Connect with us

California

'Sip, return, repeat': How this California city is trying to normalize reusable cups

Published

on

'Sip, return, repeat': How this California city is trying to normalize reusable cups


Next month, more than 30 chain restaurants and locally owned coffee shops and eateries in Petaluma, California, will begin providing beverages in reusable cups by default as part of a first-of-its-kind pilot program meant to reduce pollution from single-use plastic.

Through the Petaluma Reusable Cup Project — a three-month pilot program sponsored by a food and beverage industry group called the NextGen Consortium — customers will be served hot and cold beverages in bright purple reusable plastic cups, unless they ask for disposables or bring their own mugs. After drinking their coffees, teas, or sodas, they’ll be able to return the cups at any of the participating establishments, or at one of 60 return receptacles placed strategically throughout the city.

A reuse logistics provider, Muuse, will be in charge of collecting, washing, and redistributing the clean cups back to the coffee shops and restaurants.

Advertisement

Kate Daly, managing director of the impact investment firm Closed Loop Partners — which oversees the NextGen Consortium — said the program will be a major milestone. Existing reusable cup programs tend to operate in sports stadiums, concert halls, and other confined spaces where it’s easier to keep track of inventory. No other citywide program in the U.S. has made reusable cups the default option across so many different foodservice brands.

The project aims to achieve an “unprecedented saturation of reusable packaging” within Petaluma, Daly told Grist. Thanks to funding from the NextGen Consortium — founded by Starbucks and McDonald’s and supported by companies including PepsiCo and Coca-Cola — she said hundreds of thousands of reusable cups will be deployed throughout the city in preparation for the program’s August 5 start date. 

Participating locations will include Starbucks, Peet’s Coffee, Dunkin’, KFC, and The Habit Burger Grill, as well as local cafes and restaurants like the Petaluma Pie Company and Tea Room Cafe. Closed Loop Partners said they selected Petaluma — a city of about 60,000 people just north of San Francisco — because of its dense, walkable downtown, and because of residents’ receptivity to reuse programs. Many people may have grown familiar with reuse last year, when Starbucks tested a smaller-scale reusable cup program at 12 locations between Petaluma and another city nearby. 

Although the new program is confined to Petaluma and will only last three months, it could help inform initiatives in other cities that are seeking to do away with single-use plastic packaging, the overwhelming majority of which is made from fossil fuels. The U.S. produces close to 40 million metric tons of plastic waste every year and recycles only 5 percent of it; the rest gets sent to landfills or incinerators, or ends up as litter. 

Read Next
Advertisement
What will it take to get companies to embrace reusable packaging?

Some types of plastic, including disposable cups, are even more unlikely to be recycled. According to the most recent data from the Environmental Protection Agency, from 2018, the U.S. produces more than 1 million tons of plastic plates and cups annually and recycles virtually none of it.

Reuse programs are supposed to help by driving down demand for new plastic packaging. Some initiatives allow customers to bring their own containers to grocery stores and restaurants; others involve store-owned containers that customers borrow and then return. According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, the most effective returnable container programs could reduce materials use by up to 75 percent and greenhouse gas emissions by up to 70 percent, compared to the status quo. The nonprofit also estimates that U.S. businesses could save some $10 billion in material costs if they replace just 20 percent of their single-use plastic packaging with reusable alternatives.

In designing the Petaluma Reusable Cup Project, Daly and her colleagues sought to ensure a smoother experience than what has been offered in previous trials, including some in the San Francisco Bay Area that were launched by the NextGen Consortium. One key focus was on what she called “precompetitive collaboration,” or getting businesses to buy into a common reuse system in which all of the elements — cups, logistics, messaging — are shared. This might go against companies’ competitive instincts, but it reduces costs so that businesses can participate in a larger reuse system instead of managing one on their own. 

Advertisement

To make the program easy to participate in, the Petaluma Reusable Cup Project will be free and won’t involve any customer tracking. Most other reusable cup programs rely on financial motivations to make sure inventory doesn’t get lost — either they charge customers a small, returnable deposit when they borrow a reusable container, or they take down the customer’s credit card information so they can be charged if they fail to return the container after a set amount of time. These options often require downloading a program-specific app.

In Petaluma, however, customers won’t have to do anything to participate — they’ll just order their drinks as normal, with no additional payment or exchange of personal information. A QR code on each cup will direct customers to a website with instructions on how and where to return them — at one of the participating eateries, in return receptacles on city streets or in convenience stores and supermarkets, or by scheduling a home pickup by Muuse.

Customers in a busy coffee shop. In the foreground, some sit at a wooden table. In the background, a customer orders from a barista. The room is brightly lit.
Rob Daly, owner and president of Avid Coffee, is excited to offer reusable cups — even if they don’t have his company’s logo on them. “I don’t need the cup to say ‘Avid’ on it or have a big A,” he said. He’d rather stand out on the basis of his coffee beans’ source and quality. Courtesy of Avid Coffee

Rob Daly (no relation to Kate) is owner and president of Avid Coffee, an independent coffee shop with a location in downtown Petaluma. He said the extensive network of return locations made it a “no-brainer” to participate in the Petaluma Reusable Cup Project. Having reliable access to a return point “takes the guesswork out of the consumer’s hands and makes it easier on them,” he told Grist. “When they walk out of my store and they see a drop point, whether it’s my drop point or at multiple locations that are around me or around town — that solves everything.”

Not charging for cups or tracking customers may encourage more people to participate, but it’s also something of a gamble. If lots of customers decided to keep or forgot to return their containers, the Petaluma Reusable Cup Project Project would have no way to hold anyone accountable — it would have to eat the cost of replacing those cups. But Kate Daly said her team has taken some steps to mitigate this problem, like labeling the cups with the message “sip, return, repeat” to remind customers not to throw them away. The cups’ bright purple color is meant to make them “the right kind of ugly,” as Kate Daly put it, to discourage people from keeping them at home.

More importantly, the cups are not individually very valuable — they’re made of an inexpensive rigid plastic called polypropylene — so it won’t represent a huge loss when some inevitably go missing.

Many other reuse programs have opted for polypropylene containers too, despite concerns that they can still leach toxic chemicals and the inherent challenges with recycling them. Some environmental groups argue that single-use plastics should be replaced with reusable containers made of metal and glass, which are more inert and easier to recycle. Most plastic can only be recycled once or twice before it has to be “downcycled” into lower-quality products like carpeting.

Advertisement

Kate Daly said the Petaluma project chose polypropylene because it weighs less than alternative materials and thus causes fewer greenhouse gas emissions during transport. She also said stainless steel cups sometimes get watermarks on them after many washing cycles, causing customers to think they’re unclean.

NextGen’s funding for the Petaluma Reusable Cup Project will last until the end of October. After that, it will be up to city officials to decide whether they want to continue — and find a way to pay for — the program, with or without any structural changes. 

Georgia Sherwin, Closed Loop Partners’ senior director of strategy and partnerships, told Grist that some return bins will stay up after the program’s end date so customers can continue bringing their cups back. “The results from the first three months of the initiative will ultimately inform the next rounds of iteration and what a continuation or future reuse program like this would look like in Petaluma and beyond,” she wrote in an email.

Once the cups are collected, Sherwin said her organization aims to “maximize their uses before being recycled,” potentially by donating them to local schools, cafeterias, and businesses.






Source link

Advertisement

California

California High-Speed Rail CEO arrested on suspicion of domestic battery; DA declines charges

Published

on

California High-Speed Rail CEO arrested on suspicion of domestic battery; DA declines charges



The CEO of the California High-Speed Rail Authority was arrested earlier this month in Folsom on suspicion of domestic battery, officials said Monday. However, prosecutors have declined to file charges.

The Folsom Police Department said Ian Choudri, 57, was taken into custody on February 4 along the 500 block of Borges Court.

While police confirmed the booking, additional details regarding the specific circumstances of the incident have not been released.

Advertisement

In a statement provided to CBS News Sacramento, Choudri’s attorney, Allen Sawyer, said the Sacramento County District Attorney’s Office did not file any charges against the CEO.

“I can confirm that the Sacramento District Attorney’s Office immediately declined to file charges when an incident report was forwarded to them by the Folsom Police Department,” Sawyer said. “Mr. Choudri was never asked to appear in court and this matter is over.”

The California High-Speed Rail Authority issued a brief statement following the announcement of the arrest, noting that it was “aware of the matter and is reviewing it.” The agency declined to comment further.

Choudri, a veteran of the transportation and construction industry, was appointed to lead the high-speed rail project in August 2024.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California gas prices surge 40 cents in just 2 weeks as impact of refinery closures weighs

Published

on

California gas prices surge 40 cents in just 2 weeks as impact of refinery closures weighs


Gas prices have surged in California in recent weeks as the state’s supply is constrained due to recent reductions in refining capacity.

The price of gas rose 40 cents in about two weeks, with the average price of gas across the state of California at $4.58 a gallon – an increase from $4.46 the prior week and $4.18 two weeks before that, according to data from AAA.

Advertisement

Those figures are well above the national average of $2.92 a gallon. California’s gas prices are the highest of all states, topping $4.37 a gallon in Hawaii, $4.15 a gallon in Washington and $3.68 a gallon in Oregon.

Rising gas prices in California come amid a reduction in oil refining capacity due to the wind down of operations at Valero’s refinery in Benicia, as well as the previous closure of the Phillips 66 refinery in Los Angeles. 

GAS PRICES FALL IN JANUARY, GIVING AMERICANS A BREAK AT THE PUMP

The Phillips 66 Wilmington refinery near Los Angeles previously closed. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

The closure of the Benicia refinery, located in Northern California, leaves just six operating refineries in the state, which is the largest consumer of fuel among all states except for Texas.

Advertisement

Two others are located in the Bay Area, including Chevron’s Richmond refinery and PBF Energy’s Martinez refinery. The other four are located in Southern California – Marathon’s Los Angeles refinery, Chevron’s El Segundo refinery, PBF Energy’s Torrance refinery and Valero’s Wilmington refinery.

The tightening refining supply prompted the California state senate’s Republican caucus to write a letter to Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom that called for a special session to address the worsening “cost and supply crisis” created by state policies targeting the oil and gas industry.

CALIFORNIA ‘TRULY AT A BREAKING POINT,’ STATE SENATOR SAYS AS REFINERIES CLOSE AND GAS PRICES SURGE

Valero’s Benicia refinery is scheduled to close, reducing the refining capacity in the state of California. (Paul Morris/Bloomberg)

“California is truly at a breaking point. Refineries are closing, supply is diminishing, and my constituents are paying more at the pump every single day,” Republican state Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares said in a report by FOX Business’ Jeff Flock that aired on “Mornings with Maria.”

Advertisement

“It isn’t theoretical, this is happening right now. And the longer we wait to address this issue, the more instability and volatility we’ll see here in California,” she added.

TRUMP CONSIDERS CAPPING STATE GAS TAX, SIGNALS POSSIBLE RELIEF FOR CALIFORNIANS

For the country as a whole, gas prices have trended down over the last year, according to the latest consumer price index (CPI) data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The BLS’ January CPI inflation report showed that gas prices are down 7.5% over the last year and that prices declined 3.2% from the prior month.

Advertisement

Nationwide energy prices have been largely flat in the last year, with the CPI showing the energy index down 0.1%.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Declines in gas prices have been somewhat offset by rising prices for electricity and utility gas service, which are up 6.3% and 9.8% over the last year, respectively.

FOX Business’ Arabella Bennett contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Sacramento Snapshot: New California bill would expand hunting and fishing opportunities for sick children

Published

on

Sacramento Snapshot: New California bill would expand hunting and fishing opportunities for sick children


An effort is underway in California to expand opportunities for hunting and fishing for youth with life-threatening illnesses or who have lost a parent in service to the state or country.

Sen. Steven Choi, R-Irvine, last week introduced legislation that would task California’s Fish and Game Commission with establishing a program to help these youth access more opportunities to fish and hunt big game or upland or migratory game birds. Examples of upland game birds are pheasant, quail and wild turkey; migratory game birds include band-tailed pigeons and mourning doves.

“For some young people facing serious illness, time is not a luxury they have,” said Choi, calling Senate Bill 1021 a measure “about compassion and responsible stewardship.”

Advertisement

“This bill creates a narrowly tailored and carefully supervised opportunity for them to experience the outdoors while fully respecting California’s conservation framework,” he said.

According to the bill’s fact sheet, youth generally have a difficult time obtaining the needed permits to hunt in California, given the limited number that exist. It said some 1,880 youth applied for the 16 big game tags available to them in 2018.

Sen. Steven Choi, R-Irvine during a press conference in Irvine on Friday, February 13, 2026 unveil a new bipartisan bill, SB 1021, meant to give terminal youth more opportunities for fishing and hunting. (Photo by Leonard Ortiz, Orange County Register/SCNG)

“This will create unforgettable experiences for youth with critical diagnoses and their families,” the fact sheet said. The bill “will bring awareness to the vital role hunting plays in managing California’s wildlife resources, and it will aid in the recruitment of the next generation of our state’s declining conservationists.”

While eligibility could vary based on a case-by-case medical review, Choi’s office said someone who is between 5 and 18 years old at the time of a referral could qualify for the program, although it would be possible to fulfill someone’s hunting or fishing request after turning 18 because of planning timelines.

The proposed legislation mirrors a similar law in Georgia, where the state is able to give authorization for terminally ill people who are 21 years or younger to hunt big game or alligators.

Advertisement

Choi’s bill, though, would open the program to youth under 18 years of age who have a life-threatening illness, defined, his office said, as a “progressive, degenerative or malignant (cancerous) condition that places the child’s life in jeopardy,” Choi’s office said. Diagnoses could include chronic lung diseases, cystic fibrosis or sickle cell anemia, among others.

And since the program is to be established by the Fish and Game Commission, it would also need to utilize existing wildlife management tools and be supervised by qualified instructors and guides, according to Choi’s office, and not weaken existing conservation protections.

Senate Bill 1021 counts Sen. Tony Strickland, R-Huntington Beach, as one of its co-authors. Sens. Christopher Cabaldon, D-Yolo, and Caroline Menjivar, D-San Fernando Valley, are also among the co-authors.

The bill is sponsored by Field of Dreams, a California-based nonprofit that helps children with serious medical diagnoses or special needs, as well as military and veteran families, to experience nature and outdoor activities.

Tom Dermody, the nonprofit’s founder, said the group is backing the bill “because it (Field of Dreams) recognizes that some kids cannot wait years for an opportunity that may never come. This bill gives them hope, dignity and a chance to create meaningful memories, all while respecting wildfire and conservation.”

Advertisement

In other news

• Gov. Gavin Newsom last week signed into law a bill meant to protect veterans. From Sen. Bob Archuleta, a Democrat whose district includes Brea and Placentia, the bill is designed to protect veterans from predatory and deceptive people or companies that claim to help them access their benefits.

“This is a clear victory for veterans and their families,” Archuleta, a U.S. Army combat veteran, said after the bill’s signing. “California is sending a strong message that exploitation of those who served will not be tolerated.”

The veterans bill had deeply divided legislators in the statehouse. Opponents, including Sen. Tom Umberg, a Santa Ana Democrat and a retired U.S. Army colonel, had expressed concerns that, while well-intentioned, it could create a system in which veterans are not allowed to choose how they file benefits claims.

• Newsom also signed legislation from Umberg last week: In this case, it was an antitrust bill meant to protect consumers and businesses with more clarity during merger reviews.

The new law will give the California attorney general earlier access to federal HSR merger filings, so the office will have more time to review and challenge anticompetitive mergers and give businesses earlier notice to address any potential concerns, according to Umberg’s office.

Advertisement

Umberg called the effort “a first-of-its-kind measure in the antitrust space, creating a fairer, more efficient merger review process that balances the needs of businesses while protecting consumers.”

• Assemblymember Tri Ta, R-Westminster, is behind a new bill to ensure genetic data is protected.

Assembly Bill 1727 would make it illegal to intentionally sell or transfer someone else’s DNA sample or genetic data to a third party without their consent. An example Ta’s office used in a statement: Someone could throw away a used straw; the bill would make it illegal for someone to pick up that straw and extract their genetic data without knowledge or consent.

“Taking a person’s DNA is not a lighthearted act,” said Ta. “It is a planned and malicious crime to steal someone’s genetic material and use it for any reason. That is why it is critical that there be real consequences.”

The bill does exempt law enforcement and higher education institutions from its provisions.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending