Connect with us

Montana

Montana PSC orders NorthWestern to take closer look at low-income programs – Daily Montanan

Published

on

Montana PSC orders NorthWestern to take closer look at low-income programs – Daily Montanan


NorthWestern Energy will need to provide more information to regulators about how well its energy assistance programs are helping low-income customers in the wake of double-digit utility rate increases.

The monopoly utility also will need to identify barriers low-income customers face to using those programs and determine the best way to reach those customers.

“Evidence in the record regarding affordability is limited,” said the Montana Public Service Commission.

Tuesday, the Public Service Commission unanimously voted to approve an order that largely keeps in place a settlement agreement it greenlighted this fall with Northwestern Energy.

Advertisement

That agreement resulted in a rate increase of 24% for residential electricity customers and 25% for small businesses compared to rates in August 2022 — and commissioners didn’t specifically discuss rate changes.

But the Public Service Commission received three motions to reconsider its earlier decision, and after hearing legal and rate analyses from staff at a meeting Tuesday, it rejected two of the three motions.

However, the PSC bought into arguments made by one group of parties, the Human Resource Council District XI, Natural Resources Defense Council, and NW Energy Coalition.

The Human Resource Council and its partners argued the “effects of any utility rate increase are disproportionately felt by low-income customers,” but it said the PSC didn’t discuss those customers specifically.

The group also said NorthWestern offers no low-income programs other than what it’s required to do by law; the money that’s available isn’t enough; customers have faced roadblocks with its weatherization program ever since NorthWestern contracted with the Department of Public Health and Human Services; and participation rates in low-income programs “have declined by more than 25% over the last decade.”

Advertisement

At a PSC hearing in April, data from NorthWestern showed the decrease in participation.

Under questioning by a lawyer representing the Human Resource Council and its partners at the time, a vice president for the utility admitted the company wasn’t proposing any changes in its outreach to low-income customers.

Tuesday, however, the Public Service Commission ordered NorthWestern Energy to do more to analyze its service to low-income ratepayers.

“The commission is sensitive to the impacts that utility rate increases have on all customers, including low-income customers,” said the draft order. “The commission acknowledges that (its earlier order) does not separately and explicitly address the impact of the settlement on low-income customers and, on reconsideration, finds that the request … for an analysis of the impact is reasonable.”

The PSC said it might seem intuitive that low-income customers are more affected by rate increases, but the lack of evidence means commissioners can’t reach any conclusions.

Advertisement

“Nevertheless, on reconsideration, the Commission agrees with HRC/NRDC/NWEC that an evaluation of the efficacy of available low-income energy assistance programs through a stakeholder process is warranted,” the order said.

“At a minimum, the stakeholder process should attempt to address apparent information gaps concerning trends in energy affordability for low-income customers in relation to the residential class as a whole, barriers to participation in existing assistance programs, coordination across assistance programs, and the most effective outreach and delivery mechanisms for low-income assistance.”

The PSC, made up of five commissioners who are all currently Republican, also clarified it expects NorthWestern to maintain a permanent stakeholder group to evaluate “demand-side management,” or strategies to control energy use, and expand its engagement.

But in its order, the PSC rejected motions to reconsider from 350 Montana and Broad Reach Power.

In its motion, 350 Montana had argued the PSC invented a “magical” new way of analyzing costs that wasn’t legal, failed to consider emissions, sent $3.4 million to shareholders that belonged to customers, and discriminated against residential customers and small businesses.

Advertisement

However, an analysis from PSC staff said commissioners based their order on judicial and agency precedent, and it also said NorthWestern will need to include data about carbon emissions in future reviews.

As for the money 350 Montana alleges belongs to customers — the difference between the authorized cost of debt and NorthWestern’s actual cost of debt — the PSC said it would have to undo a decision made by an earlier commission in a separate case to go that route.

The staff analysis also indicated larger customers subsidize the cost of electricity for residential and small businesses — as part of the accounting principles of “gradualism” and moderation to decrease rate shock. At least a couple of commissioners wanted to stress that subsidy.

“Certainly the order has softened the blow … at the expense of other classes in order to lessen rate shock on residential and small business customer classes,” Commissioner Jennifer Fielder said.

Broad Reach had said it was denied due process because the PSC didn’t reschedule a hearing on the settlement after it was filed. The PSC disagreed and said the burden of canceling the hearing and requiring more testimony and discovery would have outweighed the benefit of moving ahead.

Advertisement



Source link

Montana

Planning For Life After Coal Cost a Montana County Commissioner His Seat – Inside Climate News

Published

on

Planning For Life After Coal Cost a Montana County Commissioner His Seat – Inside Climate News


Robert Pancratz couldn’t believe it. 

The Musselshell County commissioner had been defeated in the Republican primary for his seat by a two-to-one margin earlier this month. Mark Olson, who lives in Musselshell and serves as the undersheriff in Golden Valley County, won by 26 percentage points.

“That just blew me away,” Pancratz said. “All of my campaign, I had not a hint that there was that much opposition.”

At stake, from Pancratz’s perspective, is the fiscal future of his community, which includes Roundup, Montana, home to Montana’s only longwall coal mine. The mine, owned and operated by Signal Peak Energy, sits on the eastern side of the continental divide in a staunchly conservative part of the state, where its presence provides jobs and its profits generate taxable revenue for local governments. (The vast majority of its coal, the dirtiest fossil fuel, goes to markets in Asia.)

Advertisement

But that revenue could potentially be diminished by tens of millions, according to calculations by Pancratz, if a bill introduced by U.S. Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., passes Congress. The Crow Revenue Act would convey federally held coal to Signal Peak through a land transfer to a private intermediary, depriving Musselshell County of its share of the taxes Signal Peak Energy pays to mine coal on federal land. 

If the Crow Revenue Act does not pass Congress, Signal Peak says it could be forced to shut down if it loses a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana challenging the “energy emergency” the Trump administration used to grant the mine access to federal coal. That outcome would wipe out all the mine’s tax revenue and hundreds of jobs, the company claims. This month’s election hinged on Pancratz’s position on the bill and, by extension, the mine. 

Musselshell County’s three commissioners, Mike Goffena, Mike Turley and Pancratz support keeping the mine open. But they also fear Musselshell County would need to raise taxes and cut services to balance its books if the Crow Revenue Act passes as written. After studying the county’s finances, Pancratz, who works as a risk analyst consultant, concluded that the county could lose as much as $11.6 million if the Crow Revenue Act passes and the price of coal is high. The commissioners have lobbied for changes to the bill that would guarantee the county some revenue from the land transfer. 

Musselshell County commissioner Robert Pancratz lost in the Republican primary for his seat earlier this month. Credit: Courtesy of Robert Pancratz
Musselshell County commissioner Robert Pancratz lost in the Republican primary for his seat earlier this month. Credit: Courtesy of Robert Pancratz

Pancratz says he was just doing his job.

“As a risk manager, I have to develop a contingency plan for the possibility that the long-term stream of coal revenue could be disrupted or ended,” he said. “We needed to have a plan to effectively transition to other revenue sources. When I used the word transition, they took that as I was an environmentalist that was against coal.” 

“Why anybody would have a problem with that is baffling to me. But that’s what happened.”

Advertisement

According to Pancratz, Signal Peak Energy branded the men as environmentalists who want to see the company shut down forever and this willful mischaracterization played a large role in his defeat.

“The picture they painted of me was totally false,” he said.

In a recording of a commissioner meeting posted to a local Facebook group by a Signal Peak Energy employee less than a month before the election, Pancratz, Goffena and Turley can be heard strategizing how to express their concerns about the Crow Revenue Act to Daines, whom they describe as unresponsive to their concerns. 

Pancratz suggests asking for a $100 million endowment to transition from coal to “scare” Daines and Signal Peak Energy. Turley states that with funding at that level, they wouldn’t care if the mine was open or not.

“Exactly,” Pancratz responded.

Advertisement

Comments on the video show viewers expressing outrage that the commissioners would “play chicken” with the future of the mine, which provides hundreds of jobs in the surrounding area. 

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

Pancratz said the conversation was recorded without the commissioners’ knowledge. Montana is a two-party consent state, meaning all parties must be aware of and consent to a recording, but he allowed that it was possible one of the commissioners forgot to close a virtual public meeting after it concluded.

Advertisement

Pancratz said the conversation occurred when the commissioners found out there would be no money in the Crow Revenue Act for the county. The bill’s supporters, including Signal Peak Energy, had told them that the county would not lose any revenue under the bill, he said. 

“We were upset because we felt we’d been lied to,” Pancratz said.

Signal Peak Energy did not respond to a written message and phone call seeking comment. For a time after Signal Peak took over the mine in the late 2000s, it was plagued by malfeasance, including embezzlement, a faked kidnapping and safety and environmental violations, according to reporting by The New York Times.

Olson said he entered the race due to a “lack of transparency” from the commissioners over how the county was spending its money.

Mark Olson lives in Musselshell and currently serves as the undersheriff in Golden Valley County. Credit: Courtesy of Mark OlsonMark Olson lives in Musselshell and currently serves as the undersheriff in Golden Valley County. Credit: Courtesy of Mark Olson
Mark Olson lives in Musselshell and currently serves as the undersheriff in Golden Valley County. Credit: Courtesy of Mark Olson

But the mine played a role in his decision to run, too. As he was weighing his options, Olson said his cousin, Alan Olson, a former state legislator and former executive director of the Montana Petroleum Association, visited him and urged him to run to support the mine. After that conversation, he was convinced the mine’s survival depended on the Crow Revenue Act passing, and that trying to amend it would jeopardize the legislation.

“The more money we can get for the county, the better, but I don’t think it’s worth risking the mine closing,” Olson said. Losing federal revenue was better than losing all the jobs and the tax base if the mine closes, he concluded. 

Advertisement

Olson added that Parker Phipps, Signal Peak Energy’s CEO, has briefed him on the mine’s fiscal relationship with Musselshell County.

Olson’s background in law enforcement could add a new perspective to the county commissioner meetings, given Goffena and Turley’s background in ranching, he said, but the minutiae of the county’s budget will be new to him. 

“I am by no means an expert in any of this stuff,” he said.

Some worry that, with the mine facing a lawsuit, an unpredictable global coal market and the uncertain future of the Crow Revenue Act, the commissioners cannot afford to lose momentum in their efforts to attract new industries to the area.

Olson’s win in the primary will “set [economic diversification planning] back long term,” Nicole Borner, a former Musselshell County commissioner, who thinks Olson was hand-picked by the Signal Peak Energy to run and is not informed about what the job entails. 

Advertisement

“We will always just have a few crumbs to duct tape a few issues,” she said. “We’ll never be able to fix the prior forty years of being in a coal bust and our infrastructure just literally falling apart.” 

The storefronts of businesses in Roundup, Mont. Credit: Jake Bolster/Inside Climate NewsThe storefronts of businesses in Roundup, Mont. Credit: Jake Bolster/Inside Climate News
The storefronts of businesses in Roundup, Mont. Credit: Jake Bolster/Inside Climate News

Olson will likely run unopposed in the general election.

In his remaining time in office, Pancratz said he will continue to push for economic diversification in Musselshell County. He holds no animosity towards Olson, who calls Pancratz “a wonderful guy.” Instead, he laments not addressing concerns over his position on the mine sooner in the campaign. But he believes Signal Peak Energy’s political and social influence—the company operates a charity in the region—is what swayed the election.

“You can’t say anything that even remotely implies that you’re trying to prepare the county for the possibility that coal revenue may not be steady or high … There’s this attitude that the county is in debt to that coal mine. And the message I tried to get out is, it’s more the reverse,” Pancratz said. 

“I personally don’t believe the mine really cares about the county.”

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

Advertisement

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Montana

Montana Lottery Mega Millions, Big Sky Bonus results for June 19, 2026

Published

on


The Montana Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at June 19, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Mega Millions numbers from June 19 drawing

13-16-21-26-50, Mega Ball: 12

Check Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Big Sky Bonus numbers from June 19 drawing

05-12-14-30, Bonus: 03

Check Big Sky Bonus payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from June 19 drawing

02-20-28-51-54, Bonus: 02

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Advertisement

When are the Montana Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 9 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Lucky For Life: 8:38 p.m. MT daily.
  • Lotto America: 9 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Big Sky Bonus: 7:30 p.m. MT daily.
  • Powerball Double Play: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Montana Cash: 8 p.m. MT on Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 9:15 p.m. MT daily.

Missed a draw? Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Great Falls Tribune editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana State doctoral student awarded national research service grant for gut microbiome, arsenic research

Published

on

Montana State doctoral student awarded national research service grant for gut microbiome, arsenic research


Montana State University doctoral student Trenton Wolfe has received a prestigious National Institutes of Health fellowship to support research on how antibiotics affect the gut microbiome’s ability to process arsenic, a topic inspired by his upbringing.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending