Connect with us

California

Here's what we learned about California's wage increase after one quarter

Published

on

Here's what we learned about California's wage increase after one quarter


The second quarter was an important litmus test for restaurant operators with a footprint in California, as it marked the first reporting period following the state’s implementation of AB 1228 on April 1. The law raised the minimum wage at quick-service restaurants to $20 an hour, or by 25%.

The legislation initially raised some hell in the industry, to put things lightly. Some companies blamed the hike for layoffs, others for closures. Some operators vowed not to include California in their expansion plans. For public companies, however, the reaction has been a bit more measured. In summary, it’s full speed ahead in California, a state that is experiencing population growth for the first time in three years. But, it’s full speed ahead with significant price increases to offset the labor inflation, and those price increases have impacted traffic at many, if not most, concepts. According to Revenue Management Solutions, traffic in California has declined by 5.9% since January versus the U.S. average of negative 3.6%.

RMS’ data finds that menu prices in California have risen over four percentage points more than the U.S. average since January, or 7.5% compared to 3.1%. Domino’s, Shake Shack, and Chipotle are three such companies that took high-single-digital pricing increases in the state following the implementation of AB 1228.

Advertisement

Labor optimization

In addition to taking pricing, several chains are sharpening their focus on “labor optimization” to offset wage inflation. California-based The Habit Burger Grill is one of them.

“… A comprehensive store level labor optimization effort … contributed to an impressive 520 basis point expansion of restaurant level margins from the first quarter, despite a double-digit increase in restaurant level labor rates in California stores,” David Gibbs, CEO of parent company Yum Brands, said during his company’s earnings call earlier this month.

El Pollo Loco, which has a massive footprint in California, is exploring “labor productivity initiatives,” like deployment and scheduling, in addition to increased menu prices. CFO Ira Fils said traffic in California was “a little more” down compared to other markets, but overall, “we didn’t see a whole lot of difference between the markets.”

Sweetgreen is also making improvements to its labor optimization, according to CFO Mitch Reback, while Portillo’s is testing kiosks in the California market.

Advertisement

QSRs hit

Of course, QSRs have beared the brunt of this inflation and executives acknowledged as much during their respective Q2 calls. McDonald’s chief financial officer Ian Borden simply called wage pressures in California “a headwind we’re working through,” adding that margins could be “down a little bit” from 2023 accordingly, but still good considering the “overall context of what we’re working through.” McDonald’s experienced its first negative same-store sales quarter since 2020.

As for Wendy’s, CEO Kirk Tanner called California “unfortunate from a wage and labor standpoint,” adding that the company is focused on “driving more productivity.”

“If you look at where consumers are, our focus is on winning and competing well in this environment. And we’re doing that with that strategy, including places like California. It goes to delivering our core, having compelling innovation and having relevant value,” Tanner said. Wendy’s sales were essentially flat in Q2.

Jack in the Box felt a swift impact, with labor costs up 200 basis points from the prior year, while franchise-level margin was $74.6 million, compared to $75.3 million a year ago. CEO Darin Harris said the chain will “regain” its margin through improved sales, and “ongoing equipment, technology, and financial fundamentals initiatives.” The chain has adopted a new oil management process, for instance, and is in the process of testing a fryer automation system, while its sister chain, Del Taco, is testing kiosks. Jack in the Box also worked with its franchisees to take a “surgical approach” to pricing. Despite the early hit on margins and sales, executives remain optimistic about California.

Advertisement

“California fared substantially better than we thought,” CEO Darin Harris said.

“This was the first full quarter of operating under the increased minimum wage law and we are proud of how our teams executed through this change,” CFO Brian Scott said. “[For] Jack in the Box company-owned restaurants, which are predominantly in California, same-store sales performance was better than all but one market. Del Taco had a similar result, with California being one of their top markets in the quarter.”

Full-service insulated?

Despite the law only applying to QSRs, full-service wasn’t completely insulated. Consider Kura Sushi as an example here. The company’s second quarter performance fell well short of expectations, with chief executive officer Hajime Jimmy Uba citing AB 1228 as a main culprit given that comparable same-store sales decelerated in California in April.

“What we have seen … is a general perception that restaurants as a category have become expensive, introducing industry-wide pressures regardless of a given restaurant’s relative value,” he said.

Advertisement

Still, many full-service concepts have experienced no change at all, or even a small tailwind from the QSR-focused legislation. For example, Texas Roadhouse’s handful of California stores are doing “fine,” according to executives.

BJ’s Restaurants, which is headquartered in Huntington Beach, Calif., also hasn’t seen changing trends from its consumers, perhaps because gas prices have come down, according to chief financial officer Tom Houdek. BJ’s executives made it a point to also note that labor levels haven’t been impacted by higher wages at QSRs and that the company is “in a better place” than in 2019 with staffing. That said, Houdek called the statewide pricing increases a “sticker shock” for consumers.

Denny’s has leaned into a silver lining from California’s wage increases, expanding its virtual Banda Burrito brand to over 300 restaurants with a priority on the state to add the revenue channel. CEO Kelli Valade said traffic outperformed QSRs during the quarter because of lower menu prices relative to QSRs, as well as the expansion of Banda Burrito. Notably, Denny’s is also targeting California as one of its growth markets for its Keke’s brand.

“We have not experienced a material increase in team wages at our 22 California company restaurants as a result of AB 1228. We believe this is in part due to our servers earning well above the AB 1228 minimum wage when factoring in tip income,” CFO Robert Verostek said, adding,The [market share] gap we were experiencing to overall QSR, we’ve cut in half in California specifically.”

Cheesecake Factory is also seeing consistency across its geographies with no added pressure from California. CEO David Overton said the legislation mostly impacts QSRs, “which is positive for us.”

Advertisement

Notably, full-service brands aren’t the only ones with optimism. Wingstop had a meteoric second quarter relative to the rest of the industry, AB 1228 be damned. Wingstop did not experience transaction changes after implementing pricing increases to offset wage increases at its 400-ish California locations.

“In fact, the trends in California are following a very similar trend to what we see outside of California for our business,” CFO Alex Kaleida said.

Further, Dutch Bros experienced a 60-basis-point year-over-year increase in labor costs primarily driven by the wage increase in California, where about 20% of its system is located. The company took a 1.5% pricing increase to help offset the pressure but has otherwise been focused on business as usual.

“We had two of our top first week performers in California in the first half of this year,” CEO Christine Barone said. “We continue to be very bullish on our prospects in California and continue to look for sites and opening shops in California.”

Contact Alicia Kelso at [email protected]

Advertisement

 



Source link

California

PlayOn Sports fined $1.1 million by California watchdog over student data violations

Published

on

PlayOn Sports fined .1 million by California watchdog over student data violations


California’s privacy watchdog has ordered PlayOn Sports to pay a $1.10 million fine and change how it handles consumer data after finding the company’s practices violated state law in ways that affected students and schools in the state.

The California Privacy Protection Agency Board issued the decision following a settlement reached by CalPrivacy’s Enforcement Division.

The decision is the first by the board to address privacy violations involving students and California schools.

Schools across the country use PlayOn Sports’ GoFan platform to sell digital tickets to high school sporting events, theater performances, and homecoming and prom dances, with attendees presenting tickets at the door on their mobile phones.

Advertisement

Schools also use PlayOn Sports’ platforms for other sports-related activities, including attending games, streaming them online, and looking up statistics about teams and players.

In California, about 1,400 schools contract with PlayOn Sports for these services.

[RELATED] X faces possible fines as EU probes Grok nonconsensual, sexualized deepfakes

GoFan is also the official ticketing platform for the California Interscholastic Federation, the governing body for high school sports.

According to the board’s decision, PlayOn Sports used tracking technologies to collect personal information and deliver targeted advertisements to ticketholders and others using its services.

Advertisement

The company allegedly required Californians to click “agree” to tracking technologies before they could use their tickets or view PlayOn Sports websites, without providing a sufficient opt-out option.

“Students trying to go to prom or a high school football game shouldn’t have to leave their privacy rights at the door,” said Michael Macko, CalPrivacy’s head of enforcement. “You couldn’t attend these events without showing your ticket, and you couldn’t show your ticket without being tracked for advertising. California’s privacy law does not work that way. Businesses must ensure they offer lawful ways for Californians to opt-out, particularly with captive audiences.”

The decision also describes students as a uniquely vulnerable population and warns that targeted advertising systems can subject students to profiling that can follow them for years, expose them to manipulative or harmful content, and develop sensitive inferences about their lives.

Instead of providing its own opt-out method, PlayOn Sports directed students and other users to opt out through the Network Advertising Initiative and the Digital Advertising Alliance, which the decision said violated the company’s responsibility to provide its own way for consumers to opt out. The company also allegedly failed to recognize opt-out preference signals and did not provide Californians with sufficient notice of its privacy practices.

“We are committed to making it as easy as possible for all Californians — from high school students to older adults, and everyone in between — to make the choice of whether they want to be tracked or not,” said Tom Kemp, CalPrivacy’s executive director. “Californians can opt-out with covered businesses, and they can sign up for the newly launched DROP system to request that data brokers delete their personal information.”

Advertisement

Beyond the $1.10 million fine, the board’s order requires PlayOn Sports to conduct risk assessments, provide disclosures that are easy to read and understand, and implement proper opt-out methods.

The order also requires the company to comply with California’s privacy law prohibiting the selling or sharing of personal information of consumers between 13 and 16 without their affirmative opt-in consent.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California bill to bar police from taking second job with ICE advances in state Assembly

Published

on

California bill to bar police from taking second job with ICE advances in state Assembly


Wednesday, March 4, 2026 4:43AM

CA bill to keep police from moonlighting with ICE advances

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KABC) — A bill that would prevent police officers from moonlighting with federal immigration enforcement agencies, such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, is advancing through the California State Assembly.

AB 1537 passed the State Assembly’s committee on public safety on Tuesday.

The bill also requires that officers report any offers for secondary employment related to immigration enforcement to their place of work.

Those failing to comply could face decertification as a peace officer in California.

Advertisement

The bill was introduced by Assemblymember Isaac Bryan, whose district includes Mar Vista, Ladera Heights, Mid-Wilshire and parts of South Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Can’t win in primary election? Drop out, California Democrats say

Published

on

Can’t win in primary election? Drop out, California Democrats say


play

California Democrats running for governor, your party has a message for you. Think carefully about your candidacy and campaign ahead of the swiftly approaching filing deadline.

California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks urged candidates looking to assume the state’s highest office to “honestly assess the viability of their candidacy and campaign” as March 6, the final day to declare candidacy, nears. Hicks said that concerns about the crowded field of Democrat candidates “persist” in an open letter on Tuesday, March 3.

Advertisement

It comes as five leading candidates, several of which are Democrats — Katie Porter, Eric Swalwell, and Tom Steyer — are in a “virtual tie” per a recent poll, the Desert Sun reported, which is part of the USA TODAY Network.

Two Republican candidates pushing out California democrats in the gubernatorial bid may be “implausible,” but “it is not impossible,” Hicks said of the reasoning behind his latest message. Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, both Republicans, lead in RealClear Polling’s average of various polls.

The party chair spotlighted the need for California Democrats’ leadership, particularly over Proposition 50, the voter-approved measure that will temporarily implement new congressional district maps, paving the way for Democrats to secure more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

“If in the unlikely event a Democrat failed to proceed to the general election for governor, there could be the potential for depressed Democratic turnout in California in November,” Hicks said. “The result would present a real risk to winning the congressional seats required and imperil Democrats’ chances to retake the House, cut Donald Trump’s term in half, and spare our nation from the pain many have endured since January 2025.”

Advertisement

During a press conference on March 2, Gov. Gavin Newsom said that when he is out in communities, people aren’t talking about the governor’s race. It’s an observation he called “interesting,” considering voting in the primary election starts in May.

“It’s been hard, I think, to focus on that race,” Newsom said, pointing to the attention on President Donald Trump, redistricting, and other matters.

What exactly is California Democratic Party asking of candidates?

In his open letter, Hicks gave directions to candidates.

First, assess your candidacy and campaign. If you don’t have a viable path to the general election, don’t file to get your name on the ballot for the primary election in June. Also, be prepared to suspend your campaign and endorse another candidate by April 15 if you decide to file but can’t show “meaningful progress towards winning the primary election.”

Advertisement

When is the next California election? Primary election in 2026

California voters will trim the field of candidates for governor on June 2. Only the two candidates who receive the most votes, regardless of party preference, will move on to the November election.  

Paris Barraza is a reporter covering Los Angeles and Southern California for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at pbarraza@usatodayco.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending