Montana
‘We just can’t take this anymore’: Montana man, 68, begs for ‘moratorium on property taxes’ after his bill reaches $8K a year just ‘to live in our own house’
A senior from Montana has delivered a viral speech about the sorry state of property taxes in the Treasure State.
“I’m on Social Security, I’m 68-years-old and working just to pay my taxes,” says Kurt, in a clip shared on TikTok by Ryan Busse, who is running to be the next governor of Montana.
Don’t miss
Kurt claims that over the last couple of years, his annual property taxes have soared from $895 to almost $8,000 — an increase of around 790% — which he says is like paying almost “$700 a month rent to the state to live in our own house.” The state has an Elderly Homeowner/Renter Tax Credit, and the maximum credit is $1,150.
“There needs to be a moratorium on what we have to pay,” he says, adding that he’s had to continue working into what should be his retirement golden years to cover his mounting property costs. “I’m stubborn enough [that] I don’t want to dig into my bank account to pay them.”
Kurt is one of thousands of Montana homeowners suffering sticker shock over recent property tax hikes. He says: “We just can’t take this anymore. This was a great place and it still is, but the people that made it great can’t afford to live here anymore.”
Here’s what’s going on in the Treasure State.
Soaring property values
There are many reasons why property taxes may increase over time. First and foremost, property tax is typically based on a percentage of a home’s assessed value — so if your value goes up, it’s likely that your tax bill will too.
In Kurt’s case, he claims to have bought his property in 1995. In the 29 years since then, the family home (he does not share where in Montana the property is located) has undoubtedly increased in value.
According to FRED Economic Data’s house price index for Billings, MT (the state’s most populous city), the average house price at the end of 1995 was around $103,860 and by the end of 2023 it had soared around 272% to more than $387,000.
Read more: Jeff Bezos and Oprah Winfrey invest in this asset to keep their wealth safe — you may want to do the same in 2024
Looking at the data since 1985, the steepest jump in value in Billings and elsewhere in the state occurred between 2021 and 2023 — during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, when there was a surge of migration to the state and housing demand quickly outpaced supply. This corresponds with Kurt’s complaint that his property taxes have soared “over the last couple of years,” which likely occurred because his property value increased.
Instead of working deep into what should be his retirement years, Kurt could sell the family home, collect his capital gains and move somewhere smaller (and with a more manageable tax bill) — but the house holds too much sentimental value for him to consider that.
“My children were raised [there]. They want to get married there, and I plan on being there until the very end,” he says — even if that means taking winter and summer shifts.
Other homeowners in Montana, who aren’t quite so attached to their properties, may see selling and moving as their only viable option. According to a Montana Free Press (MTFP) analysis of revenue department data for the 956,000 properties on the state’s property tax rolls in both 2022 and 2023, the median Montana residential property owner saw a 21% hike on their property taxes this year, with typical increases ranging between 11% and 35%. That translates into residential tax bills that will be $98 to $660 a year more.
Where do the taxes go?
Property taxes make up almost 97% of local tax revenue here, considerably more than the 71% share for local governments in all U.S. states together, according to a state legislature brief. Property taxes account for 9.9% of the tax revenue of the Montana state government, as opposed to 1.7% for all the state governments.
Montana’s great reliance on property taxes is possibly due to the comparitively lower tax revenue from sales and excise taxes. Montana has no state or local sales tax.
Property taxes are calculated by multiplying the property’s market value by its tax rate (1.35% for residential properties) and its mill levies (one mill generates $1 for each $1,000 in taxable value). For example, for a property worth $400,000 with a tax rate of 1.35% and a mill rate of 650, the property tax would be $3,510.
Almost all property taxes in Montana go towards county and city government services like K-12 schools, law enforcement and fire departments. This money does not typically go towards state services, like universities and prisons, which are funded by state income tax.
As inflation has increased nationwide, this has not only driven up the cost of living, but it also inflated the costs of providing public services. As a result, some local governments have had to compensate by raising property tax rates.
There’s no easy fix to Montanans’ property tax nightmares. The state department of revenue has promised property tax rebates for the 2022 and 2023 tax years of up to $675 for eligible homeowners, using $350 million from the state’s budget surplus.
While that may help some cash-strapped Montana homeowners, the “moratorium” on taxes that Chuck so desperately wants remains highly unlikely.
What to read next
-
Car insurance premiums in America are through the roof — and only getting worse. But 5 minutes could have you paying as little as $29/month
-
The 5 most expensive mistakes in options trading and how to avoid them
-
These 5 magic money moves will boost you up America’s net worth ladder in 2024 — and you can complete each step within minutes. Here’s how
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Montana
More Republican leaders say state party is ‘purging.’ GOP says it’s ‘vetting.’ • Daily Montanan
More Republican legislators are finding themselves on the outs with the Montana Republican Party ahead of the 2026 election — even those long considered hard-liners.
Last year, the state GOP disowned a group that party leaders called the “Nasty Nine,” moderate Republican senators who worked with Democrats on significant legislation during the 2025 Montana Legislature.
Last month, the state GOP disavowed 16 Republican primary candidates, including longtime legislators and county committee leaders. The party also released an Honor Roll with candidates it said demonstrate support for the platform, but incumbent Republicans with conservative bona fides were missing.
Speaker of the House Brandon Ler, who earned a score of 100 on the ultraconservative Montana Family Foundation legislative scorecard, didn’t make the cut, nor did the state GOP’s own vice chairwoman Stacy Zinn.
The party’s approach has Republican lawmakers across the conservative political spectrum asking about consequences for the upcoming legislative session — and for democracy.
“I don’t know by the time this is over who is going to be left,” said Rep. George Nikolakakos, a Republican from Great Falls. “It’s going to be a real small group.”
Rep. David Bedey, a Hamilton Republican in the state House since 2019, said state GOP Chairman Art Wittich is trying to “purge the party” of anyone unaligned with “a very narrow, right-wing ideology.”
“It’s obvious that he seeks to set the legislative agenda, and he expects to have a caucus of Republicans who will vote the way he tells them to vote,” Bedey said. “There’s no other way to sugarcoat that.”
Wittich declined an interview with the Daily Montanan through a spokesperson. In responses to emailed questions, Wittich said the party is not undertaking a “purge,” but it does expect Republican candidates to adhere to the platform and be upfront about where they stand.
“The Montana Republican Party is a big tent, but it only remains standing if we have sturdy poles and a solid foundation holding it up,” Wittich said in an email. “ … We don’t want Democrats in our big tent trying to tear it down from the inside.”
State GOP active in primary, but fracturing evident
In the 2025 Montana Legislature, hard-line Republicans were elected to leadership positions in the Senate but lost control of the agenda after a group of nine GOP senators joined Democrats to pass significant legislation.
In red Montana, a primary election can be the determining race for many legislative battles, and Republican Rep. Kerri Seekins-Crowe said she believes the firm stance the state GOP is taking ahead of June 2 is an understandable reaction to the actions of “The Nine.”
That said, Seekins-Crowe also said actions can have unintended consequences.
The Billings Republican said she will not belittle the state GOP for its Honor Roll, but she also sees effective incumbents with high scores on conservative scorecards missing.
“I can tell you right now there are some really great Republicans that the state (GOP) decided to slight,” Seekins-Crowe said.
She said that Speaker Ler, recently endorsed by the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund, is among them. Ler did fill out a questionnaire the state GOP used to screen candidates for the Honor Roll, a campaign consultant said.
Seekins-Crowe said term limits already mean legislators lose inertia and power, and losing incumbent seats to newcomers means the branch that’s “closest to the people” could become ineffective — or cede power to lobbyists or the executive branch.
“We’re supposed to be one united football team,” Seekins-Crowe said. “Instead it looks like Brawl of the Wild.”
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
Seekins-Crowe didn’t fill out the questionnaire used to screen candidates for the Honor Roll — she said she doesn’t know what the right answers are supposed to be, and she has a voting record if voters or party members want to know about her. She doesn’t have a primary, but she wasn’t alone in not returning the questionnaire.
The Honor Roll resolution said 36 candidates didn’t return it, and at least one Republican candidate, Michele Binkley of Hamilton, said she didn’t bother turning it in because “I already knew they don’t like me.”
On her campaign page, Binkley, who served four years in the state House, said she’s a lifelong Republican who believes “first and foremost in limited government.” But she said many Republicans have become beholden to “party bosses” rather than the Constitution and their constituents.
“The state is made up of Republicans that cross the spectrum of Republicanism,” Binkley told the Daily Montanan. “So if you purge that, what are you going to end up with? … Is the end game to take our majority away and give it to the other party?”
Wittich disagreed. The end game, he said, is to ensure candidates who declare they’re Republicans actually adhere to those values.
“Asking Republican candidates about their principles and whether they align with the Republican Party platform expected by voters isn’t making them ‘kiss the ring,’” Wittich said. “It’s a commonsense honesty check.”
Pushback mounts against State GOP
Earlier this month, 10 chairpersons of Republican county committees pushed back against Wittich and the state GOP in a letter that said the state party has historically been a grassroots organization — built from the ground up.
The letter, distributed to news outlets and posted on social media, said admonishments from party leadership were ineffective.
Rep. Curtis Cochran and former Rep. Ross Fitzgerald were among the signers and verified the letter to the Daily Montanan.
“This is not how an effective grassroots Republican operation prospers,” they wrote. “This is how a top-down organization consolidates power. A representative republic is built on local representatives carrying the voice of local people to Helena — not bowing to a party boss or an Executive Committee.”
Nikolakakos said the state GOP can provide limited support to candidates on the campaign trail, some of its endorsements resonate with a certain portion of the population, and the party can “make your life suckier” by spreading misinformation.
But Nikolakakos, one of the candidates admonished by the GOP along with Bedey and Binkley, said the approach of “focusing the guns inward” will have consequences, and he fears it means Republicans will lose legislative seats. The GOP had a supermajority in both legislative chambers in 2023, and it had a majority in 2025.
“What they’re doing is unprecedented at least in recent Montana history,” Nikolakakos said. “If their leadership sends us off a cliff, they should have the accountability to resign.”
But in the closely contested primary, the state GOP is endorsing neither Republican candidate, and both have legislative experience.
Nikolakakos’ primary opponent, Montana Public Service Commissioner Randy Pinocci, is also on the outs with the state GOP. Pinocci refused to cut ties with a publication that has been critical of the Montana Republican Party, as party leaders demanded.
“When you look up ‘Republican’ in the dictionary, ‘Montana Republican,’ it has to be my picture,” Pinocci said.
State GOP vetting, doing ‘honesty check,’ leaders say
Former state GOP Chairman Don “K” Kaltschmidt oversaw a red wave in Montana the last six years, with Republicans winning all statewide and federal offices. As he passed the torch last summer, he told the Daily Montanan the next party leader would be charged with steering in a new era of GOP dominance.
“It’s really up to the next chairman to take it to the next level, which would be learning how to be a red state,” he told the Daily Montanan.
In June, Wittich was elected as head of the state GOP, and at the time, the former legislator and majority leader from 2013 told his colleagues Montana was a red state that could become “a bright red state.”
In written responses to the Daily Montanan, Wittich defended his quest to ensure elected Republicans cleave to the party platform, and he disagreed the state GOP’s approach could hurt its legislative agenda in 2027.
Former state Sen. Keith Regier, a Kalispell Republican, led the party committee that undertook the effort to name members to the Honor Roll. Regier is the father of two current legislators, including Senate President Matt Regier.
“The state GOP is just trying to identify who the true Republicans are that are running and get that information to the voters,” Keith Regier said.
Regier pointed to the case of Seth Bodnar, the former University of Montana president who’s running for a U.S. Senate seat as an independent. Regier said he believes Bodnar is a Democrat but doesn’t want to run as one.
“If you can’t win as a Democrat, you try as a Republican or as an independent,” Regier said.
Bodnar continues to maintain he’s neither a Democrat nor a Republican; as recently as earlier this month, he eschewed party labels, and he said he believed his boss should be the people of Montana, “not party elites, not outside business interests.”
In an email, Wittich said plenty of people support the state GOP’s priorities and platform, contrary to any argument the “big tent” is getting smaller.
“We’re the party of less government and lower taxes,” Wittich said. “We expect some disagreement on how exactly to achieve those goals with legislation, but we don’t want candidates who strive to grow government and raise taxes. It’s that simple.”
Although Wittich disagreed the party is “purging,” Regier said any incumbent who loses an election could say they were “purged” out of that office.
It’s the voters who benefit from the party assessing values, he said.
“If they vote for a Democrat, they should be able to rely that they’re going to get Democratic representation,” Regier said. “If they vote for a Republican, they should be able to rely that they’re going to follow the Republican platform the best they can.”
Montana
Montana Lottery Mega Millions, Big Sky Bonus results for May 26, 2026
The Montana Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at May 26, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Mega Millions numbers from May 26 drawing
01-05-49-51-59, Mega Ball: 07
Check Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Big Sky Bonus numbers from May 26 drawing
01-17-25-29, Bonus: 12
Check Big Sky Bonus payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from May 26 drawing
18-30-39-52-56, Bonus: 01
Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
When are the Montana Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 9 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
- Lucky For Life: 8:38 p.m. MT daily.
- Lotto America: 9 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Big Sky Bonus: 7:30 p.m. MT daily.
- Powerball Double Play: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Montana Cash: 8 p.m. MT on Wednesday and Saturday.
- Millionaire for Life: 9:15 p.m. MT daily.
Missed a draw? Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Great Falls Tribune editor. You can send feedback using this form.
Montana
Op-Ed: Montana Plan Hurts Montana Businesses
According to the New York Times, 300 individual billionaires spent more than $3 billion during the 2024 election cycle. Keep those figures in mind as you consider I-194 and its potential impact on Montana values.
The Montana Chamber of Commerce, the Kalispell Chamber of Commerce, and the Billings Chamber of Commerce have taken a clear and united stand against Initiative 194. We believe Montanans deserve a full and transparent explanation of why.
No doubt, I-194 would prohibit Montana businesses and nonprofits from participating in the political process. Under this initiative, family-owned businesses including farms, ranches, restaurants, and retail stores could not respond publicly to a ballot initiative targeting them. A Main Street restaurant could not support a local levy to improve public safety. A small business coalition could not push back against misleading claims that threaten their livelihoods and their employees’ jobs. These are not hypothetical concerns; they are the everyday realities of how Montana businesses engage in the civic life of our communities.
But make no mistake, I-194 does not remove big money from our politics.
While cleverly named “The Montana Plan,” I-194 should be called the “California Plan” since California is home to more than 200 individual billionaires and places no restrictions whatsoever on out-of-state wealthy individuals. Under I-194, a single well-funded outsider could bankroll a campaign to devastate a Montana agricultural practice, a logging operation, or a ranching family, while the Montana businesses under attack would be legally silenced. That is not campaign finance reform. That is a one-sided disarmament of Montana’s own voices.
The supporters of I-194 like to reference the Copper King’s influence that occurred at the beginning of the 20th century. And while this initiative would have prohibited the Anaconda Copper Company from supporting candidates, the actual individual Kings of copper–the millionaires that owned those companies–would have still been free to bankroll their preferred candidates, while the rest of Montana’s small business community sat in silence. They would have loved this proposal.
Montana has a proud history of fighting outside influence in our politics, from the battles against the Copper Kings to the Corrupt Practices Act of 1912. But that Act targeted corruption and covert control of government, not the right of businesses and community organizations to have an open voice in the state they call home. There is a meaningful difference between a corporation secretly buying a legislator and a chamber of commerce publicly advocating for its members.
We raised constitutional and legal questions about I-194’s scope before the Montana Supreme Court because those questions deserved an answer. We respect the Court’s ruling. And now we are doing exactly what any organization or individual is entitled to do: making our case openly, with our names attached, and letting Montanans decide.
That is what chambers of commerce do. We advocate for Montana’s businesses and workers—the coffee shops, hardware stores, family farms, and yes, the larger employers whose presence helps keep smaller businesses alive. We are Montanans representing Montana’s economic engine.
We agree that Montanans deserve a political system where their voices matter more than outside money. Silencing Montana businesses while leaving out-of-state billionaires free to spend without restriction does not achieve that goal. It simply changes who gets silenced.
We urge every Montanan to read I-194 carefully—all of it—and ask: Does this make our democracy stronger, or does it make some voices louder by making others disappear?
Montana Chamber of Commerce, Kalispell Chamber of Commerce, and Billings Chamber of Commerce
-
Los Angeles, Ca13 minutes agoFamily members searching for 2 missing Southern California girls
-
Detroit, MI37 minutes agoDetroit police revise initial account after body cam shows man fatally shot himself during search of home
-
San Francisco, CA49 minutes agoSan Francisco rapper Frak blends hip-hop, comedy and Jewish culture
-
Dallas, TX55 minutes agoFederal, local agencies tout results of North Texas anti-crime operation before World Cup
-
Boston, MA1 hour agoEast Boston couple accused in alleged racist attack on restaurant patio after calling in noise complaint
-
Denver, CO1 hour agoRep. Hurd emphasizes need for consistent, predictable energy policies at Denver roundtable
-
Seattle, WA1 hour ago
Pollen forensic technique links missing woman cold case to the Pacific Northwest
-
San Diego, CA1 hour agoA South San Diego Mother questions SDPD’S response to her teenage son’s death