Connect with us

Idaho

Overwhelming bipartisan support for tax relief in Idaho

Published

on

Overwhelming bipartisan support for tax relief in Idaho


The Idaho legislature yesterday overwhelmingly adopted Governor Little’s proposal for broad-based tax cuts, flattening Idaho’s earnings tax, and making focused schooling investments. Not solely was the vote bipartisan (34-1 in Senate and 55-15 in Home), however a number of Democratic lawmakers additionally gave ground speeches in assist of the tax aid saying that authorities shouldn’t maintain on to surplus tax income and as a substitute ought to return some to taxpayers. Whereas offering tax cuts throughout the nation has been a bipartisan effort throughout the previous couple of years, Washington’s majority occasion has but to point out curiosity in prioritizing tax aid.

As for yesterday’s motion in Idaho, this new spherical of tax cuts comes on prime of greater than $350 million in tax aid adopted earlier this yr in that state. Transferring to a flat price now supplies Idaho a path to adopting a revenue-trigger phase-out of its earnings tax based mostly on future progress.

Our buddies on the Mountain States Coverage Heart famous in regards to the Idaho tax aid:

“No less than 10 different states have lowered or flattened their private earnings taxes in 2022, and lots of extra did so in 2021…With document income on the horizon, policymakers ought to proceed to search for methods to decrease the earnings tax price. However right now, Idaho lawmakers and the governor deserve credit score for serving to Idaho households and companies, and conserving the state aggressive.”

Advertisement

I used to be capable of watch a lot of the ground debate yesterday by the Idaho Home and Senate. Whereas parachuting into their debate I discovered myself agreeing with most of the arguments: Single topic and separation of powers are necessary, the one-day particular session for main tax coverage was dangerous course of with little transparency, and the document income surplus supplies an excellent alternative for tax aid and focused investments.

Nearly all of people who voted in opposition to the Idaho tax cuts did so not as a result of they have been against tax aid, however as a substitute out of protest of the method. The tax lower invoice was written by Governor Little and the foundations of the particular session restricted debate on different proposals. This led to issues about separations of powers and whether or not the invoice violated Idaho’s single-subject restriction. The one-day particular session additionally restricted the chance for public involvement.

As we’ve seen with Washington’s abuse of Title Solely payments and dashing tax will increase by way of the waning hours of session, public course of issues whatever the coverage being applied.

After monitoring yesterday’s Idaho particular session, an necessary transparency reform ought to be adopted. Like in Washington, Idaho provides the power to join legislative committee agenda notifications and invoice actions. Sadly, you need to enroll on the day of the legislative motion. I realized this after not receiving any updates yesterday regardless of signing up weeks in the past. Here’s what I used to be advised by Idaho legislative employees once I inquired about not getting the small print:

“Every session (particular or common), have to be signed up for individually. Which implies, for those who had signed up for notifications previous to this morning, it will have been for session 2021 nonetheless. Moreover, our committee pages don’t go ‘dwell’ till the session begins.”

Advertisement

To enhance public involvement and transparency, Idaho signups for legislative agenda notifications mustn’t expire and residents shouldn’t should repeatedly request the identical info.

As for the opposite issues expressed in regards to the separation of powers and course of for the particular session, Idaho voters could have a possibility to deal with that in November once they think about Senate Joint Decision 102. In line with Idaho Experiences:

“Senate Joint Decision 102, if accepted by voters, would enable lawmakers to convene a session with a petition signed by 60% of every chamber and delivered to the Home speaker and Senate president professional tem. The petition additionally would define the themes for consideration within the session.”

It was refreshing to hearken to Democratic and Republican lawmakers in Idaho yesterday make the case for tax aid. It was additionally irritating realizing that Washington’s majority occasion has not but come to the identical conclusion nearly all of bipartisan lawmakers throughout the nation have on tax cuts.

Our lawmakers will get one other likelihood after the state’s September 23 income forecast. If the forecast continues to point out a serious income improve for the funds outlook (like occurred in June), tax aid should lastly be prioritized by the bulk occasion.

Advertisement

If Washington’s non-partisan income forecast might be handled as gospel for spending will increase, it must also be ok to offer tax aid.

Further Data
$1.5 billion improve in June income forecast ought to be devoted to tax aid
Majority of Democratic trifecta states pursuing broad tax aid

 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Idaho

Child killed in tractor accident south of Rexburg – East Idaho News

Published

on

Child killed in tractor accident south of Rexburg – East Idaho News


The following is a news release from Idaho State Police.

REXBURG – Idaho State Police is investigating a tractor-related incident that occurred at 3:14 pm on Friday in a field off of East 7000 South south of Rexburg, in Madison County.

A 45-year-old male from Rexburg was doing field work in a tractor. A juvenile passenger fell from the tractor and was struck by the equipment. The juvenile succumbed to their injuries on scene.

ISP was assisted by Madison County Sheriff’s Office, Bonneville County Sheriff’s Office, and Madison County EMS and Fire.

Advertisement

The accident is under investigation by the Idaho State Police.

=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho law says rape victims are entitled to a timely police report for abortion care, but that doesn’t always happen

Published

on

Idaho law says rape victims are entitled to a timely police report for abortion care, but that doesn’t always happen


In Idaho, women who become pregnant following a sexual assault are legally allowed to get an abortion under the law’s few exceptions. But, they first have to report their assault to a law enforcement agency and produce a police report to medical providers.

Those who do report to law enforcement and request copies of the document required by the statute may find barriers in authorities’ failure to understand their role in the process and lack of consistent protocols to assist victims.

“Most survivors opt out”

Victims advocates say requiring women to report to law enforcement prevents many from seeking the help they need.

Kelly Miller, the former head of the Idaho Coalition against Sexual and Domestic Violence said rape and sexual assault are some of the most underreported crimes in the state.

Advertisement

“Sexual assault and its various manifestations happens at extraordinarily high numbers that are not captured in most of the national or state data,” she said. Fear of not being believed by authorities and retaliation from their aggressor who they may know are a few of the reasons women don’t report their assault to the police, she added.

In 2023, law enforcement agencies in Idaho processed 594 cases of rapes, a figure she said does not reflect the reality of sexual violence in the state.

“Often, sexual assault survivors just want it to be over and so having to go through the trauma of reporting, the trauma of a forensic interview, most survivors opt out,” she said.

A woman who has been raped and wants an abortion in Idaho, first has to report her assault to the authorities, then has to request a copy of her report from the police. Only then can a medical provider perform an abortion.

“Those barriers are just going to be too much for some of those victims,” Dr. Samuel Dickman, an abortion provider in Montana. “And they will have to continue pregnancies as a result. I think that’s just incredibly tragic.”

Advertisement

Dickman co-authored a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association that estimates in the 16 months following Idaho’s abortion ban, around 11,000 women were sexually assaulted in the state, a much higher number than what is reported to the authorities. Of those assaults, the study estimates more than a thousand resulted in a pregnancy.

“And the rape exceptions are doing virtually nothing to help those victims,” Dickman said, adding about 50% of rape survivors who become pregnant as a result of their assault look to terminate the pregnancy.

“What that means is that the vast majority of survivors of sexual assault who become pregnant are not able to get legal care in state in Idaho, despite the fact that technically it ought to be available to them,” he added.

Miller said the legal system is not centered around the needs of victims. No other type of medical intervention appears to require patients to interact with law enforcement as a precondition for care.

“This is a such a personal and deep and profound trauma when someone’s sexually assaulted that asking them to report is taking away agency and choice, which was taken away from the first place in the sexual assault,” Miller said. “So it’s retraumatizing to require anyone to have to report to anybody.”

Advertisement

The 72-hour amendment

Idaho banned abortions in 2022, with exceptions in cases of rape or incest, and when the life of the mother is threatened. Victim advocates quickly pointed out that police do not release copies of records during an ongoing investigation, potentially preventing women from receiving timely abortion care. In 2023, the legislature amended the law, entitling victims of rape to receive their police report within 72 hours of it being made.

More than a year after the updated amendment went into effect, a Boise State Public Radio investigation shows law enforcement agencies and public records departments in Idaho are unevenly complying with its requirements, which could prevent victims of rape or incest from easily accessing the documentation they need for a legal abortion.

“It doesn’t work that way”

“We’re treating this notion of a police report like it’s a receipt in a store,” Sen. Melissa Wintrow said while debating the amendment before it passed on the floor in 2023.

“You get raped, you experience trauma, you go to the police, you get your receipt, and you come back to the physician, and then you ask for the abortion. It doesn’t work that way.”

“Police reports are intricate and complicated, and police just don’t take that lightly,” she added.

Advertisement

Sergeant Bryan Lovell from the Bonneville County Sheriff’s Office explained the process once police receive a request for a record.

“If it’s an active investigation, then, they’re not going to give it to you. And chances are, we wouldn’t even know if you’re the victim or a witness to it, or just someone that’s curious. Right?”

Idaho’s public records law says agencies can’t ask why people want a copy of a file, but under the amendment, a victim has to identify themselves as such to receive their report. Without specific protocols to differentiate requests from victims from the general public, victims going through standard public records portals may be denied up front.

“It just runs through that same process and we wouldn’t know,” Lovell said.

Police do not usually release files pertaining to an open investigation because they may contain sensitive information. When records are requested, they aren’t released immediately.

Advertisement

“We’ll get the request in for a particular report, and then it’ll go to the prosecutor’s office for approval, and they’ll come back and say, ‘this can be released or it can’t be released, or it can be released with redactions,’” he added.

Lovell said an option for victims whose initial request is denied would be to directly contact their prosecuting attorney’s office, something they might not know to do.

Agencies across the state comply with the requirement unevenly

Depending on where they report their assault, victims of rape may have more or less difficulty getting the documentation they need.

Boise State Public Radio contacted 56 agencies across Idaho and asked about their protocols to help rape victims access their reports.

Many did not answer. Others did not mention the 72-hour amendment and said they’d follow public records law requirements. Some said they’d defer any special cases to their prosecuting attorney’s office.

Advertisement

Ada County’s Prosecutor’s Office, which works with the largest police department in the state, cited the ongoing litigation against Idaho’s abortion statute when declining to answer questions about its protocols.

Agencies like the Meridian Police Department, Garden City Police Department and Fremont County Sheriff said they comply with the 72-hour amendment and have in-house advocates to assist victims.

As a victim witness coordinator with the Caldwell Police Department, Liz Godina said if a victim needed help getting a copy of her report, she could walk them through the system step-by-step.

“I would talk to them and kind of explain to them like, ‘this is what you are able to do, if you need me to help you, I can go with you to the records department and do that with you,’” she said, adding she could then make sure records custodians know about the updated 72-hour amendment.

“When we’re working with victims of crime, it’s very important for them to feel heard, ” Godina said. Accompanying them through that journey, she said, can make them feel respected and empowered.

Advertisement

Godina said she knew about the rape exemption’s 72-hour requirement because she read about it online and feels it’s important in her position to stay updated with law changes.

But not all victims across the state may be so lucky to have someone like Godina assisting them in getting a copy of their record.

Open investigation policies confuse the process

Some agencies contacted by Boise State Public Radio didn’t appear to have any streamlined way to provide victims their report, in particular during an open case. Others seemed unaware of the updated law altogether.

In July 2024, a year after the amendment went into effect, Rexburg’s Police Department wrote in an email that in order to get a copy of a report, victims had to go through the city’s website.

“There they can search for Public Records Request and fill out a form to obtain a copy of the report. It is then forwarded to our office and we proceed with the process of handling the request,” the email reads.

Advertisement

“If the investigation is complete and there are no pending charges or court action, the victim can receive a copy of the report. If the rape is still under investigation, a copy is not released until the investigation is complete, per our Madison County Prosecutor’s Office, and the victim is advised of this.”

Idaho’s amended abortion law says that if an act of rape or incest is reported to a law enforcement agency or child protective services “then the person who made the report shall, upon request, be entitled to receive a copy of such report within seventy-two (72) hours of the report being made, provided that the report may be redacted as necessary to avoid interference with an investigation.”

In Clearwater County, Sheriff Chris Goetz also said his office generally only releases records when an investigation is complete.

“An example for this type of case would be a victim reporting a rape and wanting a report from us that she had reported a rape so that she could get an abortion,” he wrote in an email. “If we have not yet done an investigation how would we know if a rape had actually occurred or if she just wanted an abortion.”

Goetz wrote that if a preliminary investigation showed a rape occurred, the agency would provide the report to the victim.

Advertisement

“An example of that would be that we have done all of the interviews and collected the physical evidence but are waiting on results from a lab before we could actually complete the investigation. We may not yet be able to file charges because the case is not complete but I would support the victim any way possible,” he added.

Denied Requests

At the Nampa Police, Detective Troy Hale, an investigator at their Office of Professional Standards, said their department realized it hadn’t been complying with the 72-hour requirement, and unknowingly denied records to rape victims in 2023.

“We found four that should have under the new law been released that weren’t and it was kind of more of a training issue at that point for our records division,” he said. “So it was just an oversight,” he added.

“Since then we’ve changed that procedure obviously in our records department to where within that 72 hour time frame from when they want that report, then we supply that now.”

The four victims were not notified of the department’s mistake in handling their request.

Advertisement

“To my knowledge, I don’t know that we contacted them at all,” Hale said. The reason for their initial request is unknown.

The Department of Health and Welfare reports five abortions were legally provided in 2023 in Idaho. There is no way of knowing if any were granted under the state’s rape exception.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Idaho

Dead infant found in baby drop-off box in Idaho

Published

on

Dead infant found in baby drop-off box in Idaho


A dead newborn baby girl was found in a baby drop-off box in Idaho on Oct. 13, police said this week.

The infant was removed from the box at the Grove Creek Medical Center in Blackfoot “within a minute” after a medical team responded to an alarm notifying them that a baby had been placed there.

Upon removal, they realized the infant had been dead long before being placed in the baby box, according to a news release on Monday from Safe Haven Baby Boxes on Facebook.

Idaho law allows unharmed and healthy infants to be surrendered to the baby boxes. Because this infant was already dead before being placed in the box, she was not a legal surrender.

Advertisement

Safe Haven Baby Boxes provide a secure and anonymous way for parents to safely surrender their newborns. But anonymity is only allowed when an infant is surrendered completely unharmed, said Safe Haven Baby Boxes Founder Monica Kelsey.

“We are heartbroken,” she said. “Let this be clear: this is an illegal, deadly abandonment. We are fully cooperating with the investigation and providing all information we possess to local authorities. When the baby was placed in the box, she was wrapped in a blanket with the placenta still attached.”

The parent’s identity is now known to police, according to a video update Kelsey posted to Facebook on Thursday.

“It is not because there’s cameras on these boxes, there is no cameras on these boxes,” she said. “It was either old fashioned police work or she stepped forward.”

The Twin Falls and Blackfoot police departments are both investigating.

Advertisement

“We extend our heartfelt condolences to the family and community affected by this loss. The health and safety of our community’s children remain our top priority,” the Twin Falls Police Department stated in a Monday press release.

52 infants have been legally surrendered at Safe Haven Baby Boxes since 2017, the organization said. Each infant has been adopted, the organization says.

There is only one Safe Haven Baby Box in Idaho.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending