Connect with us

Denver, CO

Here's who gets counted as homeless, sheltered and unsheltered during Denver's annual Point In Time Count

Published

on

Here's who gets counted as homeless, sheltered and unsheltered during Denver's annual Point In Time Count


At 4 a.m. on Tuesday, 25 two-person teams will scour Denver, counting people living outside.

The teams of city workers, deployed by the Department of Housing Stability, will comb through the city center, and also farther out toward Denver’s edge. They’ll look in obvious encampments but also more remote locations.

They can’t find everybody sleeping outside, but they can do their best. The number they arrive at with will be used by Mayor Mike Johnston to set policy, as he has done with last year’s Point in Time count. He used that data to decide how many people to try to shelter over two years. The number will also give service providers a sense of how many more people are living on the streets than last year.

The workers doing the count will be participating in the nationwide Point in Time Count, the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development’s attempt to figure out roughly — very roughly — how many people are experiencing homelessness on a single night in January.

Advertisement

It’s an imprecise exercise in tallying homelessness. Not all regions handle the count the same way, though all follow the same set of HUD rules.

Even the seven counties under the Metro Denver Homeless Initiative, the group overseeing the local count, have different approaches to counting. Some use volunteers. Others, like Denver, use paid staff.

Who gets counted as homeless, sheltered and unsheltered is specific.

Certain situations, considered homeless by the U.S. Department of Education, go uncounted in HUD’s Point in Time data: People staying with family and friends or doubled up and couch surfing.

People living in shelters and hotels and motels paid for by homeless service providers will be counted as people experiencing homelessness while living in “emergency shelter,” explained Kyla Moe, deputy director of the Metro Denver Homeless Initiative.

People living in unsanctioned encampments will be counted as “unsheltered.”

Advertisement

“People staying in Safe Outdoor Spaces are considered unsheltered by HUD and will therefore be reported as part of Denver’s unsheltered numbers,” explained Derek Woodbury, a spokesperson for the Department of Housing Stability. “There are currently three Safe Outdoor Spaces in Denver located at 1530 W. 13th Ave., 4635 N. Peoria St., and 3815 Steele St.”

But those living in tiny homes on government or nonprofit-run campuses will likely be considered “sheltered,” though people living independently in tiny homes or sheds without restrooms or kitchens are considered “unsheltered.”

City workers will hand count people living in encampments. The shelters will provide data for how many people spent the night to the Homeless Management Information System, the regional year-round database tracking homelessness services.

In the week after the count, at least 10% of the people identified will be surveyed about their identity and lives.

Last year saw a dramatic rise in homelessness in the metro area.

According to the 2023 Point in Time count, 9,065 experienced homelessness on a single night last January. And that’s just a fraction of the more than 30,000 people who accessed homeless services throughout the year, according to the Metro Denver Homeless Initiative’s recently released 2023 State of Homelessness report.

Advertisement

After six months of Mayor Johnston’s administration’s effort to shelter 1,000 people, Denverites will look at the new number and ask: Is Johnston’s House1000 push making a dent in unsheltered homelessness?

Cole Chandler, Johnston’s senior advisor on homelessness, told Denverite he’s optimistic the number of people living outside has dropped. But the Metro Denver Homeless Initiative won’t publish the data in the summer, so he can’t be sure.

Two factors, outside of Johnston’s control, will influence the number of people living outside.

Tens of thousands of migrants have arrived in Denver from the Texas-Mexico border, and some of them are living on the streets or in city-run shelters, likely boosting the Point in Time number of both sheltered and unsheltered individuals.

“We do not ask for migrant status in HMIS nor on the PIT survey, so someone who is a migrant who presented at a sheltered location or as unsheltered would be counted in the data,” Moe said.

Advertisement

The outreach teams across the metro are prepared to survey people who don’t speak English.

“Our community has recruited volunteers and staff that speak Spanish and we have the tools translated into Spanish,” Moe said.

The Point in Time number of unsheltered people could be much lower than it might be if the count took place in a few weeks, after the city resumes its policy of kicking migrant families out of shelters once their alloted days end — a decision the Johnston administration announced just days before the Point in Time count.

While city officials say they are trying to find housing for every migrant before they’re forced from shelter to the streets, the policy shift could lead to a massive increase in the number of people sleeping outside — something this year’s Point of Time numbers will not capture.

Chandler says the timing of removing migrants from shelters has been a topic of debate and weather has been a main factor in conversations — not so much the Point in Time count.

Advertisement

He also acknowledged that the administration did not conceive of how the increase in migration and homelessness would converge.

“This issue has so rapidly evolved over the course of six months, it’s kind of frightening,” Chandler said. “And it’s going to have to be something we continue to grapple with in a really serious way. And we’re really hoping to get some federal support and some coordination at the federal level.”

 

 

Advertisement



Source link

Denver, CO

University of Denver to close Ricks Center for Gifted Children next year

Published

on

University of Denver to close Ricks Center for Gifted Children next year


The University of Denver will close the Ricks Center for Gifted Children next year as enrollment has fallen in recent years, the college announced this week.

The Ricks Center, which serves gifted children as young as 3 years old, will operate for the 2026-27 academic year before closing, according to a letter DU sent parents on Wednesday.

“The University of Denver has made the difficult decision to close the Ricks Center for Gifted Children at the conclusion of the 2026–2027 academic year,” spokesman Jon Stone said in a statement. “This decision reflects long-term operational and financial considerations and is not a reflection of the school’s quality, leadership, or community.”

The center, which is located on DU’s campus, was started in 1984 as the University Center for Gifted Young Children. The program offers classes to students in preschool through eighth grade, according to the website.

Advertisement

The program, along with other public K-12 schools in the state, has experienced declining enrollment in recent years. The center enrolled 142 students for the 2025-26 academic year, which is down from 200 pupils four years ago.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Denver, CO

David Fountaine Black Obituary | The Denver Post

Published

on

David Fountaine Black Obituary |  The Denver Post



David Fountaine Black


OBITUARY

Dave and Martha and their three boys moved to Denver in 1974 when Dave started work at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal. He and a business partner later purchased Mid-America Plating Company. Dave operated Mid-America for 36 years and finally retired in 2018.

He was a great golfer and natural athlete. Dave was an avid runner, and for many years, he woke up before the sun to get his miles in before work. He and Martha loved playing bridge with friends, gardening – growing fruit and flowers – and spending time outside relaxing and walking on the High Line Canal Trail and in Bible Park. Dave and Martha enjoyed getting back to Arizona during the winter at their Tucson home. They loved spending time with their family.

Advertisement

Dave passed away on February 20, 2026. He is loved by family and friends and will be missed. Dave was a hard-working, kind, optimistic, and thoughtful person who leaves the world a better place. He is survived by his wife, Martha, and his three sons, Dave (Robin), Tom (Debbie), Eric (Kendra), as well as six grandchildren and three great grandchildren, Casey (Nicole), Jake (Ashleigh and great granddaughter Faye), Hailey (Robby and great granddaughter Jensen), Keenan (Nicole and great granddaughter Olivia), Griffin, and Addie (Erik).



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

10 takeaways from the Celtics looking a step behind in Denver

Published

on

10 takeaways from the Celtics looking a step behind in Denver


Sometimes in life, you feel like you’re a step behind. Nothing big, but yet, it creates a difference between where you should be and where you are, and this small difference has consequences. Well, that’s how it felt looking at the Celtics’ off-ball defense last night.

This first bucket from the Nuggets is a great example of the Nuggets being a step ahead. The screen from Cam Johnson causes a bit of chaos as Derrick White and Jaylen Brown don’t switch, leaving a lot of space for Jamal Murray to cut to the rim. A few possessions later, it’s Brown again who is half a second late when Johnson starts moving, and that’s enough for the Nuggets to punish the Celtics.

Denver is a very smart, very well coached team. It isn’t a surprise they involved Jordan Walsh’s matchup in the screen because the young wing has a tendency to overpressure off-ball. Therefore, with all the screens and movement the Nuggets are creating, it is hard for him to keep up.

This game was a great example of what makes a team like Denver so good. They can find a breach in a great defense by targeting players’ tendencies. Like the Celtics, they scout, they learn, and they adapt their approach to the opponent, and it worked out pretty well, even in garbage time.

Advertisement

#2 – The offense broke under pressure

On offense, the Celtics lost the ball on more than 15% of their possessions. When this happens, the Celtics have a 50% win rate. Taking care of the ball is one of the foundations of that team, and they couldn’t deliver last night. Led by Bruce Brown and Spencer Jones, the Nuggets put a lot of pressure on the Celtics’ ball-handlers.

They also didn’t hesitate to bring a second defender to force a quicker decision and generated some mistakes from Boston. With that appetite for steals and the domination on the offensive glass, the Denver Nuggets were able to generate 10 more field-goal attempts than the Celtics. And when the Celtics lose the possession battle, it becomes a lot harder to compete against the best teams in the league.

It was a different sight than usual on defense for the Denver Nuggets. We are used to seeing Jokic hedging on the pick-and-roll to force a pass and put pressure on the ball-handler, but this wasn’t the case last night. The guards put a lot of pressure while the Serbian was commanding from the back.

It was an interesting way to take away the paint from the Celtics while showing bodies beyond the three-point line. While Jokic was in the paint behind the pick-and-roll, the Nuggets’ closest defender next to the screen would come to disrupt the action.

Advertisement

Thanks to that, Jokic had less effort to expend on defense and could compensate on offense. In some possessions, Jokic would come up to surprise the ball-handler and create some chaos, like here:

But overall, the 3-time MVP remained in a drop position, and this explains why the Celtics had so much trouble getting to the paint last night.

#4 – Denver daring Ron Harper Junior to shoot

The young wing is discovering the NBA and what it is like to be scouted by the best teams in the world. After a standout performance against the Suns, he was back on the bench to start the game. Yet, like every other player on the roster, the Nuggets scouted him and had a plan in mind for when he would come onto the court.

As the defensive plan was to protect the paint at all costs, they decided to leave him alone beyond the line to make sure the Celtics touched the paint as little as possible.

Advertisement

The Celtics tried to get him involved in the screening action, hoping he would draw some attention from the defense, but the Nuggets couldn’t care less about his shooting threat.

In the end, that approach worked out pretty well for Denver as Harper shot one for seven from deep in 10 minutes. This also took away part of his offensive impact, and the Celtics had to adapt their rotation.

Because the Nuggets were willing to leave non-shooters open, the Celtics tried their double-big lineup again. If the opponent isn’t going to respect your shooters, you might as well play big. And the idea makes sense.

Because the Celtics played with two bigs and the non-shooter of the two is Neemias Queta, Vucevic was matched up with a smaller player. Therefore, it was easier for him to get a mismatch in the post. However, it was also easier for Jokic to come help from behind because of Queta’s presence in the paint.

To make this work on offense, I think the Celtics need to work on high-low offense with more movement from the off-ball players around the two centers. Defensively, it brought more rebounding stability and rim protection. The Celtics could target non-shooting threats like Christian Braun so the paint remained stacked.

Advertisement

If the Celtics can build some offensive synergy between Queta and Vucevic, things could be really fun and bring a great balance against big teams like Denver.

Because Denver was so aggressive when it came to protecting the paint, the Celtics decided to start their actions from the half-court line to stretch the Denver defense.

Here, a zoom action for Derrick White starts from half court, with Sam Hauser screening at the logo and Queta handing off at the three-point line. Because of that space and the distance of the screen, Jones has more difficulty containing White. This created a little bit of chaos in the defense and worked pretty well.

Yet, starting from deep isn’t enough, and using screens correctly remains one of the most important parts of off-ball actions. Here, look how easy it is for the Denver Nuggets defenders to stay connected to their matchup despite the various screens.

The idea was great, the execution not so much. Yet, it gives some perspective on how the Celtics offense can adapt when the spacing is missing.

Advertisement

#7 – More volume for White?

Looking at the stats from cleaningtheglass.com, I’m left with a couple of questions.

First, why didn’t White have more opportunities with the shot? He was really efficient with 1.25 points per shot attempt, created chaos with his speed and passing, and yet his usage was pretty average.

In the meantime, Jaylen Brown’s usage was once again close to 40% despite really low efficiency. When the defense shrinks the space like last night, I would like to see more possessions for White to unlock Jaylen Brown off-ball.

Against such a smart defense, isolation and drives in a crowded paint won’t work as much as usual, and the Celtics need to readjust how JB plays against elite teams to make sure to maximize him next to a great connector like Derrick White. The former Colorado guard scored 18 points in the second quarter but couldn’t get anything going after that.

#8 – More minutes for Hauser?

Advertisement

A second question I would have asked is why Sam Hauser didn’t get more minutes. As we saw earlier, the Nuggets were willing to leave a shooter open to protect the paint – even if that shooter was Sam Hauser.

So, when Sam was the guy next to the ball on the pick-and-roll, it created great things for the Celtics because the help defender couldn’t fully commit. And if he did, the Celtics could swing the ball to the wing.

Even if he didn’t make all the shots, the added value in spacing was so crucial that it was vital for the Celtics to keep him on the court to have the best chance on offense.

#9 – Be patient with Vucevic

It took seven games for someone to raise the question – let’s be patient. And also let’s take a step back and remember that Vucevic isn’t the Celtics’ savior. He never has been an efficient scorer, never been a great interior defender. But he is a smart player with great passing for a 7-footer.

Advertisement

If you are expecting Nikola Vucevic to reach Kristaps Porzingis’ numbers in rim protection and scoring efficiency, well, be prepared to wait for a while because it never was the case. However, Vucevic can bring a push in the possession battle while providing spacing and great secondary passing once he gets more comfortable in the Celtics offense.

Let’s be nice, let’s be patient, this roster isn’t changing anytime soon.

#10 – Out of gas, out of air

Three games in four days, the last one 5280 feet above sea level, and the Celtics were out of gas and out of air.

This month, they played six games on the road, a lot of time away from home. March should be far more comfortable with nine games at TD Garden.

Advertisement

Might be the perfect timing for Jayson Tatum to come back (and for me to book a ticket from France to cover some games from the ground).”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending