Connect with us

Montana

Economic update: Montana likely poised for slower growth in ’24

Published

on

Economic update: Montana likely poised for slower growth in ’24


Montana is likely facing a period of slower growth in 2024 after a hot few years of economic activity, according to Patrick Barkey, the director of the Bureau of Business and Economic Research at the University of Montana.

“The fear of recession has really receded,” he told a crowd in Bozeman on Wednesday. “What we face is slow growth. There’s no drama there. What we’ve been though since 2020 has been nothing but drama, down then up. But slow growth is coming.”

Barkey and a group of other experts are on their annual Economic Outlook Seminar, a tour around the state to give people a look into the crystal ball about what we can all expect in the years ahead and where things stand right now. The talks focus on the economy, tourism, health care, housing and other topics.

On a past tour in 2022, Barkey and his team predicted a recession would happen in Montana and in the U.S. in 2023. Like many other economists, they were wrong.

Advertisement

People are also reading…

“2023 was nothing at all like we forecasted,” Barkey explained.

Advertisement

Instead, the coveted “soft landing” appears to have happened, meaning growth was throttled just enough to tame inflation but not cause a recession.






Advertisement

Permits for new residential construction in Montana have dipped in recent years despite high prices.




But now it looks as if consumers have run out of spending power.

“We really think that the stronger growth in the second half of last year borrowed from this year,” Barkey said. “The capacity for consumer spending growth is just not there. We’ve spent down that extra cash. Consumer credit (debt) is up. It just looks like an economy that’s breaking.”

Advertisement

Barkey said he and many other economists are predicting that the Federal Reserve Board will cut interest rates in the coming year. He said rates are currently high, which is hampering everything from new construction to homebuying activity. Barkey noted that historically, interest rates have been much higher in past decades than they are now.

The economy has been a rollercoaster for the past few years, he explained.

“We have been through an incredible experience,” Barkey said. “Usually, the economy takes the elevator down and takes the stairs back up. That certainly was true for the Great Recession. But this time we took the elevator up.”

For example, Montana has recovered 149% of the jobs lost during the pandemic, he said, meaning there has been explosive job growth here. That’s true of other states in the Mountain West.

“The big growth story is the Mountain West and the South,” Barkey explained. “That’s likely to stay around for a while.”

Advertisement

Migration of people into Montana has slowed down the last couple years. In 2021, there were about 20,000 new residents in Montana from other places. That dropped to about 10,000 in 2023.

“Migration to Montana cooled last year, and it was inevitable that this would cool off,” Barkey noted.

The labor market remains tight, which means there are more job openings than workers. That means workers have more latitude to choose their jobs and the terms of their jobs.

Montana’s economy peaked a few years ago.

“In the Montana economy, it’s like you’re reading a book you can’t put down —  it’s so dramatic,” Barkey said. “It’s really clear the peak here was 2021. It’s been slowing down since. It’s most evident from tax receipts. Not so much wages and salaries. Business owners are seeing the big change. They’re not in terrible shape, they’re just not seeing that same phenomenal growth.”

Advertisement

As far as predictions for the U.S. economy, Barkey said he and many others are carefully watching China.

“There’s been a profound growth slowdown in China,” he said. “But that’s helping to keep commodity prices in check. If you’re smiling because gas prices are low, that’s the reason.”

A special feature on this tour is a presentation on what it would take to implement the so-called “green energy transition” in Montana.

Barkey’s message was that Montana, and the rest of the U.S., will have some hard decisions to make in the future if we’re going to transition to carbon-free power. He noted that by 2035, the world would have to produce many times more copper than has ever been produced in the past in order to get away from burning fossil fuels.

“That’s difficult to do in the U.S. because it takes so long to permit mines,” he said. He showed one example of a copper mine in Montana, the Black Butte Copper Project, that’s taken 14 years to get permitted and still isn’t fully operational. Barkey said he has no opinion of whether it’s good or bad to have a mine permit take that long.

Advertisement

“I just say this process is incompatible with meeting green energy transition goals as they relate to copper demand,” he said. “So one or the other has to give.”

Derek Sheehan, an economist at the Bureau, gave an update on housing and construction.

He said there are low rental vacancy rates, leading to high rent prices. There’s a relatively low number of homes for sale, but also a low number of buyers who are waiting on lower interest rates. And the building industry is in sort of a holding pattern. He noted that builders, and employers in many industries, are having trouble hiring and keeping workers because of high housing prices.

“The residential market in Montana is undergoing significant changes, highlighting the urgency for a proactive and equitable approach to boost housing availability,” Sheehan said. “Consumers naturally turn to their next feasible option in markets where supply is scarce, and prices are rising. It is critical to recognize the demand for housing, ranging from homeless shelters to vacation homes, is interconnected.”

He noted that plenty of research shows that rising rent prices correlate to an increase in per capita homeless people in cities that have been studied.

Advertisement

Melissa Weddell, the director of the Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research at UM said that Montana’s approach to tourists has changed since the huge influx of people visiting during and after the pandemic.

“The old model was to bring as many people as possible, and that’s changed since the pandemic,” she said. “We’re starting to see this real shift in what we call ‘destination stewardship.’”

She explained that communities are trying to build a sustainable tourism model so that towns aren’t overrun by tourists and the natural resources are preserved, yet the industry remains an important part of the economy.

David Erickson is the business reporter for the Missoulian. 

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.
Advertisement
Advertisement



Source link

Montana

Photos: Montana East-West Shrine Game

Published

on

Photos: Montana East-West Shrine Game





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana Lottery Powerball, Lotto America results for June 20, 2026

Published

on


The Montana Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at June 20, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from June 20 drawing

16-20-44-48-50, Powerball: 15, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Lotto America numbers from June 20 drawing

08-14-31-41-52, Star Ball: 04, ASB: 03

Check Lotto America payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Big Sky Bonus numbers from June 20 drawing

09-22-25-26, Bonus: 11

Check Big Sky Bonus payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Montana Cash numbers from June 20 drawing

05-22-28-30-34

Advertisement

Check Montana Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

When are the Montana Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 9 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Lucky For Life: 8:38 p.m. MT daily.
  • Lotto America: 9 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Big Sky Bonus: 7:30 p.m. MT daily.
  • Powerball Double Play: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Montana Cash: 8 p.m. MT on Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 9:15 p.m. MT daily.

Missed a draw? Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Great Falls Tribune editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Montana

Planning For Life After Coal Cost a Montana County Commissioner His Seat – Inside Climate News

Published

on

Planning For Life After Coal Cost a Montana County Commissioner His Seat – Inside Climate News


Robert Pancratz couldn’t believe it. 

The Musselshell County commissioner had been defeated in the Republican primary for his seat by a two-to-one margin earlier this month. Mark Olson, who lives in Musselshell and serves as the undersheriff in Golden Valley County, won by 26 percentage points.

“That just blew me away,” Pancratz said. “All of my campaign, I had not a hint that there was that much opposition.”

At stake, from Pancratz’s perspective, is the fiscal future of his community, which includes Roundup, Montana, home to Montana’s only longwall coal mine. The mine, owned and operated by Signal Peak Energy, sits on the eastern side of the continental divide in a staunchly conservative part of the state, where its presence provides jobs and its profits generate taxable revenue for local governments. (The vast majority of its coal, the dirtiest fossil fuel, goes to markets in Asia.)

Advertisement

But that revenue could potentially be diminished by tens of millions, according to calculations by Pancratz, if a bill introduced by U.S. Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., passes Congress. The Crow Revenue Act would convey federally held coal to Signal Peak through a land transfer to a private intermediary, depriving Musselshell County of its share of the taxes Signal Peak Energy pays to mine coal on federal land. 

If the Crow Revenue Act does not pass Congress, Signal Peak says it could be forced to shut down if it loses a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana challenging the “energy emergency” the Trump administration used to grant the mine access to federal coal. That outcome would wipe out all the mine’s tax revenue and hundreds of jobs, the company claims. This month’s election hinged on Pancratz’s position on the bill and, by extension, the mine. 

Musselshell County’s three commissioners, Mike Goffena, Mike Turley and Pancratz support keeping the mine open. But they also fear Musselshell County would need to raise taxes and cut services to balance its books if the Crow Revenue Act passes as written. After studying the county’s finances, Pancratz, who works as a risk analyst consultant, concluded that the county could lose as much as $11.6 million if the Crow Revenue Act passes and the price of coal is high. The commissioners have lobbied for changes to the bill that would guarantee the county some revenue from the land transfer. 

Musselshell County commissioner Robert Pancratz lost in the Republican primary for his seat earlier this month. Credit: Courtesy of Robert Pancratz
Musselshell County commissioner Robert Pancratz lost in the Republican primary for his seat earlier this month. Credit: Courtesy of Robert Pancratz

Pancratz says he was just doing his job.

“As a risk manager, I have to develop a contingency plan for the possibility that the long-term stream of coal revenue could be disrupted or ended,” he said. “We needed to have a plan to effectively transition to other revenue sources. When I used the word transition, they took that as I was an environmentalist that was against coal.” 

“Why anybody would have a problem with that is baffling to me. But that’s what happened.”

Advertisement

According to Pancratz, Signal Peak Energy branded the men as environmentalists who want to see the company shut down forever and this willful mischaracterization played a large role in his defeat.

“The picture they painted of me was totally false,” he said.

In a recording of a commissioner meeting posted to a local Facebook group by a Signal Peak Energy employee less than a month before the election, Pancratz, Goffena and Turley can be heard strategizing how to express their concerns about the Crow Revenue Act to Daines, whom they describe as unresponsive to their concerns. 

Pancratz suggests asking for a $100 million endowment to transition from coal to “scare” Daines and Signal Peak Energy. Turley states that with funding at that level, they wouldn’t care if the mine was open or not.

“Exactly,” Pancratz responded.

Advertisement

Comments on the video show viewers expressing outrage that the commissioners would “play chicken” with the future of the mine, which provides hundreds of jobs in the surrounding area. 

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

Pancratz said the conversation was recorded without the commissioners’ knowledge. Montana is a two-party consent state, meaning all parties must be aware of and consent to a recording, but he allowed that it was possible one of the commissioners forgot to close a virtual public meeting after it concluded.

Advertisement

Pancratz said the conversation occurred when the commissioners found out there would be no money in the Crow Revenue Act for the county. The bill’s supporters, including Signal Peak Energy, had told them that the county would not lose any revenue under the bill, he said. 

“We were upset because we felt we’d been lied to,” Pancratz said.

Signal Peak Energy did not respond to a written message and phone call seeking comment. For a time after Signal Peak took over the mine in the late 2000s, it was plagued by malfeasance, including embezzlement, a faked kidnapping and safety and environmental violations, according to reporting by The New York Times.

Olson said he entered the race due to a “lack of transparency” from the commissioners over how the county was spending its money.

Mark Olson lives in Musselshell and currently serves as the undersheriff in Golden Valley County. Credit: Courtesy of Mark OlsonMark Olson lives in Musselshell and currently serves as the undersheriff in Golden Valley County. Credit: Courtesy of Mark Olson
Mark Olson lives in Musselshell and currently serves as the undersheriff in Golden Valley County. Credit: Courtesy of Mark Olson

But the mine played a role in his decision to run, too. As he was weighing his options, Olson said his cousin, Alan Olson, a former state legislator and former executive director of the Montana Petroleum Association, visited him and urged him to run to support the mine. After that conversation, he was convinced the mine’s survival depended on the Crow Revenue Act passing, and that trying to amend it would jeopardize the legislation.

“The more money we can get for the county, the better, but I don’t think it’s worth risking the mine closing,” Olson said. Losing federal revenue was better than losing all the jobs and the tax base if the mine closes, he concluded. 

Advertisement

Olson added that Parker Phipps, Signal Peak Energy’s CEO, has briefed him on the mine’s fiscal relationship with Musselshell County.

Olson’s background in law enforcement could add a new perspective to the county commissioner meetings, given Goffena and Turley’s background in ranching, he said, but the minutiae of the county’s budget will be new to him. 

“I am by no means an expert in any of this stuff,” he said.

Some worry that, with the mine facing a lawsuit, an unpredictable global coal market and the uncertain future of the Crow Revenue Act, the commissioners cannot afford to lose momentum in their efforts to attract new industries to the area.

Olson’s win in the primary will “set [economic diversification planning] back long term,” Nicole Borner, a former Musselshell County commissioner, who thinks Olson was hand-picked by the Signal Peak Energy to run and is not informed about what the job entails. 

Advertisement

“We will always just have a few crumbs to duct tape a few issues,” she said. “We’ll never be able to fix the prior forty years of being in a coal bust and our infrastructure just literally falling apart.” 

The storefronts of businesses in Roundup, Mont. Credit: Jake Bolster/Inside Climate NewsThe storefronts of businesses in Roundup, Mont. Credit: Jake Bolster/Inside Climate News
The storefronts of businesses in Roundup, Mont. Credit: Jake Bolster/Inside Climate News

Olson will likely run unopposed in the general election.

In his remaining time in office, Pancratz said he will continue to push for economic diversification in Musselshell County. He holds no animosity towards Olson, who calls Pancratz “a wonderful guy.” Instead, he laments not addressing concerns over his position on the mine sooner in the campaign. But he believes Signal Peak Energy’s political and social influence—the company operates a charity in the region—is what swayed the election.

“You can’t say anything that even remotely implies that you’re trying to prepare the county for the possibility that coal revenue may not be steady or high … There’s this attitude that the county is in debt to that coal mine. And the message I tried to get out is, it’s more the reverse,” Pancratz said. 

“I personally don’t believe the mine really cares about the county.”

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

Advertisement

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending