Connect with us

Colorado

The Arkansas River’s Big Timbers region reflects a complex history of Western expansion, Indigenous displacement

Published

on

The Arkansas River’s Big Timbers region reflects a complex history of Western expansion, Indigenous displacement


A view of the Big Timbers grounds used by the Cheyenne and Arapaho tribes, and participants in American westward expansion, to camp along the Arkansas River during the mid 1800s at the site of Bent’s New Fort (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)

A view of the Big Timbers grounds used by the Cheyenne and Arapaho, as well as traders, trappers and the U.S. military, to camp along the Arkansas River during the mid 1800s at the site of Bent’s New Fort (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)

In late October, leaves still cling to cottonwoods that shade stretches of the Arkansas River, while the wind through their branches barely whispers the story of the landscape once known as Big Timbers.

These sturdy, intermittent groves and the mostly shallow water flowing past them mark the playground of Jake Rogers’ youth. This is where he and his buddies fished, fought Airsoft battles, hung out on a hunting stand high amid the twisted trunks and camped on land where his family still farms alfalfa and leases grazing pasture. 

But for Rogers, now the 28-year-old curator of the Big Timbers Museum in this city of nearly 8,000, the river’s meandering ribbon ties together its more recent significance — as an engine for agriculture and, gradually, recreation — with a complicated history of westward expansion and native displacement from the water’s once heavily timbered banks that extended more than 60 miles west toward La Junta.

Advertisement

The Indigenous story of this region has largely disappeared with those people. Still, residents along the Lower Arkansas continally evaluate their own relationship to the river and its surroundings as part of Colorado’s living history.

This story first appeared in
Colorado Sunday, a premium magazine newsletter for members.

Experience the best in Colorado news at a slower pace, with thoughtful articles, unique adventures and a reading list that’s a perfect fit for a Sunday morning.

Land that once thrilled Rogers’ younger self with discoveries like a beaver pond or bleached cattle bones on grazing land south of the river that was once Mexico now carries a deeper meaning. His education has been complicated by the clash of cultures that not only removed the region’s earlier inhabitants, but in the process also changed the natural environment that has nurtured his love for the landscape.

Perhaps ironically, the land where Rogers’ family eventually settled once belonged to George Bent, the son of 19th-century trader and entrepreneur William Bent and his wife Owl Woman, daughter of a Cheyenne chief. It was the last of 29 sections given to mixed-blood relatives of prominent white men by treaty in the wake of the Sand Creek Massacre. 

Advertisement

The museum stands on parcel No. 26. And in one corner of the main exhibit area, Rogers points to the original stone marker denoting parcel No. 29.

“My folks’ family farm is actually on that piece of land,” he says. “Their folks came out here during the Great Depression, and I’m not sure when they acquired the land out there, but yeah, that’s where I grew up gallivanting.”

Claims along the river

The top map shows claims awarded by treaty in 1865 to the children of the earliest white settlers and their Native American wives. The breakout map shows the location of those claims in and around Lamar. The current Big Timbers Museum sits on claim No. 26, while the family of the museum’s curator settled in the 1930s on claim No. 29. (Adapted from General Land Office map of State of Colorado, 1934. Download a full-sized PDF with more information here.)

Source: U.S. Department of the Interior/U.S. Geological Survey

List of claimants
  1. Join Poisal
  2. Virginia Fitzpatrick
  3. Andrew Jackson Fitspatrick
  4. Winsor, alias of M. Winsor, daughter of Tow-e-nah, wife of A.T. Winsor
  5. William Keith
  6. Francis Keith
  7. Robert Poisal
  8. Mrs. Margert Wilmarth
  9. John Sickles
  10. William Bent Moore
  11. William Gilpin Smith
  12. Armama Smith
  13. Julia Bent
  14. Amache Prowers
  15. Rosa Guerier
  16. Edmund Guerier
  17. Mary J., alias of Josephine Keith
  18. Adia, alias of Addia M. Moore
  19. Mary Prowers
  20. Margaret Sickles
  21. Minnie Sickles
  22. Charles Bent
  23. Mary Bent Moore, alias Mary Moore
  24. Miss Margaret Pepperdin
  25. Mrs. Matilda Pepperdin
  26. Julia Guerrier
  27. Mrs. Mary Keith
  28. None
  29. George Bent

Caro Hedge, the researcher who works with Rogers at the Big Timbers Museum, pores over old maps that portray the many faceted history of the area — whose precise definition can be a moving target.

“So the thing about Big Timbers is, if you ask somebody how long it was, you’ll get a different answer every time,” Hedge says. “Because if you go back to 1820 it was about 70 miles long and pretty much solid cottonwood trees on both sides of the river.”

Eventually, the Santa Fe Trail brought increased activity along the Arkansas, from traders and trappers to gold-rush hopefuls, while native tribes still used Big Timbers primarily in the winter. The actual wooded area began to shrink. 

Advertisement

For example, when his source of firewood in the immediate area became depleted (and at the urging of his Cheyenne trading partners) William Bent moved his original fort — the historic site known as Bent’s Old Fort, a key commercial hub — several miles to the east.

“So at that point,” Hedge explains, “Big Timbers starts becoming just these swaths of timber separated by empty spots as land got put into use and cleared for roads and everything. People say, ‘How big is Big Timbers?’ And you’ll get all sorts of answers, depending on what year it was.”

Throughout his life, Rogers’ sensitivity to an environment so laden with lore — from Indigenous tribes to Spanish and Mexican possession to the arrival of white traders, trappers and, eventually, settlers — triggered conversations with his parents and grandparents “just talking about why things are the way they are here.”

An 1819 treaty with Spain designated the Arkansas River the border between U.S. territory and Spanish holdings, and later Mexico after it won independence in 1821, until the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. That marked the end of the Mexican-American war and brought most of present-day Colorado into the expanding United States. 

But when his family bought adjacent land just south of the river, Rogers could stand on those banks an imagine a time when he would have been across the border in another country.

Advertisement

What Rogers learned about the Native American perspective in school revolved mostly around the 1864 Sand Creek Massacre, which essentially began at Fort Lyon, formerly known as Bent’s New Fort, where troops from the 1st and 3rd Cavalry, led by Col. John Chivington, rode nearly 40 miles north to slaughter more than 230 mostly elders, women and children. 

Jake Rogers, curator of Big Timbers Museum, grew up on his family’s farm that’s bisected by the Arkansas River and was once part of the area in Prowers County known as Big Timbers. While cottonwood trees (seen in the framed 1910 photo) and native grasses still grow there, they lack the stature and numbers from the turn of the 20th century. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)

“In school, we spent maybe a week learning about it,” Rogers says. “But for the most part, my education was pursued afterward, and independently so. It was a pretty significant shift for me, because you learn how their way of life was deliberately deconstructed — basically, through westward expansion and Manifest Destiny.”

Another lesson he learned — and lived — came as a student at Lamar High School, where the school’s nickname, the Savages, was challenged for its disparaging depiction of Native American culture and finally succumbed to a state law banning most such mascots.

“In school, I absolutely took pride in the mascot,” says Rogers, who graduated in 2012. “I got caught up in the school spirit. As I grew older, I learned that it’s tough to justify that kind of a name.”

But what initially caught his attention about the region’s historical narrative — and kept it — was the array of plant life that native tribes cultivated in the area. Chief among these, in his observation, was dogbane, also called Indian hemp, that grows along the river and some of the creeks and was used to make cordage for clothing and netting, among other things. Also, he has noticed native plums have become rare, as have native grapes, early food sources managed by native people that began to disappear with displacement of the tribes. 

Advertisement

And of course the trees. For the early white travelers, they provided shelter and fuel, but the soft wood was useless for replacing wagon axles or oxen yokes. Many Indigenous people regarded the cottonwood as a source of medicine and food for their horses, as well as a medium for carving spiritual artifacts.

Clusters of cottonwoods, many of good size, remain here and there along the Arkansas — although they no longer include the behemoths that inspired people to pose for photos amid improbably thick trunks. But they were plenty good for backyard camping trips, when Rogers and his scouting buddies could lie beneath them and imagine their 19th-century heyday.

As an adult, his appreciation gained depth and perspective, and piecing together the ecological and cultural history of his home turf became a hobby. He earned his associate of arts degree at Lamar Community College and then last year heard that the Big Timbers Museum was hiring an assistant. He landed the job, which “ended up being kind of an apprenticeship” as the museum’s curator prepared to step back.

Over these last few years, his understanding of the expansive history of the land and the river’s lifegiving thread has grown beyond childhood awe and led him to consider revisiting his education, perhaps through a lens of biology and history. It has certainly informed his vision of what the museum can impart to the community.

“I walked through those cottonwood forests,” Rogers says. “Most of my reverence for this place is definitely the kind of nature, the wilderness that exists here — the small, little sliver. I would like more people to realize that there are natural spaces here, out on the prairie, out in no-man’s-land, that are worth preserving and worth recognizing.”

Advertisement
map visualization

An enduring native connection

Growing up, Chris Tall Bear would listen as the elders sat in a teepee or tribal ceremony recounting historical or cultural events. Sometimes, they would talk about a place of renewal. Of abundance. A sacred landscape.

The 54-year-old Southern Cheyenne descendant of survivors of the Sand Creek Massacre, a traditional chief and member of the Council of Forty-four, lives in Oklahoma. But he remembers trips to Colorado to visit his dad and hearing history handed down through the generations about the place known as Big Timbers. 

Chris Tall Bear is a member of the Southern Cheyenne Tribe who lives in Norman, Oklahoma. He is a descendant of survivors of the 1864 Sand Creek Massacre. (Courtesy of Chris Tall Bear)

“His grandfather would tell him they would move into the trees and that river was always going,” Tall Bear recounts. “It would give them water. They always had firewood. It was abundant. And just being there with your people, you know, it was a time when we were strong.” 

Also powerful is the connection to a place he never lived, but where distant relatives on both sides of his family survived the massacre, and lived through events that displaced them to Oklahoma. There’s a sense of belonging to the Big Timbers region, yes, “but I feel like it is that whole area,” Tall Bear says.

“You’ve got to keep in mind back in 1865 a lot of these man-made boundaries were not in place, they were just areas, regions that were significant,” he adds. “Sand Creek, the whole ancestral area in general where they were wronged, that cultural patrimony, you might say, ties us to the land and the connection that the river played — the sacredness of those rivers and those waters.”

The river also served at some points in history as a tribal boundary, notes Fred Mosqueda, an outreach specialist and Southern Arapaho tribal historian and Sand Creek descendant.

“The Arkansas River was actually one of the points that the government used as a boundary for us, for the Cheyenne-Arapahoes,” he says. “They said that our area was between the Platte and the Arkansas.” 

Advertisement

The trees also held meaning. Sun Dance lodges, sites of the dayslong ceremonial rituals practiced by Plains tribes, were built out of cottonwoods, which conferred them sacred status. 

Tall Bear compares the connection to the once-forested banks of the Arkansas River to the one the Cheyenne also feel visiting Bear Butte in the Black Hills of South Dakota, where belief holds that the prophet Sweet Medicine received a sacred covenant. 

“It’s still very, very sacred, and it’s one of those places that, once you step on that ground, it just feels like you’re home,” Tall Bear says. “I just cannot describe how good it feels. It’s restoring. It’s spiritual. It’s healing.”

Returning to the tribe’s Colorado territory, he adds, inspires similar feelings.

“There’s a sad history,” he says, “but it’s also a place of healing and coming to terms with the old and the future as well.”

Advertisement

He recalls driving through the region with his dad to harvest teepee poles from National Forest land near Gunnison and reflecting on the history of their people, “having honest conversations about how it feels to us as Cheyenne, what that area represents.” 

“It’s the profoundness of distance, of freedom in the area,” Tall Bear explains. “It’s our medicines that we harvest — earth paints, mineral paints that are in the ground, resources that we needed when we had our renewal ceremonies that helped us with holistic healing. We’ve lost some of that knowledge.”

It was his father’s feeling that a return to the area can be restorative — a sense that Tall Bear shares.

“I’ve got a lot of hope that we’re going to reclaim that institutional knowledge,” he says. “It’s still there. It’s still in that region, it’s very much alive. We’ve just got to go back and look carefully for it and listen.”

Cottonwoods dot the landscape near the Arkansas River on the Rogers family farm near Lamar in the area of Prowers County once known as Big Timbers. While cottonwood trees and native grasses still grow there, they lack the stature and numbers from the turn of the 20th century. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)

An expansive history of tribal inhabitants

For centuries, tribal population of the area was diverse and complex.

Into the 1700s, Big Timbers represented the heart of an extensive Comanche trading center, boosted by the tribe’s entry into the horse trade and their shift from hunting on foot to hunting on horseback. They became the early military and economic power of the Great Plains, notes Jared Orsi, a Colorado State University professor and former state historian.

Advertisement

In the mid-18th century they began operating from the Big Timbers area and expanding a commercial network that stretched all the way to St. Louis and New Orleans, then under French control. Into the early 19th century, Big Timbers was a Comanche stronghold that attracted trading partners from hundreds of miles in every direction.

“The Cheyenne or Arapaho get there a little bit later and for them, the area is similarly important, environmentally and ecologically,” Orsi adds. “There’s tons of space on the Plains, but only a few spots are good for supporting human welfare. So having access to those resources is absolutely critical.”

Orsi notes that the Plains tribes were skilled at knowing how to travel north and south, away from the rivers, when necessary. But for European newcomers who didn’t have those skills, moving east to west along the rivers proved essential. And so, in addition to being good stopping places seasonally, rivers tended to be preferred travel routes.

Some historians cast the resulting conflict with westward expansion as essentially a contest for scarce resources that could meet human needs on a large scale. 

“Bent puts his forts on the Arkansas River because this is the place where everybody comes,” Orsi says. “Everybody’s got to travel there. Everybody who wants to move about and camp seasonally has to come through there. And so the first American trading enterprises occur along the rivers, places like Big Timbers.”

Advertisement

Additionally, much of the early American settlement in the area revolved around ranching, especially after the Civil War, as reliable irrigation wouldn’t arrive until later that century. A rancher could claim a stretch of land along the river and graze cattle for miles. 

Removing people who were competing for spaces along the rivers was necessary in order to make this economic model work, Orsi says, leading to “an ecological contest between settlers and native peoples, both of whom have lifestyles and economies that depend on having access to a small number of vital places.”

Significantly, the U.S. military presence along the Santa Fe Trail, which follows the Arkansas through the region, increased markedly between 1859 and 1865. That included the site of Bent’s New Fort, which the Army folded into nearby Fort Wise and then, in 1862, renamed Fort Lyon. It was from there that Chivington’s forces struck out in November of 1986 to attack the Cheyenne and Arapaho encampment at Sand Creek, leaving an invisible thread from the river that would tragically tie the tribes to the land long after they were displaced.

“It’s the darkest chapter in Colorado history, as far as I’m concerned,” says Sam Bock, a public historian and exhibit developer at History Colorado. “This happened at the height of the Civil War, before the Battle of Gettysburg, and the massacre was so horrifying and such a breach of military conduct that amidst the horrors of the Civil War, people are already dealing with this sense of all these atrocities.”

Land for native relatives

Almost a year after the attack at Sand Creek, the Treaty of the Little Arkansas officially proclaimed the events a massacre and promised reparations to survivors. Efforts to claim reparations continue to this day, but so far have been unable to clear legal hurdles. A privately funded study last year sought to quantify losses of life and land among 10 tribal nations that called Colorado home and foster renewed discussions about reparations with the state.

Advertisement

But the treaty’s promise of a quarter-section of land — 160 acres — to widows and orphans of the massacre never materialized. Still, more than two dozen people did come away with sections of riverfront property.

“There was another section in this treaty that gave full sections of land along the Arkansas on the northern bank to the sons and daughters of prominent white men in the area who had Indian wives and children,” says Hedge, the Big Timbers Museum researcher. 

Caro Hedge is a longtime researcher at Big Timbers Museum in Lamar. The museum was named for the huge stands of cottonwoods which once extended eastward and westward along the Arkansas River. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)

For instance, in addition to section No. 29, where the museum curator Rogers’ family eventually settled, John Prowers, the local county’s namesake, ended up with one of the sections because his wife, Amache — for whom the World War II-era Japanese American incarceration camp would be named — received section No. 14. All told, the parcels ran to Lamar from well west of present-day Rocky Ford.

“Most of them got collected up and made into some of the first major ranches in the area,” Hedge says. “But these did end up, technically, in Native American hands. They’ve all been sold and resold.”

In 1867, the Medicine Lodge Creek Treaty — actually a series of agreements among the U.S. and several Plains tribes — moved Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho people from Colorado onto an Oklahoma reservation. The succession of treaties was one mechanism in a plan designed to avoid costly military campaigns by removing tribes from the wave of westward expansion.

“The defeat of the native population of Colorado was partly military, but if you look at things like the Sand Creek Massacre, they were not decisive military battles,” says Orsi, the CSU professor. “They did not hamstring the ability of the Cheyenne or the Arapaho to engage in military activities and defend their land. The deepest reason for the ultimate surrender of the lands in 1867 was because their way of life, their economy, was no longer feasible.”

Advertisement

He puts it in these terms: Think of the native economy as mobile and expansive, in terms of land, and needing the ability to travel long distances — following the bison herds, for instance. That model ran headlong into the American strategy of using land not extensively, but intensively. Think of farmers and ranchers establishing ownership of parcels, then squeezing from those as much profit as they could.

“Those two ways of using land — intensively and extensively, communally versus privately — they can’t coexist,” Orsi says. “And so in order to impose this kind of economy of gridded small plots of land with unique owners, the United States government and the Colorado government needed to expel the peoples who wanted to use land globally and extensively.” 

The Arkansas River bisects the Rogers Family farm near Lamar in the area of Prowers County once known as Big Timbers. While cottonwood trees and native grasses still grow there, they lack the stature and numbers from the turn of the 20th century due in part to agricultural and water management practices as well as the introduction of invasive plant species. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)

The river remains a constant

On a recent afternoon, John Carson, whose diminutive stature and bushy moustache conjure the image of his great-grandfather, the controversial soldier and frontiersman Kit Carson, hikes to the top of a windswept bluff where a modest stone marker stands on the site where Bent’s New Fort once stood.

Below, the Arkansas River weaves its way eastward to Lamar through prairie land punctuated with cottonwood groves, lacing together pieces of a landscape that reflects the contradictions inherent in America’s westward expansion. 

William Bent moved his original trading post here in 1853 and leased it in 1860 to the Army —  which, having built Fort Wise nearby on lower ground by the river, used Bent’s stone structure to house a commissary as well as an Indian Agency office. A year later, in perhaps an early foreshadowing of modern historical backtracking, Virginia Gov. Henry Wise, the post’s namesake, led his state’s secession from the Union, prompting the Army to rename the post Fort Lyon, after the first U.S. general killed in the Civil War.

Carson knows all this and much more by rote. He spent 25 years teaching at the high school and college levels, and years more working at the Bent’s Old Fort National Historic Site and participating in reenactments in the area. His expertise won him honors from the Colorado Tourism Board.

Advertisement

He dates his desire to teach history back to the sixth grade. And now, at 69, he can stand on the ground his noted forebearer traveled, probably dozens of times over a career that included a roughly nine-month stint working as a hunter for the Bents in the 1840s. A Colorado town and county both bear his name, but he also carries a mixed legacy: hero frontiersman, villainous instrument of Indigenous displacement.

Historian John Carson, great-grandson of frontiersman Kit Carson, explains the strategic benefits of William Bent’s decision to build a trading post near the Cheyenne and Arapaho camping ground Big Timbers along Arkansas River in the 1850s near what’s now the town of Wiley — about 10 miles west of Lamar — in this Oct. 20, 2025 photo. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)

So John Carson probably understands the nuances of the Big Timbers landscape a little differently than most.

“You can actually visualize Bent’s trading cabin he had down there on the bottom,” he says, referring to the now-private land by the river. “You can visualize the tribes coming in and setting up their winter camps, the horse herds, the buffalo, deer, antelope, coming down to the river for water. But for me, it’s a way — probably the only way today — to see, at least in your mind, what happened historically at the site.”

Carson also can imagine Chivington leaving this very spot with his troops on a 10-hour march to Sand Creek. The morally conflicting narratives of the past still live in the Big Timbers.

“There’s always dark spots in our history,” he says, “and that’s definitely one of them. There’s nothing we can do today to change what happened. We can learn from it, we can improve on it. But what happened, happened, and we just have to admit that sometimes human beings do bad stuff.”

Down below, in real time, the river moves on.

Advertisement

“It’s a constant in this part of the state,” Carson says. “The animals depended on it, the tribes depended on it, the farmers depended on it. The towns today depend on it. And as long as we don’t mess it up too awful bad, it’ll be what the future generations depend on.”



Source link

Colorado

‘It’s Not a Penalty’: Bednar Rips Officials For MacKinnon Ejection | Colorado Hockey Now

Published

on

‘It’s Not a Penalty’: Bednar Rips Officials For MacKinnon Ejection | Colorado Hockey Now


Head coach Jared Bednar is often calm and calculated during his postgame press conferences. But his frustrations were made loud and clear on Tuesday, following the Avalanche’s 4-3 loss to the Edmonton Oilers at Ball Arena in a game that saw superstar center Nathan MacKinnon get ejected late in the second period.

With the Avs on the power play trailing 2-1, MacKinnon entered the Oilers’ zone with speed and received an east-to-west pass from Martin Necas. MacKinnon’s shot went wide, but with little space to maneuver because Oilers defenseman Darnell Nurse was cutting in on him, MacKinnon barreled into goalie Connor Ingram and was handed a five-minute major and a game misconduct.

“[MacKinnon] makes the play on the puck, and I got his toes cutting up ice probably through the top of the paint, and Ingram’s on the goal line. There’s no chance that he hits the goalie if Nurse doesn’t run into him. He’s not hitting the goalie,” Bednar said, after watching his team fall to 43-11-9 on the season.

Ingram left the game with an injury and did not return.

Advertisement

“I don’t care if he’s injured, not injured, if it’s a severe crash, not a severe crash. It’s not a penalty,” Bednar said. “If you put guys in your own goalie, it’s not a penalty.”

The MacKinnon call prematurely ended the Avs’ second power play of the night. They successfully killed off the 4:05 remaining on the major and tied the game, but couldn’t secure a point.

Ross Colton, Necas, and Valeri Nichushkin had Colorado’s goals. Unfortunately for Colton, he left the game with an upper-body injury in the second period and did not return.

“He took a shot from a player during the game and he kind of tightened up so he’s got an upper-body injury. Hopefully he loosens up for tomorrow and can play in Seattle,” Bednar said.

Mackenzie Blackwood started for the Avs after getting pulled in Dallas two games ago. He let in three goals on his first 10 shots before locking in later in the game. Blackwood made several big stops during the lengthy PK before Nichushkin tied it up. But it still wasn’t enough. Blackwood finished with 20 saves.

Advertisement

The Oilers finished 2-for-4 on the power play, getting the game-winning goal from Connor McDavid on a spectacular give-and-go with Leon Draisaitl with 10:57 remaining in regulation. Both of them finished with two points, while Ryan Nugent-Hopkins had two goals.

Colorado had a power play after that, but could not capitalize. Necas’ tally came on the PP earlier in the evening, and the Avs finished 1-for-3. Colton’s goal came just 24 seconds into the first period, which snapped his nine-game goalless drought.

All of the Avalanche’s best plays were in the first and third periods. The second was a different story.

“I’ll give you an example, three or four times at the start of the second period, we try to go in on a rush, and we lose it and change, and they get odd-man rushes and a scoring chance against,” Bednar said. “You can’t do that. You can’t do that against anybody, never mind the best offensive team in the league.”

Edmonton also played with a shortened bench. On top of losing Ingram to an injury, forward Colton Dach, and defenseman Ty Emberson also left with ailments and did not return. From the moment MacKinnon was ejected, the pace of the game changed. Frustrations were noticeable on both sides.

Advertisement

“It was a great game up until that,” Nazem Kadri said. “I think it was a good battle out there. Players were playing hard and, you know, it’s unfortunate that’s how it’s gotta end.”

Kadri was also vehemently against the MacKinnon call.

“I think Nate makes an effort. He’s diving across the top of the crease to try to get out of the way, like that’s a part of the rule for the player to at least make some sort of attempt. There was clear contact. I have no idea how that was a five-minute,” he said.

Good: Nichushkin Is Heating Up

When he’s been available to play, there haven’t been many bad stretches for Nichushkin. His on-ice production has been solid over the past three regular seasons. But this year, the 30-year-old veteran forward has had tough stretches. Entering the break, and coming out of it, Nichushkin wasn’t producing at the rate he usually does.

Over the past three games, he’s looked more like the power forward that we’ve grown accustomed to. And he’s gotten rewarded for it on the scoresheet.

Advertisement

Bad: The Penalty

I had a hard time deciphering if it was or wasn’t a penalty on MacKinnon when it first happened. I watched replays, I slowed them down, and I started to form an opinion.

But regardless of whether MacKinnon should’ve been called for anything, it shouldn’t have been a five. That part I can’t wrap my head around.

Bednar was frustrated and asked about it again. He added, “I really don’t give a crap if the goalies hurt. That’s on their D.”

Good:

Bad: Defensive Breakdowns

Advertisement

Each of the first three Edmonton goals were scored by guys that were open in front of the goal. On the first two,



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado residents should prepare for Xcel power outages this week as fire danger surges, utility says

Published

on

Colorado residents should prepare for Xcel power outages this week as fire danger surges, utility says


Xcel Energy is warning its customers along the Front Range to be prepared for possible power outages this week as the risk of wildfire surges due to hot and dry weather.

“Due to the elevated risk of wildfire, enhanced powerline safety settings are active across out Front Range service territory,” according to a social media post from the utility. The settings make the powerlines more sensitive and prompt a line to stop the flow of electricity if an object touches a line.

The highest risk for wildfire danger will be Thursday, Friday and Saturday, when strong gusty winds are forecasted, according to the National Weather Service.

Humidity could be as low as 10% and winds may top 25 mph, leading to critical and extremely critical fire weather between Thursday and Saturday, forecasters said.

Advertisement

Tens of thousands of customers have lost power in recent months from planned outages during fire danger and powerline damage from high winds.

In December, 86,040 Xcel customers lost power because of a mix of planned shutoffs and downed powerlines from high winds. The decision led some customers to criticize the utility, asking it to fine-tune its weather responses.

Some schools in northern Colorado schools preemptively canceled classes in January after Xcel announced a planned power shutoff for 9,000 customers in the area.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

An Evening Against Edmonton | Colorado Avalanche

Published

on

An Evening Against Edmonton | Colorado Avalanche


Edmonton Oilers (31-25-8) @ Colorado Avalanche (43-10-9)

8 p.m. MT | Ball Arena | Watch: TNT, truTV, HBO Max | Listen: Altitude Sports Radio (92.5 FM) 

After back-to-back shootout victories, the Avalanche concludes its two-game homestand on Tuesday against the Edmonton Oilers. This game is an Avalanche Cup Classic, presented by KeyBank, which will honor the 2022 Avs team that won the Stanley Cup and defeated the Oilers in the Western Conference Final. Tuesday’s game is the second of three regular-season meetings between the teams, as the Avalanche won 9-1 in Edmonton on November 8th, and they’ll play in Alberta on April 13th. 

Latest Result (COL): MIN 2, COL 3 (SO) 

Latest Result (EDM): EDM 4, VGK 2 

Advertisement

Sunday Success

The Avalanche defeated the Minnesota Wild 3-2 in a shootout on Sunday at Ball Arena. Nathan MacKinnon and Nicolas Roy both scored for Colorado while Nazem Kadri posted an assist in his second Avs debut. In net for Colorado, Scott Wedgewood stopped 32 of the 34 shots he faced. MacKinnon opened the scoring at 12:19 of the second period with his 43rd goal of the season via a right-circle one-timer set up by Kadri, who began the play with an interception below the offensive-zone goal line. Kirill Kaprizov tied the game for Minnesota with a power-play goal at 4:17 of the third period when his pass from the right circle deflected into the net. The Wild took a 2-1 lead at 7:01 of the third period when Nico Sturm scored a shorthanded breakaway. Colorado tied the game at 12:39 of the third period when Nicolas Roy scored his first goal as an Av and sixth of the season via a net-front deflection on Brett Kulak’s slap shot. In the shootout, Valeri Nichushkin scored for Colorado in the first round, Matt Boldy scored for Minnesota in the second round and MacKinnon tallied the winner in the fourth round. 

Leading the Way

Nate the Great

MacKinnon leads the NHL in goals (43) while ranking second in points (104) and third in assists (61). 

All Hail Cale

Among NHL defensemen, Cale Makar is tied for second in points (66) while ranking fourth in goals (19) and assists (47). 

Marty Party

Martin Necas is tied for seventh in the NHL in points (76). 

Series History

In 135 regular-season games against the Oilers, the Avalanche has a record of 74-49-6-6. The teams have met three times in the playoffs, with the Avs winning the 1997 Western Conference Semifinals in five games and the 2022 Western Conference Final in four contests.  

Advertisement

Sunday in Sin City

The Oilers defeated the Vegas Golden Knights 4-2 at T-Mobile Arena on Sunday. In the second period, Trent Frederic opened the scoring for Edmonton at 3:21 before Vegas’ Noah Hanifin tied the game at 13:09. The Oilers took a 3-1 third-period lead after goals from Vasily Podkolzin at 2:34 and Leon Draisaitl at 11:53. Jack Eichel cut the Golden Knights’ deficit to one with a shorthanded goal at 16:43 of the third period. Edmonton took a 4-2 lead when Kasperi Kapanen scored an empty-net goal at 18:03 of the third period. 

Producing Offense Against the Oilers

MacKinnon has posted 39 points (13g/26a) in 29 regular-season games against the Oilers, in addition to five points (3g/2a) in four playoff contests. 

Makar has registered 13 points (5g/8a) in 13 regular-season contests against Edmonton, in addition to nine points (2g/7a) in four playoff games. 

Kadri has recorded 25 points (12g/13a) in 30 regular-season games against the Oilers, in addition to four points (1g/3a) in three playoff contests. 

Edmonton’s Elite

Connor McDavid leads the Oilers in points (108), goals (35) and assists (73). 

Advertisement

Draisaitl is second on the Oilers in points (92), goals (34) and assists (58). 

Evan Bouchard is third on the Oilers in points (73) and assists (55) while ranking fourth in goals (18). 

A Numbers Game

34

The Avalanche are 34-0-0 when leading after the second period this season. 

85

Colorado leads the NHL with 85 second-period goals this campaign. 

.806

The Avalanche’s .806 points percentage at home this season is the best in the NHL. 

Advertisement

Quote That Left a Mark

“Emotional seeing the support I get here. It’s absolutely incredible. It makes me want to play harder for these fans and this team.” 

— Nazem Kadri on the support he received from Avalanche fans at Sunday’s game



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending