Connect with us

California

The California Digital Infrastructure Act – California Globe

Published

on

The California Digital Infrastructure Act – California Globe


California has quite a few formal acts in statute. Public Utilities Code Division 2.5 gives The Digital Infrastructure and Video Competitors Act of 2006, which is contained in Part 5800 to 5970. Division 2.5 was added in 2006 by Chapter 700. Part 5800 names the Act.

Part 5810 gives quite a few legislative findings and declarations together with that rising competitors for video and broadband providers is a matter of statewide concern for 4 major causes. Furthermore, laws to develop this new course of ought to adhere to specified rules.

As well as, the general public curiosity is greatest served when enough funds are appropriated to the Public Utilities Fee (PUC) to supply enough employees and sources to appropriately and well timed course of functions of video service suppliers and to make sure full compliance with the necessities of this division.

Lastly, it’s the intent of the Legislature {that a} video service supplier should pay as lease a franchise charge to the native entity in whose jurisdiction service is being offered for the continued use of streets, public amenities, and different rights-of-way of the native entity with a purpose to present service. It’s the intent of the Legislature that collective bargaining agreements be revered. And, it’s the intent of the Legislature that the definition of gross revenues on this division should end in native entities sustaining their present degree of income from franchise charges.

Advertisement

Part 5820 gives that nothing on this division is deemed to create a vested proper in a state-issued franchise by the franchise holder or its associates that might preclude the state from amending the provisions that set up the phrases and circumstances of a franchise. And, the holder of a state franchise is just not deemed a public utility on account of offering video service beneath this division.

Part 5830 gives definitions for the next phrases: “broadband”; “cable operator”; “cable service”; “cable system”; “fee”; “franchise”; “franchise charge”; “holder”; “holder of a state franchise”; “incumbent cable operator”; “native entity”; “native franchising entity”; “community”; “open-video system”; “OVS operator”; “public rights-of-way”; “state franchise”; “subscriber”; “video programming”; “video service”; and, “video service supplier.”

Part 5840 gives that the PUC is the only real franchising authority for a state franchise to supply video service beneath this division. The appliance for a state franchise have to be made on a type prescribed by the PUC and should embody specified info. The state franchise issued by the PUC should include specified info. It’s illegal to supply video service with out a state or domestically issued franchise. There’s a state franchise charge payable as lease or a toll for the usage of the general public rights-of-way by holders of the state franchise issued pursuant to this division. The state franchise charge should apply equally to all video service suppliers within the native entity’s jurisdiction.

Part 5850 gives {that a} state-issued franchise is barely legitimate for 10 years after the date of issuance, and the holder should apply for a renewal of the state franchise for an extra 10-year interval if it needs to proceed to supply video providers within the space lined by the franchise after the expiration of the franchise.

Part 5860 gives that the holder of a state franchise that provides video service inside the jurisdiction of the native entity should calculate and remit to the native entity a state franchise charge. The state franchise charge is a proportion of the holder’s gross revenues. No native entity or every other political subdivision of this state might demand any extra charges or costs or different remuneration of any type from the holder of a state franchise primarily based solely on its standing as a supplier of video or cable providers apart from as set forth on this division and will not demand the usage of every other calculation methodology or definition of gross revenues.

Advertisement

As well as, the time period “gross revenues” is outlined and doesn’t embody specified objects. No more than as soon as yearly, a neighborhood entity might look at the enterprise information of a holder of a state franchise to the extent fairly mandatory to make sure compensation in accordance with this part.

Part 5870 requires the holder of a state franchise to designate a enough quantity of capability on its community to permit the availability of the identical variety of public, instructional, and governmental entry (PEG) channels, as are activated and offered by the incumbent cable operator that has concurrently activated and offered the best variety of PEG channels inside the native entity beneath the phrases of any franchise in impact within the native entity as of January 1, 2007.

As well as, the PEG channels are for the unique use of the native entity or its designee to supply public, instructional, and governmental channels. The PEG channels can be utilized just for noncommercial functions. The native entity is required to make sure that all transmissions, content material, or programming to be transmitted by a holder of a state franchise are offered or submitted in a way or type that’s appropriate with the holder’s community, if the native entity produces or maintains the PEG programming in that method or type.

Lastly, a neighborhood entity might, by ordinance, set up a charge to assist PEG channel amenities in step with federal regulation that might turn into efficient subsequent to the expiration of any charge imposed. The charge can’t exceed 1 p.c of the holder’s gross revenues.

Part 5880 requires holders of state franchises to adjust to the Emergency Alert System necessities of the Federal Communications Fee so that emergency messages could also be distributed over the holder’s community.

Advertisement

Part 5885 requires the native entity to permit the holder of a state franchise beneath this division to put in, assemble, and keep a community inside public rights-of-way beneath the identical time, place, and method because the provisions governing phone firms beneath relevant state and federal regulation. The time period “encroachment allow” is outlined.

Part 5890 gives {that a} cable operator or video service supplier that has been granted a state franchise beneath this division might not discriminate in opposition to or deny entry to service to any group of potential residential subscribers due to the revenue of the residents within the native space through which the group resides.

Part 5895 requires the PUC to gather granular knowledge on the precise places served by the holder of a state franchise.

Part 5900 requires the holder of a state franchise to adjust to specified sections of the Authorities Code, and every other customer support requirements pertaining to the availability of video service established by federal regulation or regulation or adopted by subsequent enactment of the Legislature. All customer support and shopper safety requirements beneath this part have to be interpreted and utilized to accommodate newer or completely different applied sciences whereas assembly or exceeding the objectives of the requirements.

Part 5910 requires the holder of a state franchise to carry out background checks of candidates for employment, in accordance with present enterprise practices.

Advertisement

Part 5920 requires a holder of a state franchise using greater than 750 complete workers in California to yearly report back to the PUC specified info.

Part 5930 gives that any video service supplier that at present holds a franchise with a neighborhood franchising entity in a county that could be a celebration, both alone or along side every other native franchising entity positioned in that county, to a stipulation and consent judgment executed by the events thereto and accredited by a federal district courtroom should neither be entitled to hunt a state franchise in any space of that county, together with any unincorporated space and any included metropolis of that county, nor abrogate any present franchise earlier than July 1, 2014.

Part 5940 gives that the holder of a state franchise beneath this division who additionally gives stand-alone, residential, major line, fundamental phone service can’t improve this charge to finance the price of deploying a community to supply video service.

Part 5950 prohibits the PUC from allowing a phone company that’s offering video service straight or by its associates pursuant to a state-issued franchise as an incumbent native change provider to extend charges for residential, major line, fundamental phone service above the speed as of July 1, 2006, till January 1, 2009, until that phone company is regulated beneath charge of return regulation.

Part 5970 gives {that a} state franchise could also be transferred to any successor in curiosity of the holder to which the certificates initially is granted, whether or not this switch is by merger, sale, project, chapter, restructuring, or every other sort of transaction, offered that specified circumstances are met.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence

Published

on

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence


A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.

The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.

In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.

The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”

Advertisement

“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Bird Flu Virus Identified In Raw Milk Sold In California

Published

on

Bird Flu Virus Identified In Raw Milk Sold In California


The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) has detected the avian influenza or “bird flu” virus in a sample of a raw milk product. The product which was for sale at retailers at the time of the testing has now been recalled by the producer after the state of California requested it’s withdrawal from sale.

The affected product is cream top, whole raw milk produced and packaged by Raw Farm, LLC of Fresno County with lot code 2024110. The best buy date of the batch is 11. Nov, 2024 meaning consumers could still have it in their homes. No illnesses have currently been reported from this batch of milk, but people can take several days to develop bird flu after exposure. According to the World Health Organization, most people develop symptoms within 2-5 days, but can take up to 17 days to develop.

Advertisement

According to the CDC, bird flu symptoms may include fever or feeling feverish or chills, eye redness or irritation, and respiratory symptoms, such as cough, sore throat, runny or stuffy nose, muscle or body aches, headaches, and tiredness.

Customers should not consume any product matching the description above and should return the product to stores or dispose of it. The CDPH is also in the process of informing re also in the process of informing retailers about the infected product to notify them to remove it from their shelves. The CDPH has since visited both locations of the company’s farms and has found no further evidence of bird flu. The CDPH will continue to test the farm’s milk twice a week.

Advertisement

The CDPH stresses that there is no risk of consuming pasteurized milk as the milk is heated to temperatures which inactivate bacteria and viruses. However raw milk does not go through this process, meaning any bacteria or viruses in the milk can be transferred to the consumer. Public health departments, as well as the CDC have long warned against the dangers of consuming raw milk, which has been responsible for outbreaks of Listeria, E. coli, Campylobacter and Salmonella, among other microbes.

California has been hit with bird flu outbreaks in both dairy cow herds and poultry farms with over 400 dairy herds affected as of 22. November. Twenty-nine human cases have also been recorded in the state, mostly individuals who have had close contact with infected livestock. The numbers of infected individuals are likely to be under reported and very little is known about the severity of disease in humans so far. Just two days ago, the CDC confirmed a case of H5N1 bird flu in a child in California with no known contact with livestock.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Heavy Rain And Flooding Turn Deadly In California – Videos from The Weather Channel

Published

on

Heavy Rain And Flooding Turn Deadly In California – Videos from The Weather Channel




Source link

Continue Reading

Trending