Colorado
Let local governments in Colorado rule on rent control (Letters)
Let local governments rule on rent control
I’m writing this letter to urge our candidates for governor to take a stand to repeal the 1981 law prohibiting local control of rents. Local communities are the best locus to determine affordability for their residents. The conditions in Denver are different from places such as Fruita, Aspen, Durango or Lamar. Stripping municipal and county governments of the ability to assess the needs of their communities is fundamentally anti-democratic.
I have lived in Denver for 30 years and have always been a renter. I retired as a state employee over eight years ago. Currently, I pay approximately 45% of my net income for my housing. Recently, my rent was increased 17%, where I have resided for 10 years. Inflation at that time was 3%. I believe that with reasonable rent control by the city of Denver, such an increase would never have been allowed. At this rate, I will soon be forced to leave the city I love.
Increasing the housing stock is one step, but it is not a solution, especially if new rental units are unaffordable. There needs to be a limit on the amount a landlord can increase the rent, and a fair and easy mechanism for enforcement. We need our elected officials, and our candidates running for governor and other offices, to commit to working with us to overturn this unjust law that favors corporate landlords over residents.
Jeff Schweinfest, Denver
What is causing overpayments in the first place?
Re: “Unemployment: Overpayment appeals, probes under scrutiny,” May 31 news story
The Sunday article on people’s inability to challenge claw-backs of their unemployment benefits was very interesting! Thanks for doing it.
But I was left totally confused by the whole process. The reason money is clawed back presumably is because the agency determined that they had been given too much money. But that is the same agency that determined how much to give them in the first place.
So why didn’t they use the proper process (that determined how much they got in excess) right off? This is crazy! Something is really wrong here.
Steve Pomerance, Boulder
Details, please, candidates
Re: “So you’ll fight Trump; what else?” May 30 letter to the editor
Responding to the letter about the Democratic candidates for governor and running their campaigns on fighting Trump, I can only say, “Here! Here!” I am also independent and am no fan of President Donald Trump.
But it should just be assumed that any Democrat running for any office is planning to fight Trump (I wish the same could be said for the other side, but that’s an argument for another time). You would better serve your constituents by telling us how you’re going to make life better for us in this state. What is your plan? Fighting Trump should be a given. Stop wasting most of your 30-second ads on Trump and what the other candidate did or did not do. Tell us your plan. And that goes for you as well, Congressional District 8 Democratic candidates!
Andrea Llamzon, Thornton
Marx sounds a lot like Santos
Re: “Marx draws rivals’ criticism,” May 26 commentary
The achievements Victor Marx highlights as a self-proclaimed minister, such as having traveled the globe to help thousands of people victimized by trafficking and persecution . . . as well as ministries in Haiti and the Middle East where he personally battled with ISIS, sound awfully outlandish and familiar.
I’m thinking of the former Republican from New York, George Santos, who made up all kinds of wild stories about his past, which eventually got exposed — but, of course, the GOP didn’t care. Just needed his seat in Congress despite his lying and cheating, kind of like the guy sitting in the White House.
Yet, Marx is the frontrunner in the primary campaign for governor against two far more qualified candidates with genuine experience in government, whom he declines to debate. Can’t see him winning in blue state Colorado. I guess they’re more concerned about MAGA bona fides than winning.
Jeannie Dunham, Denver
Amanda Gonzalez for Secretary of State
Re: “State Sen. Jessie Danielson for secretary of state,” May 31 endorsement editorial
I was disappointed to read of your endorsement of state Sen. Jessie Danielson for Colorado Secretary of State. While she has been active in election law, she has not, as you pointed out, ever run an election.
Amanda Gonzalez has extensive election experience in Jefferson County, one of the largest counties in Colorado. In these troubled times, we need someone with nuts and bolts experience of the process, not just the laws. I hope the people of Colorado will think seriously about the qualifications of the two and vote for Amanda Gonzalez.
Kathleen N. Jones, Centennial
Michael Dougherty for Attorney General
When my husband, Kevin Mahoney, and nine other victims were killed at King Soopers in 2021, District Attorney Michael Dougherty showed up tirelessly for all of us from day one. His empathy, integrity, and years of legal expertise mattered.
It’s no surprise a guilty verdict was reached.
Now Michael is running for attorney general where he would take on the role as top lawyer for our state — a role he would excel at. I’m confident Michael will work hard for all of us in Colorado to protect our communities and natural resources. With nearly 30 years as a prosecutor, Michael knows how to tackle the toughest legal battles. He has prosecuted violent crimes, protected consumers, and defended civil rights. He continually fights for the rights and safety of our families, our children, and grandchildren. It’s a powerful fight for justice because he truly cares about people. This is a time in our country when our very democracy is at stake.
We need an experienced, hardworking, and courageous individual like Michael to take on the relentless chaos and corruption through our legal system. This is the exact expertise he brings to the table. Colorado primary day is Tuesday, June 30. Let’s elect Michael Dougherty as Colorado’s next attorney general.
Ellen Mahoney, Boulder
Sue Flageolle for Jefferson County Assessor
When it comes to the Jefferson County assessor’s race, the choice is straightforward: experience, integrity, and a genuine commitment to this community. Sue Flageolle is that choice, and she has earned my enthusiastic support.
Sue is not a political newcomer looking to use the assessor’s office as a stepping stone. She is the current deputy assessor for Jefferson County, with more than 28 years of service in our own office. Her career in real estate appraisal spans over four decades, and she has held a Certified General Appraiser License since 1989. This is not a résumé built for a campaign — it’s a career built in service to Colorado property owners.
What sets Sue apart is her understanding that the assessor’s office must work for everyone. Property owners — homeowners, small business owners and renters — all feel the downstream effects of how assessments are conducted. When valuations are inaccurate or inconsistent, the consequences ripple through our entire community: inflated tax bills, strained household budgets, and inequitable burdens on those least able to absorb them.
Sue’s commitment to fair, transparent, and market-reflective property values is not a talking point; it’s the philosophy she has practiced throughout her entire career.
Sue is also leading Jefferson County’s transition to a modern, cloud-based mass appraisal platform launching this year. We need someone at the helm who understands both the technology and the appraisal principles behind it. Sue does.
Jefferson County deserves an assessor who walks in on day one knowing exactly what the job requires. That person is Sue Flageolle.
Jamie Eickhoff, Littleton
Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.
To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.
Colorado
Colorado’s Front Range Passenger Rail eyes stops at future Broncos, Summit stadiums
The Front Range Passenger Rail District is rallying support from the cities where the future rail line will operate. Denver City Council got on board with a proclamation made Monday at its regular meeting. Denver is the latest of nearly a dozen municipalities to publicly express its support for the railway.
Councilman Darrell Watson sponsored the proclamation that received unanimous support.
“Right now, we’re dealing with forest fires throughout the state,” Watson said. “That air that’s coming in, having a cleaner approach to transit is important, and the Front Range Rail provides that.”
The proclamation also supports the creation of two additional “special events” stops that are south of Union Station and therefore would need voter approval.
“One is on South Broadway and I-25 for the new Denver Summit stadium, as well as Burnham Yard for the new Denver Broncos stadium,” explained Sal Pace, the Front Range Passenger Rail District’s general manager.
For Pace, the support is another step in the right direction for future expansion.
“We’re asking the local municipalities to agree with the station locations and the placement of stations across the district,” Pace said. “That way if we refer a ballot question, that it’s done in alignment with the local municipalities, such as here in Denver.”
But city support also brings monetary gains.
“Because of its population, Denver will be receiving $225 million in local return Pace explained. “And for passing this proclamation, they’ve just qualified themselves for an additional $22.5 million in local return dollars,” he said. “That money will be coming from any future tax revenue that a district is collecting.”
“This is a unique opportunity, not just for Denver, but for anyone that loves rail and anyone that lives in the Front Range,” Watson added.
The first phase of the railway that the Colorado Connector (CoCo) will make trips on goes from Denver up to Boulder, on to Fort Collins. That phase is already funded and is expected to begin service in 2029. The Rail’s board will have a meeting in August on a possible ballot measure for this November. Voters from Fort Collins down to Trinidad would vote on the tax measure to support future expansion if placed on the ballot.
Colorado
Colorado State football 2026 outlook from national experts
How ESPN projects the rebuilt Pac-12
ESPN names Boise State favorite in rebuilt Pac-12; San Diego State, Fresno State, WSU and Texas State close behind.
Happy college football prediction month!
July is when preseason projections hit for the upcoming season.
The Colorado State football team is approaching the first preseason camp under new coach Jim Mora, which brings hopes of a new beginning after the Rams went 2-10 in 2025.
Here’s a look at how some of the national outlets project the Rams to fare in 2026:
Athlon Sports
The national college football magazine projection for 2026 picks CSU to finish seventh in the eight-team league.
Tight end Juice Vereen is the only Ram Athlon projects to be first-team all-conference. The magazine also lists Vereen as its No. 10 in the top transfers section.
Oklahoma State transfer Hauss Hejny is the No. 3 player in Athlon’s top transfers, with the magazine saying, “Hejny is a former blue-chip recruit who showed promise for the Cowboys.”
The magazine projects Boise State to beat San Diego State in the Pac-12 title game. It does not project a bowl appearance for CSU.
Phil Steele
Steele has one of the most well-known college football preview magazines. He also projects CSU seventh ahead of only Oregon State in the Pac-12.
Steele on the QB room, led by Hejny and UConn transfer K’saan Farrar: “Despite the inexperience, this unit should top last year’s stats.”
Mora will “have to work his magic” in the offensive line room, Steele says, due to just eight career starts within the group. On the defensive line, Steele says that unit is the strength of the team “with great depth.”
Steele says Mora will “craft a run-oriented offense as (tight end) is the strength” and that the offense should “top last year’s numbers by over a TD per game.”
Overall, Steele says CSU is “stronger on both sides of the ball” and that the Rams are improved and “will win more games but it looks like a rebuilding year. Can Mora work another miracle?”
Betting odds
Some early win total betting lines for CSU include BetMGM with an over/under line of 3.5 wins for the Rams and FanDuel listing CSU with a line of 4.5 wins.
ESPN
ESPN’s FPI computer model has the Rams last in the Pac-12 with a win-loss projection of 3.6 wins and 7.5 losses. Basically, that means ESPN’s model projects between three and four regular season wins for CSU.
How do these rankings compare to a year ago?
Offseason projections get trickier every year in this era of college football with immense roster changes each season. That’s especially true in the case of CSU ahead of the 2026 season, where a new head coach means about a 75% roster turnover.
So, projections are to be taken with caution. A look at the picks from a year ago show why.
- Athlon: Projected CSU fifth in the Mountain West, to play for a bowl and that QB Brayden Fowler-Nicolosi “should compete for All-Mountain West honors.”
- Steele: Projected CSU fifth in the MW as well.
- Betting odds: Projected CSU to win six or seven regular season games.
- ESPN: Projected CSU to win six or seven games.
- Reality: In the end, CSU went 2-10, finished last in the MW, Fowler-Nicolosi was benched and eventually left the team, and coach Jay Norvell was fired.
Sports reporter Kevin Lytle can be found on social media on X, Instagram and Threads @Kevin_Lytle and on Bluesky.
Colorado
Colorado buyers gain options as Western Slope housing market rebalances
Colorado’s housing market wrapped up the spring season with more inventory than in previous years, setting up an active summer for buyers — even as economic and political uncertainty continues to drive up prices.
Colorado continued its momentum toward a “balanced and sustainable environment” in May, according to a Colorado Association of Realtors’ market trends report released in June.
Demand remained steady statewide, but buyers gained more choices thanks to higher overall inventory. New listings dropped nearly 14% in May compared to the same month last year, but pending sales increased 7%. This indicates spring buyers were more active than they were in 2025 despite affordability challenges.
“Summer visitors are beginning to arrive, and buyers and sellers are testing the waters for what many expect to be a busy season,” said Dana Cottrell, president of the Altitude Realtors Association, in the report.
Median and average sales prices rose across the state, up 2.7% and 3.3%, respectively, for the month. The median sales price for single-family homes sat at $565,000 — up $15,000 year over year — and $400,000 for condos and townhomes, which saw a modest 1.7% drop. Sellers are, for the most part, receiving close to 99% of a home’s list price, down a feeble -0.1% year over year.
Accompanying May’s higher prices was an increase in the average time a home spent on the market, jumping to 56 days from 53 in 2025.
Although sales were down slightly across the state, inventory remains significantly healthier than the historically low levels of recent years, with 4.3 months of supply statewide.
A balanced real estate market is traditionally indicated by four to six months of supply, measuring the time it would take to sell the current inventory of homes at the existing pace of sales. Anything less than four months would be a seller’s market (demand outpaces supply), while anything more than six would benefit buyers (supply outpaces demand).
While a useful indicator, it can often be unreliable on its own for determining market health in rural Colorado counties due to low sales volume and fragmented property types. Months supply is often over the six-month threshold in ski towns because homes take longer to sell, and don’t automatically point to a buyer’s market.
Rural counties on the Western Slope recorded a larger supply of homes in May for the most part — ranging from 5.5 months supply in Summit County for single-family homes to 10.5 and 8.4 months supply in Pitkin and Grand counties, respectively, according to May 2026 data from the Colorado Association of Realtors.
“Sellers are facing more competition and must price strategically, while buyers see benefit from selection and negotiating power,” the report states. “Overall, the market reflects normalization, with stable pricing, improving affordability and steady buyer activity providing a more sustainable housing environment across the state.”
On the Western Slope, higher inventory brings more negotiation power for buyers, who are becoming more active compared to this time last year. Many buyers are still moving forward despite the combination of rising prices, rising mortgage rates and economic uncertainty.
Western Slope counties see rise in buyer activity
Similar to statewide trends, some mountain towns in Colorado’s western rural counties are seeing higher inventory compared to past years, offering more options for potential buyers.
Grand County, for example, saw sidelined buyers begin re-entering the market after a year of waiting for opportunities to improve, according to Monica Graves, a realtor in the area. These buyers returned to the market with more negotiating power than they’ve had during the last few years.
Sellers in Grand County, on the other hand, are facing increasing competition. As more housing projects pop up around mountain towns, buyers have more inventory to choose from compared to recent spring and summer seasons. The result is steadying demand and a return to a balanced mountain real estate market, according to the Colorado Association of Realtors report.
“May 2026 felt like the market finally woke up from winter,” Graves said in the report. “Resort buyers are still attracted to the area’s year-round recreation and proximity to Denver, but they are taking longer to make decisions.”
Steamboat Springs saw a similar trend in May, with higher year-over-year inventory despite entering 2026 with fewer new listings across all property types. Single-family inventory was down 4.5% and multi-family inventory was down 21.9% compared to last year, the report states.
Sales for single-family homes were stronger to end the spring season, but homes took longer to sell, averaging 90 days on the market year-to-date.
Summit County’s spring inventory also remained above the “extremely limited levels” seen during the pandemic years, according to Cottrell, giving buyers more options and negotiating power. Single-family home sales were up 27% with a 20% bump in listings in May 2026 compared to 2025, while multi-family homes saw a 32% drop in sales and a 15% decline in new listings.
Listings were mostly down for counties across other parts of the north-central mountains, with Eagle, Garfield and Pitkin counties seeing fewer new listings for single-family homes. All except Pitkin County saw a rise in inventory compared to last May, accompanied by a lengthening of days on market to over 100 days. Pitkin County properties spent the longest on the market before selling, rising 10% to 228 days, according to data from the Colorado Association of Realtors.
Interest is high, but what about pricing?
Whether Western Slope counties saw housing prices rise or drop varied significantly from town to town. However, more expensive price tags don’t seem to be slowing buyers down heading into the summer selling season — for now.
The median price for single-family homes dropped to $965,000 in Grand County from $990,000, while the median list price in Winter Park hit $1.2 million.
“Well-priced properties moved, while homes that missed the mark on pricing tended to sit longer,” Graves said. Homes in Winter Park averaged around 51 days on market in May — lower than the statewide average — while those in Granby averaged 78 days despite significantly lower pricing. Graves added that, in places like Granby, homes offering updated finishes, views or short-term rental potential generated the strongest interest.
Prices across Summit County went up compared to last spring. The average price for single-family homes rose 6% to $2.68 million in May 2026, while multi-family home prices saw a larger 19% jump, hitting $1.07 million.
The most expensive home sold in the county was a $13 million home in Breckenridge. This continued strength in pricing demonstrates that demand for mountain living remains firmly intact, with many buyers still moving forward despite economic uncertainty, Cottrell said.
In Steamboat Springs, multi-family homes — which matched last year’s May closings at 26 — saw median and average sales prices increase to $1.96 million and $2.24 million, respectively. Across Routt County, median sales prices jumped 62% for single-family homes and 156% for townhomes and condos, more than doubling from their May 2025 median price of $640,000 to hit $1.64 million.
Across Eagle, Garfield and Pitkin counties, changes in pricing differed by property type. All three counties recorded a drop in the median sales price for single-family homes, with the greatest drop coming from Pitkin County: 58.5% for a median price of $5.5 million in May 2026. The average sales price also dropped from $12.9 to $12.6 million, while townhomes and condos saw a 50% increase in average sales price, bumping up the cost from $2.99 million to $4.5 million.
Could rising mortgage rates scare away potential buyers?
A major market element that could influence buyer activity heading deeper into the summer season is rising mortgage rates.
In February, Western Slope housing markets were reporting an uptick in buyer inquiries due to sinking mortgage rates. Rates had trended downward throughout the first few months of 2026, after home loan rates hit their lowest point in three years in early January.
As of July 2, 30-year mortgage rates have climbed to 6.51%, reversing what had once improved the sentiments of buyers who had been sidelined by affordability concerns.
Rates began increasing following the start of the war in Iran and the closing of the Strait of Hormuz. Rising inflation has only further elevated mortgage rates, though they’ve managed to remain below the 7% reached in early 2025, according to reporting by the Wall Street Journal.
With recent rate fluctuations, it remains to be seen whether rates will dampen buyer enthusiasm during Colorado’s peak season for buyers.
-
Indiana2 minutes ago‘Big Boy’ locomotive returns for overnight stay in northeast Indiana
-
Iowa8 minutes agoMeet the 3 Best New Food at the Iowa State Fair finalists for 2026
-
Kansas14 minutes ago‘Explosive diarrhea’ outbreak includes 5 cases in Sedgwick County, 22 in Kansas
-
Kentucky20 minutes agoGun safety advocates discuss Kentucky’s new concealed carry law for young adults
-
Louisiana26 minutes agoSaronic’s Louisiana shipyard helps drive a new wave of defense technology
-
Maine32 minutes agoCommunities in Maine demand justice after ICE officer shoots, kills 25-year-old
-
Maryland38 minutes agoDog turns on toaster, sparking Maryland house fire that kills 3 pets
-
Michigan44 minutes agoMichigan AD Warde Manuel says he’s been fired by social media 3 times in 10 years