Connect with us

California

Northern California Horsemen Feeling Wave of Emotions

Published

on

Northern California Horsemen Feeling Wave of Emotions


Uncertainty has plagued Northern California racing for the better part of a year, if not long before.

Since the July 2023 announcement of the impending closure of Golden Gate Fields, industry stakeholders in the region have questioned what their next steps would be. The roller coaster of emotions may come to a head March 21 as the California Horse Racing Board meets and is scheduled to allocate the remainder of 2024 Northern California racing dates.

Emotions ran high at the Jan. 18 CHRB meeting as Northern California horsemen showed up to voice their desire for continued racing in the north while representatives from the south encouraged a redirection of funds to bolster Southern California purses and increase field sizes there. Plans to preserve racing in the north pitched by the California Association of Racing Fairs were met with skepticism.

“We came out of that meeting stronger than ever,” said owner Johnny Taboada. “In this coming meeting, it’s not going to be the same. People are not going to be confrontational because they know we have a solution.”

Advertisement

One proposed solution is for Pleasanton, which usually hosts a meet in the summer at the Alameda County Fair, to pick up a 26-day fall meet to fill in as the new Golden Gate. Alameda County also is located in the San Francisco Bay Area. 

Sign up for

KING: CARF Proposes Continued NorCal Racing at Pleasanton

“When Pleasanton was announced the place to be, the right people were involved,” Taboada said. “There have been meeting with the CHRB. The questions they asked have been answered.”

“Pleasanton is in a really good area with a lot of money,” said trainer Ed Moger Jr. “If they could boost the purses there, at least to start, so that people have something to look forward to, they can get back in business.”

Advertisement

Taboada, Moger, and Lindsay LaRoche were the three members of the Thoroughbred Owners of California board who resigned in January due to the TOC’s stance on Northern California. TOC president and CEO Bill Nader led the presentation Jan. 18 on the proposed shift to Southern California.

“We were not involved in some of the decision-making,” Taboada said of his resignation. “Now that I look back, they knew a long time ago they were going to approach it this way and we were not going to be part of the process.”

“It felt like we were wasting our time,” Moger said. “I’m not upset with the board, but we had different opinions over what was the right thing for Northern California.”

After their departure, Ty Green, John Harris, and Andy Mathis joined the board as Northern California representatives.

“The north needs a seat at the table,” Green, an owner and breeder in Northern California, said. “People in the south don’t necessarily know the benefits and challenges of racing in the north. I think it is important that they know. My opinion is that we need to bring people together where we can.”

Advertisement

The story of California racing, for many years, has been north vs. south. Purses have fallen behind the likes of Kentucky and Arkansas and have recently been cut further to adjust for purse overpayments in the millions.

“We no longer can compete with the purses on the East Coast,” Taboada said. “It doesn’t mean you have to sacrifice the north to maybe have the possibility of keeping things the same. You’re just patching the problem.”

Photo: Vassar Photography

Many northern California horsemen hope Pleasanton can add race dates in the region

Advertisement

In addition, the foal crop has continued to drop in California. In 2003, the state registered 3,867 foals but that figure dropped 66% to 1,319 registered foals in the 2021 crop. There were 5,126 Thoroughbred races in California in 2003 but just 2,815 last year.

“Are we a two-circuit state living in a one-circuit body with racing reduced to three days a week—both in the north and south—and field sizes at an all-time low?” Nader asked at the January CHRB meeting. “Can we continue to support two full-time circuits? This is a fair question.”

At the January meeting, the TOC stood on the grounds that condensing racing to the south—outside of the normal fair meets—would help to increase purses and field size. Those supporting the continuation of year-round racing in the north are concerned that condensing in the south could reduce breeding in the state.

“There are a lot of owner/breeders in Northern California,” Green said. “There are a number of people that breed to race up north.”

Field size has been an ongoing issue in California. In 2023, the average state-wide field size was 7.00.

Advertisement

“Cal-breds fill fields in the south in both open and state-restricted races,” Green said. “I’m not sure of the number, but a large percentage of the racing population in the south are Cal-breds.”

“What if instead of having 1,300 2-year-old Cal-breds, all of a sudden you have 800 or 900?” Moger said. “They need more people breeding horses, not less.”

As the uncertainty has drawn on over the fall and winter, some in Northern California decided not to wait and see what the future holds. Moger has taken a string of 25 horses with him to Santa Anita, with nearly 20 horses remaining at Golden Gate that he’s weaning off.

“Owners are getting out of the industry,” Moger said. “We had up to 35 mares at our farm that were bred last year; this year we’ll be lucky to breed 10.”

Siskany, with William Buick up, wins Race 1 at Santa Anita on November 4, 2023.
Photo: Chad B. Harmon

A small field competes at Santa Anita Park.

Advertisement

A telling sign for Moger was when two of his owners, independent from each other, gave away two mares in foal to Clubhouse Ride .

“They both gave the horse away,” Moger said. “That’s what’s going on here.”

Moger has bought a farm in Kentucky and, although he’s staying in Southern California for now, will start trying his luck further east, as is former Golden Gate leading jockey Evin Roman.

“My dream was always to come (to Kentucky),” Roman said. “The news at Golden Gate, they decided to close the racetrack, so I made the move.”

Advertisement

Roman was leading Golden Gate’s jockey standings when he made the move in late January. Rather than complete the meet, he decided he needed to take the next step in his career and move on from Northern California sooner than later. Meanwhile, others in Northern California are ready to ride the wave and see what happens.

Matthew Troy trains a small stable of horses, acting as an outlet for horses who can’t compete in the south. His clients are owners who purchase horses at sales, and if unsuccessful at the southern tracks, send their horses to Troy in the north for easier competition and different surfaces. A member of the California Thoroughbred Trainers’ board, since Golden Gate’s announcement of plans to close Troy has been working to keep people informed and answer questions.

“People dig in and have roots here. Kids have school,” Troy said. “Do they move? Do they commute? Buy a house, sell a house, rent a new apartment? People ask me those questions all the time, life stuff.”

According to Troy, several trainers and many workers at Golden Gate have part-time jobs or work for companies such as Uber and Lyft to make ends meet. He wouldn’t be surprised if other people exit the industry due to the financials.

“Owners are going to pay a higher day rate,” Troy said of trainers moving to Southern California. “A lot of horses that could run 1-2-3 here might be running 4-5-6 down there, and that’s not going to pay the bills.”

Advertisement

In addition, the loss of Golden Gate’s synthetic and turf courses will remove a large motivation for sending horses north for the fair meetings. If there is no permanent base in the north, the fair circuit could be negatively impacted. Troy noted if connections are going to race on dirt either way, they’ll likely stay in the south.

“There’s going to be no draw to run in Northern California because there’s no synthetic surface,” Troy said. “Why would you ship (from Southern California) to run for a $10,000 pot?”

Months of agonizing over the future at the dining room table could soon be temporarily relieved should the CHRB approve fall dates for Pleasanton. Troy believes, regardless of what is to come in future years, allowing racing to stay in the north throughout the remainder of the year is the moral thing to do for those who live and work there.

“The transition (from Golden Gate) is going to be difficult,” said Troy. “We just need somewhere soft to land. Make it as easy and convenient as possible. For the stability of people’s lives, just get these dates. I think that’s fair. If it doesn’t seem feasible or doesn’t work, you can revamp for next year.”

“Why can’t they just wait and see if Pleasanton can survive and then make a decision,” Moger said. “They’re gonna make a run at it. It would be good for California racing if they did.”

Advertisement

With The Stronach Group exiting the north, several industry stakeholders see it as an opportunity to improve racing for the future.

“We can have a say in what’s coming to the north and lift the racing aspect of it,” Taboada said. “Marketing, engaging, something we have not been doing in the north for many years.”

The fair tracks have always done well when it comes to attendance. Purses and handle have lagged behind that of Golden Gate, but now that the fairs will be in control of the region, marketing efforts not possible before can help bring about a change.

“We’re finally getting away from the big corporate where we had no say whatsoever,” Taboada said. “Finally, our voice can be heard. It’s the light at the end of the tunnel.”

Charlene's Dream wins the $75,000 Guaranteed Pike Place Dancer, the 1-mile race ran in 1:38.32, ridden by Evin Roman and trained by Ed Moger, Jr. at Golden Gate Fields. Photo credit: Vassar Photography
Photo: Vassar Photography

Jockey Evin Roman guides Ed Moger Jr.-trained Charlene’s Dream to victory in the 2023 Pike Place Dancer Stakes at Golden Gate Fields.

Advertisement

2025 is a question to be answered on another day. For now, Northern California is ready to embrace an opportunity in 2024 to find its own way and seek longevity.

“Pleasanton has committed. Pleasanton wants to help, period,” Taboada said. “2025 is a matter of fine-tuning things, adjusting how things are handled and going forward.”

Taboada believes a key to strengthening Northern California is “connecting the dots” with Arizona racing and Emerald Downs in Washington.

“We need to team up as the West Coast,” Taboada said. “As a whole, we can do many things.”

Advertisement

For those in Northern California, any information that helps them make important decisions for their future is needed, and the CHRB meeting should help one way or the other.

“The back and forth is a lot,” said Troy. “People are trying to prepare.”

Despite purses being cut 25% at Golden Gate before its current meet, many horsemen have chosen to stick it out and see what happens.

“Tremendous resilience by these people to hang in there,” said Taboada. “For us to turn this negative news into something positive, we need to have everybody involved going forward.”

“It’s a tribute to the Northern California horsemen,” Green said. “They’re hanging in there because they are positive about the future with the new circuit in Northern California. It’s a tribute to them and their dedication to keep going.”

Advertisement



Source link

California

500-pound bear evicted after living under California home for months

Published

on

500-pound bear evicted after living under California home for months


play

A 500-plus-pound bear living underneath a residence in Southern California has departed the space it called home for months, according to the nonprofit that helped evict the large mammal.

BEAR League announced in a Facebook post on Jan. 8 that it helped remove the bear from Kenneth Johnson’s home after he reached out to the nonprofit. Johnson previously told the Los Angeles Times and KTLA that he found signs of something living under his home as early as April 2025, but he didn’t know what it was for sure until November, when a security camera caught the bear sneaking into a crawl space.

Advertisement

At an estimated weight of 500-plus pounds, the bear “barely fit into the crawlspace and caused extensive damage to the home’s heating ducts,” according to BEAR League. Concerned over a possibly damaged gas line, Johnson shut off his gas service just before Christmas, the nonprofit said.

BEAR League said it stepped in to evict the bear after earlier removal attempts by state wildlife officials were unsuccessful. Two first responders with the nonprofit traveled to Johnson’s home, where one of them crawled beneath the residence — “fully aware the bear was still there” — to get behind the animal and “encourage him to exit through the crawlspace opening,” according to Lake Tahoe-based the nonprofit.

The nonprofit also said it loaned Johnson electric unwelcome mats, which shock bears when they step on them, to give him time to make repairs and secure the crawlspace to prevent future visits.

“If you live in bear country, securing your crawlspace is essential. This time of year, BEAR League evicts multiple bears from under homes every day,” BEAR League said.

Advertisement

Kenneth Johnson creates GoFundMe to help with repairs

At the bottom of BEAR League’s social media post, the nonprofit linked to Johnson’s GoFundMe page, which he created to help cover repair costs.

According to Johnson’s fundraiser page, the 500-plus-pound bear dwelled underneath his home in Altadena for over a month, causing “tens of thousands of dollars in damage.”

“I’m in a situation I never imagined,” Johnson wrote on the fundraising page.

Johnson further explained his current employment situation, saying that right after surviving the Eaton fire in early January 2025, he lost his job, and shortly after that, the “bear began tearing into the structure of (his) home.”

“I have video footage of it twisting gas pipes, which created an extremely dangerous situation and forced me to shut off my utilities just to stay safe,” he continued.

Advertisement

The funds would also go toward making Johnson’s home “safe and livable again,” which includes paying for professional traps. As of Jan. 10, the GoFundMe has raised over $8,000; however, its goal is $13,000.

Jonathan Limehouse covers breaking and trending news for USA TODAY. Reach him at JLimehouse@gannett.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Gavin Newsom proposes $350B California budget — kicks the can on debt

Published

on

Gavin Newsom proposes 0B California budget — kicks the can on debt


California Gov. Gavin Newsom unveiled a record-high $350 billion state budget Friday that makes “historic” investments in areas like education — but kicks the can on paying down federal debt, foisting costs onto struggling employers.

Newsom’s budget incorporates a $43 billion windfall tied to the stock market that he touted in his State of the State speech Thursday, bringing his office’s estimated deficit down to $3 billion — the state’s fourth deficit in a row. The budget plows billions into maintaining education, health care, and other programs but ignores a $20 billion federal loan for Covid unemployment payments — a situation one legislator called “alarming.”

Ignoring the loan means small businesses are on the hook for the state’s debt, said state Sen. Roger Niello of Fair Oaks.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom unveiled a record-high $350 billion state budget Friday REUTERS

“We already have the highest unemployment in the nation and we’re putting this additional burden on our employers. It makes absolutely no sense,” Niello said.

Advertisement

The budget includes $662.2 million in mandatory interest payments, but there is no money going towards the principal.

Since July, the total balance has ballooned to $21.3 billion, and private employers in California pick up the tab under federal rules. Employers pay an $42 extra per employee this year and growing, per KCRA

Every state expect California has paid off the Covid-era loans.

“That is an alarming thing because [Newsom is] basically saying that businesses and employment are not a priority to him and that’s troubling,” Niello added.

At 5.5%, California’s unemployment rate was the highest in the country as of November.

Advertisement

Newsom’s $350 billion budget proposal is about $30 billion higher than this year’s budget, thanks largely to federal healthcare cuts that forced costs onto the state and mandatory set-asides in areas like education.

Newsom’s finance director Joe Stephenshaw highlighted record spending on education. California Governor Gavin Newsom

At a budget briefing Friday, Newsom’s finance director Joe Stephenshaw highlighted record spending on education— amounting to a record $27,418 per K-12 student, $5.3 billion for the University of California system, $15.4 billion to community colleges, and $1 billion to needy schools — along with $500 million towards local homelessness prevention, $195 million in new public safety spending, $3 billion for the state’s rainy day fund and $4 billion for school reserve funds.

The budget includes some cuts to climate-related spending and housing and homelessness, per Calmatters. And it does not include any direct funding for Prop. 36, the anti-crime measure supported by nearly 70% of voters in 2024 — a move Republicans blasted.

But even with Newsom’s unexpected windfall, analysts expect deficits to grow to as high as $35 billion in the coming years as expenditures outpace even optimistic revenue projections.

Newsom and the state Legislative Analyst create separate budget projections, and the governor’s has historically been far rosier on the revenue side. The legislative analyst projected a $18 billion deficit in the coming fiscal year, while the governor calculated $3 billion.

Advertisement

Under Newsom, the state’s general fund spending has increased by 77% partly owing to new programs spun up when the state was flush with cash, according to Republican legislators.

Newsom’s $350 billion budget — the last before he leaves office next year — does little to confront ballooning expenses, dumping the problem on the future governor and Legislature, according to Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones.

“This is more of the same from a lame-duck governor content on leaving the rest of us to pick up the financial pieces when he leaves office,” Jones said in a statement.  

Democrats in the legislature were more measured in their responses.

Advertisement
Newsom’s $350 billion budget proposal is about $30 billion higher than this year’s budget, thanks largely to federal healthcare cuts. California Governor Gavin Newsom

“During these times of uncertainty, we must craft a responsible budget that prioritizes the safety and fiscal stability of California families,” said State Senate Leader Monique Limón in a statement.

Newsom and legislators will refine the budget in the coming months towards a final proposal in May.

One major unknown is how California will handle a loss of about $1.4 billion in funding due toTrump administration changes to low-income health care and food programs.

Last year, Newsom was force to scale back a controversial plan to provide Medicaid coverage for illegal immigrants after costs spiked, forcing California was forced to borrow $3.4 billion, Politico reported.

Newsom’s budget didn’t fully explain what would happen to immigrant health care under federal cuts, and Stephenshaw struggled to answer detailed questions from reporters — saying Newsom’s office was still awaiting guidance from the feds.

Advertisement

“As we work through the May revision, this is something we’ll be well aware of and we’ll make those decision at that time,” he said.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

How Trump’s tariffs ricochet through a Southern California business park 

Published

on

How Trump’s tariffs ricochet through a Southern California business park 


  • Tariffs impact businesses in Rye Canyon differently
  • Supreme Court may rule on Trump’s emergency tariffs soon
  • Some businesses adapt, others struggle with tariff costs

VALENCIA, California, Jan 9 (Reuters) – America’s trade wars forced Robert Luna to hike prices on the rustic wooden Mexican furniture he sells from a crowded warehouse here, while down the street, Eddie Cole scrambled to design new products to make up for lost sales on his Chinese-made motorcycle accessories.

Farther down the block, Luis Ruiz curbed plans to add two imported molding machines to his small plastics factory.

Sign up here.

“I voted for him,” said Ruiz, CEO of Valencia Plastics, referring to President Donald Trump. “But I didn’t vote for this.”

All three businesses are nestled in the epitome of a globalized American economy: A lushly landscaped California business park called Rye Canyon. Tariffs are a hot topic here – but experiences vary as much as the businesses that fill the 3.1 million square feet of offices, warehouses, and factories.

Advertisement

Tenants include a company that provides specially equipped cars to film crews for movies and commercials, a dance school, and a company that sells Chinese-made LED lights. There’s even a Walmart Supercenter. Some have lost business while others have flourished under the tariff regime.

Rye Canyon is roughly an hour-and-a-half drive from the sprawling Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. And until now, it was a prime locale for globally connected businesses like these. But these days, sitting on the frontlines of global trade is precarious.

The average effective tariff rate on imports to the U.S. now stands at almost 17%–up from 2.5% before Trump took office and the highest level since 1935. Few countries have been spared from the onslaught, such as Cuba, but mainly because existing barriers make meaningful trade with them unlikely.

White House spokesman Kush Desai said President Trump was leveling the playing field for large and small businesses by addressing unfair trading practices through tariffs and reducing cumbersome regulations.

‘WE HAD TO GET CREATIVE’ TO OFFSET TRUMP’S TARIFFS

Rye Canyon’s tenants may receive some clarity soon. The U.S. Supreme Court could rule as early as Friday on the constitutionality of President Trump’s emergency tariffs. The U.S. has so far taken in nearly $150 billion under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. If struck down, the administration may be forced to refund all or part of that to importers.

Advertisement

For some, the impact of tariffs was painful – but mercifully short. Harlan Kirschner, who imports about 30% of the beauty products he distributes to salons and retailers from an office here, said prices spiked during the first months of the Trump administration’s push to levy the taxes.

“It’s now baked into the cake,” he said. “The price increases went through when the tariffs were being done.” No one talks about those price increases any more, he said.

For Ruiz, the plastics manufacturer, the impact of tariffs is more drawn out. Valencia makes large-mouth containers for protein powders sold at health food stores across the U.S. and Canada. Before Trump’s trade war, Ruiz planned to add two machines costing over half a million dollars to allow him to churn out more containers and new sizes.

But the machines are made in China and tariffs suddenly made them unaffordable. He’s spent the last few months negotiating with the Chinese machine maker—settling on a plan that offsets the added tariff cost by substituting smaller machines and a discount based on his willingness to let the Chinese producer use his factory as an occasional showcase for their products.

“We had to get creative,” he said. “We can’t wait for (Trump) to leave. I’m not going to let the guy decide how we’re going to grow.”

Advertisement

‘I’M MAD AT HIM NOW’

To be sure, there are winners in these trade battles. Ruiz’s former next-door neighbor, Greg Waugh, said tariffs are helping his small padlock factory. He was already planning to move before the trade war erupted, as Rye Canyon wanted his space for the expansion of another larger tenant, a backlot repair shop for Universal Studios. But he’s now glad he moved into a much larger space about two miles away outside the park, because as his competitors announced price increases on imported locks, he’s started getting more inquiries from U.S. buyers looking to buy domestic.

“I think tariffs give us a cushion we need to finally grow and compete,” said Waugh, president and CEO of Pacific Lock.

For Cole, a former pro motorcycle racer turned entrepreneur, there have only been downsides to the new taxes.

He started his motorcycle accessories company in his garage in 1976 and built a factory in the area in the early 1980s. He later sold that business and – as many industries shifted to cheaper production from Asia – reestablished himself later as an importer of motorcycle gear with Chinese business partners, with an office and warehouse in Rye Canyon.

“Ninety-five percent of our products come from China,” he said. Cole estimates he’s paid “hundreds of thousands” in tariffs so far. He declined to disclose his sales.

Advertisement

Cole said he voted for Trump three times in a row, “but I’m mad at him now.”

Cole even wrote to the White House, asking for more consideration of how tariffs disrupt small businesses. He included a photo of a motorcycle stand the company had made for Eric Trump’s family, which has an interest in motorcycles.

“I said, ‘Look Donald, I’m sure there’s a lot of reasons you think tariffs are good for America,” but as a small business owner he doesn’t have the ability to suddenly shift production around the world to contain costs like big corporations. He’s created new products, such as branded tents, to make up for some of the business he’s lost in his traditional lines as prices spiked.

He pulls out his phone to show the response he got back from the White House, via email. “It’s a form letter,” he said, noting that it talks about how the taxes make sense.

Meanwhile, Robert Luna isn’t waiting to see if tariffs will go away or be refunded. His company, DeMejico, started by his Mexican immigrant parents, makes traditional-style furniture including hefty dining tables that sell for up to $8,000. He’s paying 25% tariffs on wooden furniture and 50% on steel accents like hinges, made in his own plant in Mexico. He’s raised prices on some items by 20%.

Advertisement

Fearing further price hikes from tariffs and other rising costs will continue to curb demand, he’s working with a Vietnamese producer on a new line of inexpensive furniture he can sell under a different brand name. Vietnam has tariffs, he said, but also a much lower cost base.

“My thing is mere survival,” he said, “that’s the goal.”

Reporting by Timothy Aeppel; additional reporting by David Lawder
Editing by Anna Driver and Dan Burns

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending