Connect with us

Idaho

Idaho attorney general projects optimism Supreme Court won’t overturn abortion law – Washington Examiner

Published

on

Idaho attorney general projects optimism Supreme Court won’t overturn abortion law – Washington Examiner


Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador told the Washington Examiner in an exclusive interview that he is optimistic in the weeks leading up to oral arguments in a critical Supreme Court case that could threaten the state’s near-total abortion ban and similar laws across the country.

The Biden administration has sued to halt Idaho’s abortion ban on the argument that it violates federal law requiring emergency room physicians to provide “necessary stabilizing treatment” to all patients under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, or EMTALA, because the state law prohibits all abortions except for cases of rape and incest, even under potentially life-threatening circumstances.

If the Biden administration were successful in winning its case in the high court, it would undermine many of the abortion restrictions put in place by several states following the overturning of Roe v. Wade in June 2022, a decisive blow to anti-abortion advocates ahead of the 2024 election.

“The Supreme Court wants to have a say on this issue,” Labrador said. “We’re preparing our case and making sure that we can get the best defense possible.”

Advertisement

Path to the Supreme Court

Immediately following the overturning of Roe, Idaho’s ban on abortion took effect, prohibiting all abortions except for those performed in the first trimester in cases of rape or incest.

Soon after, the Biden administration successfully sued in federal district court, enjoining the anti-abortion law as a violation of EMTALA.

On appeal, a three-judge panel of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals initially reversed the decision of the district court, upholding the abortion ban as valid. An en banc panel of 11 judges, though, issued an injunction on the law, yet again blocking its implementation.

The conservative legal advocacy organization Alliance Defending Freedom called the en banc panel’s injunction “an unreasoned, one-sentence order.”

ADF and the law firm Cooper & Kirk were invited by Labrador to join the legal team on the case when the Supreme Court issued a stay on the 9th Circuit’s ruling in January, allowing Idaho’s abortion prohibition to take effect until the high court makes an official decision in the case.

Advertisement

Emergency medical treatment or prohibited abortion

EMTALA was passed by Congress in 1986 to ensure that emergency room physicians and staff provide care to all patients, regardless of ability to pay. 

The text of EMTALA specifically references “the unborn child” four times as a patient also worthy of stabilization under emergency circumstances. It says that the health of the individual patient could refer to “the woman or her unborn child” in the context of a pregnant woman. 

The Biden administration’s argument is that an abortion procedure can fit the statutory definition of a “necessary stabilizing treatment” within EMTALA in certain nonlethal conditions — such as infection, preeclampsia, or premature rupture of membranes. 

“The Biden administration decided to be creative with a law that has never been interpreted this way,” Labrador said, “and eventually it’s going to harm women and children.”

The Biden administration contends that EMTALA requires hospitals to offer all possible treatment options to stop the emergency, including in some circumstances ending the life of the fetus in order to save the woman.

Advertisement

“Both Idaho law and EMTALA, their mission and their goal is to protect the lives of pregnant women and the lives of unborn children, and I believe that the Biden administration is completely misconstruing and misreading the statute,” Labrador said. 

Labrador said that the abortion ban does not prevent physicians or other healthcare providers from treating pregnant women for life-threatening conditions, such as an ectopic pregnancy or a miscarriage. Rather, he said, the legal confusion over what to do in emergency circumstances is politically motivated by abortion-rights advocates.

“Instead of having their lawyers explain to doctors how clear our law is that yes, they can provide life-saving care in an emergency situation, they try to confuse the doctor so they feel like they’re somehow being targeted,” Labrador said.

Cautious optimism

Labrador said he is hopeful that the Supreme Court’s decision to take up the case is a signal that Idaho’s abortion law and its interpretation of EMTALA will stand.

“It’s hard to read the tea leaves with the Supreme Court,” Labrador said, adding that issuing a stay “usually means that there’s a majority of the Court that thinks there’s a likelihood of success on the merits. But you can’t ever take anything for granted.”

Advertisement

Labrador said that he believes the Biden administration chose to challenge the law in Idaho, rather than in any of the 14 other states that have prohibited abortion at all 40 weeks of pregnancy, because the federal district court in the state and the 9th Circuit are more friendly to abortion-rights arguments.

“I don’t think they were expecting to have somebody to vigorously defend the laws of the state of Idaho,” Labrador said.

Labrador has been attorney general since 2022. Before then, he served in the House of Representatives from 2011 to 2017 and as the chairman of the Idaho Republican Party from 2019 to 2020. He ran an unsuccessful campaign for governor in 2018.

Implications for OB-GYN care in Idaho

Abortion-rights advocates say that abortion restrictions have a negative effect on access to obstetrics and gynecology care, heightening existing shortages in rural communities across the country.

A report from the Idaho Coalition for Safe Healthcare and the Idaho Physician Well-Being Action Collaborative published in February found that the Gem State lost approximately 22% of its obstetricians following the institution of the abortion ban. 

Advertisement

The findings indicate that the number of practicing OBs fell from 268 in August 2022 to 210 in November 2023, resulting in a ratio of slightly over two OBs per 10,000 women in the state.

Of those OBs still in practice, nearly 85% practice in the most populous counties in the state, with only half of all 44 counties in the state having at least one OB.

When asked about the fears of OB-GYNs leaving the state, Labrador discounted ICSH’s study, saying it was biased in favor of abortion-rights supporters.

Although the data from the study relies on public records to corroborate the number of OB-GYNs in the state, Labrador noted, the footnotes indicate that the data are also derived from what ICSH calls “local knowledge from members.”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Advertisement

“Idaho has been one of the best places for doctors to practice medicine,” Labrador said. “It’s always been a pro-life state.”

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court are scheduled for April 23, with a final decision likely to be released in June.



Source link

Idaho

‘Unrelenting’: Statehouse reporters recap 2026 legislative session in Idaho Falls – East Idaho News

Published

on

‘Unrelenting’: Statehouse reporters recap 2026 legislative session in Idaho Falls – East Idaho News


IDAHO FALLS — Two prominent Idaho Statehouse reporters say this past legislative session was “unrelenting,” chaotic, largely driven by budget cuts, and they see the Legislature getting more powerful.

Kevin Richert and Clark Corbin recapped this past legislative session at a forum on the ISU Idaho Falls Campus on Thursday.

Richert is a senior reporter at Idaho Education News, with more than 30 years of experience covering education policy and politics. Corbin is a senior reporter at the Idaho Capital Sun who has covered every Idaho legislative session, gavel to gavel, since 2011.

The event was hosted by the City Club of Idaho Falls, which “exists to sponsor and promote civil dialogue and discourse on all matters of public interest” and strives to be “nonpartisan and nonsectarian,” according to its website.

Advertisement

Budget cuts

Both Richert and Corbin said this session was driven by budget cuts. Corbin said this was due to a lack of revenue stemming from past income tax and the adoption of new federal tax cuts.

“Cuts for almost every state agency and state department dominated the legislative session,” Corbin said. “We’re talking about 4% budget cuts for most state agencies and departments in the current fiscal year, and we’re talking about an additional 5% budget cuts for almost all state agencies and departments starting next year — fiscal year ’27 — and continuing permanently.”

RELATED | Gov. Little signs so-called ‘crappy bill’ to cut state budget

Richert said he thought higher education was taking the brunt of budget cuts. “It’s not a question of whether tuition fees are going to go up at the universities; it’s a question of how much,” he said.

When asked what the future would hold, Corbin said the budget cuts aren’t likely to go away, and their effects will be felt over time.

Advertisement

“There could always be a change of leadership in the House, but they do expect the budget crunch to continue in the next year’s legislative session,” Corbin said.

‘Radiator capping’

Richert said he has one word to describe this year’s legislative session: “unrelenting.”

One thing that made it feel that way was that some bills were recycled over and over, he said. For example, Richert said the Legislature saw five different versions of a bill that proposed cuts to the Idaho Digital Learning Alliance.

“We had multiple bills that came from the dead,” he said.

The journalists said this is partly due to a tactic called “radiator capping.” The term means to replace the entire car — the bill’s text, in political terms — while only keeping the radiator cap: the bill number. By rewriting a bill on the House or Senate floor while maintaining its number, failed bills can effectively bypass the committee process.

Advertisement

“Those are the changes they tried to make on immigration bills, on union bills this year,” Corbin said. “It made it extremely difficult for the public to have any idea what was going on, to have any opportunity to participate in the legislative process and share their opinions.

A more powerful, more chaotic Legislature

Richert said Idaho’s annual legislative sessions are trending longer, commonly going into the early part of April, and producing a record number of bills.

“There are rumblings that this Legislature, as a body, is wanting to expand its reach over more and have even more power over the other branches of government to the point of — are we trending towards more of a full-time professional legislature?” Richert said. “We’re a long way from there.”

“The legislative branch of government, particularly the Idaho House of Representatives, is the most powerful I’ve seen it in 16 years of covering state government,” Corbin said.

He added that this year’s legislative session was unlike any he’s experienced.

Advertisement

“The overall temperature in the building was bad,” Corbin said. “It was divisive. It was chaotic. People were not hiding their feelings of disgust for each other. These traditional ideas of decorum and respect very much fell by the wayside.”

Richert said Gov. Brad Little vetoed very few bills that came across his desk, and the ones he did weren’t high-profile.

RELATED | Idaho Gov. Brad Little issues 5 vetoes. Here are the bills affected

“I think the governor behaved like he was very concerned about the supermajority-controlled Legislature, and I think that that Legislature, in turn, asserted itself and took control of the agenda this year,” Corbin said.

Are legislators representing Idaho?

Corbin said some bills this year also focused on the LGBTQ+ community, such as a bathroom restriction for transgender individuals, and a bill that banned the City of Boise from waving a Pride flag.

Advertisement

RELATED | Idaho governor signs bill to criminalize trans people using bathrooms that align with their identity

RELATED | Boise removes LGBTQ+ pride flag as Idaho governor signs bill to fine city for its display

When asked if these were what Idahoans wanted, Corbin said it doesn’t necessarily appear so to him, based on his review of Boise State University’s annual public policy survey.

“For years and years, I’ve heard concerns about affordability of housing, access to housing, managing the growth of the state of Idaho, having quality public schools available for our young people — that also generates a workforce pipeline for some of our businesses,” Corbin said. “I’ve heard about paying for wildfires. I’ve heard about having good roads, supporting access to public lands, public recreation, those are the concerns I hear from Idahoans.”

“But the Legislature spent a significant amount of time over the last two, three, four years placing additional restrictions on LGBTQ communities, placing restrictions on what teachers can and cannot teach in their classrooms, what school boards can and cannot do,” Corbin continued. “They talked about requiring a moment of silence every day to begin the public school day, where children could pray or read the Bible.”

Advertisement

RELATED | Gov. Brad Little signs public school ‘moment of silence’ bill into law

Corbin said it may be his own opinion, but perhaps it is easier to “make a bunch of noise about what’s going wrong and (distract) people with social issues” rather than focus on harder issues that Idaho faces.

“I think what you saw on the policy space is a reflection of the fact that you had legislators thinking about reelection, and legislators with time on their hands — and that’s not always a good combination,” Richert said.

Accountability

When asked how people can keep legislators accountable, Corbin said it can be done by following the state Legislature through trusted news sources, going to community events and voting.

“This is a great year to practice accountability, because all 105 state legislators and all statewide elected officials are up for election this year,” he said.

Advertisement

=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho Lottery results: See winning numbers for Powerball, Pick 3 on April 18, 2026

Published

on


The results are in for the Idaho Lottery’s draw games on Saturday, April 18, 2026.

Here’s a look at winning numbers for each game on April 18.

Winning Powerball numbers from April 18 drawing

24-25-39-46-61, Powerball: 01, Power Play: 5

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Pick 3 numbers from April 18 drawing

Day: 9-5-1

Night: 0-2-4

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from April 18 drawing

Day: 4-6-0-4

Night: 9-9-8-2

Advertisement

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lotto America numbers from April 18 drawing

18-21-22-32-42, Star Ball: 10, ASB: 03

Check Lotto America payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Idaho Cash numbers from April 18 drawing

08-19-22-31-44

Check Idaho Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from April 18 drawing

17-19-47-48-55, Bonus: 04

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

When are the Idaho Lottery drawings held ?

  • Powerball: 8:59 p.m. MT Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 9 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Pick 3: 1:59 p.m. (Day) and 7:59 p.m. (Night) MT daily.
  • Pick 4: 1:59 p.m. (Day) and 7:59 p.m. (Night) MT daily.
  • Lucky For Life: 8:35 p.m. MT Monday and Thursday.
  • Lotto America: 9 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • 5 Star Draw: 8 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Idaho Cash: 8 p.m. MT daily.
  • Millionaire for Life: 9:15 p.m. MT daily.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a USA Today editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Idaho

League of Women Voters of Idaho partners to host candidate forums ahead of 2026 primary elections

Published

on

League of Women Voters of Idaho partners to host candidate forums ahead of 2026 primary elections


The rotunda as seen on March 16, 2026, at the Idaho State Capitol Building in Boise. (Photo by Pat Sutphin for the Idaho Capital Sun)

Ahead of the 2026 primary elections, the League of Women Voters of Idaho is teaming up with several local groups to hold candidate forums and voter education events in the hopes of boosting voter turnout.

The groups invited all candidates for public office in Ada and Canyon County’s commissions, and in legislative district 11, which is in Canyon County.

Advertisement

The groups that are hosting include Mormon Women for Ethical Government, the Caldwell Chamber of Commerce, the American Association of University Women’s Boise branch and the College of Idaho’s Masters of Applied Public Policy Program.

Here’s when and where the forums are:

  • Ada County Commissioner District 2: 7-8:30 p.m. April 24 at Meridian City Hall, located at 33 E. Broadway Ave. in Meridian.
  • Ada County Commissioner District 1: 7-8:30 p.m. April 28 at Valley View Elementary School, located at 3555 N Milwaukee St. in Boise.
  • Legislative District 11: 6:30-8:30 p.m. April 30 at Caldwell City Hall, located at 205 S. 6th Ave. in Caldwell.
  • Canyon County Commissioner: 6-8 p.m. May 7 at Caldwell City Hall, 205 S. 6th Ave. in Caldwell.

Learn more about candidates at the League of Women Voters’ online voter guide, VOTE411.ORG

SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending