Connect with us

Denver, CO

Denver Water not legally responsible for pipe burst that damaged 50 properties

Published

on

Denver Water not legally responsible for pipe burst that damaged 50 properties


The utility firm will, nevertheless, pay residents for damages incurred and the work wanted to revive properties.

DENVER — It took round three hours for crews to show greater than 30 totally different valves earlier than they had been in a position to shut off the water spewing out of a burst pipe within the Berkeley neighborhood this weekend. The water that flooded the world impacted 50 properties.

Because the cleanup continues, the main focus shifts to who’s chargeable for the damages.

Advertisement

The individuals who dwell within the space clearly aren’t in charge for the pipe that burst. However Denver Water says the regulation states it doesn’t should take duty for the damages both.

The utility firm cites the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act. On this case, it permits the corporate to jot down on their web site, “Denver Water isn’t chargeable for damages ensuing from a water fundamental break.”

Advertisement

9NEWS Authorized Analyst Whitney Traylor mentioned that’s the identical act that stops issues like emergency responders being chargeable for harm from a crash.

“The beginning place is the federal government is immune from lawsuits,” Traylor mentioned, explaining how the Governmental Immunity Act works. “They gained’t be chargeable for accidents. That’s the beginning place.”

Traylor mentioned householders may possible nonetheless sue for damages.

“If everyone may sue for each doable scenario, it could be exorbitant,” Traylor mentioned. “The federal government wouldn’t have the ability to function. Taxpayers could be paying for all of that.”

Advertisement

Denver Water doesn’t should take duty, however mentioned it is going to nonetheless pay for the damages the pipe induced.

Householders start cleanup after water fundamental break floods backyards and basements

The utility is giving householders a restoration firm to work with. In the event that they use that firm, the utility mentioned it is going to pay the invoice immediately. If householders use a unique firm, they are often reimbursed, as much as the quantity Denver Water’s contractor says is a good estimate.

Advertisement

Denver Water mentioned it is going to additionally pay as much as $8,000 to cowl uninsured property that was broken and as much as $1,000 for vehicles that had been broken.

Extra details about Denver Water’s help program is out there right here. 

Advertisement

One thing that gained’t assist on this scenario is householders insurance coverage.

“Usually when you’ve gotten a fundamental water line break, it’s a metropolis pipe,” mentioned Carole Walker, Govt Director of the Rocky Mountain Insurance coverage Affiliation. “That’s not one thing that’s going to be coated by your householders insurance coverage as a result of it’s off your property line.”

If a pipe had been to burst inside your private home, householders insurance coverage would step in. As a result of the break occurred on public property, non-public insurance coverage possible gained’t assist.

Advertisement

“Sadly this isn’t one thing that’s going to be coated on this scenario underneath most owners’ insurances,” Walker mentioned. 

Denver Water mentioned there are greater than 80,000 totally different valves within the water system all through the town. It took crews some time to establish which valves turned the water off, which is why it took a lot time to get the water to cease popping out of the burst pipe.

   

Advertisement

SUGGESTED VIDEOS: Newest from 9NEWS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=videoseries

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Denver, CO

Details Emerge on Broncos’ Decision Not to Trade Courtland Sutton

Published

on

Details Emerge on Broncos’ Decision Not to Trade Courtland Sutton


Recently, the San Francisco 49ers extended disgrunteled wide receiver Brando Aiyuk after months of trade speculation, and along the way, the Denver Broncos were linked. According to reports by ESPN’s Dianna Russini and Sports Illustrated’s Albert Breer, the Broncos were involved in a potential trade that never was. 

We learned after the extension that the Niners wanted a receiver to replace Aiyuk, if he were to be traded, and they had their eyes on Courtland Sutton, the Broncos’ top wide receiver. To feel comfortable making the trade, the Niners were reportedly willing to give Denver a third-round pick for Sutton.

When you add in Breer’s report, the pick to be exchanged would’ve been a Niners’ third-round pick by way of the Pittsburgh Steelers. The question is, did the Broncos make the right decision?

In order to answer that question, we must examine all the details that have emerged since Aiyuk’s extension knocked loose a lot of new information. Let’s dive in.

Advertisement

The Broncos moved on from Tim Patrick to ease their log jam at wide receiver and create an avenue for younger receivers like Devaughn Vele, Troy Franklin, and Marvin Mims Jr. to see the field. Releasing Patrick wasn’t a move to help the salary cap situation since the Broncos ate $6 million in dead money while saving a little over $1.1 million in cap space. It was about the log jam at the position. 

Sutton has the second-highest cap hit on the Broncos roster, at a hair under $17.3 million, behind left tackle Garett Bolles. Sutton was unsatisfied with his contract, and for months, the Broncos were unwilling to rework his deal.

However, the two sides finally came to an agreement on some bonuses that were considered unlikely to be earned. The fact that they are unlikely to be earned matters a ton here. 

When performance bonuses are handed out, they’re dubbed unlikely or likely to be earned based on a player’s track record. If they’re likely to be earned, they’ll count against the current year’s salary cap, and if they go unearned, the team will re-gain that cap space the following season.

As unlikely bonuses, they count against the following year’s salary cap if earned. This is important in this situation with Sutton. 

Advertisement

The Broncos wouldn’t be on the hook for any of the money unless he earned those bonuses. If he were with the Niners and earned them, it would go against their salary cap. With no new guaranteed money, the Broncos would save $9.6 million against the salary cap with $7.6 million in dead money. 

Had the Broncos traded Sutton, this would likely have kept Patrick on the roster. Remember, Patrick represents roughly $6 million in dead money while freeing up $1.1 million.

Trading Sutton would’ve added $1.6 million more in dead money, but it would have freed up $8.5 million more in usable cap space, which could’ve also been used to roll over into the 2025 season. The Broncos will still be dealing with Russell Wilson’s dead cap hit, so an extra $8.5 million could be useful. 

What happens next on the Broncos beat? Don’t miss out on any news and analysis! Take a second, sign up for our free newsletter, and get breaking Broncos news delivered to your inbox daily!

The other fact here is the additional third-round pick, which, according to Breer, would’ve been from the Steelers. It’s impossible to predict where that third-round pick would end up, but let’s look at where different publications projected them. 

Advertisement

Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin has never had a losing season, and the defense they have is excellent, so most outlets view them as a nine or 10-win team. NFL.com had Pittsburgh tied with the Broncos as the 11th team in the AFC, but no record was given.

USA TODAY had the Steelers at 10-7, as did Sports Illustrated. I was unable to find a Steelers record prediction from ESPN or other national sites. That record would have put that pick Denver would have garnered from San Francisco for Sutton at around pick at No. 85 overall or the 20th or 21st pick in the third round. That’s better than if the pick was coming from the Niners, who are projected to be in the late 90s, as they’re one of the favorites to contend for a Super Bowl this year. 

The final fact to consider is the uncertainty of Sutton’s future with the team. There was a chance for the Broncos to rework his deal, which could’ve included an extension to secure his future with the team for at least a couple more seasons, but the team passed on that.

Rumors have been circulating about the Broncos wanting to move on from Sutton for almost three years. So, that’s important to remember when talking about the uncertainty of his standing with the team in future years. 

The Broncos had a chance to proceed with Patrick, an extra third-round pick, and an additional $8.5 million in salary cap space, but they passed on that avenue. Would that have been better than having only Sutton for the 2024 season with uncertainty beyond 2025, the final year of his deal?

Advertisement

The Broncos are betting that Sutton’s worth more to them on the team than all those other resources combined, and only time will tell whether they made the right decision.


Follow Mile High Huddle on X and Facebook and subscribe on YouTube for daily Broncos live-stream podcasts!





Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

What Happened To Bob Denver After Gilligan’s Island? – SlashFilm

Published

on

What Happened To Bob Denver After Gilligan’s Island? – SlashFilm


The culture at large seems to be very ambivalent about Sherwood Schwartz’s 1964 sitcom “Gilligan’s Island.” On the one hand, it was massively popular and, thanks to plum syndication deals, remained in the pop culture consciousness for literally decades, feeding its goofy reruns to multiple generations. The seven stranded castaways are all easily recognizable by millions, and kids grew up chuckling to Gilligan’s antics. On the other hand, “Gilligan’s Island” is often lambasted, critically, as the nadir of television. The series takes place in a lightweight, cartoonish universe, and it doesn’t ever reach deeply into the souls of the characters to analyze how they adapt to being stranded on a tropical island. There is no madness or deterioration, just shenanigans. 

Anything as popular as “Gilligan’s Island” at least deserves a robust and healthy regard, however. Its seven stars may have been playing broad, slapstick archetypes, but their performances certainly struck a chord. At the center of the show was Bob Denver, a comedic actor who had been performing professionally since the 1950s. Indeed, prior to “Gilligan’s Island,” Denver already had a hit sitcom under his belt with “The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis,” on which he played the character Maynard G. Krebs for 144 episodes. He also appeared in the feature films “For Those Who Think Young” (which also starred his future “Island” co-star Tina Louise), “Take Her, She’s Mine,” and “A Private’s Affair.” 

“Gilligan’s Island” made Denver a household presence, although, as an actor, Denver merely continued to work at an average clip. After “Gilligan’s Island,” Denver would reprise the role multiple times on a few spinoffs, and play himself in many “Island” retrospectives. This was while also taking many notable TV jobs, mostly as a guest performer on some of the biggest shows of the day. 

Advertisement

Bob Denver’s post-Gilligan career

Denver kept busy during “Gilligan’s Island,” also appearing on episodes of “I Dream of Jeannie.” As soon as “Island” went off the air in 1967, Denver already had another leading role lined up on “The Good Guys,” a show about a cab driver (Denver) and a fry cook (Herb Edelman) who were constantly trying to get rich. “The Good Guys” lasted for 42 episodes over two seasons, getting canceled in 1970. At about the same time, Denver also appeared in three feature films, “Who’s Minding the Mint?,” the biker flick “The Sweet Ride,” and the Phyllis Diller vehicle “Did You Hear the One About the Traveling Saleslady?” 

From 1970 to 1973, Denver appeared on three episodes of “Love, American Style” before landing the title role in the Western sitcom “Dusty’s Trail,” also created by Sherwood Schwartz. “Dusty’s Trail” was more or less a Western retooling of “Gilligan,” as it featured the same seven archetypal character as its tropic island counterpart. The series only lasted 26 episodes over one season. Four episodes of the show were re-edited into a feature and it was released in theaters as “The Wackiest Wagon Train in the West.” 

“Trail” then led directly into the animated series “The New Adventures of Gilligan” in 1974. It was the first time Denver would return to the role. 

In 1975, Denver took another leading role in Sid and Marty Krofft’s kid-friendly sci-fi series “Far Out Space Nuts.” One can admire Denver for always managing to play lead characters and title characters. He frequently played bumbling characters and slapstick boobs, but he did an exemplary job. “Space Nuts” only lasted 15 episodes, ending in 1976. From this point forward, a lot of Denver’s acting career would begin to calcify around Gilligan, and he would return for other shows and TV movies. 

Advertisement

Gilligan Rising

By the late 1970s, reruns of “Gilligan’s Island” became ubiquitous, and there was seemingly a public demand for the show’s return. Rather than merely reboot or revive the series, however, Sherwood Schwartz put out a series of TV movies and animated shows that featured most of the original cast (Tina Louise bowed out) in the same roles. 1979 saw the release of “The Castaways of Gilligan’s Island,” and in 1981, the seminal American classic “The Harlem Globetrotters on Gilligan’s Island” hit the airwaves. Denver also played Gilligan in all 13 episodes of “Gilligan’s Planet,” an animated series that moved the castaways to an abandoned planet, many lightyears from Earth. They were able to build a spacecraft out of wood, you see. 

Denver also returned to the role of Maynard G. Krebs a few times, once in 1977 in “Whatever Happened to Dobie Gillis?” and again in 1988 in “Bring Me the Head of Dobie Gillis.” Denver would also appear as Gilligan in several other sitcoms, usually there to visit characters who were fans of “Gilligan’s Island.” Gilligan showed up in “The New Gidget,” “ALF,” and even in an 1992 episode of “Baywatch.” Denver entered a “resting on his laurels” phase in his career, mostly appearing on TV to play Gilligan, or to play himself. One of his last acting jobs was on the 1997 sci-fi series “Meego,” also playing Gilligan. His last role was playing himself on a 1998 episode of “The Simpsons.” 

Denver passed away in 2005 at the age of 70, having left a deep mark in popular culture, even if he never was heavily awarded as a comedic actor. His “Island” fame was seemingly a blessing and a curse, bringing him national attention, but also pigeonholing him into a series of Gilligan-like roles, or constant revivals of the part. He seems like a decent, hardworking, funny fellow. All credit to Denver for creating a silly, but memorable character.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

The ‘youth movement’ by the 2024 Broncos is loved by fans

Published

on

The ‘youth movement’ by the 2024 Broncos is loved by fans


Earlier this week, I dropped a survey about the youth movement this team has experienced heading into Week 1 compared to last year. In 2023, Denver entered Week 1 as the third oldest team in the NFL and today they are the 10th youngest. That is a rapid shift towards youth.

71% of fans are loving the move and 28% are neutral on it. Then we have a Las Vegas Raiders and Kansas City Chiefs fans filling out the last 2%.

Advertisement

The movement to get younger has not gone unnoticed by the local media. In fact, veteran defensive lineman John Franklin-Myers was asked about what it means for a team to be ‘young and hungry’ in the NFL. Myers actually had a really good explanation of how a young team feels different from a more veteran-heavy one.

“I think there’s a different level of physicality [and] there’s a different level of effort playing with guys who are young and hungry,” Myers explained. “What’s kind of understood is that when you first get into the league, we’re all excited. We all just want to run and hit. You see that a lot here. Guys just want to run, they want to hit and they play with extreme effort and physicality. Those are the two things [I said] in my first press conference [that] if you ask anybody about my game, that’s what they’re going to tell you I play with. So I fit right in with these guys, and [I’m] looking forward to the season.”

The seven-year veteran enjoys the kind of atmosphere this young locker room has in Denver this season and he went on to say that the hunger to win is always there with him.

Advertisement

“It’s been a while,” Myers said of winning. “I went to the Super Bowl my rookie year, and I’m in year seven now. The hunger is [there].”

As a rookie, Myers was with the Los Angeles Rams when they lost to the New England Patriots. He ended up with the New York Jets every year since and that franchise has been stuck in a long rut just like the Broncos have.

Hopefully that changes this season for Denver.

However, if you ask most NFL fans the optimism that Denver is heading in the right direction is about 50-50.

Advertisement

While that might seem like a bad number, its actually the 13th best rank out of all 32 teams. This survey was of all NFL fans, not just Broncos fans. Obviously, we’re about as close to 100% as we can be after two un-bo-lievable preseason games.

What did you think of these results? Share in the comments section below.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending