Connect with us

Idaho

2024 primaries to watch: GOP challengers seek to unseat Idaho budget committee co-chair • Idaho Capital Sun

Published

on

2024 primaries to watch: GOP challengers seek to unseat Idaho budget committee co-chair • Idaho Capital Sun


Two well-known Republican challengers are hoping to unseat an experienced GOP legislator and state budget writer in Tuesday’s Republican primary election for Seat B in the Idaho House of Representatives.

The GOP primary features incumbent Ammon Mayor Sean Coletti, incumbent Rep. Wendy Horman, and Republican National Committee member Bryan Smith, all R-Idaho Falls. Because of the name recognition of each candidate and the fact that two Republicans are challenging an established Republican incumbent, this may prove to be one of Idaho’s 2024 primary elections to watch

Coletti is an attorney and veteran of the U.S. Army National Guard who has served as the mayor of Ammon since 2018. Coletti previously served on the Ammon City Council since 2010.

Horman is a small business owner who has served six terms in the Idaho Legislature and holds the position of co-chair of the Idaho Legislature’s Joint-Finance Appropriations Committee, or JFAC. JFAC is a powerful legislative committee that sets each element of the state budget. Before she was elected to the Idaho Legislature, Horman was a member of Bonneville Joint School District 93 school board. 

Advertisement

Smith is an attorney from Idaho Falls who previously ran two unsuccessful campaigns for the U.S. Congress. Smith lost to incumbent U.S. Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, in 2014 and 2022. In August, Smith was appointed to represent Idaho on the Republican National Committee.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement

Legislative District 32 is located entirely within Bonneville County in eastern Idaho. The district includes the cities of Ammon, Iona and a portion of the city of Idaho Falls, as well as portions of western Bonneville County. 

The winner of Tuesday’s Republican primary election will advance to the Nov. 5 general election to run against Democrat Patricia Dustin Stanger.

The Idaho Capital Sun sent the same four questions to each of the candidates in the race. Horman responded, Coletti said he did not have time to complete the questionnaire and Smith did not respond to multiple requests to complete the questionnaire. Continue reading to find Horman’s answers to the Sun’s questionnaire. 

Advertisement

Idaho’s abortion law is one of the strictest in the nation, and many doctors and hospital administrators have said it has made recruitment and retention of OB-GYNs and maternal-fetal medicine specialists even more difficult, especially in rural areas. Do you support any legislation, such as health exceptions, that would amend or clarify Idaho’s abortion law?

Horman: “Idaho’s law is clear: abortion is illegal except in the case of rape, incest or if the life of a mother is in danger. A physician may use all tools necessary in ‘good faith medical judgment’  to save the life of a mother. IC 18-622(4) reads ‘Medical treatment provided to a pregnant woman by a health care professional as defined in this chapter that results in the accidental death of, or unintentional injury to, the unborn child shall not be a violation of this section.’ 

To my knowledge, no physician has been sued in Idaho for performing an abortion to save the life of a mother. Bonneville County voters are overwhelmingly pro-life and I will evaluate any future legislation defining life of the mother on their behalf. 

Idaho has been at or near the bottom of physicians per capita for many years, long before the Defense of Life Act became law. There are many nuances to the issue of physician recruitment, including for OB-GYNs. I personally am aware that some physicians want to move to Idaho to avoid performing abortions. Other issues impacting maternal care in Idaho include the high cost of malpractice insurance, the declining birthrate and low Medicaid reimbursement rates.”

The Idaho Legislature’s Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee co-chairwoman Rep. Wendy Horman, R-Idaho Falls, listens to proceedings at the Idaho State Capitol building on Jan. 11, 2023. (Otto Kitsinger for Idaho Capital Sun)

Advertisement

Do you support public dollars being used for private education, including through tax credits or education savings accounts available to parents, or any other means? Why or why or not?

Horman: “Yes. Idaho already uses public dollars for private education, starting with the Launch program which can be used at public, private and religious institutions. The Advanced Opportunity program (which funds high school students seeking college credits and technical credentials), the Opportunity Scholarship (for college-bound students) and the Empowering Parents Microgrants (for K-12 students) all support students who attend public, private and religious schools. 

These existing programs are fully Constitutional in Idaho. Research is clear that increasing educational choice improves outcomes for all children, including those in public schools. Keeping in mind that NONE of the school choice bills I have sponsored with Sen. Den Hartog proposed taking money away from public schools, the 2024 BSU Public Policy Survey asked respondents this question: ‘Would you favor or oppose a plan to allow Idaho parents to take that $8,000 out of the public school system and use it to enroll their child in a private or religious school?’ 49% of survey respondents said they favor such a plan. 65% of Republicans, 46% of Independents and 35% of Democrats. School choice and parents’ rights to choose the best education option for their child regardless of their income and ZIP code is not a fringe issue. It is at the center of the electorate and crosses ideological lines.” 

Transgender people and LGBTQ+ advocates in Idaho have testified that policies, such as redefining sex and gender, criminalizing doctors for providing gender-affirming care to youth, among others, are harmful to the transgender community and undermine their existence. Do you agree? Why or why not?



Horman: “I voted to support H71 which protects children struggling with an identity crisis from making decisions that could permanently damage their body and soul. I do not believe it undermines these children’s existence; I believe it protects them. We don’t let children buy alcohol or vote or drive or even use a tanning bed until they are old enough to understand the potential consequences do so responsibly. The best way to protect youth in identity crisis is not to help them secretly hide their struggles from their parents or to surgically remove or add body parts. H71 was called The Vulnerable Child Protective Act for a reason. That’s exactly what it does: protect children from choices they don’t yet have the maturity to make for reasons that may very well be transitory, situational or influenced by social media.” 

Advertisement

According to the 2024 Boise State University Idaho public policy survey, Idahoans continue to be concerned about a range of issues surrounding growth, housing and economic security. As a legislator, what specific steps would you take to address those concerns?



Horman: “Limiting the size of government by keeping taxes low and reining in government spending. I have supported $3.7 billion in tax cuts and rebates in the last four years. Gov. Little and the legislature have worked collaboratively to pay off debt, invest one-time funds in infrastructure such as roads, bridges, water projects and broadband. We have been recognized for our fiscal decisions with a AAA credit rating. 

Sen. Scott Grow and I led an effort during the 2024 legislative session for a more transparent and accountable budgeting process. For the first time ever, we separated base (fixed) spending from growth (new) spending. We have now put in place a building block that moves Idaho from basic compliance with budget laws toward accountability for efficient and effective use of taxpayer dollars, in the direction of performance-based budgeting. We will be connecting spending to the promised outcomes for the first time. This is great news for taxpayers, their pocketbooks and economic security.”



Source link

Advertisement

Idaho

Delaney Gibb Lifts BYU Past Upset-Minded Idaho In Opener

Published

on

Delaney Gibb Lifts BYU Past Upset-Minded Idaho In Opener


PROVO, Utah – BYU women’s basketball opened the 2024-25 season with a win over Idaho on Wednesday night in the Marriott Center.

The Cougars held off Idaho to secure a 67-62 victory.

BYU had a 16-point halftime lead but saw it trimmed to one point in the fourth quarter.

BYU women’s basketball defeats Idaho 67-62

Freshman Delaney Gibb led BYU with a team-high 17 points in her college basketball debut. Idaho’s Hope Hassmann scored a game-high 23 points.

Along with scoring production, Gibb dished out five assists. She scored eight of her 17 points from the free-throw line, knocking down 80% of her attempts from the charity stripe.

Gibb pointed to her defense as a highlight from her debut. The Raymond, Alberta, Canada native had two blocks and one steal.

“I think what helped me out was my defense,” Gibb said. “When Amari was off, I had to pick up ball and that always gives me a lot of energy. That worked well, and then also attacking into the paint hard and drawing fouls. It’s always nice to get to the free throw line and knock down some free shots.”

Advertisement

Former Utah/Cal transfer Kemery Congdon was a steadying force for BYU, scoring 12 points.

Santa Clara transfer Marya Hudgins had eight points and nine rebounds to give BYU the season-opening victory.

First Quarter

BYU opened the season on a 9-0 run. Former Utah and Cal transfer Kemery Congdon scored the season’s first points on a reverse layup, then Santa Clara transfer Marya Hudgins buried the first of her two threes in the first quarter.

A total of six BYU players scored in the first period, led by senior center Emma Calvert, who scored eight points.

BYU 24, Idaho 15

Advertisement

Second Quarter

BYU freshman Delaney Gibb scored nine points in the second quarter, giving her a team-high total of 11 points at the half. Gibb is a heralded freshman from Canada who played in her first BYU game.

Both teams’ offense struggled to close the first half, combining for 0-of-17 to end the second quarter.

Half: BYU 42, Idaho 26

Third Quarter

The Vandals showed fight in the third quarter, outscoring BYU 19-13. BYU only shot 20% from three and committed five turnovers.

BYU 55, Idaho 45

Advertisement

BYU women’s basketball held off Idaho in the Fourth Quarter

Idaho cut BYU’s lead down to eight and had three possessions where they missed three-point attempts. BYU guard Marya Hudgins then knocked down a jumper with 7:50 remaining to get the lead back to double digits.

The Vandals then reeled off a 6-0 run to make it a 57-53 BYU lead.

At the 4:24 mark, BYU was 1-of-8 from the field.

BYU was up 57-55 with Idaho and the Vandals had a fastbreak layup opportunity to tie the game, but Gibb blocked the layup by Hope Hassmann.

The Cougars didn’t capitalize on the offensive end resulting in another empty possession.

Advertisement

Idaho’s Rosie Schweizer hit a layup under the hoop to tie the game at 57.

Gibb then went on the attack and quickly put BYU back in front with a layup of her own. But the Vandals had another answer: Anja Bukvic hit a tough shot to tie it up.

One minute later, with 1:13 remaining, Heather Hamson put BYU in front.

Idaho then burned a 30-second timeout. Out of the break, they committed a turnover, which allowed BYU to set up a play for sharpshooter Kemery Congdon, who buried a three to give BYU a five-point lead.

On the Vandals’ next possession, Hassmann knocked down a three of her own, keeping Idaho within one possession.

Advertisement

BYU then burned a timeout with 20 seconds left. The Vandals fouled Amari Whiting, sending her to the line, where she made only one of her two attempts.

With 17.3 seconds remaining, Idaho committed a turnover out of a timeout, and then they fouled Gibb down 65-62. Gibb knocked down both free throws.

BYU came away with the five-point victory.

Next up for BYU women’s basketball

BYU hosts Wyoming on Saturday at 2 p.m. at the Marriott Center.

Mitch Harper is a BYU Insider for KSLsports.com and hosts the Cougar Tracks Podcast (SUBSCRIBE) and Cougar Sports Saturday (12–3 p.m.) on KSL Newsradio. Follow Mitch’s coverage of BYU in the Big 12 Conference on X: @Mitch_Harper.

Advertisement

Take us with you wherever you go.

Download the new and improved KSL Sports app from Utah’s sports leader. It allows you to stream live radio and video and stay up to date on all of your favorite teams.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho citizens committee approves legislative salary increases • Idaho Capital Sun

Published

on

Idaho citizens committee approves legislative salary increases • Idaho Capital Sun


Idaho lawmakers will see an increase in their pay from $19,913, to $25,000 per year for the next two years.

The Citizens’ Committee on Legislative Compensation unanimously approved this increase Wednesday morning at the Idaho State Capitol in Boise. 

The Idaho Senate president pro tem and Idaho House speaker will also receive an increase of an additional $5,000 per year to $5,500 per year, and minority leadership will receive an increase of an additional $2,000 to $2,500. 

The new salary structure will take effect on Dec. 1 for the next two years, unless the state Senate and House of Representatives reject or reduce the new rates by concurrent resolution within 25 days of the legislative session, which begins Jan. 6. If the new rates are rejected, the previous lower rates will remain in effect.

Advertisement

Costs for daily meals and travel expenses during the annual legislative session will remain covered under the new structure.

According to the Idaho Constitution, the Legislature “shall have no authority to establish the rate of its compensation and expense by law.” Rather, a citizens committee must establish the salary of Idaho lawmakers. The committee consists of six members who are not public officials – three appointed by the governor and three by the Idaho Supreme Court.

Committee rejects original proposal for 43% increase

The original request from Idaho Senate and House leadership and minority leadership sought a 43% pay increase for state lawmakers. This proposed pay rate would have boosted salaries to $37,801 in the coming year while eliminating some expense reimbursements, the Idaho Statesman reported.

Advertisement

On Wednesday, the committee rejected that proposal.

“I think leadership has done a great job, but I just don’t think they deserve that much more compensation,” committee member Mary Hasenoehrl said. 

At Wednesday’s hearing, three individuals voiced their opposition to the original proposal, beginning with American Action Fund Idaho field manager Sulamita Rotante. 

“A 43% pay increase for legislators during a time of historic inflation is out of touch with what Idaho people want and the conservative values we hold true. This should be a no brainer for our elected officials,” she said. “… Legislators should be focused on cutting government spending and taxes, or cutting government spending and taxes.”

Rotante also said it was “concerning” that the committee chose to meet at 8 a.m. the day after the presidential election. Committee chairman Dennis Johnson said he is aware of the inconvenience of the timing of the meeting. However, it was not an attempt to “do this in the dark of the night,” he said, but rather it met the schedules of those who are on this committee. 

Advertisement

Others who spoke in opposition to the proposed pay increases included Idaho Freedom Foundation policy director Niklas Kleinworth, and District 25 Idaho House Representative-elect David Leavitt.

“I believe it sends a wrong message to our taxpayers to fund lawmaker raises,” Leavitt said. “We should be focusing on saving taxpayers money.”

Idaho Senate Pro Tem Chuck Winder, R-Boise, attended the hearing virtually on Zoom. Winder, who was defeated in his May primary election and won’t be returning to the Legislature in January, defended the proposed increases, emphasizing the need to attract younger candidates and the high cost of housing in Boise.

“In Boise, housing is very difficult to obtain, and people are actually living in hotels,” Winder said.  “I can remember 10 years ago when a $100 a room was kind of the top end. Now to get a room in the downtown area or close to the capitol, you’re looking at $200 to $300 a night.”

Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, R-Boise, speaks from the Senate floor at the State Capitol building on Jan. 9, 2023. (Otto Kitsinger for Idaho Capital Sun)
Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho Republicans to expand supermajority in Idaho Legislature • Idaho Capital Sun

Published

on

Idaho Republicans to expand supermajority in Idaho Legislature • Idaho Capital Sun


As part of Tuesday’s conservative red wave, Republicans were poised to expand their supermajority in the Idaho Legislature based on unofficial results from the 2024 general election.

Idaho Republicans were on the verge of gaining four legislative seats and adding to the GOP’s robust supermajority. 

Idaho Democrats, meanwhile, were looking at coughing up four legislative seats and seeing their influence in Boise diminished again. 

Based on partial, unofficial election results released early Wednesday by the Idaho Secretary of State’s Office, Republicans were poised to flip Idaho Senate seats in West Boise’s Legislative District 15 and Central Idaho’s Legislative District 26. Republicans were also in position to flip Idaho House of Representatives seats in District 26 and Bannock County’s District 29.

Advertisement

For the past two years, Idaho Republicans controlled 87 of the 105 seats in the Idaho Legislature, while Democrats controlled 18 seats in the Idaho Legislature.

If Wednesday’s results hold, the balance of power would shift to a 91-14 advantage for the Idaho GOP. Broken down further, Republicans would control 30 seats in the Idaho Senate compared to five seats for the Democrats. Republicans would also see their influence in the Idaho House grow to a 61 to nine advantage over Democrats.

  • In the District 15 Idaho Senate race, former House Rep. Codi Galloway, R-Boise, was leading incumbent Sen. Rick Just, D-Boise, by a margin of 12,414 votes to 11,089 with all 197 Ada County precincts reporting early Wednesday, according to the Ada County Elections Office. 
  • In the District 26 Idaho Senate race, former Rep. Laurie Lickley, R-Jerome, was leading incumbent Sen. Ron Taylor, D-Hailey, by a margin of 7,933 votes to 7,873 with one of the three counties fully reporting, according to the Idaho Secretary of State’s Office. 
  • In the District 26 Idaho House Seat A race, Republican challenger Mike Pohanka was leading incumbent Rep. Ned Burns, D-Bellevue, by a margin of 9,127 votes to 8,404 votes with one of three counties fully reporting. 
  • In the District 29 Idaho House Seat B race, Republican challenger Tanya Burgoyne defeated incumbent Rep. Nate Roberts, D-Pocatello, by a margin of 11,498 votes to 10,359 votes with all Bannock County precincts reporting. 

Although it is too early to tell, losing seats in the 2024 general election could potentially cost Democrats some of the few seats they do hold on influential legislative committees such as the House State Education Committee and the House Health and Welfare Committee. Idaho legislators will convene an organizational session in early December to elect leadership positions, choose committee chairs and make committee assignments.

Election results in Idaho will not become official in Idaho until they are certified by the Idaho State Board of Canvassers on Nov. 26 in Boise.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending