Connect with us

Colorado

Colorado lawmakers will go after parents | BRAUCHLER

Published

on

Colorado lawmakers will go after parents | BRAUCHLER







Advertisement

George Brauchler



Shortly after the Michigan parents of a juvenile school shooter were sentenced to prison last month for their roles in the arming of their son and his subsequent murder of four sudents and shooting of seven others, Gazette Executive Editor Vince Bzdek explored whether parents should be criminally responsible for their kid’s criminal conduct — especially mass shootings.

The prosecution in Michigan is factually unique and unlikely to be replicable in Colorado absent our legislature’s change to our laws — and that is what is coming for us. Next session. Be aware.

To be clear: The Crumbley parents engaged in inexplicable behavior and unjustifiable lapses in judgment. I believe they would have been prosecuted here, but it would have been more complicated. The Crumbley parents were more easily prosecuted under Michigan laws we do not have here — yet. Colorado does not have an Involuntary Manslaughter charge, like Michigan’s, that contains provisions specific to firearms, the failure to perform a legal duty and “gross negligence.”

Stay up to speed: Sign up for daily opinion in your inbox Monday-Friday

Advertisement

Colorado’s homicide statutes decrease in severity from first- to second-degree murder to manslaughter to criminally negligent homicide. Our manslaughter charge is based on recklessness, which is similar — but not an exact match — for Michigan’s “gross negligence.”

The significant difference between our laws lies in Michigan’s ability to prosecute someone for failure to perform a legal duty. Michigan allows prosecution of a person who “willfully neglected or refused to perform (a legal) duty and (his / her) failure to perform it was grossly negligent to human life.” That fits the Crumbleys. As the elected district attorney told the jury during trial, the parents were “not on trial for what (their) son did,” but “for what (they) did and for what (they) didn’t do.”

This is the change we should expect next year’s legislature to enact, because it simultaneously attacks two things the progressives in power dislike: guns and parents.

Gov. Jared Polis and Democrats in the legislature have continued a relentless march toward making gun ownership by the law-abiding either completely illegal, or so risky many will choose not to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms. At the same time, they have done nothing to discourage or punish criminals with guns.

The legislature made it a crime for law-abiding Coloradans not to lock up their firearms in their houses and cars. Yet, this year’s Democrats refused to increase the penalties for criminals who break into cars to steal those same guns. Lawful gun owners who have never misused their firearms are on the verge of having to carry attorney-enriching liability insurance for exercising their Second Amendment rights, while those who have committed felonies — including drug dealing and car theft — can now possess guns under Colorado law (thank you, Attorney General Phil Weiser). Local governments are entrusted to whittle away gun rights by limiting what firearms can be possessed, but they cannot be trusted to decide who and under what conditions a concealed-carry permit is to be issued.

Advertisement

While extremists like Hamas-celebrant Tim Hernandez and Israel-hating Elisabeth Epps work to pass laws blaming and punishing everyone except the evil-doer who pulled the trigger killing someone, Coloradans should know legal theories predicated on parental failure to intervene to prevent “gun violence”  would have been irrelevant in every mass shooting case I have handled.

Columbine: The parents immediately lawyered up and provided no statement to law enforcement. The weapons obtained by the evil killers were obtained either illegally (the TEC DC-9), and the wrongdoers went to prison, or legally (the long rifles), by the girlfriend of one of the murderers. Nobody knew what they intended to do. One shooter hid the homemade pipe bombs, magazines, web gear and rifle in his locked bedroom. An appropriately nosey parent would have discovered it — my mom (an appropriately nosey mom) would have discovered it.

Aurora Theater: Everything was purchased legally, including the four firearms, thousands of rounds of ammo, body armor, the building blocks for the apartment bombs and the “road stars” for puncturing police tires as the killer envisioned them chasing him. He spread the purchases around using different methods of payment to avoid detection.

Arapahoe High School: the 18-year-old killer murdered innocent Clair Davis with a legally purchased shotgun.

Mountain Vista High School: Two 16-year-old girls planned a Columbine-style mass shooting that was averted by a nosey parent and DCSO text-a-tip. The would-be killers made efforts to obtain a handgun illegally, but had thus far failed.

Advertisement

STEM School: the 16- and 18-year-old murderers of hero Kendrick Castillo five years ago broke into a parent’s safe with an axe and crowbar to steal four weapons and ammunition.

The issue of parental responsibility for the conduct of children is real and parents like the Crumbleys are rightly held accountable under the law. However, the current discussions and inevitable exploration by our liberal lawmakers of ways to make it easier to criminally prosecute and incarcerate parents is a double-edged sword. It takes little imagination to envision a prosecutor using such a law to target parents of gang members (or is it “gang-involved individuals”?) or bullies or recalcitrant youth or even juveniles who have previously offended.

The Crumbleys are an outlier best addressed under our current laws. But take heed, Colorado parents and gun-owners — unless November’s elections change things under the Gold Dome — expect the legislature to make it easier to prosecute you for the misdeeds of your kids, especially if they involve the use of a firearm.

George Brauchler is the former district attorney for the 18th Judicial District and is a candidate for district attorney in the newly created 23rd Judicial District. He has served as an Owens Early Criminal Justice Fellow at the Common Sense Institute. Follow him on Twitter(X): @GeorgeBrauchler.



Source link

Advertisement

Colorado

Colorado coaching great McCartney dies at 84

Published

on

Colorado coaching great McCartney dies at 84


Bill McCartney, a three-time coach of the year in the Big Eight Conference who led the Colorado Buffaloes to their only national football title in 1990, has died. He was 84.

McCartney died Friday night “after a courageous journey with dementia,” according to a family statement.

“Coach Mac touched countless lives with his unwavering faith, boundless compassion, and enduring legacy as a leader, mentor and advocate for family, community and faith,” the family said in its statement. “As a trailblazer and visionary, his impact was felt both on and off the field, and his spirit will forever remain in the hearts of those he inspired.”

After playing college ball under Dan Devine at Missouri, McCartney started coaching high school football and basketball in Detroit. He then was hired onto the staff at Michigan, the only assistant ever plucked from the high school ranks by Bo Schembechler.

Advertisement

Schembechler chose wisely. As the Wolverines’ defensive coordinator during the 1980 season, McCartney earned Big Ten “Player” of the Week honors for the defensive scheme he devised to stop star Purdue quarterback Mark Herrmann.

“When I was 7 years old, I knew I was going to be a coach,” McCartney told The Gazette in 2013. “My friends, other kids at that age were going to be president, businessmen, attorneys, firemen. Ever since I was a little kid, I imitated my coaches, critiqued them, always followed and studied them.”

In 1982, McCartney took over a Colorado program that was coming off three straight losing seasons with a combined record of 7-26. After three more struggling seasons, McCartney turned things around to go to bowl games in nine out of 10 seasons starting in 1985, when he switched over to a wishbone offense.

His 1989 team was 11-0 when it headed to the Orange Bowl, where Notre Dame dashed Colorado’s hopes of a perfect season. McCartney and the Buffaloes, however, would get their revenge the following season.

After getting off to an uninspiring 1-1-1 start in 1990, Colorado won its next nine games to earn a No. 1 ranking and a rematch with the Fighting Irish. This time the Buffaloes prevailed, 10-9, and grabbed a share of the national title atop the AP poll (Georgia Tech was tops in the coaches’ poll).

Advertisement

McCartney won numerous coach of the year honors in 1989, and he was also Big Eight Coach of the Year in 1985 and 1990. His teams went a combined 58-11-4 in his last six seasons before retiring (1989-94).

The Buffaloes finished in the AP Top 20 in each of those seasons, including No. 3 in McCartney’s final year.

“I was fortunate to be able to say goodbye to Coach in person last week,” Colorado athletic director Rick George, who worked under McCartney and was a longtime friend of his, said in a statement. “Coach Mac was an incredible man who taught me about the importance of faith, family and being a good husband, father and grandfather. He instilled discipline and accountability to all of us who worked and played under his leadership.

“The mark that he left on CU football and our athletic department will be hard to replicate.”

McCartney remains the winningest coach in Colorado history. He retired at age 54 with an overall record of 93-55-5 (.602) in 13 seasons, all with Colorado.

Advertisement

He was inducted into the College Football Hall of Fame in 2013. His family announced in 2016 that McCartney had been diagnosed with late-onset dementia and Alzheimer’s.

“Here’s what football does: It teaches a boy to be a man,” McCartney told USA Today in 2017. “You say, ‘How does it do that?’ Well, what if you line up across from a guy who’s bigger, stronger, faster and tougher than you are? What do you do? Do you stay and play? Or do you turn and run? That’s what football does. You’re always going to come up against somebody who’s better than you are.

“That’s what life is. Life is getting knocked down and getting back up and getting back in the game.”

ESPN’s Adam Rittenberg and The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado grocery workers could strike against King Soopers, again

Published

on

Colorado grocery workers could strike against King Soopers, again


Shutterstock

DENVER—After securing a lucrative contract for grocery workers three years ago, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 7 is back at the bargaining table with King Soopers, an affiliate of grocery giant Safeway/Albertsons, and negotiations are stalling, again.

Last week, UFCW Local 7 units at King Soopers stores in Colorado Springs, Pueblo, Grand Junction and Northern Colorado agreed to a two week contract extension to continue bargaining. The King Soopers/City Market contract negotiations will resume January 15 and 16.

Advertisement

The extended contract will now expire on January 24 at midnight. Strike authorization votes could be held in the coming weeks.

“We’ve been negotiating with King Soopers City Market representatives for about three months, and we’ve made little to no progress with the company,” said Kim Cordova, president of the UFCW Local 7.

“The company has so much cash they have announced a plan to spend roughly $2 billion on stock buybacks. Instead of spending this money on its stock, the company should be investing in stores and workers,” the union said.

Late last year, in a blow to corporate interests and monopoly power, U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson in Portland, Ore., and King County Superior Court Judge Marshall Ferguson in Seattle, Wash., killed the Kroger-Albertson’s grocery chain mega-merger.

The resistance to the merger was spearheaded by the Stop the Merger campaign, a coalition of progressive UFCW locals, with little to no assistance from the International. Local 7 was part of the core of this coalition, along with Local 3000, Local 770 and Local 324. The other locals who were part of the coalition also will begin bargaining in late January and early February.

Advertisement

Even with excitement among UFCW members with the blocked merger, grocery workers are tired and have been overworked, Cordova said. “They have been really disregarded through this whole attempted merger that failed.” Immediately after the dissolution of the merger agreement, both Kroger and Albertsons announced billions of dollars of stock buybacks.

“It was a cynical move to line the pockets of CEOs and key shareholders rather than invest the money locally in sadder stores with fresher food,” Todd Crosby, who helped coordinate the Stop The Merger campaign, told People’s World. “This is money that could be invested in the workers who provided the service and safe food.”

Major issues continue to be low-staffing, unsafe working conditions in the stores, hours and wages for lower-tiered workers, a lack of a reasonable path to full-time employment, job protection from the use of artificial intelligence, and unreasonable quotas and shafting on overtime.

Says more help needed

“I would like to see more help in my department because I can’t continue to do the job of three clerks. We need help, we need workers!” a produce manager at the Denver King Soopers store said.

Advertisement

Roman V., who has worked at King Soopers for over eight years, said winning adequate staffing was the most important demand for him in this contract.

“It is so crazily understaffed there are hardly enough people there to do the job daily and people get in trouble constantly because of job performance. I don’t see how they can get in trouble for job performance when performing the job of several people,” he said.

“I transferred into the store two years ago, and we’ve been shorthanded the whole time that I’ve been here,” said grocery worker Irene. “We’re not meeting the standards because we don’t have enough people to do the required work. Since we’re not meeting the standards, they are taking away hours. This doesn’t make any sense to me.”

Throughout bargaining, Safeway/Albertsons has refused to provide the union with basic information and data concerning staffing models—the main grievance workers and their union have with the company.  And, as Local 7 points out, Safeway/Albertsons is doing well, but they are still cutting hours.

“Despite the company’s claims over the past two years that they need to merge with Kroger to do well, their sales numbers actually surpassed Kroger’s. This occurred even though Safeway/Albertsons gave away $4 billion in cash to wealthy shareholders back in early 2023. Adding insult to injury, the companies would be doing far better if they adequately staffed our stores,” the union said.

Advertisement

Chris Herrera, a 40-year UFCW member and bargaining committee member, said that so far in negotiations, Safeway/Albertsons has been unwilling to make the necessary improvements to staffing levels, angering the workers and prompting many to want to authorize a strike.

The strike three years ago was one of the largest strikes in Colorado history, with 8,000 workers walking out, and it marked the first time grocery workers have gone on strike in the state since the late 1990s.

Last time around, King Soopers hired scabs to work at higher wages during the strike. In response, the union filed Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) charges against the company. When the strike concluded, King Soopers had to fire all the scabs and was forced to promote more than 500 part-time workers to full-time by the end of that year.

It’s unclear whether or not King Soopers will try the same union-busting tactic this time and workers aren’t holding their breath that the company will bargain in good faith without breaking labor law. Like in 2022, Local 7 has filed a number of charges with the National Labor Relations Board concerning ULPs.

“The company seems set on continuing its pattern of illegal and unfair labor practices, including a continuing refusal and failure to provide information, a cover-up of a 2022 agreement with Kroger that undercut negotiating leverage, and implementing new policies without notifying or bargaining with the Union,” Local 7 said in a bargaining update last week.

Advertisement

“We remain focused on addressing staffing as a way to improve take-home pay and improve stores as places to work and shop. The company’s cutting of staff in Colorado is backfiring.”

We hope you appreciated this article. At People’s World, we believe news and information should be free and accessible to all, but we need your help. Our journalism is free of corporate influence and paywalls because we are totally reader-supported. Only you, our readers and supporters, make this possible. If you enjoy reading People’s World and the stories we bring you, please support our work by donating or becoming a monthly sustainer today. Thank you!


CONTRIBUTOR

Cameron Harrison






Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado Department of Corrections program to equip parole officers with body cams is shelved

Published

on

Colorado Department of Corrections program to equip parole officers with body cams is shelved


Colorado Department of Corrections program to equip parole officers with body cams is shelved – CBS Colorado

Watch CBS News


Records obtained by CBS Colorado show the Colorado Department of Corrections purchased hundreds of Motorola cameras for the adult parole division.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending