Connect with us

Montana

Montana property value spikes bring tax confusion, blame

Published

on

Montana property value spikes bring tax confusion, blame


As Montanans around the state open their mail to find the new appraisal value for their homes set by the state, and in some cases are met with eye-popping increases, the process has created a lot of questions, confusion and blame.

The state Department of Revenue last November told legislators that residential market values were expected to increase about 43% as part of the two-year reappraisal cycle. That ended up being pretty close to the 45% median increase in values for residential properties statewide determined during reappraisal, according to the department.

The increases are not divided equally around the state, with Granite County seeing the highest spike in median residential value, at 67%, or a jump of $122,561. In total, 27 of the state’s 56 counties saw the median home value jump more than 40%. Only 11 saw single-digit increases.

People are also reading…

Advertisement





Advertisement

Contractors work to build a home in the Highland Meadows Subdivision in East Helena in March 2023.



Advertisement


A spokesperson for the revenue department said in an email Wednesday the increases in appraised value are driven by the spike in real estate prices Montanans have seen since the pandemic.

“The real estate market exploded in 2020 and 2021. Our valuation process is reliant on sales, and the impact of appreciation in the market has a direct impact to our valuation,” the spokesperson said.

A real estate report produced by Altos Research for the Helena market found the 90-day average home listing price went up 52% between January 2020 and January 2022, and DOR determined median home values in Helena went up 45% over the two-year appraisal cycle.

Commercial properties were not left untouched, with rates there increasing 26.79%, more than the predicted 16.7%, according to DOR.

The notices sent this month have caused confusion between higher property values and what property taxes might increase by. That’s because as everyone’s taxable value goes up, the share of tax obligations each home is responsible for will go down. Still, Republican state Sen. Greg Hertz, R-Polson, said people can expect to generally see increases in their tax bills.

Advertisement

“The biggest thing in regards to your appraisal notice is that if your property is up 30%, 40%, 50%, your taxes are not going up that much,” Hertz said. “Unfortunately the letter from the Department of Revenue overstated what people’s taxes are going up because they’re using existing mills, so that has added to the confusion out there.”

Mills can be understood as tax rates, and counties may lower the number of mills they assess to keep their revenues the same given higher property values. The revenue department estimated property tax increases in the letters to owners based on 2022 millage rates, which can change in 2023.

Montana Democratic Party Executive Director Sheila Hogan and Democratic State Rep. Jonathan Karlen held a press conference Wednesday laying the blame on any expected property tax increases squarely at the feet of Republicans, who hold a majority in the state Legislature. Democrats argued they brought bills that would have used some of the state’s $2.5 billion surplus for property tax relief, but the GOP did not support their policies.

“Right now is a period of a lot of uncertainty and people are scared,” Karlen said.

Karlen said Republicans voted down several bills from Democrats, such as House Bill 280, a so-called “circuit breaker” bill that would have created an income tax credit based on the amount of property taxes paid or rent equivalent. The program would have cost $82 million a year and about 87,000 households would have qualified, according to legislative records.

Advertisement

“We saw this time and time again, that every structural reform we made that would have provided Montana’s homeowners with really a historic level of property tax relief, they shot that down,” Karlen said. He also accused the GOP of not heeding the information from DOR foreshadowing the appraised value hike, saying the GOP is now shifting blame onto local governments and the portion of property taxes that come from their budgets and voter-approved levies that fund things like schools, fire departments and more.

Hertz, of course, has a different view on it than Karlen.

“The Montana Constitution requires the state to value properties across the state, so there’s nothing the Legislature can do to stop those valuation increases. They are what we are,” Hertz said.

While lawmakers could reduce how much of the valuation is taxable, Hertz said doing so for one class of property would only mean having to raise rates on a different class or reduce services.

The November 2022 report from DOR estimated that the current taxable value rate for residential property of 1.35% would have to drop to 0.94% to keep a neutral tax bill for residents.

Advertisement

Karlen said he also felt that adjusting those rates was just a “short-term fix to a broken system.”

Hertz said lawmakers passed other relief options for Montanans using the surplus, pointing to the income tax rebates that are expected to reach people in the coming months with $1,250 for individuals and $2,500 for married couples. There’s also a $675 property tax rebate, though it will not be available until later in the year. People will also have to apply for it, Hertz said, and that is because the Department of Revenue will require people to show they are full-time residents who have lived in the state seven months or longer, whereas the income tax rebates are sent automatically.

Hertz said where he lives in Lake County, property taxes are expected to rise between 12-15%, and he attributed 7% of that to a $40 million school levy passed recently.

The GOP senator cited legislation that passed this session like a bill he brought to require local governments to tell taxpayers when setting their budgets how much additional spending would make property taxes go up. A bill Hertz tried but was unsuccessful in passing would have required higher turnout in any election to increase property taxes through levies.

Hertz said he thinks solutions to property tax increases should come from both the local and state level. He cited a failed bill from Rep. Daniel Zolnikov, R-Billings, that would have limited revenue growth from local mill levies to 4.75%. Hertz also pointed to other bills that did things like use marijuana tax revenue to help reduce school taxes, which would lower property tax burdens.

Advertisement

Karlen, however, said voters around the state have not approved any levies adding to the local tax burden since lawmakers gathered in Helena in January. He also took jabs at other tax changes made during the session by Republicans that he said shifts the tax burden onto homeowners and renters. Those include increasing the business equipment tax exemption, a drop in the top income tax rate and cutting the capital gains tax.

Missoula County Commissioner Josh Slotnick also rebutted the notion local jurisdictions are wholly responsible for the jump in tax appraisals.

“I think they’re looking at the wrong side of the equation,” Slotnick said Wednesday. “Our levels of taxation reflect the cost of operating an effective local government, and our economy has changed. Our tax system should match our economy.”

While Slotnick advocates for a sales tax on tourist-specific items, like restaurants, bars, gasoline and hotels, he contends the revenue raised on such a theoretical tax would directly offset property taxes, rather than become a new pot of revenues for jurisdictions to allocate to different services.

Local sales tax options are hardly ever taken seriously by state lawmakers, and any suggestion of expanding population caps to the resort tax afforded to smaller municipalities like Whitefish and West Yellowstone have never gained traction in the GOP-led Legislature.

Advertisement

Slotnick said it is “highly unlikely” Missoula County will levy the same number of mills considering the value of a mill climbed thanks to the increase in home values.

In an effort happening outside the Legislature, Bozeman attorney and former GOP lawmaker Matthew Monforton again tried to bring a ballot initiative that would cap increases to taxable values at 2% unless there’s a change in property ownership. Monforton submitted the text of his proposed constitutional initiative for the 2024 ballot to the Secretary of State in April. On June 5, Republican Attorney General Austin Knudsen determined the initiative language was legally insufficient. In a petition Monforton filed challenging that determination before the Montana Supreme Court, he said the AG found a “nearly identical” initiative in 2021 passed muster. The court has not yet weighed in.

Holly Michels is the head of the Montana State News Bureau.  You can reach her at holly.michels@lee.net

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

'Montana Bar Fairies' expanding to Bozeman starting Cat-Griz weekend as Gallatin County DUIs increase

Published

on

'Montana Bar Fairies' expanding to Bozeman starting Cat-Griz weekend as Gallatin County DUIs increase


BOZEMAN — People in downtown Bozeman who choose not to drink and drive after a night out will soon see fairies giving them a gift to thank them for their good choices.

“Montana Bar Fairies is a nonprofit that my daughter and I started because my son was killed by a drunk driver in the Flathead, on March 23rd, after celebrating his 21st birthday,” says Beth McBride.

Bobby Dewbre was set to graduate from Flathead Valley Community College with a welding certificate before he was hit by a drunk driver while waiting for his sober ride.

To ensure no other family experiences the grief they do, Beth McBride and her daughter Carli Dewbre decided to start Montana Bar Fairies.

Advertisement

Hevenn Vanh

Montana Bar Fairies shirt that says, “Your luck will run out. Don’t drink and drive.”

“My daughter drove by a bar early in the morning on her way to work and she saw some cars in the parking lot. And she called me up and she said, ‘Mom I wish there was a way that we could thank people for not drinking and driving, for leaving their cars,’” McBride recalls.

The nonprofit began in Kalispell almost a year ago, but an increase in DUI-related accidents in Gallatin County brought the Bar Fairies to Bozeman.

“There seems to be a desire for the community here to say, ‘You know what? We’re done.’ It’s over. We’re not accepting drunk driving anymore. It’s time to save lives,” says McBride.

According to the Gallatin County DUI Task Force, Gallatin County consistently ranks in the top five most dangerous counties in Montana for impaired driving—with Bozeman Police issuing a majority of all DUIs in the county.

Advertisement

Bozeman’s Bar Fairies chapter director and MSU student, Patricia Hinchey, says there’s no better time to start their work in Bozeman than the weekend of Cat-Griz.

“Sunday morning, we’re going to be going really early and placing coffee cards on cars, around downtown, in the parking lots, along the streets. And so, if you’re lucky, you might get a coffee card thanking you for not drinking and driving after the Cat-Griz game,” Hinchey says.

Included with each coffee card is a card with a story of someone who lost their life to a drunk driver. Patricia says they’re looking for Bozeman families willing to share their story, as well as more volunteers.

“We want to take Montana from the worst state for DUI fatalities to zero. And we need the community’s help to do that,” says McBride.

Contact Hinchey for help with Bozeman’s chapter at Patricia@montanabarfairies.org

Advertisement

Learn more about Montana Bar Fairies at their website.





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

What’s At Stake For No. 1 NDSU at No. 4 USD & No. 9 Montana at No. 2 Montana State?

Published

on

What’s At Stake For No. 1 NDSU at No. 4 USD & No. 9 Montana at No. 2 Montana State?


The FCS playoff picture will take shape with Week 13 games a day before FCS Selection Sunday.

The Top 4 seeds could be pretty clear, depending on results. The Top 5 seeds could also get real messy, depending on results.

Two Top 10-ranked matchups will especially impact the order of the overall Top 8 seeds: No. 1 NDSU at No. 4 USD and No. 9 Montana at No. 2 Montana State.

What does this weekend’s result mean for these four teams and their playoff positioning? We’ll go through the scenarios below.

Advertisement

For the purposes of this article, we’ll say things go chalk and No. 5 UC Davis wins at Sac State and No. 3 SDSU wins at No. 18 Missouri State, which is no guarantee, but they would be big upsets if Davis or SDSU were to lose.

If Montana State & NDSU Win

NDSU and Montana State should be the Top 2 playoff seeds with home-field advantage.

It will be a healthy discussion in the selection room and during the committee member voting process on who the No. 1 seed is.

  • NDSU: 11-1 overall, 11-0 vs. the FCS, 5 currently-ranked wins, 2 Top 10 wins, No. 1 strength of schedule
  • MSU: 12-0 overall, 3 currently-ranked wins, 3 Top 10 wins, FBS win, No. 22 SOS

NDSU has been ranked No. 1 for most of this year, and the committee could have the same mindset as voters, similar to 2022.

Two years ago, Sac State had a better on-paper resume than SDSU, but SDSU, who was ranked No. 1 for most of the season, got the top seed. Sac State was 11-0 with an FBS win, four ranked wins, and the No. 4 SOS. SDSU was 10-1 overall, 10-0 vs. the FCS, three ranked wins, and the No. 5 SOS.

Seeds 3-4 behind NDSU and MSU would probably be SDSU and UC Davis, assuming they win on Saturday.

  • SDSU: 10-2 overall, 9-1 vs. the FCS, 9 D1 wins, 3 currently-ranked wins, 2 Top 10 wins, No. 3 SOS, FCS loss to NDSU
  • UC Davis: 10-2 overall, 10-1 vs. the FCS, 2 currently-ranked wins, 2 Top 10 wins, No. 15 SOS, FCS loss to MSU

Mercer, Idaho, or UIW could fight for the No. 5 seed after this.

With a loss, Montana would finish 8-4 overall/vs. the FCS with two currently-ranked wins. The Grizzlies will likely get a 9-16 seed and host a first-round game.

Advertisement

With a loss, USD will be nervously wondering if it’ll get a first-round bye. The Coyotes would finish 8-3 overall with only seven D1 wins and zero currently-ranked victories. How does that stack up to other teams with nine or 10 D1 wins who are fighting for a Top 8 seed? USD’s No. 8 SOS could help its argument, and if it were to lose to NDSU, a close loss would be important for the “eye test” instead of getting blown out.

If Montana State & USD Win

Montana State should jump to the No. 1 seed at 12-0, three currently-ranked wins, three Top 10 wins, and an FBS win.

With a loss, Montana would finish 8-4 overall/vs. the FCS with two currently-ranked wins. The Grizzlies will likely get a 9-16 seed and host a first-round game.

Seeds 2-5 then get very interesting in this scenario. The committee would have to sort through these teams to seed behind Montana State (assuming SDSU and UC Davis win on Saturday):

  • UC Davis: 10-2 overall, 10-1 vs. the FCS, 2 currently-ranked wins, 2 Top 10 wins, No. 15 SOS, FCS loss to MSU
  • NDSU: 10-2 overall, 10-1 vs. the FCS, 4 currently-ranked wins, 1 Top 10 win, No. 1 SOS, FCS loss to USD
  • USD: 9-2 overall, 8-1 vs. the FCS, 8 D1 wins, 1 currently-ranked win, 1 Top 10 win, No. 8 SOS, FCS loss to SDSU
  • SDSU: 10-2 overall, 9-1 vs. the FCS, 9 D1 wins, 3 currently-ranked wins, 2 Top 10 wins, No. 3 SOS, FCS loss to NDSU


If Montana & NDSU Win

Montana should get into the Top 8 seeds at 9-3 overall/vs. the FCS with three currently-ranked wins, one Top 10 win, and the No. 18 SOS. The Griz would likely be in the 6-8 seed range.

NDSU should secure the No. 1 seed with a win and a Montana State loss. The Bison would be 11-1 overall, 11-0 vs. the FCS, five currently-ranked wins, two Top 10 wins, and the No. 1 SOS.

Advertisement

Seeds 2-4 then get very interesting in this scenario. The committee would have to sort through these teams to seed behind NDSU (assuming SDSU and UC Davis win on Saturday):

  • UC Davis: 10-2 overall, 10-1 vs. the FCS, 2 currently-ranked wins, 2 Top 10 wins, No. 15 SOS, FCS loss to MSU
  • MSU: 11-1 overall, 11 D1 wins, 2 currently-ranked wins, 2 Top 10 wins, FBS win, No. 22 SOS, FCS loss to Montana
  • SDSU: 10-2 overall, 9-1 vs. the FCS, 9 D1 wins, 3 currently-ranked wins, 2 Top 10 wins, No. 3 SOS, FCS loss to NDSU

Mercer, Idaho, or UIW could fight for the No. 5 seed after this.

With a loss, USD will be nervously wondering if it’ll get a first-round bye. The Coyotes would finish 8-3 overall with only seven D1 wins and zero currently-ranked victories. How does that stack up to other teams with nine or 10 D1 wins who are fighting for a Top 8 seed? USD’s No. 8 SOS could help its argument, and if it were to lose to NDSU, a close loss would be important for the “eye test” instead of getting blown out.

promo-page-bannerpromo-page-banner

If Montana & USD Win

Montana should get into the Top 8 seeds at 9-3 overall/vs. the FCS with three currently-ranked wins, one Top 10 win, and the No. 18 SOS. The Griz would likely be in the 6-8 seed range.

Seeds 1-5 would be an absolute battle in this scenario. The committee would have to sort through these teams to seed the Top 5 (assuming SDSU and UC Davis win on Saturday):

  • UC Davis: 10-2 overall, 10-1 vs. the FCS, 2 currently-ranked wins, 2 Top 10 wins, No. 15 SOS, FCS loss to MSU
  • MSU: 11-1 overall, 11 D1 wins, 2 currently-ranked wins, 2 Top 10 wins, FBS win, No. 22 SOS, FCS loss to Montana
  • SDSU: 10-2 overall, 9-1 vs. the FCS, 9 D1 wins, 3 currently-ranked wins, 2 Top 10 wins, No. 3 SOS, FCS loss to NDSU
  • NDSU: 10-2 overall, 10-1 vs. the FCS, 4 currently-ranked wins, 1 Top 10 win, No. 1 SOS, FCS loss to USD
  • USD: 9-2 overall, 8-1 vs. the FCS, 8 D1 wins, 1 currently-ranked win, 1 Top 10 win, No. 8 SOS, FCS loss to SDSU

Uffda. Good luck!

jamie-foxx-fbo-latest-9-24jamie-foxx-fbo-latest-9-24



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Montana

Pregnant Montana Brown shows off her blossoming baby bump in a stylish green bikini as she prepares to welcome her baby girl

Published

on

Pregnant Montana Brown shows off her blossoming baby bump in a stylish green bikini as she prepares to welcome her baby girl


Montana Brown showed off her blossoming baby bump in a series of vacation snaps on Thursday. 

The former Love Island star, 29, who is expecting her second child with fiancé Mark O’Connor, displayed her growing bump in a stylish green bikini which consisted of a triangle bikini top and a pair of tie-side bikini bottoms. 

Cradling her bump, the TV star further accessorised her pool-side look with a pair of cool shades. 

The mother-of-one captioned the gorgeous snaps with: ‘Not long Babygirl (heart emoji)’

Advertisement

Fans and close friends of the star then flocked to the comment section to pay their compliments. 

One fan wrote: ‘A real life angel!!!’; ‘Gorgeous glowing mama’; ‘Feels like yesterday baby Jude was in there!!’

Pregnant Montana Brown showed off her blossoming baby bump while wearing a bikini in a series of vacation snaps on Thursday

The former Love Island star, 29, is expecting her second child with fiancé Mark O'Connor

The former Love Island star, 29, is expecting her second child with fiancé Mark O’Connor

Montana announced she was pregnant with her second child in July and took to her Instagram to share the happy news with her 1.1 million followers. 

She displayed her tummy in a chic knit dress and cradled her stomach as she smiled for the camera in the clip. 

Confirming that she is expecting again with her rugby player fiancé Mark, Montana wrote: ‘Two under two let’s go!’

Advertisement

Montana and Mark welcomed their first child, a son named Jude, in June last year and announced they were expecting again just 13 months later.

The couple travelled to Santorini after they enjoyed a week-long holiday with their son Jude in Montenegro and shared updates from their sun-soaked trip. 

The reality personality was flooded with congratulatory messages from her famous friends and Instagram followers.

Gabby Allen, who appeared on her series of Love Island, wrote: ‘Omgggg.’

While fellow Love Island alum, Tasha Ghouri said: ‘Ahh!! Congratulations!’

Advertisement
The mother-of-one captioned the gorgeous snaps with: 'Not long Babygirl (heart emoji)'

The mother-of-one captioned the gorgeous snaps with: ‘Not long Babygirl (heart emoji)’

Samira Mighty penned: ‘Ahhhh.’

Food influencer Emily English posted a series of clapping hands while Tiffany Watson and Natalya Wright both said ‘congratulations’.

Other stars who shared their support included Vicky Pattison, Danielle Lloyd, Grace Beverley, Kendall Rae Knight and Elle Brown.

Earlier this year, Montana celebrated the joys and sorrows of motherhood as she paid tribute to her baby son Jude in a heartfelt Instagram post.

Montana reflected on her pregnancy journey seven months after her little one was born – as she shared her emotional thoughts with her followers.

Advertisement

She detailed the highs and lows of the ‘humbling’ experience, admitting she was always ‘one comment away from having a meltdown’ but it also made her ‘respect her body so much more’.

Sharing a throwback picture of when she was seven months pregnant, she showed off her baby bump in a red bikini.

Montana was seen posing on a lavish terrace while soaking up the sun, adding a stylish straw hat and chic shades.

Montana announced she was pregnant with her second child in July and took to her Instagram to share the happy news with her 1.1 million followers

Montana announced she was pregnant with her second child in July and took to her Instagram to share the happy news with her 1.1 million followers 

Montana and Mark welcomed their first child, a son named Jude, in June last year and announced they were expecting again just 13 months later

Montana and Mark welcomed their first child, a son named Jude, in June last year and announced they were expecting again just 13 months later 

In the second shot, she displayed her growing baby bump in the same beach set while smiling happily in a mirror selfie.

The TV star added a few heart-melting pictures of little Jude to her carousel, accompanied by a lengthy caption: ‘7 months in vs 7 months out.’

Advertisement

‘I actually LOVED being pregnant, it was such a special experience and it really made me respect my body so much more I’m still in awe.’

‘This chapter has been hard, the lack of sleep etc is so tough, I legit cried when someone beeped me in the car recently and I always feel one beep or one comment away from having a meltdown but it’s such a humbling experience.’

She went on saying: ‘I am in awe of the mums that do it on their own, don’t have family around to support and who just don’t get a break because I am so fortunate to have support around me and I am STILL in the thick of it..’

The Love Islander finished gushing over her tiny one: ‘But despite how tired I have been, Jude gets me through, his smile first thing in the morning is just priceless.’



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending