Colorado
Colorado congressional members speak ahead of SNAP deadline, open enrollment
DENVER (KDVR) — Open enrollment season kicks off in just a couple of days. SNAP benefits are set to run out at the same time on Nov. 1.
Some leaders on Capitol Hill say Americans should prepare to be sticker-shocked by an increase in premiums. This is all coming with no deal on healthcare subsidies as Congress remains shut down.
Open enrollment begins with no deal on healthcare
We heard from both Democrats and Republicans representing Coloradans on Capitol Hill.
They have different thoughts about how we got to this point and what could happen next.
“This is going to impact everybody, even if you are on an employer-sponsored healthcare. That’s why we need to fix this,” said Congressman Jason Crow, a Democrat representing the state’s 6th Congressional District. “House Speaker Mike Johnson has closed the House of Representatives. He has not convened Congress for about a month now. So that prohibits our ability to negotiate, to debate, to discuss the path forward. So they actually just need to reopen negotiations, reopen the Congress and in the case of the President, he needs to come back to the United States so we can strike a deal.”
Democrats in Congress are sounding the alarm ahead of open enrollment. Some people getting their insurance through the open market are already seeing cost projections ahead of November 1st, like Mike, a retiree from Littleton.
“I could finally afford to retire early, knowing I would still have healthcare. My plan through Cigna today costs $936 a month. Thanks to the ACA tax credits, I only pay $141. Without that subsidy, it would be completely unaffordable. It’s a game changer for me and millions of others,” Mike said.
The state estimates 225,000 Coloradans rely on the subsidies, saying they are set to average an increase of 101% statewide. Some members of Congress say there will be a trickle-down impact.
“When people see that shocking number, far too many are going to choose to opt out and that puts us all in a vulnerable position and especially them. The skyrocketing cost will hit all of us. They will be able to adjust, but we need action now. We need leadership in Washington to care about working families,” said Congresswoman Brittany Pettersen, a Democrat representing Colorado’s 7th Congressional District.
Some Colorado Republicans in Congress are standing firm against the subsidies, saying they need reform before they can approve them.
“These subsidies that democrats are talking about are going to illegal immigrants. If we want to get the cost of healthcare down in Colorado, we have to stop paying for illegal immigrants. We have to stop being a sanctuary city and state, and we have to cut the red tape and regulations in Colorado that is strangling our economy to include healthcare,” said Congressman Gabe Evans, a Republican representing Colorado’s 8th Congressional District.
It’s important to note that those subsidies are only available to people in the nation lawfully.
They expire at the end of the year.
SNAP benefits set to run out on Saturday
With the federal government still shut down, SNAP benefits will halt for families across the nation. So how is Colorado going to handle it? Can there be a compromise or even a lawsuit that can stop it? While some continue to urge the federal government to act, the state of Colorado moved ahead with its plan to help cover for it.
Democratic members of the House Committee on Agriculture joined Colorado Congressman Joe Neguse on Wednesday in urging the Trump Administration to use $5 billion in contingency funding for food assistance.
“The Trump Administration has made a conscious decision to, and deliberate choice, to suspend snap benefits,” said Congressman Neguse, a Democrat representing Colorado’s second congressional district. “Over five billion dollars available today that could be used. That must be used under the law so that hungry families don’t starve.”
President Donald Trump and Speaker of the U.S. House Mike Johnson have said those funds cannot be used to cover the benefits.
“There was a memo that went out, basically saying that those contingency funds are supposed to be used in an emergency. That’s normally a natural disaster or something like that, not a government shutdown. So I think them talking and Speaker Johnson has talked about this and Trump has, basically saying this isn’t an emergency,” said Michael Fields, FOX31 political analyst and Republican strategist.
The calls from Congress come after Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser joined more than 20 other states in suing the USDA Secretary over the suspension of the benefits, marking the 40th time the state has sued the Trump administration. Fields said he does not think the administration will act on the emergency relief or lawsuit.
“I don’t think that it’s good policy. It’s not going to work. The fact that we are suing the federal government 40 times, I don’t think, is something that we should be celebrating, given the fact that this is all taxpayer money that we are talking about,” Fields said. “So I don’t think they are going to win this case. I think Phil Weiser should be putting pressure on Senator Hickenlooper and Senator Bennet to vote to reopen the government.”
The state’s Joint Budget Committee approved the use of $10 million in state funding to help offset the loss of SNAP dollars. JBC members said the funds go to food banks and pantries in the state to help meet demand, as the state cannot issue SNAP benefits.
Colorado
Colorado governor fires two clemency board members who spoke out about Tina Peters’ commutation | CNN Politics
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis on Wednesday fired two members of the state’s clemency board after they spoke out against his controversial decision to grant clemency to Tina Peters – an election denier whose sentence was cut in half by the outgoing Democratic governor in May.
Azra Taslimi and Hannah Seigel Proff told CNN they were fired after speaking out publicly, including in a New York Times article in June, in which they revealed secret details about the clemency process and criticized the governor for overruling the board. They told the Times the clemency board twice voted unanimously behind closed doors to reject Peters’ application for an early release from prison.
Polis’ decision in May to release Peters came after President Donald Trump waged a long pressure campaign against Colorado to free her. Peters – who was released from prison in June – was the last Trump ally still in prison for 2020 election-related crimes.
In letters to Taslimi and Proff obtained by CNN, Polis said the two members breached confidentiality by speaking out.
“Specifically, you breached the required duty of confidentiality by publicly divulging Board members’ votes pertaining to a clemency application which you obtained only through your official position on this Board,” Polis wrote in the letters.
The two women told CNN they are disappointed they were fired — but not surprised.
“I’m not upset that he overrode our decision. I think what’s upsetting is that we understand why he did it, which is that you know Tina Peters had a powerful ally behind her,” Taslimi said. “She had political pressure applied in her name, and the governor capitulated to it, and that is what makes this unfair, and that is why I call it selective mercy, because you are giving her the benefit that you don’t give or apply to anyone else.”
Eric Maruyama, a spokesperson for the governor, told CNN in a statement Wednesday, “Publicly disclosing board recommendations and how members vote on any case threatens the credibility of the board, colors future deliberations by the board and breaks clearly stated confidentiality policy articulated in the Executive Order which establishes this board.”
Proff, who served on the board for nearly eight years, said she understood the state rules around the closed-door clemency recommendation process “more as the confidentiality to protect the people who apply for clemency, not to protect the governor.”
The governor primarily justified his decision to release Peters by citing a recent Colorado appeals court ruling that found the trial judge violated Peters’ First Amendment rights by improperly punishing her for her protected speech about the 2020 election.
“It was a straightforward decision because, after reviewing the facts, and reading the Appeals Court decision, I concluded that her sentence was simply too long,” Polis wrote in a Substack post, where he condemned Peters’ crimes.
Now that they’ve been terminated, Proff worries there will be less transparency.
“I worry now that we’ve been terminated from the board what comes of this is that people are less likely to speak out … that politicians will go unchecked on these sort of decisions,” Proff said.
-
Maine3 minutes agoMagalloway Conservation Project in western Maine nearing completion
-
Maryland6 minutes agoBaltimore Gas and Electric seeks $8 monthly rate increase for Maryland customers
-
Michigan11 minutes agoMichigan lawmakers work through the night on ‘compromise’ budget
-
Massachusetts18 minutes agoMassachusetts city imposes curfew ahead of historic World Cup match
-
Minnesota21 minutes ago
Where to watch Minnesota Lynx vs New York Liberty on July 3: TV channel, start time and streaming
-
Mississippi26 minutes agoList of Jackson area events to celebrate July 4th before firework shows
-
Missouri33 minutes agoMost Missouri state and Columbia offices closed Friday; Columbia parking meters will not be enforced during Fourth of July weekend | 93.9 The Eagle
-
Montana36 minutes agoDodging rocks and chasing memories on Montana’s Smith River
