Colorado
What is the “Cyclopean Cave” — and why are these guys hauling buckets of Colorado mud to find it?
Story first appeared in:
LEADVILLE — “It’s easy digging, but it’s scary as hell down there,” says Wes Devenyns, who is covered, helmet to boot, in mud.
“What’s so scary?” his pals atop the dark entrance of the historic mine shaft ask.
“The timbers,” he says. “Don’t touch the timbers.”
“Don’t even look at ’em. I mean, they were installed in the 1800s,” says Mike Frazier, who appears unbothered by the mud speckling his eyeglasses. “They are just kind of floating above you. But hey, this is what I like about caves. Finding places that so few people will ever see.”

Sure, this could be the mythological cave. Or it could be a hole full of mud. Cave digging is never a certainty.
— Wes Devenyns, spelunker
Right now, eight avid spelunkers are hauling buckets of mud and rocks up from the bottom of a hole, pulling together on a haul rope every few minutes. They’ve been digging here sporadically for a few years and they’ve cleared the mine shaft to a depth around 45 feet.
They are in the middle of a conifer forest near Leadville. The private land is dotted with prospecting holes where miners in the 1800s dug in search of gold, silver and precious metals. But this hole is littered with black shale. Down the mountain is a long-collapsed cabin next to what looks like a horizontal bore that accesses the mine shaft.
These are signs that this particular mine shaft is the entrance to a long-lost cave that some say is a myth made up by a newspaper reporter who occasionally veered into fiction.
“Sure, this could be the mythological cave. Or it could be a hole full of mud. Cave digging is never a certainty,” Devenyns says.
“Hoax, Humbug and Orth Stein.”

Orth Stein was a pioneer journalist at the just-launched Leadville Carbonate Weekly Chronicle in the late 1800s. He was prone to tall tales. (This was not uncommon in that age of news. Mark Twain was a young newspaper reporter in the 1860s, spinning yarns of dubious veracity in California and Nevada.)
One of Stein’s stories described a fully intact wooden ship, with two giant masts, embedded deep in a granite cave beneath Battle Mountain near Red Cliff. Another Stein report in the Leadville Chronicle in 1884 described “a hideous visitor” and “sea serpent” frightening residents around Twin Lakes.
So, not surprisingly, his reports of a vast series of caverns he called the Cyclopean Cave, which were written mere weeks after his ship-in-a-cave dispatch from Battle Mountain, were easily dismissed as fiction.
In the 1973 book “Caves of Colorado,” a sort of bible for spelunkers, author and caving pioneer Lloyd Parris included the Cyclopean Cave in a chapter titled “Hoax, Humbug and Orth Stein.” Parris cited previous reports calling the Cyclopean Cave an invention by “a bored newspaper reporter in Leadville in the 1880s.” In the early 1900s, a memoir published by Stein’s boss, Leadville newspaper editor C.C. Davis, described the Cyclopean Cave as “fiction from headlines to tailpiece.”
Across the globe, exploring spelunkers have investigated and proved the existence of mythical caves and the potential of the Cyclopean Cave being a hoax did not deter Colorado caver Richard Rhinehart.
Rhinehart, the editor of Rocky Mountain Caving Journal and author of several books on Colorado’s caves, and a crew of cave-crawling geologists spent several years poring over Stein’s newspaper reports as well as studying the geology around Leadville.

Stein described a miner near Leadville who was down digging in a shaft when he broke through and fell into a dark room.
“A guy disappeared down in the darkness and ended up on a ledge down below … so he calls up from below ‘Hell is not a half-mile off,’” Rhinehart says as he hauls on the mud-slicked rope on a recent Sunday afternoon. “And his colleague up here somewhere helps him climb back up. They probably drank some whiskey. They said they needed to get the nerve to go back down with candles and explore.”
Stein spoke with those miners, and the articles published in October 1880 described the shaft as 52-feet deep when the miner broke into the cavern, which held “thousands upon thousands” of stalactites. Stein wrote that month about joining several Leadville residents — all real people — in the cavern and “their wonder and delight was very great.”
He described a spring, stream, lake and a petrified waterfall he called “hushed Niagara.” Stein included a map of the cave in an Oct. 30, 1880, article in the Leadville paper titled “Marvelous. The Mammoth Cave of Colorado” that described “the first exploration of its bewildering labyrinths.” Stein described one chamber — Stein Gallery, he called it — as something akin to the galleries of the Vatican “bathed in moonlight.”

This story first appeared in
Colorado Sunday, a premium magazine newsletter for members.
Experience the best in Colorado news at a slower pace, with thoughtful articles, unique adventures and a reading list that’s a perfect fit for a Sunday morning.
Artist illustrations for the article show miners holding torches and panning for gold in the underwater river Stein called the “River Styx.” Upon returning from the cave on horseback, Stein describes seeing the lights of Leadville and thinking that his home city “not only surpasses the world in her mineral wealth, but possesses a natural cavern which will for years furnish food for thought and curiosity.”
Stein said the owner of the property was “negotiating with London capitalists for the sale and full development” of the Cyclopean Cave. Leadville was a booming silver town in the 1880s, with a population of more than 30,000 supporting saloons, brothels, hotels, restaurants and a new opera house.
Rhinehart spent many months tracking down the name of every person mentioned in Stein’s Cyclopean Cave articles and each was a known resident with a lengthy history in Leadville.
More articles in the years that followed noted local residents exploring the cave in the early 1900s. Rhinehart has found articles mentioning Cyclopean Cave visits in 1941.
Rhinehart suspects the cave was a bit of a bummer for miners who wanted precious minerals, not a tourist destination. Hence the cave’s fade into local Leadville lore.

“I’m sure it was exciting when they found this cave but it was also probably a disappointment because it was not some big vein,” Rhinehart says. “They were miners, not cavers.”
Cavers are curious explorers. In a previous life, they were the adventurers who sailed the seas to find new civilizations and in the future, perhaps they will sail into space, says Rhinehart, who has discovered new caves and chambers over several decades of spelunking.
“It’s exciting to investigate something that has never before been seen by anyone,” he says. “It’s been more than 80 years since the Cyclopean Cave has been visited. In that time, it’s been labeled as fiction by historians and media, based upon incorrect information. To reopen the cave will help set the record straight.”
In 2021, after several days scouring the area, Rhinehart and his friends found that pile of black Belden shale on the private parcel. The shale means the shaft had breached a layer dozens of feet below that stretches from Leadville across Battle Mountain to the old mines around the ghost town of Gilman.

It’s been more than 80 years since the Cyclopean Cave has been visited. In that time, it’s been labeled as fiction by historians and media, based upon incorrect information. To reopen the cave will help set the record straight.
— Richard Rhinehart, spelunker
More than three years ago they brought in ropes, hoists and equipment and started clearing the shaft, noting airflow as they carefully descended and removed trees and logs blocking the hole. After many days of digging since 2021, they suspect they are very close to the caverns of the Cyclopean Cave.
“I swear I felt air flowing out of there today,” Rhinehart says.
“Always up for a little adventure”


LEFT: Mike Frazier pulls on a rope with others to haul up dirt out of a mine shaft on Sept. 22, 2024 in Leadville. RIGHT: Wes Devenyns, left, and Mike Frazier lower a handbuilt safety shelter into the mine shaft. (Rebecca Slezak, Special to The Colorado Sun)


TOP: Mike Frazier pulls on a rope with others to haul up dirt out of a mine shaft on Sept. 22, 2024 in Leadville. BOTTOM: Wes Devenyns, left, and Mike Frazier lower a handbuilt safety shelter into the mine shaft. (Rebecca Slezak, Special to The Colorado Sun)
Rhinehart and his fellow explorers reached out to the property’s owner when they first found the mine shaft they suspect leads to the Cyclopean Cave.
“It’s always a scary thing to call an owner and say there’s a big cave on your property. They could tell us to never come back. They could close it down,” Rhinehart says.
But this owner, who bought the 42-acre mining claim near Leadville in the 1980s, says he has “always been up for a little adventure.”
“So I was happy for some exploring without actually having to leave home,” said the landowner, who asked that The Sun not publish his name or the location of the mine entrance “just yet.” (He’s wary that visitors may come exploring and get hurt, reflecting a growing concern among landowners in Colorado. All the digging cavers who visit his property sign liability waivers.)
The owner has hiked “every inch” of his property and nothing about the mine shaft ever seemed different than the many other prospector holes. The cavers pointed out the shale and a debris collapse exposing the shaft’s timbers. The owner now joins Rhinehart and his fellow cavers in hopes that maybe this is the entrance to the Cyclopean.
He’s keen to enter the cave if the shaft connects to caverns. If it is something “big and spectacular,” maybe there will be some sort of opportunities to host visitors, he says. Maybe nearby tourist operations in the Upper Arkansas River Valley would be interested in offering tours, he says.
“But that’s a long way away,” he says. “Let’s see what happens.”
The owner and his dog often join the cavers on their digs. He helps pull on the haul rope and enjoys the company of the well-traveled scientists and explorers. The conversation is riveting as they talk about discovering new caves and exploring Colorado’s darkest corners.
They talk about Groaning Cave, which cavers found in 1968 and is the longest in Colorado with a length of tunnels and caverns reaching 14.7 miles in the White River National Forest. They talk about how the hard-to-reach and ropes-required Fixin’-To-Die Cave in Garfield County is aptly named.
Frazier talks about spending seven hours last year navigating 57 rope drops into one of the deepest caves in the world, Abismo Batavia in Oaxaca, Mexico. He’s featured prominently in a full-length documentary detailing that 2023 expedition. He owns Cave of the Clouds in Glenwood Canyon. He dreams about retreating into a cave with his partner “and becoming cave hermits.”
“Most of the caves that are considered hoaxes, I think really exist,” he says.

In Colorado now it’s to the point where there’s still stuff out there to be found, but there’s more stuff to be found by digging at the back of caves that are already known.
— Mike Frazier, spelunker
He’s found caves that were considered lost or forgotten. Like the Cave Creek Cavern near Fairplay, which contains the largest known cave room in the state.
“The potential here is pretty fantastic,” Frazier says. “All the signs are right. But honestly, we could be in the wrong spot. You just don’t know. In Colorado now it’s to the point where there’s still stuff out there to be found, but there’s more stuff to be found by digging at the back of caves that are already known. I’m not saying this is not going to happen. I’m saying it’s not going to be easy.”
If Stein’s reports are correct, the mine shaft was about 50 feet deep and the cavers have plumbed close to that.
Fred Luiszer, who wrote his geology doctoral dissertation at the University of Colorado on the “Genesis of the Cave of the Winds” near Manitou Springs, specializes in speleology. He estimates he’s been on “more than a thousand mine digs” in his life. He makes sure that is not interpreted as his involvement in the discovery of more than 1,000 caves.
“But more often than not,” he says of his exploratory digs, “they are fruitful.”
Luiszer feels confident about this dig. The historical record, the layers of shale from deep below piled in the forest, the wooden beams in the shaft and the tunnel approaching the shaft from down the hill are signs that they are nearing a cave, he says.
He grabs a rock from the bucket that’s discolored and oxidized and calls it “a keeper.” The staining on the chunk of sparkling porphyry indicates hydrothermal activity below. Another sign, he says.
“Either way, this is character building,” the septuagenarian says, leaning into the rope to haul up the next bucket of mud and rocks.

Colorado
Boebert takes on Trump over Colorado water
Colorado
Colorado attorney general expands lawsuit to challenge Trump ‘revenge campaign’ against state
Attorney General Phil Weiser on Thursday expanded a lawsuit filed to keep U.S. Space Command in Colorado to now encapsulate a broader “revenge campaign” that he said the Trump administration was waging against Colorado.
Weiser named a litany of moves the Trump administration had made in recent weeks — from moving to shut down the National Center for Atmospheric Research to putting food assistance in limbo to denying disaster declarations — in his updated lawsuit.
He said during a news conference that he hoped both to reverse the individual cuts and freezes and to win a general declaration from a judge that the moves were part of an unconstitutional pattern of coercion.
“I recognize this is a novel request, and that’s because this is an unprecedented administration,” Weiser, a Democrat, said. “We’ve never seen an administration act in a way that is so flatly violating the Constitution and disrespecting state sovereign authority. We have to protect our authority (and) defend the principles we believe in.”
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Denver, began in October as an effort to force the administration to keep U.S. Space Command in Colorado Springs. President Donald Trump, a Republican, announced in September that he was moving the command’s headquarters to Alabama, and he cited Colorado’s mail-in voting system as one of the reasons.
Trump has also repeatedly lashed out over the state’s incarceration of Tina Peters, the former county clerk convicted of state felonies related to her attempts to prove discredited election conspiracies shared by the president. Trump issued a pardon of Peters in December — a power he does not have for state crimes — and then “instituted a weeklong series of punishments and threats targeted against Colorado,” according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit cites the administration’s termination of $109 million in transportation grants, cancellation of $615 million in Department of Energy funds for Colorado, announcement of plans to dismantle NCAR in Boulder, demand that the state recertify food assistance eligibility for more than 100,000 households, and denial of disaster relief assistance for last year’s Elk and Lee fires.
In that time, Trump also vetoed a pipeline project for southeastern Colorado — a move the House failed to override Thursday — and repeatedly took to social media to attack state officials.
The Trump administration also announced Tuesday that he would suspend potentially hundreds of millions of dollars of low-income assistance to Colorado over unspecified allegations of fraud. Those actions were not covered by Weiser’s lawsuit, though he told reporters to “stay tuned” for a response.
Weiser, who is running for governor in this year’s election, characterized the attacks as Trump trying to leverage the power of the executive branch to exercise unconstitutional authority over how individual states conduct elections and oversee their criminal justice systems.
In a statement, a White House official pushed back on Weiser’s characterization.
“President Trump is using his lawful and discretionary authority to ensure federal dollars are being spent in a way that (aligns) with the agenda endorsed by the American people when they resoundingly reelected the President,” White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said.
Stay up-to-date with Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly newsletter, The Spot.
Colorado
US Fish and Wildlife backed Colorado plan to get wolves from Canada before new threats to take over program, documents show
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service backed Colorado’s plan to obtain wolves from Canada nearly two years before the federal agency lambasted the move as a violation of its rules, newly obtained documents show.
In a letter dated Feb. 14, 2024, the federal agency told Colorado state wildlife officials they were in the clear to proceed with a plan to source wolves from British Columbia without further permission.
“Because Canadian gray wolves aren’t listed under the Endangered Species Act,” no ESA authorization or federal authorization was needed for the state to capture or import them in the Canadian province, according to the letter sent to Eric Odell, CPW’s wolf conservation program manager.
The letter, obtained by The Colorado Sun from state Parks and Wildlife through an open records request, appears to be part of the permissions the state received before sourcing 15 wolves. The agency also received sign-offs from the British Columbia Ministry of Land, Water and Resource Stewardship and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna.
In mid-December, however, the Fish and Wildlife Service pivoted sharply from that position, criticizing the plan and threatening to take control over Colorado’s reintroduction.
In a letter dated Dec. 18, Fish and Wildlife Service Director Brian Nesvik put CPW on alert when he told acting CPW Director Laura Clellan that the agency violated requirements in a federal rule that dictates how CPW manages its reintroduction.
Colorado voters in 2020 directed CPW to reestablish gray wolves west of the Continental Divide, a process that has included bringing wolves from Oregon in 2023 and British Columbia in 2025.
The federal rule Nesvik claims CPW violated is the 10(j). It gives Colorado management flexibility over wolves by classifying them as a nonessential experimental population within the state of Colorado. Nesvik said CPW violated the 10(j) by capturing wolves from Canada instead of the northern Rocky Mountain states of Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Washington, eastern Oregon and north-central Utah “with no warning or notice to its own citizens.”
CPW publicly announced sourcing from British Columbia on Sept. 13, 2024, however, and held a meeting with county commissioners in Rio Blanco, Garfield, Pitkin and Eagle counties ahead of the planned releases last January. The agency also issued press releases when the operations began and at the conclusion of operations, and they held a press conference less than 48 hours later.
Nesvik’s December letter doubled down on one he sent CPW on Oct. 10, after Greg Lopez, a former Colorado congressman and 2026 gubernatorial candidate, contacted him claiming the agency violated the Endangered Species Act when it imported wolves from Canada, because they lacked permits proving the federal government authorized the imports.
That letter told CPW to “cease and desist” going back to British Columbia for a second round of wolves, after the agency had obtained the necessary permits to complete the operation. Nesvik’s reasoning was that CPW had no authority to capture wolves from British Columbia because they aren’t part of the northern Rocky Mountain region population.
But as regulations within the 10(j) show, the northern Rocky Mountain population of wolves “is part of a larger metapopulation of wolves that encompasses all of Western Canada.”
And “given the demonstrated resilience and recovery trajectory of the NRM population and limited number of animals that will be captured for translocations,” the agencies that developed the rule – Fish and Wildlife with Colorado Parks and Wildlife – expected “negative impacts to the donor population to be negligible.”
So despite what Nesvik and Lopez claim, “neither identified any specific provision of any law – federal, state or otherwise – that CPW or anyone else supposedly violated by capturing and releasing wolves from British Columbia,” said Tom Delehanty, senior attorney for Earthjustice. “They’ve pointed only to the 10(j) rule, which is purely about post-release wolf management, and applies only in Colorado.”
More experts weigh in
In addition to the 2024 letter from the Fish and Wildlife Service, documents obtained by The Sun include copies of permits given to CPW by the Ministry of British Columbia to export 15 wolves to the United States between Jan. 12 and Jan. 16, 2025.
These permits track everything from live animals and pets to products made from protected wildlife including ivory.
The permit system is the backbone of the regulation of trade in specimens of species included in the three Appendices of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, also called CITES. A CITES permit is the confirmation by an issuing authority that the conditions for authorizing the trade are fulfilled, meaning the trade is legal, sustainable and traceable in accordance with articles contained within the Convention.

Gary Mowad, a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife agent and expert on Endangered Species Act policies, said “obtaining a CITES certificate is unrelated to the 10j rule” and that in his estimation, CPW did violate both the terms of the 10(j) and the memorandum of agreement with the Fish and Wildlife Service, because “the 10(j) specifically limited the populations from where wolves could be obtained, and Canada was not authorized.”
Mike Phillips, a Montana legislator who was instrumental in Yellowstone’s wolf reintroduction that began in 1995, thinks “the posturing about a takeover seems like just casually considered bravado from Interior officials.”
And Delahanty says “Nesvik and Lopez are making up legal requirements that don’t exist for political leverage in an effort that serves no one. It’s unclear what FWS hopes to accomplish with its threatening letter,” but if they rescind the memorandum of agreement, “it would cast numerous elements of Colorado’s wolf management program into uncertainty.”
Looking forward
If Fish and Wildlife does as Nesvik’s letter threatens and revokes all of CPW’s authority over grey wolves in its jurisdiction, “the service would assume all gray wolf management activities, including relocation and lethal removal, as determined necessary,” it says.
But Phillips says “if Fish and Wildlife succeeds in the agency’s longstanding goal of delisting gray wolves nationwide,” a proposition that is currently moving through Congress, with U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert’s Pet and Livestock Protection Act bill, the agency couldn’t take over Colorado’s wolf program. That’s because “wolf conservation falls back to Colorado with (its voter-approved) restoration mandate.” And “the species is listed as endangered/nongame under state law,” he adds.
If the feds did take over, Phillips said in an email “USFWS does not have staff for any meaningful boots-on-the-ground work.” Under Fish and Wildlife Service control, future translocations would probably be “a firm nonstarter,” he added, “but that seems to be the case now.”
A big threat should Fish and Wildlife take over is that lethal removal of wolves “in the presence of real or imagined conflicts might be more quickly applied,” Phillips said.

But it would all be tied up in legal constraints, given that gray wolves are still considered an endangered species in Colorado, and requirements of the 10(j) and state law say CPW must advance their recovery.
So for now, it’s wait and see if CPW can answer Fish and Wildlife’s demand that accompanies Nesvik’s latest letter.
Nesvik told the agency they must report “all gray wolf conservation and management activities that occurred from Dec. 12, 2023, until present,” as well as provide a narrative summary and all associated documents describing both the January 2025 British Columbia release and other releases by Jan. 18., or 30 days after the date on his letter. If they don’t, he said, Fish and Wildlife “will pursue all legal remedies,” including “the immediate revocation of all CPW authority over gray wolves in its jurisdiction.”
Shelby Wieman, a spokesperson for Gov. Jared Polis’ office, said Colorado disagrees with the premise of Nesvik’s letter and remains “fully committed to fulfilling the will of Colorado voters and successfully reintroducing the gray wolf population in Colorado.”
And CPW maintains it “has coordinated with USFWS throughout the gray wolf reintroduction effort and has complied with all applicable federal and state laws. This includes translocations in January of 2025 which were planned and performed in consultation with USFWS.”
-
Detroit, MI5 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology3 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Dallas, TX4 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Health5 days agoViral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits
-
Nebraska2 days agoOregon State LB transfer Dexter Foster commits to Nebraska
-
Iowa3 days agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Nebraska3 days agoNebraska-based pizza chain Godfather’s Pizza is set to open a new location in Queen Creek
-
Entertainment2 days agoSpotify digs in on podcasts with new Hollywood studios