Connect with us

California

Five things to know about nuclear power in California

Published

on

Five things to know about nuclear power in California


As California makes progress towards assembly its bold local weather targets, one concern has gone unanswered: How can it cease burning fossil fuels whereas making certain the facility grid stays dependable? 

That query is on the heart of a debate over the state’s use of nuclear energy.

Nuclear energy doesn’t depend on fossil fuels, so it doesn’t produce massive volumes of planet-warming pollution as different vitality sources do. Whereas it’s seen as a climate-friendly various, opponents cite security threats and issues storing radioactive waste.

Advertisement

Now, practically six years after the choice to shut California’s final nuclear energy plant —  the two,240-megawatt Diablo Canyon facility — Gov. Gavin Newsom says he’s contemplating making use of for federal funding that might preserve it open previous its scheduled 2025 closure. It’s a transfer, he mentioned, that would keep away from rolling blackouts and energy shortages because the state transitions to renewables and braces for extra excessive warmth, wildfires, drought and floods. 

Newsom has till Might 19 to use for the funding and would wish the power’s proprietor, Pacific Gasoline & Electrical, to get on board, too. Some consultants say if Diablo Canyon is shut down, there’s a great likelihood state officers shall be scrambling to switch the misplaced megawatts. 

So what ought to Californians know concerning the state’s reliance on nuclear energy? Listed here are 5 key takeaways:

Diablo Canyon provides sufficient energy for 3 million individuals

Perched on California’s gusty Central Coast, Diablo Canyon has been supplying energy to the state’s electrical grid since 1985. However the plant close to San Luis Obispo has been battered by controversy the complete time. 

Advertisement

Just some years into development, PG&E discovered the positioning was close to a number of seismic fault strains. That spurred lawsuits and big, statewide protests, culminating within the largest arrest within the historical past of the nation’s anti-nuclear motion. Regardless of the opposition, the plant was accomplished.

In the present day, the power employs about 1,500 staff. Its 2,240 megawatts of electrical energy era is roughly sufficient to assist the wants of greater than 3 million individuals, based on PG&E. 

Nuclear energy accounted for 9.3% of California’s electrical energy in 2020; pure gasoline was by far the first supply at about 37%, based on the California Vitality Fee.

A salty dispute: California Coastal Commission unanimously rejects desalination plant

California will get nuclear energy from out of state, too

Most of California’s nuclear vitality is generated by Diablo Canyon, but it surely additionally imports nuclear-powered electrical energy from Arizona and Washington state, based on the California Vitality Fee.  

Advertisement

Twenty-eight states have at the least one business nuclear reactor. However some are also dealing with attainable closure within the many years to return.

Twelve business reactors have closed prior to now decade, together with in New York, Massachusetts, Nebraska and Iowa. But Oregon-based NuScale Energy not too long ago gained approval to construct take a look at reactors in Idaho in 2029 and 2030.

California imports extra electrical energy than some other state — about 30% of its provide in 2020, together with some from coal-fired vegetation which are larges sources of greenhouse gases, based on the California Vitality Fee. 

Open letter seeks support for Clean Tech Innovation Park at Diablo Canyon site

Hurdles stay to maintaining the plant open

In 2016 PG&E introduced plans to completely shutter Diablo Canyon, noting that the transition to renewable vitality would make continued operations too pricey. The California Public Utilities Fee accepted the closure in 2018, after the utility reached a settlement settlement with advocacy teams and environmentalists. One reactor is slated to shut in 2024, adopted by the second in 2025.

Advertisement

Confronted with a possible energy crunch as local weather change ravages the state, Newsom mentioned PG&E ought to contemplate making use of for $6 billion in federal funds that the Biden administration put aside to rescue nuclear vegetation from closing. 

However the prospect of maintaining it open may face quite a few technical, monetary and logistical hurdles.

PG&E and the Nuclear Regulatory Commision, which points the licenses to maintain the plant working, must expedite the renewal course of in time for the quickly-approaching shutdown. 

PG&E didn’t reply to a number of requests for remark. In a press release to CalMatters, the CPUC mentioned “all choices are on the desk.” 

“Electrical energy reliability for California is a most important precedence,” mentioned spokesperson Terrie Prosper. “Extending the operation of Diablo Canyon would require examination by the CPUC.” 

Advertisement

Doubts dog Gov. Newsom’s idea to extend Diablo Canyon’s life beyond 2025

PG&E additionally must deal with getting old infrastructure issues and make investments to adjust to the state’s water-cooling laws, based on Matthew Freedman, a workers lawyer with The Utility Reform Community, a shopper advocacy group.

Delaying the closure may doubtlessly be costlier for ratepayers. A greater various can be to enhance the state’s vitality storage capability for renewable vitality, he mentioned. 

“For the reason that continued operation of Diablo Canyon may show to be very costly, any proposal to maintain the plant alive should be accompanied by binding price containment and protections for ratepayers,” Freedman mentioned. “PG&E’s charges have already been skyrocketing and we wish to do every little thing we will to convey it down. So we’re undoubtedly in opposition to any proposal that might give PG&E a clean verify.”

Nuclear energy comes at an environmental price 

Nuclear vitality is generated from splitting uranium atoms in a reactor. This course of, referred to as fission, produces steam that’s then utilized by generators to create electrical energy. The result’s a dependable, 24/7 vitality provide. However working the plant nonetheless has penalties for communities and the setting. 

Advertisement

Nuclear vegetation require water as a cooling mechanism to stop them from overheating. That water is commonly launched again into the ocean at a a lot increased temperature that would injury marine habitats. 

And whereas energy vegetation don’t produce greenhouse gases, they do produce a poisonous byproduct: spent nuclear gasoline, which should be disposed of safely.

Opponents of nuclear vitality argue that folks of colour, together with Black, Latino and Native American communities, are particularly susceptible to hurt from mining uranium in addition to the disposal and storage of radioactive waste. Corporations that function these vegetation have lengthy used ancestral native lands and different areas close to deprived communities to supply supplies and retailer spent gasoline, mentioned Shaun Burnie, a senior nuclear specialist with Greenpeace. 

Nonprofit backs open, transparent process to determine Diablo Canyon's future | Guest Commentary

Critics of Diablo Canyon additionally say the facility’s infrastructure is outdated and flawed. Burnie mentioned the specter of earthquakes is a high concern. The 2011 nuclear catastrophe in Fukushima was attributable to an earthquake and subsequent tsunami.

Advertisement

As a substitute, he mentioned the state ought to abandon the thought of maintaining the plant open, focusing solely on renewable vitality initiatives and decentralizing the facility grid.  

“It’s an entire distraction, it’s infuriating,” Burnie mentioned. “That is about saving an embattled nuclear trade — it’s not about saving the local weather.” 

“Our view is that zero-carbon assets are the alternative for Diablo Canyon and we don’t assume extra fossil gasoline era is required,” Freedman mentioned. “That being mentioned, we perceive that there are challenges with reliability that policymakers are attempting to handle.”

Proponents laud nuclear energy as zero-carbon, lower-cost

Diablo Canyon has performed an important position in offering carbon-free vitality and sustaining the reliability of California’s energy grid, mentioned Jacopo Buongiorno, a professor at MIT’s division of nuclear science and engineering. With out it, Buongiorno mentioned, it will likely be tough to fulfill demand as intensifying climate patterns more and more pressure the grid. He mentioned the state must depend on all types of renewable and carbon-free sources, together with nuclear vitality, to attain carbon-neutrality by 2045. 

“Given the magnitude of the problem that we’re dealing with when it comes to decarbonizing and mitigating local weather change, I’d argue that we should always use extra nuclear vitality, we should always use extra photo voltaic and extra wind,” he mentioned. “Every little thing that doesn’t emit carbon dioxide ought to be on the desk.”

Advertisement

Buongiorno acknowledged security and nuclear waste considerations, however described the dangers as minimal in comparison with the detrimental results that fossil gasoline emissions have on the setting and heavily-polluted communities. He mentioned the storage of nuclear gasoline can be extremely regulated and dealt with in a “protected, efficient method” with using dry solid storage. 

If Diablo Canyon had been to shut, sustaining a carbon-neutral grid by 2045 would require extra vitality storage — at the least 18 gigawatts of solar energy, based on a joint 2021 Stanford and MIT research co-led by Buongiorno. To construct these photo voltaic services, the state would wish about 90,000 acres of land in comparison with the 900-acre Diablo Canyon web site. Discovering that out there area could possibly be a problem as a result of an government order requiring the state to protect 30% of its pure and coastal lands by 2030. 

The research discovered that maintaining Diablo Canyon open may save an estimated $2.6 billion in energy system prices from 2025 to 2035. The worth of pure gasoline has risen not too long ago, so current nuclear energy vegetation are typically extra aggressive, Buongiorno mentioned.

The price of electrical energy from photo voltaic and battery storage is increased than the price of Diablo Canyon alone, “so there are financial savings merely from working a less expensive asset,” he mentioned. 

Excluding the worth of nuclear gasoline, PG&E spent $1.2 billion in 2021 to function Diablo Canyon.

Advertisement

Steven Chu, a Stanford College physics professor and the vitality secretary through the Obama administration, mentioned the state ought to be making each effort to scale back its reliance on fossil fuels. Closing Diablo Canyon would solely gradual that transition, he mentioned.

“Nuclear energy could also be definitely the lesser of two evils in comparison with maintaining oil and pure gasoline vegetation,” he mentioned. “You’ll be able to’t wave a magic wand and say we go 100% wind and photo voltaic as a result of they’re intermittent. It’s straightforward to go from zero to 50%. It’s a lot tougher to go from 50 to 75% and practically not possible to get to 100%.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

Park Fire roughly doubles in size, becomes one of the biggest in California history

Published

on

Park Fire roughly doubles in size, becomes one of the biggest in California history



The blaze has nearly doubled in size since Friday morning. It’s burning about 90 miles north of Sacramento.

play

A fire that allegedly started when a man pushed a flaming car into a gully in a Northern California park on Wednesday has quickly ballooned into the West’s largest fire burning right now and one of the largest in state history.

Advertisement

The Park Fire, about 90 miles north of Sacramento, has now burned over 307,000 acres as of Saturday morning, according to Cal Fire. It’s currently the eighth-largest fire in California history, has no containment, and is even producing its own clouds.

The blaze has roughly doubled in size since Friday morning when it engulfed an area the size of Chicago.

Prosecutors allege the fire started when Ronnie Stout sent his mother’s car ablaze 60 feet down an embankment near Alligator Hole in Chico’s Upper Bidwell Park. That gave the fire its match to spread northward across the Sierra Nevada foothills.

Triple-digit temperatures, low humidity and gusty winds contributed to the Park Fire’s rapid growth, officials say. The Park Fire on Saturday has burned an area roughly the size of the city of Los Angeles. So far, the Park Fire has damaged 134 structures, Cal Fire’s latest incident report showed.

Advertisement

Cooler temperatures, with highs in the upper 80s, and more humidity are expected Saturday, according to the National Weather Service’s Sacramento office. On Friday afternoon, officials hoped these conditions would give some 2,500 firefighters the needed respite to reduce the fire’s spread from Butte County into Tehama County, where the majority of the fire is now occurring, as it burns grass, brush, timber and dead vegetation.

Evacuation orders and warnings continued through Friday night, the Butte County Sheriff’s Office announced. This included warnings for Magalia in the foothills east of Chico, located just next to Paradise, the California town burned by the 2018 Camp Fire that destroyed 14,000 homes and killed 85 people. The Camp Fire, caused by faulty Pacific Gas & Electric power lines, maxed out at 153,336 acres, half the size of the current Park Fire. 

There are nearing 100 large wildfires across 10 western states and Alaska that have burned over a million acres and growing. Climate change is driving fires’ growing size and severity as warmer temperatures, high winds and dry conditions help fuel fires.

Contributing: Christopher Cann and Dinah Pulver of USA TODAY

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California Still Has No Plan to Phase Out Oil Refineries – Inside Climate News

Published

on

California Still Has No Plan to Phase Out Oil Refineries – Inside Climate News


Gov. Gavin Newsom often touts California’s role as a global climate leader. Yet it’s hard to defend that claim as long as California remains one of the nation’s top oil-refining states, experts argued at a recent webinar calling for a phaseout of refineries.

The state has made major strides implementing policies to support the transition away from fossil fuels in the transportation and energy sectors, yet has largely ignored oil refineries.

This is an egregious oversight, policy experts and community advocates on the panel said, because refineries are the largest source of industrial fossil fuel pollution and one of the biggest threats to both health and the climate.

“There are significant acute and chronic public health and climate impacts from refiners,” said Woody Hastings, a policy expert at The Climate Center, a nonprofit that hosted the webinar and is working to rapidly reduce climate pollution. “There is no plan to phase them out.”

Advertisement

Election 2024

Explore the latest news about what’s at stake for the climate during this election season.

California can embrace its role as a global leader by charting a path to phasing out refineries that others can follow, as it’s done before, he said. When California passed a measure to cut vehicle tailpipe emissions in 2002, 13 other states followed suit. When it passed a 2018 law requiring that all electricity come from renewable sources by 2045, 10 other states and the federal government adopted the same goal, Hastings said.

The most recent climate Conference of the Parties, COP28 in Dubai, called for a transition away from fossil fuels and energy systems in a just, orderly and equitable manner, Hastings said. “Let’s have California create the model for how to do it.”

All the other major fossil fuel sectors—electricity, transportation and oil drilling—have some form of phaseout requirements and plan to lower emissions, said Alicia Rivera, an organizer with the nonprofit Communities for a Better Environment who works in Wilmington, a Los Angeles neighborhood dominated by oil wells and refineries. “Refineries have none.”

The costs of inaction are clear, she said. Almost all the census tracts near refineries are communities of color forced to endure very high toxic releases and other health harms, Rivera said.

Advertisement

“People on the other side of the refinery cannot see the emissions because they are invisible,” she said. “But they are large and they are always there, nonstop.”

Refineries convert crude oil into gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and other petroleum products like butane and propane. One refinery can cover thousands of acres, with massive heaters and boilers superheating the crude and separating the liquids that will become gas and other fuels. The refining process, storage tanks and flaring—the burning of excess hydrocarbons—all emit pollution and toxic gases like lung-damaging sulfur dioxides and cancer-causing benzene.

“People on the other side of the refinery cannot see the emissions because they are invisible. But they are large and they are always there, nonstop.”

Oil refineries must report annual benzene emissions. But various studies have shown that many refineries underestimate emissions of volatile organic compounds, including benzene, understating the health risks. 

“We’ve seen places where California has found significant risk from benzene without including that massive underestimation,” said Julia May, senior scientist with Communities for a Better Environment. “If you include the underestimation, that means the cancer risk is higher. It’s also a VOC that contributes to smog.”

Working Toward a Just Transition

California has failed to act partly because several cities benefit financially from contributing to the nearly 2 million barrels of crude oil refined a day in the state, May said, noting that regulators are under “severe pressure” to avoid phaseout requirements. 

Advertisement

But just two refinery products, gasoline and diesel, cause about half of California’s greenhouse gas emissions, she said. “You can’t solve the smog or climate disaster without phasing out oil refineries.” 

The state must start looking at ways to reduce refineries’ production on the road to a full shutdown, May urged. “We’re not talking about shutting down refineries tomorrow. All we’re asking for is, start a plan over the next two decades and start with gasoline and diesel.”

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

Advertisement

California policy is headed toward no more oil production, which will significantly reduce refining capacity in the state, said Kevin Slagle, spokesperson for the Western States Petroleum Association, which represents oil extractors and refiners. “An EV mandate that limits the sale of internal combustion cars may not say, ‘Hey refinery, you have to reduce production by X amount,’” he said. “But if you don’t have vehicles on the road that use that product, the refiners are probably not going to be here.”

Even without specific bills that mandate refinery reductions, Slagle said, California policy will lead to fewer refineries in the state, “probably quicker than folks expect.”

That phaseout needs to be managed in a way that doesn’t leave workers behind, the panelists argued. And that requires understanding that the phrase “just transition” means different things to different people, said Brian White, a longtime union leader and policy director for Eduardo Martinez, mayor of Richmond, home of the Chevron refinery, where a catastrophic fire and explosion in 2012 sent 15,000 people to the hospital.

White’s union, the United Steelworkers, coined the term “just transition,” he said. For refinery workers it means making sure they can shift to a job with dignity, benefits and pay. For environmentalists, he said, it’s moving from a dirty, dangerous industry to a cleaner, greener world. And for local governments, it means replacing revenue lost by closing refineries in order to continue providing the services communities need.

The different groups need to recognize that they’re working toward the same goals, White said. On that note, he added, the Richmond City Council recently voted to place a “polluters tax” on the November ballot. 

Advertisement

“Oil refining has negative impacts on the city, including environmental hazards, public health harms and stress on emergency services,” White said. The tax on oil refining—Chevron’s Richmond refinery is one of the biggest in the nation—aims to improve the city’s financial position and the quality of life for Richmond residents, he said, especially those most affected by the oil refinery.

How to coordinate policies designed to reduce demand for refinery products like gasoline and phase out refineries remains a major challenge, the panelists said.

One in every four new car sales in California is a zero-emission vehicle, said Siva Gunda, vice chair of the California Energy Commission. “We’ve crossed our peak demand of gasoline in California in 2017,” he said, noting a downward trend that he expects to continue. “Yet even if we are wildly successful with EVs, there will be some demand.”

Siva Gunda, vice chair of the California Energy Commission.Siva Gunda, vice chair of the California Energy Commission.
Siva Gunda, vice chair of the California Energy Commission.

For Gunda, it’s imperative to find ways to reduce demand for fossil fuel products while expanding access to zero-emission vehicles and renewable energy for all Californians, especially for fenceline communities where residents suffer from higher rates of respiratory problems like asthma attacks, heart disease and cancer.

Gunda saw firsthand the disproportionate burdens these communities endure when Rivera, the community organizer, took him on a tour of Wilmington. This predominantly Black and Latino community at Los Angeles’ southern edge sits atop the third-largest oil field in the country. Residents have such a distinctive way of clearing their throats it’s called the Wilmington cough. 

“It’s heartbreaking to imagine that some of us get to see our grandmothers a little bit longer than some of us, because of where we live,” Gunda said.

Advertisement

Yet the climate crisis will not affect only disadvantaged communities, the panelists warned.

Climate change is widespread and rapidly intensifying, May said. She pointed to a 2022 study from the First Street Foundation, a nonprofit that studies U.S. risks from climate change, which found that about a quarter of the country could be practically unlivable in 30 years, frequently reaching temperatures higher than 125 degrees Fahrenheit. “It’s really quite frightening,” she said. 

“We need just-transition planning to phase out refineries,” May said. “We need to deal with replacing the taxes. We need to support the workers. We need to support the communities and we need to survive catastrophic climate change. We can do it.”

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Advertisement

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California residents flee massive wildfire sparked by burning car

Published

on

California residents flee massive wildfire sparked by burning car


Thousands of Northern California residents were forced to evacuate their homes as a massive wildfire scorched more than 250 square miles. The Park Fire, California’s largest this year, was started by a man who pushed a burning car into a gully.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending