Connect with us

Colorado

Colorado lawmakers will go after parents | BRAUCHLER

Published

on

Colorado lawmakers will go after parents | BRAUCHLER







Advertisement

George Brauchler



Shortly after the Michigan parents of a juvenile school shooter were sentenced to prison last month for their roles in the arming of their son and his subsequent murder of four sudents and shooting of seven others, Gazette Executive Editor Vince Bzdek explored whether parents should be criminally responsible for their kid’s criminal conduct — especially mass shootings.

The prosecution in Michigan is factually unique and unlikely to be replicable in Colorado absent our legislature’s change to our laws — and that is what is coming for us. Next session. Be aware.

To be clear: The Crumbley parents engaged in inexplicable behavior and unjustifiable lapses in judgment. I believe they would have been prosecuted here, but it would have been more complicated. The Crumbley parents were more easily prosecuted under Michigan laws we do not have here — yet. Colorado does not have an Involuntary Manslaughter charge, like Michigan’s, that contains provisions specific to firearms, the failure to perform a legal duty and “gross negligence.”

Stay up to speed: Sign up for daily opinion in your inbox Monday-Friday

Advertisement

Colorado’s homicide statutes decrease in severity from first- to second-degree murder to manslaughter to criminally negligent homicide. Our manslaughter charge is based on recklessness, which is similar — but not an exact match — for Michigan’s “gross negligence.”

The significant difference between our laws lies in Michigan’s ability to prosecute someone for failure to perform a legal duty. Michigan allows prosecution of a person who “willfully neglected or refused to perform (a legal) duty and (his / her) failure to perform it was grossly negligent to human life.” That fits the Crumbleys. As the elected district attorney told the jury during trial, the parents were “not on trial for what (their) son did,” but “for what (they) did and for what (they) didn’t do.”

This is the change we should expect next year’s legislature to enact, because it simultaneously attacks two things the progressives in power dislike: guns and parents.

Gov. Jared Polis and Democrats in the legislature have continued a relentless march toward making gun ownership by the law-abiding either completely illegal, or so risky many will choose not to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms. At the same time, they have done nothing to discourage or punish criminals with guns.

The legislature made it a crime for law-abiding Coloradans not to lock up their firearms in their houses and cars. Yet, this year’s Democrats refused to increase the penalties for criminals who break into cars to steal those same guns. Lawful gun owners who have never misused their firearms are on the verge of having to carry attorney-enriching liability insurance for exercising their Second Amendment rights, while those who have committed felonies — including drug dealing and car theft — can now possess guns under Colorado law (thank you, Attorney General Phil Weiser). Local governments are entrusted to whittle away gun rights by limiting what firearms can be possessed, but they cannot be trusted to decide who and under what conditions a concealed-carry permit is to be issued.

Advertisement

While extremists like Hamas-celebrant Tim Hernandez and Israel-hating Elisabeth Epps work to pass laws blaming and punishing everyone except the evil-doer who pulled the trigger killing someone, Coloradans should know legal theories predicated on parental failure to intervene to prevent “gun violence”  would have been irrelevant in every mass shooting case I have handled.

Columbine: The parents immediately lawyered up and provided no statement to law enforcement. The weapons obtained by the evil killers were obtained either illegally (the TEC DC-9), and the wrongdoers went to prison, or legally (the long rifles), by the girlfriend of one of the murderers. Nobody knew what they intended to do. One shooter hid the homemade pipe bombs, magazines, web gear and rifle in his locked bedroom. An appropriately nosey parent would have discovered it — my mom (an appropriately nosey mom) would have discovered it.

Aurora Theater: Everything was purchased legally, including the four firearms, thousands of rounds of ammo, body armor, the building blocks for the apartment bombs and the “road stars” for puncturing police tires as the killer envisioned them chasing him. He spread the purchases around using different methods of payment to avoid detection.

Arapahoe High School: the 18-year-old killer murdered innocent Clair Davis with a legally purchased shotgun.

Mountain Vista High School: Two 16-year-old girls planned a Columbine-style mass shooting that was averted by a nosey parent and DCSO text-a-tip. The would-be killers made efforts to obtain a handgun illegally, but had thus far failed.

Advertisement

STEM School: the 16- and 18-year-old murderers of hero Kendrick Castillo five years ago broke into a parent’s safe with an axe and crowbar to steal four weapons and ammunition.

The issue of parental responsibility for the conduct of children is real and parents like the Crumbleys are rightly held accountable under the law. However, the current discussions and inevitable exploration by our liberal lawmakers of ways to make it easier to criminally prosecute and incarcerate parents is a double-edged sword. It takes little imagination to envision a prosecutor using such a law to target parents of gang members (or is it “gang-involved individuals”?) or bullies or recalcitrant youth or even juveniles who have previously offended.

The Crumbleys are an outlier best addressed under our current laws. But take heed, Colorado parents and gun-owners — unless November’s elections change things under the Gold Dome — expect the legislature to make it easier to prosecute you for the misdeeds of your kids, especially if they involve the use of a firearm.

George Brauchler is the former district attorney for the 18th Judicial District and is a candidate for district attorney in the newly created 23rd Judicial District. He has served as an Owens Early Criminal Justice Fellow at the Common Sense Institute. Follow him on Twitter(X): @GeorgeBrauchler.



Source link

Advertisement

Colorado

Police arrest 2 juveniles, search for third in Colorado, accused of crashing stolen car into patrol vehicle

Published

on

Police arrest 2 juveniles, search for third in Colorado, accused of crashing stolen car into patrol vehicle



Police in Arvada arrested two juveniles and searched for a third juvenile early Monday morning in connection with an auto theft. According to investigators, the suspects swerved at officers who were on foot in the area near 60th Avenue and Yarrow Lane.

Police in Arvada searched for a third suspect wanted in connection with crashing a stolen vehicle into a patrol vehicle near 60th and Yarrow.

Advertisement

CBS


That’s when they allegedly drove into a patrol vehicle. 

After a brief chase, officers were able to track down two suspects and continued to search for the final suspect. 

morning-copter-frame-133624.jpg

CBS Colorado’s helicopter flew over the scene near 60th Avenue and Yarrow Lane in Arvada. 

CBS

Advertisement




Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado man convicted of multi-million-dollar scheme to sell hand sanitizer during COVID

Published

on

Colorado man convicted of multi-million-dollar scheme to sell hand sanitizer during COVID


A 51-year-old Castle Rock resident was recently found guilty on 15 counts of fraud by jurors in Denver federal court. 

According to a court document, Rico Tomas Garcia received $2.4 million from two businesses at the outset of the COVID pandemic. He spent the money to purchase a vehicle and three properties without delivering any of the promised product.

Garcia agreed in April 2020 to provide nine million 16-ounce bottles of hand sanitizer to a Virginia-based distributor of personal protective equipment (PPE) and safety work gear, according to the grand jury indictment in his case. A second company financed the deal for the distributor. 

If reached in full, the deal would have paid Garcia $37.8 million. But Garcia reportedly moved the first $2.4 million paid to him into accounts held by three corporations operated by he and his girlfriend. 

Advertisement

A month after making the deal, none of the product was delivered and the finance company halted payments and demanded a refund. Instead, Garcia, according to the indictment, falsified documents about his arrangements with a Chinese manufacturer of the hand sanitizer. 

The contract was terminated in June of that year. 

Garcia allegedly bought homes in Topanga Canyon, California and Sedalia, Colorado, plus an undisclosed Nevada property, with the ill-gotten proceeds. Federal prosecutors also allege Garcia moved over a million dollars of the remaining money into offshore accounts in the Caribbean.

A federal grand jury indicted Garcia in April 2024. He was taken into custody eight months later. The jury reached its verdict March 9 after a week-long trial, finding him guilty of nine counts of wire fraud and six counts of money laundering. 

Meanwhile, the distributor and its finance company are still trying to resolve their finances through a civil lawsuit filed the year the deal went south. 

Advertisement

Garcia is scheduled to be sentenced Sept. 8.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

How Colorado funeral homes are rebuilding trust eroded by years of industry scandal

Published

on

How Colorado funeral homes are rebuilding trust eroded by years of industry scandal


Mike Dudley can usually pick up on someone’s anxiety about dealing with Colorado’s funeral home industry the first time they sit down to talk.

It starts with pointed questions as he meets with families in the conference room at Rundus Funeral Home & Crematory in Broomfield, where Dudley is the general manager and funeral director. How is their loved one’s body going to be handled? Who will be caring for them? When, where and how will they be cremated or put in a casket?

Sometimes it comes out of the blue, like when a man called Dudley three years after Rundus cremated his loved one because he couldn’t stop thinking about whether or not he actually had the correct cremains.

“His mind just got wondering and he needed reassurance,” Dudley said. “Like, ‘How do I know this is in fact my person in the urn?’”

Advertisement

Whether it’s pointed questions from prospective clients or phone calls years after the fact, recent scandals in the state’s funeral industry have shaken Coloradans’ trust in the professionals who care for their deceased loved ones, funeral directors and industry experts told The Denver Post.

While Colorado lawmakers have made significant strides in adding state regulations to prevent future scandals, rehabilitating the funeral industry’s reputation is a more complicated task.

“The trust that’s been broken here, it’s going to take a long while for us to restore it,” said Matt Whaley, president of the Colorado Funeral Directors Association.

The effect of Colorado’s notoriously lax funeral home regulations burst into public view in 2018, when an FBI raid on Sunset Mesa Funeral Directors in Montrose found that mother-daughter team Megan Hess and Shirley Koch stole and sold hundreds of bodies around the world to turn a profit.

Hess is now serving a 20-year prison sentence and Koch is serving a 15-year sentence.

Advertisement

Coloradans are still seeing the fallout of more recent scandals, like the active investigation into Davis Mortuary owner (and former Pueblo County coroner) Brian Cotter, who operated the mortuary where state inspectors found 24 decomposing bodies in a hidden room in August.

Dudley is often at a loss for words when he thinks about the scandals, like what happened at the Return to Nature funeral home in Penrose, where owners Jon and Carie Hallford allowed 191 bodies, stacked on top of each other, to decompose for over four years while giving families fake cremains.

The Hallfords both face decades-long prison sentences after pleading guilty in their state criminal cases.

“Even when we’re transferring (the deceased) from a cot to a dressing table, we’re making sure their head doesn’t bang. We’re treating them as if they’re still alive, with care and respect. That you could let those people languish for years… how could you do that?” Dudley said. “How could you sit in front of a family and hand them an urn knowing full well it’s Quikrete?”

So when the man called him out of the blue asking about his loved one’s cremains, Dudley explained that every person who is cremated gets a metal disk with a unique set of numbers that stays with them through the whole process and is zip-tied to the bag of cremains that are returned to families.

Advertisement

“I said, ‘Tell me that number. Don’t tell me the name of your person. I’ll go back to our cremation log and tell you the name associated with the number,’” Dudley said. “I came back, said I have that number associated with this person, and he just said, ‘Oh, thank God.’”

A hearse and van are parked outside the Return to Nature Funeral Home in Penrose, Colo., on Oct. 6, 2023. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File)

Scandals had statewide, local ripple effects

Cases of industry workers mishandling bodies in Montrose, Penrose, Denver and Pueblo have had a far-reaching effect on Colorado’s funeral home industry, said Kim Bridges, who owns the parent company that oversees three metro Denver funeral homes, including Rundus.

“When these things started happening, it was awful for the industry,” she said. “It makes everyone look at the industry with skepticism and that’s a shame because you need to be able to trust the people you entrust your loved one to.”

Bridges Funeral Services, which Bridges owns with her husband, also oversees funeral and mortuary facilities in New Mexico, Tennessee and Florida.

The uptick in funeral directors and staff encountering families who are anxious about cremating or burying their loved ones is not limited to Rundus, said Whaley, who has worked in the funeral home industry for 38 years and is now market director at Dignity Memorial.

Advertisement

More people are also asking to witness cremations to make sure they know exactly what is happening to their loved one, he said.

When Dudley encounters people with questions or doubts about the funeral and cremation process, he tries to be as transparent as possible, answering their questions with as much detail as they want and offering tours of the facility.

For most, the offer is enough to calm their fears, Dudley said. But about a third of those want to see everything, from the plain-but-clean room lined with cabinets and counters where the deceased are prepared for services, to the massive, gray crematory that looks similar to a metal shipping container.

Whaley, Dudley and Bridges all shared the same sentiment: Families asking more questions about the funeral process is a good thing and should be welcomed.

“If someone doesn’t want to give a consumer all the information they’re asking for, shame on them,” Bridges said. “The consumer should go somewhere else and ask for a tour of the place.”

Advertisement

That kind of simple and up-front communication is the right way to rebuild trust with the community after a crisis, said Andy Boian, founder and CEO of the Colorado- and California-based public relations firm Dovetail Solutions.

Boian and other public relations experts who spoke to The Denver Post commented on the scandals hypothetically, as neither have worked directly with funeral homes on this issue.

Good communication includes walking people through the process, making sure they understand what’s happening and circling back regularly, he said.

“At the end of the day, that would ratify and settle a lot of people’s concerns,” Boian said.

That transparency now extends into Colorado’s industry regulations after state legislators, motivated by recent scandals, passed new laws to prevent the same kind of situation from happening at funeral homes or mortuaries ever again.

Advertisement

Passed in 2024, the three new laws require funeral directors and other industry professionals to obtain licenses; for state regulators to perform routine inspections at facilities; and for businesses to obtain consent and share more information about body donation.

Colorado officials say the new regulations are already making a difference — for example, bodies discovered in a hidden room at Davis Mortuary in Pueblo were found by state inspectors during their first-ever visit to the facility — though that impact isn’t necessarily felt by the people doing the work every day.

A police vehicle is parked outside Davis Mortuary in Pueblo, Colo., on Thursday, Aug. 21, 2025. Investigators discovered human remains as old as 15 years at the business operated by Pueblo County Coroner Brian Cotter. (Photo by Mike Sweeney/Special to The Denver Post)
A police vehicle is parked outside Davis Mortuary in Pueblo, Colo., on Thursday, Aug. 21, 2025. Investigators discovered human remains as old as 15 years at the business operated by Pueblo County Coroner Brian Cotter. (Photo by Mike Sweeney/Special to The Denver Post)

Bridges jokes that her staff are more nervous about a drop-by visit from her than from state inspectors.

“We welcome all oversight because we conduct ourselves in such a way that it’s not an issue,” she said. “If you have to run around and get things right before someone comes in, you’re doing something wrong.”

That ethos, Boian said, also represents another avenue for funeral homes to redeem themselves in the eyes of the community.

“There’s also an opportunity here as well, and that is to be the best and most proficient at your craft,” he said.

Advertisement

Overcoming scandal, moving forward

Crisis management experts told The Denver Post that while the public is usually willing to forgive and forget scandals if those involved do a good job communicating, the fraught nature of dealing with death makes this more complicated.

“It’s really tricky when it’s something sensitive like this,” said Kara Schmiemann, senior director of crisis communications at Red Banyan, a national crisis PR firm with offices in Denver. “When it has to do with our loved ones, these are the most difficult industries when they face a crisis because there’s a lot of emotion packed in there.”

Mike Dudley, general manager of Rundus Funeral Home, walks into the funeral home's chapel in Broomfield on Jan. 19, 2026. (Photo by RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post)
Mike Dudley, general manager of Rundus Funeral Home, walks into the funeral home’s chapel in Broomfield on Jan. 19, 2026. (Photo by RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post)

And while the scandals at a handful of Colorado funeral homes may have sown skepticism among the general public, they had the opposite effect on Arapahoe Community College student Luke Olson.

Olson, who studies in the mortuary science program, was pursuing a mechanical engineering degree before he switched career paths. He said he was drawn to the hospitality of the field and the family connection — his grandfather was a mortician for a tiny town of 90 people.

“Going into the practice is emboldening to me and a new generation of death care practitioners who want to uphold the law and repair the damage that’s been done to Colorado’s reputation in the past,” Olson said.

Contrary to the stereotype about funeral home owners trying to profit off of the bereaved, people who get into the profession are not doing it for the money, Olson said, describing the wages as “very middle class.” (Funeral directors earn $51,607 per year on average, according to the National Funeral Directors Association.)

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending