Connect with us

Montana

Montana AG raises concerns about credit card companies tracking firearm purchases

Published

on

Montana AG raises concerns about credit card companies tracking firearm purchases


Legal professional Common Austin Knudsen. (Offered by the Montana Legal professional Common’s Workplace for the Day by day Montanan.)

Montana Legal professional Common Austin Knudsen is main a gaggle of attorneys common in calling out a handful of economic establishments for a brand new coverage that will observe and monitor firearm purchases.

On the heart of the coalition’s ire is current motion taken by the Worldwide Group for Standardization —  a worldwide federation of nationwide requirements our bodies —that will create a Service provider Class Code for gun shops to make use of when processing credit score and debit card transactions. The attorneys common outlined their issues concerning the new coverage in a letter dated Sept. 20 addressed to Stephen J. Squeri, chairmain and CEO of American Categorical, Michael Miebach, president and CEO of Mastercard and Alfred F. Kelly Jr., chairman and CEO of Visa. The letter was authored by Knudsen and Tennessee Legal professional Common Jonathan Skrmetti.

Advertisement

“It’s extraordinarily disappointing to see bank card corporations cave to strain from worldwide our bodies and undertake this measure that may do nothing to enhance public security,” Knudsen stated in a press launch. “As an alternative, it invitations potential future invasions of shopper privateness and additional coordination between firms and authorities companies to erode Individuals’ basic proper to maintain and bear arms.”

Whereas it’s unclear if any of the monetary establishments have began utilizing the brand new categorization, the attorneys common say it goes towards the U.S. Structure’s Second Modification and public security.

“The brand new code is not going to shield public security. Categorizing the constitutionally protected proper to buy firearms unfairly singles out law-abiding retailers and customers alike,” the letter reads.

It goes on to say that the brand new coverage will end in imprecise and deceptive info. For instance, it says the brand new categorization wouldn’t be capable to differentiate between the acquisition of a gun protected and a firearm.

The letter additionally raises issues about doable misuse of the information collected.

Advertisement

“Creating and monitoring this information solely issues in case your establishments are contemplating utilizing that info to take additional, dangerous motion—like infringing upon shopper privateness, inhibiting constitutionally protected purchases by selectively limiting using your cost programs, or in any other case withholding your monetary providers from focused ‘disfavored’ retailers,” the letter reads.

In response to the letter, Knudsen and the opposite attorneys common see the brand new coverage as a company overreach and a strategy to additional the businesses’ social values.

“The brand new code for gun shops is the results of transnational collusion between giant firms leveraging their market energy to additional their house owners’ desired social outcomes,” the letter states. “Social coverage needs to be debated and decided inside our political establishments. Individuals are uninterested in seeing company leverage used to advance political objectives that can’t muster fundamental democratic help.”

Attorneys common from Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming, West Virginia additionally signed onto the letter.

The letter additionally threatens the businesses with authorized motion in the event that they determine to implement the brand new categorization.

Advertisement

“Be suggested that we are going to marshal the complete scope of our lawful authority to guard our residents and customers from illegal makes an attempt to undermine their constitutional rights. Please maintain that in thoughts as you take into account whether or not to proceed with adopting and implementing this Service provider Class Code,” the letter reads.

The submit Montana AG raises issues about bank card corporations monitoring firearm purchases appeared first on Day by day Montanan.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

Average gas prices drop 4¢ per gallon in Montana

Published

on

Average gas prices drop 4¢ per gallon in Montana


Gas prices have dropped again across Montana just as drivers hit the roads for one of the year’s busiest travel times.

GasBuddy.com reports average gasoline prices in the state have fallen 4.2¢ per gallon in the last week and are averaging $2.79 per gallon as of Monday.

Gas prices are 20.2¢ per gallon lower than at this time a month ago and 22.7¢ per gallon lower than a year ago.

The national average price of gasoline has risen 3.1¢ per gallon over the last week to $3.01 per gallon, which is 2.6¢ lower than a month ago.

Advertisement

GassBuddy.com reports the cheapest gas in Montana was at $2.56 per gallon on Sunday while the most expensive was $3.06 per gallon.





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana State Supreme Court Upholds Historic Climate Decision

Published

on

Montana State Supreme Court Upholds Historic Climate Decision


Montana’s Republican lawmakers may not be swayed by the gravity of climate crisis, but six state Supreme Court justices did not need convincing. Last Wednesday, 16 young plaintiffs won a resounding victory as those jurists upheld a historic 2023 climate decision, with only one dissenting vote among the seven justices. With climate deniers poised to roll back energy and environmental policies in Washington next year, and the U.N. climate conference (COP29) failing to resolve major international challenges, the decision was a bright spot in an otherwise dismal year of climate policy developments.

The case tackled the state’s appeal of Held v. Montana (2023), which found a provision of the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) unconstitutional. This “MEPA limitation” prohibited environmental studies demonstrating how the state’s greenhouse gas emissions contribute to global climate change. The state Supreme Court agreed with a lower-court ruling that the provision is unconstitutional because it violated the right to “a clean and healthful environment.”

More from Gabrielle Gurley

In the 2023 decision, Judge Kathy Seeley took great care to provide a detailed exploration of the climate issues and give credence to the young people’s fears for their future. While state Supreme Court justices touched on some climate issues, such as increasing global temperatures, they turned their attention to the specific question of climate change as “a serious threat to the constitutional guarantee of a clean and healthful environment in Montana.”

Advertisement

Significantly, the justices pointed to the state constitution’s stipulation that “the state and each person shall maintain and improve” Montana’s environment “for present and future generations.” The legislature, for its part, had the responsibility to protect what they termed the “environmental life support system” from “unreasonable depletion and degradation of natural resources.”

They decided that the framers of the state constitution wanted to carve out “the strongest environmental protection provision found in any state constitution” and agreed with the young plaintiffs that there is ample evidence that the climate crisis has exacerbated wildfires and affected air and water quality in the state. The jurists also noted that the framers “would [not] grant the State a free pass to pollute the Montana environment just because the rest of the world insisted on doing so.”

The single dissent from Justice Jim Rice rested largely on the standing of the young people to bring the initial lawsuit. He argued that there was “no project, no application, no decision, no permit, no enforcement of a statute” that materially affected the group. Their stories were “not legally unique” and no different from other state residents.

Gov. Greg Gianforte (R-MT) argued that the case will prompt “perpetual lawsuits” and increase energy bills for residents. He also echoed the dissenting justice’s contention that the decision was another example of judicial activism with the court “step[ping] outside of its lane” to tread on legislative prerogatives. Not surprisingly, using Held v. Montana as an entrée, Montana Republican legislative leaders—the GOP controls both chambers—have pledged to take up new curbs on the state courts when the legislature reconvenes in January.

But for now, the ruling produces a powerful precedent that citizens, no matter their age, play an important role in shielding the planet from environmental harm, and cannot be easily dismissed.

Advertisement

December 23, 2024

5:15 AM

Unlike many news organizations, the Prospect has remained staunchly committed to keeping our journalism free and accessible to all. We believe that independent journalism is crucial for a functioning democracy—but quality reporting comes at a cost.

This year, we’re aiming to raise $75,000 to continue delivering the hard-hitting investigative journalism you’ve come to expect from us. Your support helps us maintain our independence and dig deeper into the stories that matter most.

Advertisement

If you value our reporting, please consider making a contribution today. Any amount helps secure our future and ensure we can continue holding power to account.

Will you support independent journalism with a donation to the Prospect?



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana Lottery Lucky For Life, Big Sky Bonus results for Dec. 22, 2024

Published

on


The Montana Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Dec. 22, 2024, results for each game:

Winning Lucky For Life numbers from Dec. 22 drawing

04-07-37-43-47, Lucky Ball: 08

Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Big Sky Bonus numbers from Dec. 22 drawing

03-12-23-27, Bonus: 06

Advertisement

Check Big Sky Bonus payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

When are the Montana Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 9:00 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Lucky For Life: 8:38 p.m. MT daily.
  • Lotto America: 9:00 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Big Sky Bonus: 7:30 p.m. MT daily.
  • Powerball Double Play: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Montana Cash: 8:00 p.m. MT on Wednesday and Saturday.

Missed a draw? Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.

Winning lottery numbers are sponsored by Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network.

Where can you buy lottery tickets?

Tickets can be purchased in person at gas stations, convenience stores and grocery stores. Some airport terminals may also sell lottery tickets.

You can also order tickets online through Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network, in these U.S. states and territories: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Texas, Washington, D.C., and West Virginia. The Jackpocket app allows you to pick your lottery game and numbers, place your order, see your ticket and collect your winnings all using your phone or home computer.

Advertisement

Jackpocket is the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue for audience referrals to Jackpocket services. GAMBLING PROBLEM? CALL 1-800-GAMBLER, Call 877-8-HOPENY/text HOPENY (467369) (NY). 18+ (19+ in NE, 21+ in AZ). Physically present where Jackpocket operates. Jackpocket is not affiliated with any State Lottery. Eligibility Restrictions apply. Void where prohibited. Terms: jackpocket.com/tos.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Great Falls Tribune editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending