Idaho
Idaho bill that would require children to opt in to vaccine registry heads to House floor – Idaho Capital Sun
Idaho legislators advanced a bill on Monday that would require parents to opt in to the state’s vaccine registry, rather than Idaho’s existing policy that lets them to opt their children out.
Legislators on Idaho’s House Health and Welfare Committee on Monday advanced a bill that would require medical providers to only share the vaccination status of Idaho kids in a state-run database if their parents or caregivers say so.
Currently, Idaho’s immunization database, called the Immunization Reminder Information System, lets patients not be part of the database by opting out. If passed, the bill would take effect July 1, 2024.
Some health care professionals said the switch could leave Idaho medical offices with millions more in administrative costs.
Idaho’s children immunization rates, which have been among the lowest in the nation for years, fell in recent years as more people opted out of vaccines required for school, Idaho Education News reported last fall. Before the pandemic, 86.5% of Idaho kindergartners, first- and seventh-grade students were vaccinated. By 2021-22, only 80.2% were, Idaho EdNews reported.
House Majority Leader Megan Blanksma, R-Hammett, who is sponsoring House Bill 397, said she worried that Idahoans vaccination data — including for adults — is in Idaho’s vaccine database without them knowing. She referenced own experience finding out that her children’s and mother’s vaccine records were in the state database without their permission, after she opted out for her children. She also said Idaho’s vaccine database originally was “opt in” based.
As she closed debate on her bill, Blanksma said many Idahoans who received vaccines “don’t know that the government was collecting your data on that vaccine” because they weren’t given an informed consent form.
“That’s what should scare us more than anything else … that there’s data collection that people don’t know about, are completely unaware of. And that’s what this bill fixes,” Blanksma said. “It makes sure everyone knows where their medical data is going.”
Blanksma also said in the hearing that Idaho’s opt-out rate was low because it is difficult to opt out, and the bill would ensure that medical “providers don’t opt you in.”
“It’s become more complicated, and less transparent,” she said. “… Anytime the government is collecting your data, it should be transparent.”
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
How would the opt-in changes affect medical providers?
The change should not require more state and federal funds, the bill’s fiscal note estimates. Blanksma also told the committee that she doesn’t expect increased costs for providers. She said under Idaho’s current opt-in model, “they are already providing the data to the government.”
But Rebecca Coyle, who said she was an expert on immunization registries, said if you assume that this would cost $10,000 to update each system, it’d cost over $10 million across the more than 1,000 clinics connected to Idaho’s vaccine registry. The medical system today is built for an “opt-out system,” she said, and adding consent files to those systems would be costly.
“It’s going to push a cost over $10 million in costs back to citizens of this state,” Coyle said, “for fewer than 1,000 people who have opted out since 2010.”
Many rural clinics would likely “fail to comply” with the bill because of the high costs of changing the reporting system, said Dr. Cristina Abuchaibe, a doctor in eastern Idaho who represented the Idaho chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
“In order for every single potential patient to be given the choice, it will require extra staff and it will require fancier electronic medical record systems. To be perfectly honest with you, the rural areas don’t have the capacity to support,” Abuchaibe testified. “We’re barely surviving now with a lot of the physicians also doing a lot of the staff work and working as a team to be able to keep up.”
Idaho Family Policy Center Policy Associate Grace Howat, the only member of the public to testify in support of the bill Monday, said Idaho’s current opt-out practice “intrudes on the privacy of Idaho parents and intrudes on parental rights.”
“Parents are responsible for raising their children, not the state,” Howat testified.
Heather Gagliano, an Idaho mom and registered nurse, testified against the bill. She said she’s been fully informed of her rights to participate in Idaho’s vaccine registry for her two children over the years.
And as a public health professional who’s given thousands of vaccines, she said she’s seen the benefits of Idaho’s vaccine system’s ease of use for medical providers. But when kids immunization records are incomplete, or hand-written and often illegible, she has to delay care, Gagliano said.
Rep. Jordan Redman, R-Coeur d’Alene, made a motion that the committee send the bill to the House floor and recommend that it pass. Only the committee’s three Democrats opposed the vote, after a failed motion by House Minority Leader Ilana Rubel, D-Boise, to hold the bill in committee.
House Bill 397 now heads to the House floor, where lawmakers could debate it before sending it through to the Idaho Senate.
What is the Immunization Reminder Information System, or IRIS?
Idaho’s IRIS system is similar to those used by other states. It helps health care providers remind people when they, or their children, are due for vaccines. Child care providers can access it to verify a child’s vaccine status. It also maintains a record so that, for example, a patient with a short memory doesn’t get a tetanus booster shot every year.
The records are stored securely and made accessible only to health care providers, child care providers and schools. Individual patients also can request their own records, or opt to have their records excluded from IRIS.
Idaho Republican leadership sent a letter to former Idaho Attorney General Lawrence Wasden in 2021 accusing the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare of unlawfully using the state’s vaccine-record keeping system, calling for the agency to destroy its records on adult immunizations. An attorney for the Idaho Office of the Attorney General replied later that year that the department wasn’t unlawfully using the system and that lawmakers were wrong.
Idaho
From Idaho roots to the national spotlight: The story behind Judge Justin Beresky’s journey – East Idaho News
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Justin Beresky spoke with EastIdahoNews.com reporter Nate Eaton in an exclusive interview. Watch the 55-minute conversation in the video player above | Jordan Wood, EastIdahoNews.com
PHOENIX — It’s not common for a judge to speak on the record with a reporter, so when I emailed Judge Justin Beresky requesting an interview, I knew there would be some conditions.
For one, I was aware he would likely not answer questions about the two Lori Vallow Daybell trials he presided over earlier this year. If he wanted to discuss them, I’d be more than happy to listen, but the Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct prohibits judges from making public statements about cases in their courtrooms.
However, it was the Daybell trials that made Beresky known worldwide. For a few weeks in April and then again in June, an untold number of people watched him conduct court as Daybell represented herself in the highest-profile trials Arizona has seen since the Jodi Arias murder case in 2013.
Memes featuring Beresky’s photo were shared on social media and phrases he said in court were printed on t-shirts and badges. Online commenters frequently wrote about Beresky’s good looks, giving him nicknames such as “Judge McSteamy,” “Judge McDreamy,” “The Court’s Finest” and “The Honorable Hottie.”
As Beresky sat day after day in a Maricopa County courtroom presiding over a case with Idaho ties, few knew that he himself has deep roots in the Gem State. That’s the story I wanted to tell, and after some time, Beresky agreed to sit down with me for his first-ever media interview.
Childhood in Grangeville
Justin Beresky was born in Oregon and when he was in kindergarten, his family moved to Grangeville, Idaho, a rural farming town of about 3,500 people located 75 miles southeast of Lewiston. His father was a chiropractor and his mother was a homemaker.
“She got a Realtor’s license and did a little bit of that. She had a side business and would go into other people’s homes and give women consultations on what colors were good for them to wear,” Beresky recalls. “She actually put on a fashion show in Grangeville when I was in sixth or seventh grade with the local JCPenney providing all the clothes. … I think she has a picture in her living room where I have my sister on one arm and my sister’s best friend on the other, and we’re all dressed up going down the runway.”

Justin Beresky participated in a fashion show organized by her mother during his childhood in Grangeville, Idaho. | Courtesy Justin Beresky
Beresky’s small-town childhood was idyllic. He’d ride his bike with friends to the pool, play hide-and-seek on summer nights, ski in the winter, camp, visit the rivers and explore nearby forests.
In the fifth grade, a boy named Chad Hill moved to town, and he and Beresky became friends.
“He was very funny and active in sports. His best sport was probably baseball and he was our ace pitcher,” Hill tells EastIdahoNews.com. “He had a pitch with a curveball that we called the ‘hoop of fire.’ When he threw it, our whole team was excited.”
Hill says Beresky, who is now in his early 50s, was outgoing and “the girls seemed to like him.” The two of them, along with six other boys, formed a tight-knit friendship that still endures today. They keep up a running group text, and most of them recently took a fishing trip together.
Beresky excelled in school and, as a teenager, thought he might become a teacher.
“When I was in third or fourth grade, I took some sort of basic aptitude test, and it said I should either be a teacher, a lawyer or a garbage man,” Beresky says with a smile.
Beresky didn’t take much interest in the law until sixth grade, when brothers Mark Henry Lankford and Bryan Stuart Lankford — later known as the “Grangeville brothers” — were charged with the 1983 murders of Robert and Cheryl Bravence, a Texas couple vacationing near Grangeville. The case, which ultimately resulted in death sentences, caught his attention.
College and law school
Beresky’s parents divorced when he was in high school, and his father moved to New Mexico.
“I felt like I needed to get out of town and find some new, exciting adventure. So I went to the University of New Mexico,” Beresky says. “I really liked New Mexico, and for me, growing up in Grangeville and then moving to Albuquerque, it was like this big adventure being in a big city for the first time in my life.”
Beresky worked toward a degree in secondary education and planned to become a teacher. In his senior year, he student taught in high school classes and enjoyed it. But as graduation approached, he wondered if there might be something else in store for him.
“I was about to graduate and was only 21. I thought it was a little early to get tied into a teaching career, so why not go to law school and just see what happens? So I took the LSAT and applied to some law schools,” Beresky says.
He was accepted into the University of Idaho College of Law in Moscow, which worked in his favor because he qualified for in-state tuition. He moved back to Idaho and embraced the challenges of law school.
“I really liked the trial week that we did before our final year, where you get together with other students in your class and you’re trained on how to do a trial,” Beresky recalls. “You learn the different aspects, cross-examination, direct examination, and at the end of the week, you put on a trial. That week, I think, really galvanized for me that I’d like to be in the courtroom when I became a lawyer.”
Beresky admits he was naïve when he graduated from law school. Unsure how to find a job, he moved to Arizona, took the bar exam and began walking into law firms to ask if they needed help.
“I had connections in Arizona and knew that I liked the climate. I was naïve in a sense, too, because I thought I’d come to Phoenix and be here for a year or two and then maybe take a bar somewhere else and move there,” he explains. “I had no plan to stay here, and then it just sort of happened. I got into this career here and plan on staying until my career is over.”
In the courtroom
Beresky knew he wanted to be in the courtroom on a regular basis, so his best option was practicing criminal or family law. After spending a few months working for a civil practitioner, he applied for and was offered a job with the Maricopa County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office.
“The great thing about here in Phoenix, whether you’re at the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office or the public defender’s office, if you get a job there, you’re gonna be in the courtroom right away,” Beresky says.
He recalls his first jury trial, which occurred after he had been on the job for two or three months. It was a DUI case, and the defense attorney was a well-known trial attorney “who would have absolutely mopped the floor with me.”
Beresky’s mentor, who was helping with the case, took over halfway through the trial, and they ended up getting a conviction.
After two years in the prosecutor’s office, Beresky decided it was time to move on. He and Geoffrey Fish, a friend he had worked with in the prosecutor’s office, decided to open up a defense practice together in June 2001.
“When we opened, we took a variety of cases – civil, some family, bankruptcies and small claims. We ultimately ended up doing mostly criminal defense work,” Fish, who is now a Maricopa County Superior Court judge, tells EastIdahoNews.com.
Beresky says opening a firm was “kind of scary,” and shifting from prosecution to defense work demanded a different set of skills.
“You have to have a certain bedside manner and build a rapport with your client … because sometimes you have to tell them things they don’t want to hear, or you have to tell them things that maybe are probably bad news for them,” Beresky says. “I also think when you’re a prosecutor, you have a little bit of built-in credibility and gravitas with a jury, just from the nature of being a prosecutor. So you have to work a little more as a defense attorney to get that sort of consideration with the jury.”
Gregg Woodnick, an attorney in Phoenix, met Beresky and Fish in the mid-2000s.
“Justin was just a nice guy. As a defense attorney, you might be termed a little aggressive and get the moniker of being a jerk, but he was just a nice guy,” Woodnick tells EastIdahoNews.com. “People really liked him as a defense attorney because he was approachable, kind and helpful.”
As a defense attorney, Beresky was often asked how he could represent clients accused of terrible crimes. He says he always saw them first as people with constitutional rights that deserved to be protected.
“At the end of the day, you’re just trying to make sure the process works,” Beresky says. “So people say, ‘Oh, that person got off on a technicality or whatever.’ Well, I don’t think constitutional rights are a technicality. I’ve also had people who were truly innocent of what they’ve been charged with, and those are the difficult cases too. So I don’t go into a case thinking you’re guilty or you’re innocent. I just go and try to get the best result that I can for my client.”
One day, when Beresky was in court, he had a bad experience with a judge who was being “unnecessarily rude” to everyone in the courtroom. Beresky was irritated and had an idea.
“This thought just popped into my head that I could do better than that. I had never really thought about being a judge or anything at any point,” Beresky says. “That thought kind of took seed and it developed. After a while, the more I thought about it, the more I thought I really could do a good job as a judge.”
Becoming a judge
Maricopa County uses a thorough application and vetting process to select judges. A governor-appointed committee reviews applications, checks references and chooses whom to interview. The panel then forwards its recommendations to the governor, who ultimately appoints the new judges.
Beresky applied a few times before being selected as a Maricopa County court commissioner, which is a similar position to a magistrate judge in Idaho.
“I started out in the probation violation court, and then after that, I was assigned as a special assignment commissioner, which kind of means ‘have legal pad, will travel.’ You get plugged in to fill different spots,” Beresky says. “I did that for several years too, which I think helped my application process (to be a judge) because it showed that I could handle all these different calendars.”
Maricopa County has roughly 100 judges and 80 court commissioners, and each year a few positions open as judges retire. In January 2018, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey appointed Beresky to one of those seats on the bench.
The judges rotate assignments every few years between criminal, civil, family, juvenile, and probate divisions. They don’t choose their departments, and they don’t choose their cases.
“I spent a total of four years in family court, which is a lot of custody cases and divorced people fighting over visitation with their children, child support, splitting up assets and debts, those sorts of things,” Beresky says.
He was then reassigned to criminal court, which he says became his favorite since he had previously practiced criminal law as a prosecutor and defense attorney.
“I felt like I did a good job in criminal, as far as doing settlement conferences and trials and those sorts of things,” Beresky says. “The good thing about our rotations, though, is that it helps keep things from getting stale and gives you something new. You have to learn a whole new area of law that you haven’t practiced before.”
Beresky runs an efficient courtroom and is respected among his colleagues.
Izzy Contreras, his judicial assistant, has spent 29 years working for Maricopa County Superior Court. He knows all the judges and has spent time in their courtrooms.
“I was very selective in choosing which judge I wanted to work for,” Contreras tells EastIdahoNews.com. “When his position came up, I knew it would be a good fit. He lets me be me, he lets me do my job without micromanaging me, he lets me run the office and is there for any guidance that I need. He’s very calm, very level-headed, very neutral, everything you would want a judge to be.”
Several attorneys who spoke with EastIdahoNews.com feel the same way.
“We like appearing in front of him because he runs an efficient courtroom,” says Woodnick, who has won and lost cases in front of Beresky. “He doesn’t dillydally. He doesn’t go down the drama rabbit hole that sometimes happens in court. He has an effective way of controlling that. You saw that in the Vallow Daybell case. When things started to get off track, he had a really good way of kind of recentering it and keeping it efficient in a really respectful way.”
Christine Whalin, a criminal defense attorney who has known Beresky for nearly two decades, has appeared in front of Beresky over the years.
“He’s a very well-reasoned, fair judge. He will listen to each side’s argument and I think he does everything in his power to do the right thing and follow the law,” Whalin says. “He’s very easy to get along with and I think that translates onto the bench. He rarely gets upset. I think he keeps what I’ll call ‘judicial temper’ in check and that helps him when he’s on the bench tremendously.”
Hill, Beresky’s childhood friend from Grangeville, visited him in Arizona a few years ago and watched him in court for a day. He described it as “surreal” to see his childhood buddy now presiding seriously from the bench.
“I think the only reason he wanted me to come here was so I had to stand up when he entered the room,” Hill says with a laugh. “He waited for me to get into the courtroom and then, when the bailiff said all rise, he looked at me and grinned. I knew I had been duped.”
Personal life
Beresky and his wife, Beth, are very private and live in a quiet neighborhood in Phoenix. They were married on a beach in Mexico in February 2020, just as the COVID-19 pandemic was beginning to sweep the globe.
Both had been married before. Beth brought a daughter, now a teenager, into the family, and Beresky brought a son, who is in his 20s. Parenthood, he says, has taught him the patience often needed in the courtroom — and he’s never without a well-timed dad joke at home.
“I have all sorts of dad jokes. They’re terrible, though. Like, ‘When does a joke become a dad joke?’ When it becomes a parent,” he says with a smile. “I’ve always loved kids. If you had asked me where I saw myself when I was in high school, I would have told you I’d probably have six kids or something like that. That never worked out for me, but I love being a dad. I wish I had time to have more, but I’m getting too old.”
The Bereskys like to swim in their backyard pool, have Sunday game nights, paddleboard and kayak in nearby rivers and go on hikes. Beth watches true crime shows, while Beresky prefers cheering on the San Francisco Giants.
To unwind, he goes to the gym, takes his dog on walks and spends time outdoors.
The future
The Daybell trials came at the tail end of Beresky’s rotation in the criminal division. He began his new assignment in juvenile courts this summer and now presides over cases involving parental rights, adoptions and kids in foster care.
“It can be very heavy. Some days you’re reading reports and talking to lawyers and parents (about) these kids with serious mental health issues who are living in a lockdown facility,” Beresky says.
He will remain in juvenile court for the next several years and may have one or two final division assignments before retiring in about 10 years. At that point, he says he might put his teaching degree in law classes at local universities.
Over the summer, he returned to Idaho to help with the University of Idaho Law Week. He found it invigorating to be back on campus, reflecting on the fact that he once stood in the same place as the students he was now guiding.
Despite a career that has placed him in a high-profile, visible role this year, Beresky says he isn’t focused on fame or accolades; instead, he says he wants to be remembered simply as a good person who tried to do right by others.
“I don’t know that I care how I am remembered. What I mean by that is I think so many people chase fame or glory or whatever,” he says. “You could be the most famous person in the world, and 50 years after you die, no one’s going to remember who you are. It’s not that I want to be remembered as a scoundrel or a terrible person, but at the same time, I’m not out seeking some sort of fame to be remembered a certain way. I think you should just be a good person in life and things will work out.”
Watch our entire interview with Judge Justin Beresky in the video player above and hear his views on what makes a good judge, cameras in the courtroom, the hardest part about being a judge and whether he watches true crime programs.
=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>
Idaho
Idaho grand jury indicts 4 in alleged murder cover-up near local boat dock
IDAHO FALLS — A grand jury has charged four people in connection with the fatal shooting of a man near a boat dock in June.
Brittnie Lynn I Schennum, 33, of Idaho Falls, Megan Lynne Paz Warrick, 35, of Idaho Falls, Jonathan Terry Warrick, 31, of Idaho Falls, and Jarrod Thomas Sisneros, 30, of North Folk, Idaho, have been charged with felony accessory, willfully withholding or concealing knowledge of a felony from a peace officer and felony conspiracy to commit aggravated battery.
The grand jury proceedings are not open to the public, and no police booking affidavits have been filed, meaning there is little detail about the incident in court records.
The shooting
EastIdahoNews.com reported on June 23 on the shooting death of a 34-year-old man, Daniel William Leary, near the West Snake River Boat Ramp.
According to a news release from the Bonneville County Sheriff’s Office, deputies were dispatched to North River Road about 7:15 a.m. after a report came in of a man found with a gunshot wound.
The man, later identified as Leary, was taken to a nearby hospital and died from his injuries.
Court records
According to the indictment, the four who have been charged knew who had committed the crime of first-degree murder — and they withheld that knowledge from police.
In crime stories, EastIdahoNews.com typically only releases names of people who have been formally charged. The person accused of killing Leary in court documents has not yet been charged in connection with the incident. EsatIdahoNews.com will post that defendant’s name once charges have been filed against that individual.
The second count states the four had conspired to commit aggravated battery against another person on June 23.
Sisneros was arrested in July near Big Timber, Montana, and was a person of interest in Leary’s death.
The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.
Idaho
Idaho’s projected state budget deficit increases to $58.3 million – East Idaho News
BOISE (Idaho Capital Sun) – Idaho’s projected state budget deficit for the current fiscal year 2026 has increased to $58.3 million, according to the state’s latest revenue forecasts and budget documents released this week.
The projected deficit has increased from a month ago, when the state budget was projected to end the fiscal year with a $56.6 million deficit, the Idaho Capital Sun previously reported.
Overall, state revenues have come in below forecasts in three out of the first four months of the current fiscal year, state records show.
According to the November edition of the General Fund Budget Monitor report published by the nonpartisan Idaho Legislative Services Office on Wednesday, total state revenue collections have come in $103.1 million, or 5.8%, less than the revised forecast issued by the Idaho Division of Financial Management. In addition to revenues coming in below budget projections, cumulative revenues have also come in $59.5 million, or 3.4%, below the actual revenue collections compared to the same time period last year, according to the General Fund Budget Monitor.
When it comes to the bottom line, the state general fund is projected to end the current fiscal year 2026 on June 30 with a budget deficit of $58.3 million.
In interviews Thursday, two prominent legislators from two different political parties presented two very different assessments of the budget situation.
“It keeps me up at night,” said House Minority Leader Ilana Rubel, D-Boise. “I cannot underscore enough how dire the situation we are facing is.”
Rubel said 3% budget cuts ordered by Gov. Brad Little this summer are already causing harm to Idaho’s elderly, disabled and low income families. She predicted more cuts will be forthcoming, calling it “a catastrophe.”
Idaho budget committee co-chair says Idaho won’t see a budget deficit
On the other hand, Rep. Wendy Horman, an Idaho Falls Republican who co-chairs the Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee, said the latest monthly budget reports show Idaho’s economy is healthy. She pointed out the state has record levels of savings accounts and cash reserves and said the largest tax cuts in state history are going to provide real benefits to Idahoans.
“We’re coming off the largest tax cut in state history and individual income tax collections are still up,” Horman said.
“I am looking at the trends now, and we have one month up and three months under revenue forecasts, but the numbers are small. They are not off by hundreds of millions. By no stretch is revenue in a free fall – it isn’t.”
Horman said one revenue source – corporate income tax collections – are down by $58.3 million. That number is identical to the projected deficit of $58.3 million.
“You can explain the entire variance simply with corporate income tax numbers,” Horman said.
Idaho legislators are required to pass a balanced budget
The Idaho Constitution requires the state to have a balanced budget and prohibits the state from spending more money than the amount of revenue that is collected.
In simple terms, revenue is the amount of money the state takes in. Idaho’s largest sources of revenue are taxes, specifically individual income taxes, sales taxes and corporate income taxes.
The latest revenue report covers the first four months of the 2026 fiscal year.
“We will set a balanced budget,” Horman told the Sun on Thursday. “The constitution requires it. I am personally committed to it. And I anticipate we will leave as large of a cash balance as we can to carry over into next year to guard against unforeseen circumstances. It was a wise decision to do it last year. And it will be a wise decision to do it again next year while still maintaining the core functions of government.”
Projected budget deficit does not include impact of President Trump’s tax cuts
The projected budget deficit does not include the cost of paying for more than $100 million in supplemental funding requests the Idaho Legislature will consider in 2026. The projected deficit also does not include the cost of conforming to tax changes included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that President Donald Trump signed into law this summer.
The nonprofit Idaho Center for Fiscal Policy released a report Nov. 6 estimating that conforming to the personal and corporate tax changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act could reduce Idaho revenue by an additional $284.4 million.
“Idaho’s lawmakers should ensure that our state revenue is protected to provide the public services that Idahoans rely on — like our education system, roads, and public safety,” said May Roberts, policy analyst for the Idaho Center for Fiscal Policy. “Idaho’s budget should not take a hit to fund corporate tax breaks that primarily benefit businesses in other states.”
Big budget decisions await Idaho Legislature in 2026
During meetings this month at the Idaho State Capitol, leaders of the Idaho Legislature’s Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee, or JFAC, vowed that the Legislature will intervene to ensure the state ends the fiscal year with a balanced budget.
JFAC is a powerful legislative committee that sets all of the budgets for every state agency and department.
Horman emphasized that Idaho is not now in a budget deficit, and the deficit is a projected forecast. What matters, she said, is where the budget actually stands when the 2026 fiscal year ends.
Idaho runs on a fiscal year calendar that begins July 1 and ends June 30. That means that the current fiscal year 2026 ends June 30.
The latest budget documents released by the state cover the months of July through October, representing one-third of the full fiscal year.
The state’s projected revenue shortfalls are not limited to the current fiscal year. The gap between revenue projections and requested budget expenditures is projected to widen during the upcoming 2027 and 2028 fiscal years, according to budget documents presented to the Legislature’s budget committee earlier this month.
One budget scenario that state staffers presented to JFAC last week showed an estimated budget deficit of $555.2 million – more than half of a billion dollars – for fiscal year 2027.
Horman said that $555 million figure is just a projection and said the Idaho Legislature has never agreed to fund everything that the state agencies requested.
The revenue shortfall is occurring after the Republican-controlled Legislature reduced state revenues by more than $450 million during the 2025 legislative session to pay for tax cuts and a new education tax credit that reimburses families for nonpublic school education expenses, including tuition at private, religious schools.
“Prior budget crises we have faced were due to the housing crisis in 2008 that we had to react to,” Senate Minority Leader Melissa Wintrow, D-Boise, said in a text message to the Idaho Capital Sun last week. “This one is a direct result of the Legislature setting a questionable revenue projection in order to do tax cuts.”
Gov. Little sounded public warnings during the 2025 legislative session about the impact of revenue reductions on the budget.
During a Feb. 25 breakfast with reporters, Little said he was not very happy about the reductions in state revenue.
“If I would have thought we could do $450 (million), I would have proposed $450 (million),” Little told reporters Feb. 25.
In contrast to the $450 million worth of revenue reductions, Little proposed $100 in tax cuts and another $50 million for private school education initiatives in his January 2025 State of the State address.
Despite his concern with the revenue reductions, Little did sign each of the tax cuts and the new private school education tax credit into law earlier this year.
The 2025 legislative session begins Jan. 12 at the Idaho State Capitol in Boise.
=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>
-
Hawaii1 week agoMissing Kapolei man found in Waipio, attorney says
-
Vermont7 days agoNorthern Lights to dazzle skies across these US states tonight – from Washington to Vermont to Maine | Today News
-
New Jersey1 week agoPolice investigate car collision, shooting in Orange, New Jersey
-
West Virginia1 week ago
Search for coal miner trapped in flooded West Virginia mine continues for third day
-
Seattle, WA1 week agoSoundgarden Enlist Jim Carrey and Seattle All-Stars for Rock Hall 2025 Ceremony
-
Business6 days agoDeveloper plans to add a hotel and hundreds of residences to L.A. Live
-
World1 week ago
The deadly car explosion in New Delhi is being investigated under an anti-terrorism law
-
Washington, D.C1 week agoBarack Obama surprises veterans on honor flight to DC ahead of Veterans Day




