Connect with us

California

Dan Walters: How California’s Native Americans beat the odds

Published

on

Dan Walters: How California’s Native Americans beat the odds


You possibly can’t flip in your tv set or click on on a YouTube video as of late with out being subjected to a barrage of adverts for and in opposition to California poll measures that might legalize betting on sports activities occasions.

Nearly all of these spots characteristic members of California’s Native American tribes. Most tribes oppose Proposition 27, an on-line playing measure sponsored largely by FanDuel and different gaming firms, saying it might undermine the funds of casino-owning tribes. Nonetheless, a number of tribes that don’t have casinos are touting Proposition 27, saying its provisions would assist them escape poverty.

It doesn’t matter what occurs to Proposition 27, or to Proposition 26, which is sponsored by casino-owning tribes and would increase their digital monopoly on playing, the extreme campaigns remind Californians of their state’s very giant Native American inhabitants.

The 2020 census revealed that the state’s 762,733 self-identified Native Individuals — almost 4 occasions their quantity when the primary white explorers reached California — are by far the most important inhabitants of any state. Furthermore, California has greater than 100 federally acknowledged tribes, ranging in measurement from 5 individuals to greater than 6,000, and dozens of reservations.

Advertisement

The involvement of California’s Native Individuals in political clashes with multi-billion-dollar stakes is a testomony to their resilience in a state that attempted to enslave and/or eradicate them.

Those that survived enslavement and smallpox and different ailments introduced into California by explorers and fortune-seeking migrants had been usually handled as vermin.

“{That a} conflict of extermination will proceed to be waged between the races, till the Indian race turns into extinct, should be anticipated,” California’s first elected governor, Peter Burnett, declared after taking workplace in 1851. “Whereas we can’t anticipate this end result however with painful remorse, the inevitable future of the race is past the ability or knowledge of man to avert.”

California supplied a 25-cent bounty for Indian scalps, later rising it to $5, and the federal authorities dispatched troops to California to maintain the state’s native tribes beneath management. Ulysses S. Grant, later to command Union troops through the Civil Battle and be elected president, spent a few of his early Military profession at Fort Humboldt, defending Trinity River gold miners from clashes with native tribes.

The killing lastly stopped, however California’s Indians had been largely confined to reservations, virtually all bothered with deep poverty till the latter years of the twentieth century.

Advertisement

Within the Nineteen Eighties, a U.S. Supreme Courtroom choice gave California tribes the authorized proper to supply some types of playing as a result of California had a number of kinds of authorized wagering.

The choice protected modest tribal bingo and poker parlors from police raids and a few tribes pushed the authorized envelope additional by putting in slot machines. Though legally doubtful, the tribes’ machines generated money to construct bigger casinos and sponsor two poll measures to lock of their on line casino playing monopoly.

With that monopoly, tribes may entice funding capital and construct even bigger casinos, some full-fledged resorts. Additionally they adroitly cultivated assist amongst politicians of each events — which explains why each have formally opposed Proposition 27.

Though the battle to this point has been over Proposition 27, and Proposition 26 has been just about ignored, its passage may increase the tribal playing monopoly much more. Along with sanctioning sports activities betting inside tribal casinos (and some horse racing tracks), Proposition 26 legalizes different video games, akin to roulette and craps. One part even topics rival non-tribal poker parlors to probably injurious authorized actions.

Thus no matter voters decree in November, they may write a brand new chapter within the really wonderful historical past of California’s Native Individuals.

Advertisement

Dan Walters has been a journalist for almost 60 years, spending all however a number of of these years working for California newspapers. His commentary comes by way of CalMatters.org, a public curiosity journalism enterprise dedicated to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it issues. For extra, go to calmatters.org/commentary.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence

Published

on

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence


A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.

The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.

In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.

The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”

Advertisement

“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending