montana State is in line for a top-two seed in the FCS playoffs, which would mean a first-round bye and home-field advantage through the semifinal round. The Cats could get the No. 1 overall seed after South Dakota beat North Dakota State 29-28.
The Grizzlies, who are now 8-4 (and 5-3 in the Big Sky), are likely to receive an at-large bid into the tournament.
The 24-team bracket will be announced Sunday with the 2024 NCAA Division I Championship Selection Show on Sunday at 10:30 p.m. Mountain time on ESPNU. The show is also available for streaming on ESPN+.
-
Business1 week ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
Science5 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics7 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology6 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle7 days ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World7 days ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government
-
News6 days ago
They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony
-
News7 days ago
Gaetz-gate: Navigating the President-elect's most baffling Cabinet pick