Connect with us

California

Unique Provisions of California’s Budget Bill – Part IV – California Globe

Published

on

Unique Provisions of California’s Budget Bill – Part IV – California Globe


The California state price range is the biggest within the nation, and it additionally represents the biggest invoice in web page size and variety of provisions. Whereas its provisions are too many to cowl, there are a variety of them which might be distinctive and readers ought to pay attention to them. This text is the fourth in a collection.

So, what are a few of these distinctive provisions of California’s Funds Invoice?

Financial savings from Efficiencies

This part, with specified exceptions, requires changes to objects of appropriation to mirror any internet financial savings achieved by efficiencies or cost-reduction measures. The Director of Finance is granted authority to make changes to objects of appropriation.

Advertisement

SEC. 4.05.

However some other regulation, every merchandise of appropriation supplied on this act or different spending authority supplied outdoors of this act, except these for the California State College, the College of California, Hastings School of the Regulation, the Legislature, and the Judicial Department, shall be adjusted, as applicable, to mirror the online financial savings achieved by operational efficiencies and different cost-reduction measures together with, however not restricted to, reorganizations, eliminations of boards and commissions, fee modifications, contract reductions, elimination of extra positions, and the cancellation or postponement of data know-how initiatives. The Director of Finance shall allocate the required adjustment to every merchandise of appropriation or different spending authority to mirror financial savings achieved. The Director of Finance could authorize an augmentation to any merchandise of appropriation supplied on this act or outdoors this act to mirror the prices associated to reorganizations, consolidations, or eliminations of companies, departments, boards, commissions, or packages. The Division of Finance shall make the ultimate willpower of the budgetary and accounting transactions to make sure correct implementation of reorganizations and eliminations.

DOF Reporting

This part is meant to make public how departments use place authority for positions approved for funding of their respective departments. The Division of Finance is required to report back to the Legislature by every January 10 and submit this data on its web site.

SEC. 4.11.

Advertisement

To advertise higher transparency in how departments use place authority, the Division of Finance shall report back to the Joint Legislative Funds Committee and Legislative Analyst by January 10 of every yr the previous yr precise numbers for every of the next: (1) proportion of vacant positions for every division, by month; (2) whole approved positions for every division; and (3) common proportion of vacant positions all year long for every division. This report shall be posted on the Division of Finance’s web site and simply accessible by the general public from the division’s eBudget web site.

DGS Reimbursements

These sections of the California Funds Invoice (Sections 4.72 and 4.75) require reimbursement to the Division of Common Companies for actions associated to engineering assessments and electrical automobile charging infrastructure at state services, in addition to for centralized prices billed by the statewide surcharge.

Funds for Attorneys’ Charges

Part 5.25 requires cost of attorneys’ charges arising from actions in state courts towards state companies to be paid from objects of appropriation that assist the state operations of the affected company, division, board, bureau, or fee. The Controller can solely make these funds in full and ultimate satisfaction of the declare, settlement, compromise, or judgment for legal professional’s charges incurred in reference to a single motion.

Advertisement

Eligibility for Federal Applications

This part (Part 8.50) supplies, in making appropriations to state companies which might be eligible for federal packages, it’s the intent and understanding of the Legislature that purposes made by the companies for federal funds below federal packages are to be for the utmost quantity allowable below federal regulation. Subsequently, any quantities obtained from the federal authorities are hereby appropriated from federal funds for expenditure or for switch to, and disbursement from, the State Treasury fund established for the aim of receiving the federal help topic to any provisions of this act that apply to the expenditure of those funds.

Use of Federal Funds for Similar Function

This part authorizes the Director of Finance to scale back state appropriations if federal belief funds are obtained for a similar function. The next language supplies:

SEC. 8.52.

Advertisement

(a) The Director of Finance could scale back objects of appropriation upon receipt or expenditure of federal belief funds in lieu of the quantity appropriated for a similar function and should make allocations for the aim of offsetting expenditures. Allocations made for the aim of offsetting current expenditures shall be utilized as a detrimental expenditure to the appropriation the place the expenditure was charged.

Reporting of Federal Fund Reductions

This part expresses the intent of the Legislature for it to be notified when there are reductions to federal funds appropriated within the state price range invoice. The next is an instance of that language:

SEC. 8.53.

It’s the intent of the Legislature that reductions to federal funds appropriated within the Funds Invoice enacted for every fiscal yr, ensuing from federal audits, be communicated to the Legislature in a well timed method. Subsequently, however some other regulation, an company, division, or different state entity receiving a ultimate federal audit or deferral letter shall present a replica of it to the Chairperson of the Joint Legislative Funds Committee inside 30 days.

Advertisement

Amassing Federal Funds for Oblique Prices

This part expresses the intent of the Legislature that the State try to gather federal funds for sure state oblique prices. The next is an instance of that language:

SEC. 8.54.

(a) It’s the intent of the Legislature that the State of California gather federally allowable statewide oblique prices, besides the place prohibited by federal statutes. If the Division of Finance determines a state company just isn’t recovering allowable statewide oblique prices from the federal authorities as required by Sections 13332.01 and 13332.02 of the Authorities Code, the Division of Finance could scale back any appropriation for state operations for the state company by an quantity to not exceed 1 p.c and switch that quantity to the Central Service Value Restoration Fund, the Common Fund, or each, as allotted by the Division of Finance.

Administrative Approval Course of for Federal Funds

Advertisement

This part expresses the intent of the Legislature that the State present flexibility and streamlining of the executive approval course of for offering funds to satisfy sure matching necessities. The next is an instance of that language:

SEC. 8.75.

(a) In an effort to maximize the state’s receipt of federal funds, it’s the intent of the Legislature in enacting this part to offer flexibility and streamline the executive approval course of for offering funds, together with funds from the Common Fund, to satisfy state matching necessities and take full benefit of funding alternatives made out there below the Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act (P.L. 117-58). It is usually the intent of the Legislature in enacting this part to extra usually present flexibility for budgetary changes to appropriations for infrastructure and infrastructure-related functions, to expend unanticipated federal funds obtained by the state which might be out there for such functions, and provide using state funds, if relevant.

(b) Within the occasion that unanticipated formulation or aggressive fund alternatives are made out there for a state division below the Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act, the Director of Finance could present the division a letter of dedication, if one is required, for funds from an current appropriation, together with funds from the Common Fund, if the division lacks an alternate viable funding supply and supplied the proposed use of the extra federal funds is in step with common makes use of of the appropriated funds supplied as match, to point the state’s dedication to satisfy the state match necessities mandated for Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act packages.

(c) Within the occasion that unanticipated formulation or aggressive fund alternatives below the Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act are awarded to a state division, the Division of Finance could alter any merchandise in Part 2.00 or create a brand new merchandise to offer funds from an current appropriation, together with funds from the Common Fund, if the division lacks an alternate viable funding supply, to satisfy state match necessities mandated for Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act packages supplied the proposed use of the extra federal funds is in step with common makes use of of the appropriated funds supplied as match.

Advertisement

(d) The Division of Finance could allocate unanticipated federal funds to impact or scale back, in complete or partly, in an quantity equal to the federal funds to be allotted, any merchandise of appropriation for infrastructure and infrastructure-related functions, together with appropriations from current federal funding sources, if in step with the needs for which the unanticipated federal funds have been made out there. Any financial savings pursuant to this part shall revert to the fund from which the appropriation was made.

(e) The Division of Finance could create a brand new price range merchandise to accommodate unanticipated federal funds from the Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act supposed for infrastructure functions ought to an relevant merchandise of appropriation not exist within the state price range.

(f) Any adjustment pursuant to this part shall not be made previous to 30 days after the Director of Finance notifies the Chairperson of the Joint Legislative Funds Committee in writing of the needs of the deliberate adjustment, and justification for the adjustment quantity. The Chairperson of the Joint Legislative Funds Committee, or the chairperson’s designee, could shorten or waive that 30-day interval by written notification to the Director of Finance.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

Caitlyn Jenner says she'd 'destroy' Kamala Harris in hypothetical race to be CA gov

Published

on

Caitlyn Jenner says she'd 'destroy' Kamala Harris in hypothetical race to be CA gov


Caitlyn Jenner, the gold-medal Olympian-turned reality TV personality, is considering another run for Governor of California. This time, she says, if she were to go up against Vice President Kamala Harris, she would “destroy her.” 

Advertisement

Jenner, who publicly came out as transgender nearly 10 years ago, made a foray into politics when she ran as a Republican during the recall election that attempted to unseat Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2021. Jenner only received one percent of the vote and was not considered a serious candidate. 

Jenner posted this week on social media that she’s having conversations with “many people” and hopes to have an announcement soon about whether she will run. 

Caitlyn Jenner speaks at the 4th annual Womens March LA: Women Rising at Pershing Square on January 18, 2020 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Chelsea Guglielmino/Getty Images)

Advertisement

She has also posted in Trumpian-style all caps: “MAKE CA GREAT AGAIN!”

As for VP Harris, she has not indicated any future plans for when she leaves office. However, a recent poll suggests Harris would have a sizable advantage should she decide to run in 2026. At that point, Newsom cannot run again because of term limits. 

Advertisement

If Jenner decides to run and wins, it would mark the nation and state’s first transgender governor.  



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Northern California 6-year-old, parents hailed as heroes for saving woman who crashed into canal

Published

on

Northern California 6-year-old, parents hailed as heroes for saving woman who crashed into canal


LIVE OAK — A six-year-old and her parents are being called heroes by a Northern California community for jumping into a canal to save a 75-year-old woman who drove off the road. 

It happened on Larkin Road near Paseo Avenue in the Sutter County community of Live Oak on Monday. 

“I just about lost her, but I didn’t,” said Terry Carpenter, husband of the woman who was rescued. “We got more chances.” 

Terry said his wife of 33 years, Robin Carpenter, is the love of his life and soulmate. He is grateful he has been granted more time to spend with her after she survived her car crashing off a two-lane road and overturning into a canal. 

Advertisement

“She’s doing really well,” Terry said. “No broken bones, praise the Lord.” 

It is what some call a miracle that could have had a much different outcome without a family of good Samaritans. 

“Her lips were purple,” said Ashley Martin, who helped rescue the woman. “There wasn’t a breath at all. I was scared.” 

Martin and her husband, Cyle Johnson, are being hailed heroes by the Live Oak community for jumping into the canal, cutting Robin out of her seat belt and pulling her head above water until first responders arrived. 

“She was literally submerged underwater,” Martin said. “She had a back brace on. Apparently, she just had back surgery. So, I grabbed her brace from down below and I flipped her upward just in a quick motion to get her out of that water.” 

Advertisement

The couple said the real hero was their six-year-old daughter, Cayleigh Johnson. 

“It was scary,” Cayleigh said. “So the car was going like this, and it just went boom, right into the ditch.” 

Cayleigh was playing outside and screamed for her parents who were inside the house near the canal.

I spoke with Robin from her hospital bed over the phone who told us she is in a lot of pain but grateful.

“The thing I can remember is I started falling asleep and then I was going over the bump and I went into the ditch and that’s all I remember,” Robin said. 

Advertisement

It was a split-second decision for a family who firefighters said helped save a stranger’s life. 

“It’s pretty unique that someone would jump in and help somebody that they don’t even know,” said Battalion Chief for Sutter County Fire Richard Epperson. 

Robin is hopeful that she will be released from the hospital on Wednesday in time to be home for Thanksgiving. 

“She gets Thanksgiving and Christmas now with her family and grandkids,” Martin said. 

Terry and Robin are looking forward to eventually meeting the family who helped save Robin’s life. The family expressed the same feelings about meeting the woman they helped when she is out of the hospital. 

Advertisement

“I can’t wait for my baby to get home,” Terry said. 



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program

Published

on

California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program


California Gov. Gavin Newsom may exclude Tesla and other automakers from an electric vehicle (EV) rebate program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases.

Newsom proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which was phased out in 2023 after funding more than 594,000 vehicles and saving more than 456 million gallons of fuel, the governor’s office said in a news release on Monday.

Advertisement

“Consumers continue to prove the skeptics wrong – zero-emission vehicles are here to stay,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future – we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The proposed rebates would be funded with money from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters under the state’s cap-and-trade program, the governor’s office said. Officials did not say how much the program would cost or save consumers.

NEBRASKA AG LAUNCHES ASSAULT AGAINST CALIFORNIA’S ELECTRIC VEHICLE PUSH

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images, File / Getty Images)

They would also include changes to promote innovation and competition in the zero-emission vehicles market – changes that could prevent automakers like Tesla from qualifying for the rebates.

Advertisement

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who relocated Tesla’s corporate headquarters from California to Texas in 2021, responded to the possibility of having Tesla EVs left out of the program.

Tesla automobile plugged in and charging a Supercharger rapid battery charging station for the electric vehicle company Tesla Motors, in the Silicon Valley town of Mountain View, California, August 24, 2016.

Tesla and other automakers may not qualify for the proposed tax credits, according to the governor’s office. (Getty Images, File / Getty Images)

“Even though Tesla is the only company who manufactures their EVs in California! This is insane,” Musk wrote on X, which he also owns.

BENTLEY PUSHES BACK ALL-EV LINEUP TIMELINE TO 2035

Those buying or leasing Tesla vehicles accounted for about 42% of the state’s rebates, The Associated Press reported, citing data from the California Air Resources Board.

Newsom’s office told Fox Business Digital that the proposal is intended to foster market competition, and any potential market cap is subject to negotiation with the state Legislature. 

Advertisement
Ticker Security Last Change Change %
TSLA TESLA INC. 338.59 -13.97 -3.96%

“Under a potential market cap, and depending on what the cap is, there’s a possibility that Tesla and other automakers could be excluded,” the governor’s office said. “But that’s again subject to negotiations with the legislature.”

Newsom’s office noted that such market caps have been part of rebate programs since George W. Bush’s administration in 2005.

Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom

Newsom has pushed Californians to replace gas-powered vehicles with zero-emission vehicles. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images / Getty Images)

Federal tax credits for EVs are currently worth up to $7,500 for new zero-emission vehicles. President-elect Trump has previously vowed to end the credit.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

California has surpassed 2 million zero-emission vehicles sold, according to the governor’s office. The state, however, could face a $2 billion budget deficit next year, Reuters reported, citing a non-partisan legislative estimate released last week.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending