Connect with us

Hawaii

Hawaii’s Supreme Court declares the Second Amendment clashes with ‘the spirit of Aloha’ and says ‘there is no state constitutional right to carry a firearm in public’

Published

on

Hawaii’s Supreme Court declares the Second Amendment clashes with ‘the spirit of Aloha’ and says ‘there is no state constitutional right to carry a firearm in public’


Hawaii’s Supreme Court has ignored recent Supreme Court precedent in a recent case, and upheld state laws that prohibit carrying an unlicensed firearm in public.

‘The spirit of Aloha clashes with a federally-mandated lifestyle that lets citizens walk around with deadly weapons during day-to-day activities,’ Justice Todd Eddins wrote in a unanimous 5-0 decision.

In Wednesday’s ruling, the court said it disagreed with the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent rulings interpreting the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment, which is also repeated almost verbatim in Article 1, Section 17 of Hawaii’s state constitution.

‘We read those words differently than the current United States Supreme Court,’ Eddins wrote. ‘We hold that in Hawaii there is no state constitutional right to carry a firearm in public.’

Advertisement

Rather, the court contended, the right was ‘militia-centric.’ 

Hawaii’s Supreme Court upheld state laws that generally prohibit carrying an unlicensed firearm in public, straying from precedent set by the U.S. Supreme Court

Michael Wilson was among the justices who stated the Second Amendment 'clashes with the spirit of Aloha

Justice Todd W. Eddins said Hawaii's Supreme Court 'read those words differently than the current United States Supreme Court'

Michael Wilson (left) and Todd W. Eddins (right) were among the justices who stated the Second Amendment ‘clashes with the spirit of Aloha

The court also reversed a lower circuit court’s dismissal of two charges filed against Paia man Christopher Wilson, 47, after he was arrested for criminal trespass while carrying an unregistered pistol.

The case against Wilson dates back to December 2017, when Flyin Hawaiian Zipline owner Duane Ting spotted men on his fenced-in property and called Maui police.

When officers arrived, Wilson said he had a weapon in his front waistband. Police lifted his shirt and found a Phoenix Arms .22 LR caliber pistol, loaded with ten rounds of .22 caliber ammunition.

Wilson said he legally purchased the gun in Florida in 2013. A records check showed that the pistol was unregistered in Hawaii, and Wilson had not obtained or applied for a permit to own a handgun.

Advertisement

The County of Maui Department of the Prosecuting Attorney charged Wilson with four counts. Two of the counts, improper storage of a firearm and improper storage of ammunition, fall under Hawaii’s ‘place to keep’ laws.

The Paia man was also charged with violating permits to acquire ownership of a firearm and first degree criminal trespass.

Wilson filed to dismiss the charges twice. On the second attempt, following the 2022 ruling of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, he successfully appealed and the place to keep charges were dismissed in circuit court.

Wilson claimed the place to keep laws subverted his constitutional right to protect himself in public by carrying a lethal weapon.

The justices declared there is 'no state constitutional right to carry a firearm in public'

The justices declared there is ‘no state constitutional right to carry a firearm in public’

Lisa M. Ginoza was among the five judges who issued the ruling in a unanimous decision

Justice Sabrina Shizue McKenna

The ruling was a unanimous 5-0 decision. Pictured: Judges Lisa M. Ginoza (left) and Sabrina Shizue McKenna (right)

However, the State appealed the dismissal in addition to challenging Wilson’s standing, arguing that Wilson did not bother to apply for a carry license and satisfy Hawaii’s license to carry law.

Advertisement

Therefore, they argued, Wilson could not claim that his right to bear arms was impeded.

The case went to the Supreme Court, where the justices affirmed Wilson’s right to challenge the constitutionality of the place to keep laws.

‘A criminal defendant has standing to level a constitutional attack against the charged crime,’ Eddins wrote.

However, he contended, Wilson lacked the standing to challenge Hawaii’s licenses to carry law, as the State did not charge him with violating it and Wilson made no attempt to obtain a carry license.

‘Conventional interpretive modalities and Hawaiʻi’s historical tradition of firearm regulation rule out an individual right to keep and bear arms under the Hawaiʻi Constitution,’ Eddins wrote in the 5-0 decision.

Advertisement

‘In Hawaii, there is no state constitutional right to carry a firearm in public.’

Moreover, he added: ‘The history of the Hawaiian Islands does not include a society where armed people move about the community to possibly combat the deadly aims of others.

The court also reversed a lower circuit court's dismissal of two charges filed against Paia man Christopher Wilson, 47, after he was arrested for criminal trespass while carrying an unregistered pistol

The court also reversed a lower circuit court’s dismissal of two charges filed against Paia man Christopher Wilson, 47, after he was arrested for criminal trespass while carrying an unregistered pistol

‘The government’s interest in reducing firearms violence through reasonable weapons regulations has preserved peace and tranquility in Hawaiʻi. A free-wheeling right to carry guns in public degrades other constitutional rights.’

Laws regulating firearms in public advanced the rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, Eddins wrote.

He also criticized Bruen, writing: ‘Time-traveling to 1791 or 1868 to collar how a state regulates lethal weapons – per the Constitution’s democratic design – is a dangerous way to look at the federal constitution.’

Advertisement

The Hawaii Supreme Court is made up of three appointed Democratic governors and two Republican-appointed justices.



Source link

Hawaii

Hawaii DOH warns of raw milk cheese recall over E. coli | Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Published

on

Hawaii DOH warns of raw milk cheese recall over E. coli | Honolulu Star-Advertiser


1/2

Swipe or click to see more

Advertisement

COURTESY FDA

COURTESY FDA

2/2

Swipe or click to see more

Advertisement

COURTESY FDA

Advertisement
COURTESY FDA
COURTESY FDA
Advertisement

The Hawaii Department of Health is alerting residents to a nationwide raw milk cheddar cheese recall due to potential contamination with E. coli.

The recall is for RAW FARM brand cheddar cheese, including both shredded and block products, after federal investigations found they may be contaminated with E. coli O157:H7.

DOH says the products were distributed to a small number of specialty grocery stores in Hawaii, including Down to Earth and Hanalei Market and is following up to ensure they are no longer available for sale.

Advertisement

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration requested RAW FARM of Fresno, Calif., issue the voluntary recall, and the business did so under protest.

The FDA continues to investigate a multi-state outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 infections linked to RAW FARM-brand faw dairy products.

The recalled products include:

>> 8 oz. lightly salted cheddar block, with expiration date 8/23/2026

>> 80 oz. lightly salted cheddar block, with expiration date 8/11/2026

>> 16 oz. lightly salted cheddar block, with expiration date 8/23/2026

>> 80 oz. bag of original cheddar shred, with expiration date 5/6/2026

Advertisement

>> 16 oz. Jalapeno cheddar block, with expiration date 9/24/2026

>> 8 oz. lightly salted cheddar shred, with expiration date 5/13/2026

>> 8 oz. Jalapeno Cheddar Block, with expiration date 9/24/2026

Any batches produced prior to the dates listed above are also under recall.

As of today, nine people infected with the E. coli strain have been reported from three states, including California, Texas and Florida, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Three have been hospitalized.

Advertisement

More than half of illnesses are in children under age 5.

No illnesses or adverse events from the product have been reported in Hawaii.

Symptoms include severe stomach cramps, diarrhea, fever, nausea and/or vomiting. They can begin anywhere from a few days after consuming contaminated food to up to nine days later.

“Although most healthy adults can recover completely within a week, some infections can cause severe bloody diarrhea and may lead to life-threatening conditions such as a type of kidney failure called hemolytic uremic syndrome,” said DOH in a news release. “HUS is most likely to occur in young children and the elderly.”

Infections with this strain may also lead to the development of high blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, and neurologic problems.

Advertisement

Anyone exhibiting symptoms after having consumed the recalled products should contact their health care provider immediately.

Consumers with questions may contact RAW FARM https://rawfarmusa.com/contact.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Hawaii

State bills would raise tax on pricey Hawaii home sales | Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Published

on

State bills would raise tax on pricey Hawaii home sales | Honolulu Star-Advertiser




Source link

Continue Reading

Hawaii

Gov. Green nominates new Hawaii Supreme Court chief justice

Published

on

Gov. Green nominates new Hawaii Supreme Court chief justice


HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) – Gov. Josh Green on Thursday announced he has nominated Vladimir Devens to serve as chief justice of the Hawaii Supreme Court.

The chief justice is responsible for administering the statewide court system, including oversight of court operations, judicial assignments, and efforts to improve efficiency and access to justice.

Devens, who has served as an associate justice since 2024, brings more than three decades of legal experience to the role, including extensive work in civil litigation and public service.

Green said Devens “brings something that is essential in this moment — real-world experience, a deep understanding of working people and a grounded, salt-of-the-earth perspective that reflects the values of our communities. At a time when families are focused on affordability, housing and stability, we need continuity and steady leadership in our courts. Justice Devens is the right person to lead with fairness, independence and a clear understanding of how decisions impact everyday people.”

Advertisement

If confirmed by the Hawaii State Senate, Devens will serve as the state’s highest-ranking judicial officer, overseeing the administration of the judiciary and guiding the work of the Supreme Court.

He would succeed Chief Justice Mark Recktenwald, who retired last September after reaching the state’s mandatory retirement age of 70.

“I am deeply honored by Governor Green’s nomination and grateful for the opportunity to continue serving the people of Hawaii,” Devens said. “Throughout my career, I have worked alongside individuals and families navigating real challenges and I carry those experiences with me. If confirmed, I will focus on ensuring our courts remain fair, accessible and responsive to the needs of all communities, while upholding the rule of law and maintaining public trust.”

Devens received a bachelor’s degree in economics, graduating magna cum laude and earning Phi Beta Kappa honors from the University of California, Berkeley. He earned his Juris Doctor from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law (formerly Boalt Hall), where he served as an Associate Editor of the Industrial Relations Law Journal.

Prior to his appointment, Devens worked in private practice for more than 30 years, where he concentrated on civil litigation across multiple practice areas. He also served on the Hawaii State Bar Association board of directors and on various HSBA committees.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending