Connect with us

Colorado

More generations living under one roof as Coloradans battle high housing costs, caregiving needs

Published

on

More generations living under one roof as Coloradans battle high housing costs, caregiving needs


Steve Chapman’s full house sometimes feels like it’s bursting at the seams.

The 45-year-old and his wife welcomed Chapman’s mother and stepdad into their Aurora home a few years ago after his mom’s landlord sold the Loveland trailer the couple lived in, leaving them unable to afford Colorado rent on their Social Security income.

“The idea was it’d be temporary to help them get going, but it’s impossible to make it here, it seems,” Chapman said of the living arrangement.

Then the Chapmans’ 23-year-old daughter fell on financial hard times while working and pursuing her education at Arapahoe Community College. She moved into her parents’ home to save on rent. Now their eldest daughter, who lives in Nevada, is planning to move home, too.

Advertisement

Chapman said he feels fortunate he’s able to support his family in a four-bedroom home where everyone has their own space. But it’s a fine line between feeling cozy and crowded.

“Realistically, me and my wife are having to come to terms with the fact that this might be forever,” he said. “I don’t know if I see a viable way for this to change. It’s not like my parents are getting younger.”

Multigenerational households — homes where at least two generations of adults live — are on the rise in Colorado and across the United States. The share of the American population living in multigenerational homes has more than doubled over the past five decades, according to Pew Research, from 7% in 1971 to 18% in 2021.

In Colorado, the share of the population living in multigenerational households is about 3.7%, according to 2020 Census data. That means around 71,300 households in the state feature multiple adult generations living under one roof, up from 51,400 households in 2010 — a nearly 40% increase over the decade.

Experts point to Colorado’s steep housing market, caregiving needs for elders and children, and changing demographics and multicultural traditions as reasons for the rise in families living together.

Advertisement

Colorado boasts four of the most expensive noncoastal housing markets in the nation. In the Denver area, the median price of a single-family home sold in December came in at $613,500, according to data from the Denver Metro Association of Realtors. The median price in 2013 was $290,000, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices, amounting to a more than 110% increase in a decade.

Whatever the reason, said Donna Butts, executive director of the nonprofit Generations United, multigenerational households are the way of the future.

“Those who do choose to live together should be valued and respected and, unfortunately, in this country, we look at multigenerational households as having a stigma or that something is wrong, and it’s not,” she said. “Oftentimes, it’s very, very right. Families pool their resources and they live together and support each other. There’s nothing wrong with that.”

Realizing the value of family

Thor Kieser, his wife and their 8-year-old daughter live in a two-bedroom home in Golden. Kieser’s father-in-law recently immigrated from the Philippines and can’t afford a place of his own, so Grandpa sleeps on a mattress in the laundry room.

The living arrangement works well for 65-year-old Kieser, he said, because he gets the support he needs.

Advertisement

A few years ago, Kieser was diagnosed with stage 4 melanoma, which he overcame. Then, in 2022, he had a serious climbing accident in which he fell and broke 17 bones.

“It was one of those ‘barely survive’ situations,” Kieser said. “But I survived it, and here I am.”

Kieser’s accident resulted in health problems that impacted his mobility and ability to work. He uses a walker to get around and needs assistance getting to and from a slew of medical and physical therapy appointments.

Grandpa takes his granddaughter to elementary school in the morning. He drives Kieser to his oncology appointments, gastroenterologist and physical therapy sessions, and helps around the house while Kieser’s wife works as a certified nursing assistant during the day.

“It works out for us because I need that helping hand,” Kieser said.

Advertisement

Caregiving is a big reason why families are choosing to move in together, Butts said.

The mission of Generations United, the organization Butts leads, centers on improving the lives of kids and elders through intergenerational collaborations, public policies and programs.

During the pandemic, she said, families came together to support each other amid the stresses of a new frontier. Families found that caregiving — whether for children or aging parents — became easier with more people in the home. Incomes could be pooled for more affordable rents. Elderly folks at risk of isolation were around loved ones.

“We need to change our mindset and realize there is great value and importance in families staying together,” Butts said.

Bernice Ocaña, 87, front left, made dinner with her son-in-law Efrain Rodriguez, 43, front right, and grandchildren Amalia, 12, left, and Josue, 14, top right, at their home in Morrison on Jan. 10, 2024. The multigenerational family lives together. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)

“We all help with something”

Many cultures already have adopted this mindset, Butts said.

Advertisement

Multigenerational living is rising partly because the demographic groups comprising most of the recent U.S. population growth — including Asian, Black, Hispanic and foreign-born people — are more likely to live with multiple generations, according to Pew Research.

Diana Cobos Ocaña, 47, lives with her husband, their 12- and 14-year-old children, and her 87-year-old widowed mother in their Morrison home.

Cobos Ocaña grew up in Colombia, where she said it’s not traditional to put elders in nursing homes.

“Besides, she is a great help,” Cobos Ocaña said. “Our kids love having Abuelita” — Spanish for Grandma — “at home, and they are required to speak Spanish to her and teach her English expressions, so that’s another way to preserve our language.”

Diana Cobos Ocaña, 47, left, cleans up after dinner with her children Josue, 14, center, and Amalia, 12, at their home in Morrison on Jan. 10, 2024. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)
Diana Cobos Ocaña, 47, left, cleans up after dinner with her children Josue, 14, center, and Amalia, 12, at their home in Morrison on Jan. 10, 2024. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)

Thirty percent of the adults in multigenerational households surveyed by Pew say the experience has been very positive while 27% label it as somewhat positive. That’s far more than the 14% who think it’s been somewhat negative or 3% who say it’s been very negative.

Cobos Ocaña and her husband are both teachers. When they go off to work and the kids go to school, she said her mother takes care of the home by cleaning and preparing meals.

Advertisement

“I enjoy the freedom that I feel when I have everybody in charge of something,” Cobos Ocaña said. “Everybody — my mom, my husband, my kids, myself — we all help with something.”

Diana Cobos Ocaña, 47, center, spends time with her mother Bernice Ocaña, 87, left, and daughter Amalia Rodriguez, 12, after dinner at their home in Morrison on Jan. 10, 2024. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)
Diana Cobos Ocaña, 47, center, spends time with her mother Bernice Ocaña, 87, left, and daughter Amalia Rodriguez, 12, after dinner at their home in Morrison on Jan. 10, 2024. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)

Feed me to the tigers

In 2014, for the first time in more than 130 years, adults between the ages of 18 and 34 were more likely to live in their parents’ home than they were to live with a partner in their own household, according to Pew, which attributed the change to “the dramatic drop in the share of young Americans who are choosing to settle down romantically before age 35.”

Overall, men and women are equally likely to live in a multigenerational house, but men are more likely to do so when they’re under 40 and women are more likely when they’re over 40, researchers found. Among the oldest Americans — 65 and older — 20% of women live in multigenerational households, compared with 15% of men, Pew said.

A third of U.S. adults in multigenerational households cite caregiving as a major reason for their living arrangement, including 25% who noted adult caregiving and 12% who noted child care, according to Pew.

Evelyn Baker joked that she could write a doozy of a self-help book about the trials and tribulations of trying to date as a single mother of teenage boys living with an elderly parent during a global pandemic.

At the height of COVID-19, the 53-year-old Baker searched for a housing situation that would allow her to better care for her octogenarian mother with Parkinson’s disease.

Advertisement

Baker looked into Lennar’s Next Gen homes, which offer a house with a connected suite with a private entrance to “provide all the essentials multigenerational families need to work, learn, create or have a sense of independence,” the company’s website said. Baker was told they were so popular that none were available at the time, but she was persistent and managed to snag one in the Central Park neighborhood that fell out of escrow in 2020.

“We felt really fortunate,” she said.

Baker’s mother grew up in the Philippines, where multigenerational households are more common. But Baker was born in the U.S.

“There’s an interesting multicultural thing happening, where I feel sort of beholden to some of those cultural expectations,” she said.

On one hand, Baker said the living arrangement has been a blessing. Her children have been able to spend time with their grandmother and understand the Filipino elder in a way they wouldn’t have otherwise, she said.

Advertisement

“I feel really lucky to have had this time, too, though it’s really hard,” Baker said.

Baker isn’t able to have much of a social life, she said, because she comes home from work to relieve her mother’s in-home caretaker. Baker does the cooking and cleaning and struggles to find time and space for herself, she said, while managing anticipatory grief over her mother’s declining health.

“Plus, even as a grown-ass woman, when we moved back in together, all of a sudden all those mother/daughter dynamics come flooding back, and it felt like, ‘Oh my God, I’m 15 again,’” Baker said.

Baker recognizes the financial privilege her family has in being able to purchase a home with space for everyone and to be able to afford in-home care.

“It highlights for me how sucky we are as a culture in figuring out how to deal with aging in this society right now,” Baker said. “We’re lucky to have the resources to figure out the best possible solution, but even the best possible solution feels untenable and heartbreaking on a daily basis.”

Advertisement

Recently, Baker discussed the possibility of going on a safari vacation with her children and needing to find care for her mother during the trip.

“She asked me to take her with me and feed her to the tigers,” Baker said. “We started joking about a business model that was like an end-of-life safari where you can go out with a bang.”

Butts noted that American culture needs to adopt policies to make multigenerational living a better, easier experience.

For example, she said oftentimes there can only be one homeowner or married couple on an insurance policy or loan for the household. Sometimes there are zoning issues that prevent or discourage too many people from living together, she said.

“There is this old John Wayne mentality that we have to stand on our own when we oftentimes need each other,” Butts said.

Advertisement

“Forced into this position”

University of Colorado Boulder economics professor Terra McKinnish said Colorado’s housing market is playing a significant role in generations needing to move in together to afford rent.

The Baby Boomer generation has acquired significant housing wealth, McKinnish said, but many localities have restricted housing supply to such a degree that it’s generated “enormous wealth” for mostly older, mostly higher-income homeowners.

“But then the housing costs faced by younger generations and lower- and middle-income and non-homeowners are enormous,” McKinnish said. “That’s really affected the ability of younger generations to establish their own separate households compared to the Baby Boomer generation. It’s become much harder for the younger generations to break into homeownership unless they’re getting financial support from Baby Boomer parents who have housing wealth.”

Juan Manuel Ramirez Anzures would like to move out of his grandparents’ West Colfax home, but he’d be shelling out nearly half of his monthly income as a Denver Public Library employee — at least — to afford rent in the city where he grew up.

Anzures’ parents moved to New Mexico when he was a senior in high school so they could finally know life without a mortgage payment hanging over their heads. Anzures moved in with his grandparents and now, at 23, hasn’t been able to afford to leave, he said.

Advertisement

The Denverite has a front-row seat to condo construction around his grandparents’ home. The view is bittersweet. Anzures said he knows more homes need to be built — Colorado is short more than 100,000 housing units, with nearly half of the state’s housing shortfall concentrated in metro Denver — but is worried about gentrification that pushes out marginalized communities.

Living with his grandparents and a cousin isn’t bad, he said. The family eats dinner together and watches telenovelas — Spanish soap operas. But Anzures wants more privacy and the pride of feeling like he can make it on his own.

“Everything is becoming much more challenging to obtain, even the most bare-bones accommodations for oneself,” Anzures said. “It leads to young people experiencing nihilism and despair — that no matter how much I try and try to do things the right way, I’m just stuck or even going in reverse.”

The average rent for a one-bedroom apartment in Denver in January is around $1,600, according to Zillow. That’s a more than 50% increase over 10 years ago, when the average Denver rent was about $1,041.

The disparity has meant young adults are staying in their parents’ homes longer.

Advertisement

Chapman and his adult daughter — soon to be joined by her sister back home in Aurora — know the struggle.

Chapman said he sympathizes with his daughters, who aren’t lazy, but a victim of circumstance. He knows it’s hard to live a lifestyle conducive to being a young adult while crashing with parents, he said.

“We lived our crazy 20s already, so I’m not trying to live that again,” Chapman said. “I know that’s hard on her. But it is our home. You kind of have to choose at this point if you’re going to live your crazy 20s or live with your parents. They’re kind of forced into this position.”

Get more Colorado news by signing up for our daily Your Morning Dozen email newsletter.



Source link

Advertisement

Colorado

Boebert takes on Trump over Colorado water

Published

on

Boebert takes on Trump over Colorado water


Congress failed Thursday to override President Donald Trump’s veto of a Colorado water project that has been in the works for over 60 years. It’s one of two back-to-back vetoes, the first of his second term. But Colorado Republican 4th Congressional District U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert — known for her fierce MAGA loyalties — still […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado attorney general expands lawsuit to challenge Trump ‘revenge campaign’ against state

Published

on

Colorado attorney general expands lawsuit to challenge Trump ‘revenge campaign’ against state


Attorney General Phil Weiser on Thursday expanded a lawsuit filed to keep U.S. Space Command in Colorado to now encapsulate a broader “revenge campaign” that he said the Trump administration was waging against Colorado.

Weiser named a litany of moves the Trump administration had made in recent weeks — from moving to shut down the National Center for Atmospheric Research to putting food assistance in limbo to denying disaster declarations — in his updated lawsuit.

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser speaks during a news conference at the Ralph Carr Judicial Center in Denver on Tuesday, July 22, 2025. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)

He said during a news conference that he hoped both to reverse the individual cuts and freezes and to win a general declaration from a judge that the moves were part of an unconstitutional pattern of coercion.

“I recognize this is a novel request, and that’s because this is an unprecedented administration,” Weiser, a Democrat, said. “We’ve never seen an administration act in a way that is so flatly violating the Constitution and disrespecting state sovereign authority. We have to protect our authority (and) defend the principles we believe in.”

Advertisement

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Denver, began in October as an effort to force the administration to keep U.S. Space Command in Colorado Springs. President Donald Trump, a Republican, announced in September that he was moving the command’s headquarters to Alabama, and he cited Colorado’s mail-in voting system as one of the reasons.

Trump has also repeatedly lashed out over the state’s incarceration of Tina Peters, the former county clerk convicted of state felonies related to her attempts to prove discredited election conspiracies shared by the president. Trump issued a pardon of Peters in December — a power he does not have for state crimes — and then “instituted a weeklong series of punishments and threats targeted against Colorado,” according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit cites the administration’s termination of $109 million in transportation grants, cancellation of $615 million in Department of Energy funds for Colorado, announcement of plans to dismantle NCAR in Boulder, demand that the state recertify food assistance eligibility for more than 100,000 households, and denial of disaster relief assistance for last year’s Elk and Lee fires.

In that time, Trump also vetoed a pipeline project for southeastern Colorado — a move the House failed to override Thursday — and repeatedly took to social media to attack state officials.

The Trump administration also announced Tuesday that he would suspend potentially hundreds of millions of dollars of low-income assistance to Colorado over unspecified allegations of fraud. Those actions were not covered by Weiser’s lawsuit, though he told reporters to “stay tuned” for a response.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

US Fish and Wildlife backed Colorado plan to get wolves from Canada before new threats to take over program, documents show

Published

on

US Fish and Wildlife backed Colorado plan to get wolves from Canada before new threats to take over program, documents show


The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service backed Colorado’s plan to obtain wolves from Canada nearly two years before the federal agency lambasted the move as a violation of its rules, newly obtained documents show.  

In a letter dated Feb. 14, 2024, the federal agency told Colorado state wildlife officials they were in the clear to proceed with a plan to source wolves from British Columbia without further permission.

“Because Canadian gray wolves aren’t listed under the Endangered Species Act,” no ESA authorization or federal authorization was needed for the state to capture or import them in the Canadian province, according to the letter sent to Eric Odell, CPW’s wolf conservation program manager. 

The letter, obtained by The Colorado Sun from state Parks and Wildlife through an open records request, appears to be part of the permissions the state received before sourcing 15 wolves. The agency also received sign-offs from the British Columbia Ministry of Land, Water and Resource Stewardship and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna.  

Advertisement

In mid-December, however, the Fish and Wildlife Service pivoted sharply from that position, criticizing the plan and threatening to take control over Colorado’s reintroduction. 

In a letter dated Dec. 18, Fish and Wildlife Service Director Brian Nesvik put CPW on alert when he told acting CPW Director Laura Clellan that the agency violated requirements in a federal rule that dictates how CPW manages its reintroduction. 

Colorado voters in 2020 directed CPW to reestablish gray wolves west of the Continental Divide, a process that has included bringing wolves from Oregon in 2023 and British Columbia in 2025.

A gray wolf is carried from a helicopter to the site where it will be checked by CPW staff in January 2025. (Colorado Parks and Wildlife photo)

The federal rule Nesvik claims CPW violated is the 10(j). It gives Colorado management flexibility over wolves by classifying them as a nonessential experimental population within the state of Colorado. Nesvik said CPW violated the 10(j) by capturing wolves from Canada instead of the northern Rocky Mountain states of Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Washington, eastern Oregon and north-central Utah “with no warning or notice to its own citizens.” 

CPW publicly announced sourcing from British Columbia on Sept. 13, 2024, however, and held a meeting with county commissioners in Rio Blanco, Garfield, Pitkin and Eagle counties ahead of the planned releases last January. The agency also issued press releases when the operations began and at the conclusion of operations, and they held a press conference less than 48 hours later.

Advertisement

Nesvik’s December letter doubled down on one he sent CPW on Oct. 10, after Greg Lopez, a former Colorado congressman and 2026 gubernatorial candidate, contacted him claiming the agency violated the Endangered Species Act when it imported wolves from Canada, because they lacked permits proving the federal government authorized the imports. 

That letter told CPW to “cease and desist” going back to British Columbia for a second round of wolves, after the agency had obtained the necessary permits to complete the operation. Nesvik’s reasoning was that CPW had no authority to capture wolves from British Columbia because they aren’t part of the northern Rocky Mountain region population.  

But as regulations within the 10(j) show, the northern Rocky Mountain population of wolves “is part of a larger metapopulation of wolves that encompasses all of Western Canada.” 

And “given the demonstrated resilience and recovery trajectory of the NRM population and limited number of animals that will be captured for translocations,” the agencies that developed the rule – Fish and Wildlife with Colorado Parks and Wildlife – expected “negative impacts to the donor population to be negligible.” 

So despite what Nesvik and Lopez claim, “neither identified any specific provision of any law – federal, state or otherwise – that CPW or anyone else supposedly violated by capturing and releasing wolves from British Columbia,” said Tom Delehanty, senior attorney for Earthjustice. “They’ve pointed only to the 10(j) rule, which is purely about post-release wolf management, and  applies only in Colorado.” 

Advertisement

More experts weigh in 

In addition to the 2024 letter from the Fish and Wildlife Service, documents obtained by The Sun include copies of permits given to CPW by the Ministry of British Columbia to export 15 wolves to the United States between Jan. 12 and Jan. 16, 2025. 

These permits track everything from live animals and pets to products made from protected wildlife including ivory. 

The permit system is the backbone of the regulation of trade in specimens of species included in the three Appendices of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, also called CITES. A CITES permit is the confirmation by an issuing authority that the conditions for authorizing the trade are fulfilled, meaning the trade is legal, sustainable and traceable in accordance with articles contained within the Convention. 

An image that looks to be from a security camera shows a wolf looking straight at the camera
Gray wolf sits in a temporary pen awaiting transport to Colorado during capture operations in British Columbia in January 2025. (Colorado Parks and Wildlife)

Gary Mowad, a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife agent and expert on Endangered Species Act policies, said “obtaining a CITES certificate is unrelated to the 10j rule” and that in his estimation, CPW did violate both the terms of the 10(j) and the memorandum of agreement with the Fish and Wildlife Service, because “the 10(j) specifically limited the populations from where wolves could be obtained, and Canada was not authorized.” 

Mike Phillips, a Montana legislator who was instrumental in Yellowstone’s wolf reintroduction that began in 1995, thinks “the posturing about a takeover seems like just casually considered bravado from Interior officials.” 

And Delahanty says “Nesvik and Lopez are making up legal requirements that don’t exist for political leverage in an effort that serves no one. It’s unclear what FWS hopes to accomplish with its threatening letter,” but if they rescind the memorandum of agreement, “it would cast numerous elements of Colorado’s wolf management program into uncertainty.” 

Advertisement

Looking forward 

If Fish and Wildlife does as Nesvik’s letter threatens and revokes all of CPW’s authority over grey wolves in its jurisdiction, “the service would assume all gray wolf management activities, including relocation and lethal removal, as determined necessary,” it says. 

But Phillips says “if Fish and Wildlife succeeds in the agency’s longstanding goal of delisting gray wolves nationwide,” a proposition that is currently moving through Congress, with U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert’s Pet and Livestock Protection Act bill, the agency couldn’t take over Colorado’s wolf program. That’s because “wolf conservation falls back to Colorado with (its voter-approved) restoration mandate.” And “the species is listed as endangered/nongame under state law,” he adds. 

If the feds did take over, Phillips said in an email “USFWS does not have staff for any meaningful boots-on-the-ground work.” Under Fish and Wildlife Service control, future translocations would probably be “a firm nonstarter,” he added, “but that seems to be the case now.” 

A big threat should Fish and Wildlife take over is that lethal removal of wolves “in the presence of real or imagined conflicts might be more quickly applied,” Phillips said. 

A gray wolf with black markings crosses a snowy area into a patch of shrubs.
A gray wolf dashes into leafless shrubs. It is one of 20 wolves released in January 2025, 15 of which were translocated from British Columbia (Colorado Parks and Wildlife photo)

But it would all be tied up in legal constraints, given that gray wolves are still considered an endangered species in Colorado, and requirements of the 10(j) and state law say CPW must advance their recovery. 

So for now, it’s wait and see if CPW can answer Fish and Wildlife’s demand that accompanies Nesvik’s latest letter. 

Advertisement

Nesvik told the agency they must report “all gray wolf conservation and management activities that occurred from Dec. 12, 2023, until present,” as well as provide a narrative summary and all associated documents describing both the January 2025 British Columbia release and other releases by Jan. 18., or 30 days after the date on his letter. If they don’t, he said, Fish and Wildlife “will pursue all legal remedies,” including “the immediate revocation of all CPW authority over gray wolves in its jurisdiction.” 

Shelby Wieman, a spokesperson for Gov. Jared Polis’ office, said Colorado disagrees with the premise of Nesvik’s letter and remains “fully committed to fulfilling the will of Colorado voters and successfully reintroducing the gray wolf population in Colorado.” 

And CPW maintains it “has coordinated with USFWS throughout the gray wolf reintroduction effort and has complied with all applicable federal and state laws. This includes translocations in January of 2025 which were planned and performed in consultation with USFWS.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending