Connect with us

California

Unique Provisions of California’s Budget Bill – Part III – California Globe

Published

on

Unique Provisions of California’s Budget Bill – Part III – California Globe


The California state funds is the most important within the nation, and it additionally represents the most important invoice in web page size and variety of provisions. Whereas its provisions are too many to cowl, there are a selection of them which can be distinctive and readers ought to concentrate on them. This text is the third in a collection.

So, what are a few of these distinctive provisions of California’s Funds Invoice?

Common Sections and Definitions

The state funds invoice, after all the 1000’s of appropriations are made beneath the respective businesses, departments, boards, commissions, and different state entities, incorporates many pages beneath the title, “Common Sections Statewide.”

Advertisement

These sections start with provisions pertains to salaries and different bills incurred by the state entity or its workers. Furthermore, the funds appropriated for capital outlay embody the acquisition of actual property that shall be owned by the state, in addition to different bills, reminiscent of these incurred for buying the land. There are additionally particular guidelines associated to appropriations which can be made pursuant to a schedule.

As well as, this part features a collection of definitions, together with for the next phrases: “packages”; “tasks”; “research”; “acquisition”; “preliminary plans”; “working drawings”; “building”; “efficiency standards”; “design-build”; and, “minor tasks.” The next is the language associated to those provisions discovered within the California State Funds:

SEC. 3.00.

At any time when herein an appropriation is made for help, it shall embody salaries and all different correct bills, together with repairs and gear, incurred in reference to the establishment, division, board, bureau, fee, officer, worker, or different company for which the appropriation is made.

Every merchandise appropriating funds for salaries and wages consists of the extra funds essential to proceed the fee of the quantity of salaries in impact on June 30, 2022, for the state officers whose salaries are specified by statute.

Advertisement

At any time when herein an appropriation is made for capital outlay, it could embody acquisition of land or different actual property to be owned by the state. It might additionally embody minor tasks, research, specs, design, building, and gear vital in reference to a building, restore, or enchancment venture on state-owned or state-leased property.

At any time when herein any merchandise of appropriation incorporates provisions for acquisition of land or different actual property, it shall embody all vital bills in reference to the acquisition of the property.

At any time when herein an appropriation is made in accordance with a schedule set forth after the appropriation, the expenditures from that merchandise for every program or venture included within the schedule shall be restricted to the quantity specified for that program or venture, besides as in any other case offered on this act. Every schedule is a restriction or limitation upon the expenditure of the respective appropriation made by this act, doesn’t itself applicable any moneys, and isn’t itself an merchandise of appropriation.

DOF Transfers

This part permits the Division of Finance to switch fund amongst particular person capital outlay gadgets of appropriations in specified situations. It additionally expresses the intent of the Legislature on this regard. The next is the language usually discovered within the California Funds Invoice:

Advertisement

SEC. 3.10.

However every other legislation, and in accordance with legislative intent, the Division of Finance could authorize subschedule transfers, as outlined in Part 3.00, inside particular person capital outlay gadgets of appropriation in these situations the place the transfers are vital for the environment friendly and cost-effective implementation of the tasks funded by this act.

Fees for Salaries and Wages

This part units forth all the advantages that include the appropriations for salaries which can be paid to state entity workers, in addition to different worker advantages and administrative prices.

SEC. 3.50.

Advertisement

At any time when an appropriation is made for help or different bills for an establishment, division, board, bureau, fee, officer, worker, or different company, the next shall be charged to the appropriation from which salaries and wages are paid: employees’ compensation, compensation paid to workers on accredited go away of absence on account of illness, unemployment compensation advantages, industrial incapacity go away and funds, nonindustrial incapacity advantages and funds, the executive prices of the Advantage Award Program offered by Part 19823 of the Authorities Code, the state’s contribution to the Public Workers’ Retirement Fund as offered by Sections 20822 and 20824 of the Authorities Code, the state’s contribution to the Lecturers’ Retirement Fund as offered by Sections 22950, 22951, and 23000 of the Training Code, the state’s contribution to the Outdated Age and Survivors’ Insurance coverage Revolving Fund as offered by Sections 22601 and 22602 of the Authorities Code, the state’s contribution to the Outdated Age and Survivors’ Insurance coverage Revolving Fund for fee of hospital insurance coverage taxes imposed by the Inside Income Code, the state’s contribution to the Public Workers’ Contingency Reserve Fund, the state’s contribution for the price of well being advantages plans as offered by Sections 22871, 22881, and subdivision (b) of Part 22883 of the Authorities Code, and the state’s contribution for prices of different worker advantages and the executive prices related to the supply of advantages established by any state company legally approved to barter and set wage and profit ranges.

As of the efficient date of this act, the state’s contributions, as offered by Sections 22871, 22881, and subdivision (b) of Part 22883 of the Authorities Code, for prices of every other worker advantages and the executive prices related to the provisions of those advantages established by any state company legally approved to barter and set wage and profit ranges for any month shall be charged to the identical appropriations used for fee of salaries and wages from which the worker premium contributions for such month are deducted.

Retirement Contributions

This part offers with employers’ retirement contribution for the present fiscal yr for these officers and workers who’re members of CalPERS and or the judges’ retirement system. It additionally specifies the chances for the employer contributions for retirement advantages.

SEC. 3.60.

Advertisement

(a) However every other legislation, the employers’ retirement contributions for the 2022–23 fiscal yr which can be chargeable to any merchandise with respect to every state officer and worker who’s a member of the Public Workers’ Retirement System (PERS) or the Judges’ Retirement System II and who’s in that employment or workplace shall be the proportion of salaries and wages by state member class, as follows:

Contributions for Prefunding Advantages

This part offers with contributions which can be appropriated with the intention to “prefund” different postemployment advantages for state officers and workers. The person bargaining models are specified and the Director of Finance has the authority to regulate quantities in any appropriation merchandise or class in specified situations.

SEC. 3.61.

Contribution to Prefund Different Postemployment Advantages.

Advertisement

(a) However every other legislation, the employers’ contribution for prefunding different postemployment advantages for the 2022–23 fiscal yr which can be chargeable to any merchandise with respect to every state officer and worker who’s a member of the Public Workers’ Retirement System, the Judges’ Retirement System, the Judges’ Retirement System II, or the Legislators’ Retirement System and who’s in that employment or workplace shall be the month-to-month greenback quantity or the proportion of pensionable compensation by bargaining unit, retirement class, fund supply, or state workplace, division, division, board, bureau, fee, group, or company, as follows:



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

Caitlyn Jenner says she'd 'destroy' Kamala Harris in hypothetical race to be CA gov

Published

on

Caitlyn Jenner says she'd 'destroy' Kamala Harris in hypothetical race to be CA gov


Caitlyn Jenner, the gold-medal Olympian-turned reality TV personality, is considering another run for Governor of California. This time, she says, if she were to go up against Vice President Kamala Harris, she would “destroy her.” 

Advertisement

Jenner, who publicly came out as transgender nearly 10 years ago, made a foray into politics when she ran as a Republican during the recall election that attempted to unseat Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2021. Jenner only received one percent of the vote and was not considered a serious candidate. 

Jenner posted this week on social media that she’s having conversations with “many people” and hopes to have an announcement soon about whether she will run. 

Caitlyn Jenner speaks at the 4th annual Womens March LA: Women Rising at Pershing Square on January 18, 2020 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Chelsea Guglielmino/Getty Images)

Advertisement

She has also posted in Trumpian-style all caps: “MAKE CA GREAT AGAIN!”

As for VP Harris, she has not indicated any future plans for when she leaves office. However, a recent poll suggests Harris would have a sizable advantage should she decide to run in 2026. At that point, Newsom cannot run again because of term limits. 

Advertisement

If Jenner decides to run and wins, it would mark the nation and state’s first transgender governor.  



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Northern California 6-year-old, parents hailed as heroes for saving woman who crashed into canal

Published

on

Northern California 6-year-old, parents hailed as heroes for saving woman who crashed into canal


LIVE OAK — A six-year-old and her parents are being called heroes by a Northern California community for jumping into a canal to save a 75-year-old woman who drove off the road. 

It happened on Larkin Road near Paseo Avenue in the Sutter County community of Live Oak on Monday. 

“I just about lost her, but I didn’t,” said Terry Carpenter, husband of the woman who was rescued. “We got more chances.” 

Terry said his wife of 33 years, Robin Carpenter, is the love of his life and soulmate. He is grateful he has been granted more time to spend with her after she survived her car crashing off a two-lane road and overturning into a canal. 

Advertisement

“She’s doing really well,” Terry said. “No broken bones, praise the Lord.” 

It is what some call a miracle that could have had a much different outcome without a family of good Samaritans. 

“Her lips were purple,” said Ashley Martin, who helped rescue the woman. “There wasn’t a breath at all. I was scared.” 

Martin and her husband, Cyle Johnson, are being hailed heroes by the Live Oak community for jumping into the canal, cutting Robin out of her seat belt and pulling her head above water until first responders arrived. 

“She was literally submerged underwater,” Martin said. “She had a back brace on. Apparently, she just had back surgery. So, I grabbed her brace from down below and I flipped her upward just in a quick motion to get her out of that water.” 

Advertisement

The couple said the real hero was their six-year-old daughter, Cayleigh Johnson. 

“It was scary,” Cayleigh said. “So the car was going like this, and it just went boom, right into the ditch.” 

Cayleigh was playing outside and screamed for her parents who were inside the house near the canal.

I spoke with Robin from her hospital bed over the phone who told us she is in a lot of pain but grateful.

“The thing I can remember is I started falling asleep and then I was going over the bump and I went into the ditch and that’s all I remember,” Robin said. 

Advertisement

It was a split-second decision for a family who firefighters said helped save a stranger’s life. 

“It’s pretty unique that someone would jump in and help somebody that they don’t even know,” said Battalion Chief for Sutter County Fire Richard Epperson. 

Robin is hopeful that she will be released from the hospital on Wednesday in time to be home for Thanksgiving. 

“She gets Thanksgiving and Christmas now with her family and grandkids,” Martin said. 

Terry and Robin are looking forward to eventually meeting the family who helped save Robin’s life. The family expressed the same feelings about meeting the woman they helped when she is out of the hospital. 

Advertisement

“I can’t wait for my baby to get home,” Terry said. 



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program

Published

on

California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program


California Gov. Gavin Newsom may exclude Tesla and other automakers from an electric vehicle (EV) rebate program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases.

Newsom proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which was phased out in 2023 after funding more than 594,000 vehicles and saving more than 456 million gallons of fuel, the governor’s office said in a news release on Monday.

Advertisement

“Consumers continue to prove the skeptics wrong – zero-emission vehicles are here to stay,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future – we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The proposed rebates would be funded with money from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters under the state’s cap-and-trade program, the governor’s office said. Officials did not say how much the program would cost or save consumers.

NEBRASKA AG LAUNCHES ASSAULT AGAINST CALIFORNIA’S ELECTRIC VEHICLE PUSH

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images, File / Getty Images)

They would also include changes to promote innovation and competition in the zero-emission vehicles market – changes that could prevent automakers like Tesla from qualifying for the rebates.

Advertisement

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who relocated Tesla’s corporate headquarters from California to Texas in 2021, responded to the possibility of having Tesla EVs left out of the program.

Tesla automobile plugged in and charging a Supercharger rapid battery charging station for the electric vehicle company Tesla Motors, in the Silicon Valley town of Mountain View, California, August 24, 2016.

Tesla and other automakers may not qualify for the proposed tax credits, according to the governor’s office. (Getty Images, File / Getty Images)

“Even though Tesla is the only company who manufactures their EVs in California! This is insane,” Musk wrote on X, which he also owns.

BENTLEY PUSHES BACK ALL-EV LINEUP TIMELINE TO 2035

Those buying or leasing Tesla vehicles accounted for about 42% of the state’s rebates, The Associated Press reported, citing data from the California Air Resources Board.

Newsom’s office told Fox Business Digital that the proposal is intended to foster market competition, and any potential market cap is subject to negotiation with the state Legislature. 

Advertisement
Ticker Security Last Change Change %
TSLA TESLA INC. 338.59 -13.97 -3.96%

“Under a potential market cap, and depending on what the cap is, there’s a possibility that Tesla and other automakers could be excluded,” the governor’s office said. “But that’s again subject to negotiations with the legislature.”

Newsom’s office noted that such market caps have been part of rebate programs since George W. Bush’s administration in 2005.

Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom

Newsom has pushed Californians to replace gas-powered vehicles with zero-emission vehicles. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images / Getty Images)

Federal tax credits for EVs are currently worth up to $7,500 for new zero-emission vehicles. President-elect Trump has previously vowed to end the credit.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

California has surpassed 2 million zero-emission vehicles sold, according to the governor’s office. The state, however, could face a $2 billion budget deficit next year, Reuters reported, citing a non-partisan legislative estimate released last week.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending