Connect with us

California

Can this state be saved? Why California is so different from the rest of the U.S.

Published

on

Can this state be saved? Why California is so different from the rest of the U.S.


For people who don’t live in California, the nation’s most populous state can be a little hard to understand.

Home to Hollywood and Silicon Valley, Yosemite National Park and Disneyland, Lake Tahoe and the Napa Valley, the Golden State offers some of the most desirable tourist destinations in the U.S. — and some of the most beautiful places to live. California has great food, gorgeous landscapes and temperate weather. “If there were an ‘it girl’ of the United States, it’d have to be California,” House Beautiful magazine gushed last year.

There is the American dream, yes, but there is also the “California dream,” which for decades drove people to heed Horace Greeley’s famous call to “Go West” in search of the good life.

And yet, these days, California is derided for its politics and laws, seen by those in other states as wildly out of step with the rest of the nation; this year, new laws include one prohibiting school districts from notifying parents if a student changes their gender identity at school, and another that legalizes cannabis cafes.

Advertisement

The wildfires that swept through Los Angeles this month brought into sharp relief the state’s progressive environmental and building laws that some say contributed to the devastation. Actor Mel Gibson, whose $14.5 million Malibu home was destroyed in the fires, said on the Joe Rogan podcast, “This might finally get me out of California.”

An aerial view shows the devastation by the Palisades Fire, Thursday, Jan. 16, 2025, in Malibu, Calif.

The state has been losing residents to other regions in recent years; more than 800,000 residents left between 2021 and 2022, with some citing high taxes, home prices and the cost of living generally. (California’s gas taxes are the highest in the nation, 68 cents a gallon in 2024.) Consumer Affairs recently named California the worst state in which to raise a family, and United Van Lines ranks California fourth on its list of states that people are moving out of, behind New Jersey, Illinois and New York. High-profile voices who have left California in recent years include Elon Musk, Ben Shapiro and Joe Rogan.

President-elect Donald Trump has just named Jon Voight, Sylvester Stallone and Mel Gibson as “special ambassadors” charged with bringing business back to Hollywood — even before the fires, headlines were proclaiming that “Hollywood is ditching Hollywood” because of entertainment companies going to places like Georgia and New Mexico, and even to other countries, to escape California’s costs.

But there are other ways in which California is an outlier, maybe even a little bit weird.

Take the “California Psychics” that advertise so heavily on conservative radio shows. It’s hard to articulate why psychics seem to belong in California, but it’s clear that “Virginia Psychics” or “Ohio Psychics” just wouldn’t have the same cachet.

Advertisement

And is there an American consumer alive who hasn’t been perplexed— and perhaps a little bit fearful — about why something they’re about to eat is banned in California while legal everywhere else?

“California is the embodiment of ‘a nice place to visit, but you wouldn’t want to live there,’” said Bill Whalen, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University who was a speechwriter for former California Gov. Pete Wilson.

While a state as large as California is naturally going to have a lot of churn, there is some evidence that conservatives leaving the state are seeking “redder pastures,” as the Los Angeles Times put it a few years ago. There are also nonpartisan reasons for the exodus, to include the nation’s largest risk of wildfires and tsunamis, and the nation’s second highest risk of earthquakes (after Alaska), all of which make it more expensive to get insurance, if you can get insurance at all.

State Farm, among insurers which recently reduced or dropped coverage in the state because of wildfire risk, is under heightened scrutiny because of the LA fires and has pulled its popular advertising out of this year’s Super Bowl.

The residence of Zhi-feng Zhao, destroyed by the Eaton Fire, is seen Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2025, in Altadena, Calif. | Damian Dovarganes

All of California, it seems, was not ready for its close-up, which arrived when the Santa Ana winds hit the Pacific Palisades Jan. 7, sparking both the fires and national scrutiny.

In the coming months, California faces a reckoning on whether its proud reputation as the “Left Coast” is literally destroying parts of the state — and whether that needs to change. If there is a shift to the right, as some people are predicting in the wake of the fires, it would be a seismic change for a state that embraces its outlier status.

Advertisement

“It’s not just big — it’s different,” acknowledges Dan Schnur, who teaches politics and communications at the University of Southern California and University of California, Berkeley. “Most Californians see it that way and like it that way.”

That’s in part because a lot of what the rest of the country sees as California oddities are policies aimed at improving the quality of life — like the $20 minimum wage for fast-food workers — or protecting California residents from various nefarious threats, such as the notice that pops up on the GetTrumpWatches.com website that says “Notice to California consumers.”

“Under California Civil Code sections 1798.83-1798.84, California residents are entitled to ask us for a notice describing what categories of Personal Information we share with third parties or corporate affiliates for those third parties or corporate affiliates’ direct marketing purposes.”

The notice stipulates that this only applies to residents of California.

Advertisement

But one person’s protection, of course, is another person’s nanny state.

How many Californians voted for Trump?

Schnur moved to California nearly 35 years ago to work on a political campaign, intending to stay for only a few months, but he stayed, living for a while in Sacramento and the Bay Area, before moving to Los Angeles, where he lives now.

“What I find fascinating about Southern California is that it might be the most diverse society in the history of the planet Earth. There’s something exciting and sometimes challenging about being part of this mass experiment, of people with different backgrounds, different heritage and different beliefs, trying to make it work,” he said.

Rene Amy, left, and Sean Courtney pack up their stuff after hanging an “Altadena Strong” sign Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2025, in Altadena, Calif. | John Locher

“There have been times in the past when New York or Boston or perhaps Miami represented that diversity more than any other place, but Southern California’s geographic location is what leads to such a broad range of backgrounds.”

In fact, more than a quarter of the state’s population was born outside the U.S., nearly twice the national average, and the state has been a hotbed for immigration battles. California not only has sanctuary cities, but is considered a “sanctuary state.” And Gov. Gavin Newsom has vowed to fight President-elect Donald Trump’s plans to deport immigrants living in the U.S. illegally; the Legislature approved his $50 million package to “Trump-proof” the state, with half of that money going to fight deportations.

The package was the latest volley in the long-simmering feud between Newsom and Trump, which stands to become more acrimonious in the coming months as Washington debates what aid to authorize for California, and whether there should be restrictions tied to it. Glenn Beck and House Speaker Mike Johnson are among those arguing that wildfire aid should be conditional, on California making changes.

Advertisement

California, however, has long been a stronghold of resistance to the GOP. Vice President Kamala Harris comfortably beat Trump in November with 58.5% of the vote, and former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has wielded power in Washington for decades, most recently being instrumental in the ousting of President Joe Biden on the Democratic ticket. As the most populous state, California has the most representatives in Congress, even after losing a seat after the 2020 census. Writing for Cal Matters, Dan Walters warned that California’s political power will shrink as its population does.

And although the state remains blue, 6 million Californians voted for Trump — roughly the population of Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico combined.

Which, Schnur points out, is what many outsiders don’t understand about California: just how large and diverse the state is. People who haven’t lived in California think of the state as an amalgam of “Baywatch,” Hollywood and Silicon Valley, not realizing it’s also the nation’s largest agricultural producer, and that parts of the state, particularly along its eastern border, “aren’t all that much different from the rest of the country.”

Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Center COO Amy Johnson, left, hugs Rhea Bartolome, vice president of operations, outside their center after the Eaton Fire, Sunday, Jan. 12, 2025, in Pasadena, Calif. They returned to check on the facility after evacuating senior care residents from the fire. | Ethan Swope

“But there are 40 million people here, and most of them don’t work in entertainment or technology,” Schnur said.

This sentiment is seconded by people like Mike Cernovich, a filmmaker who frequently posts about California’s beauty on the social media platform X. “No one wants to leave California. Geographically it is perfect. You can go from beach to mountains in three hours,” Cernovich wrote on X. But his photos of Golden State beauty are sometimes challenged by people who say they feel gaslit.

“We have some very serious problems here in California, and they’re being perpetuated by progressive policies. Things like needle exchange programs, open air drug markets, and the decriminalization of theft,” podcaster Michael Oxford wrote in response to one of Cernovich’s idyllic photos.

Advertisement

Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has talked about biking past a homeless encampment in Venice on his way to the gym, and California accounts for about one-third of the homeless population in the U.S.

It is, in fact, those sorts of images that make California a punchline on Fox News and cause people in other parts of the country to wonder why anyone would want to live there. That’s quickly followed, however, by those in Texas, Utah and other locations with, “but don’t move here and drive up our housing prices.”

Both the golden view and doomsday view of California can be true; it depends on where you’re looking.

The ‘great exception’

The late Carey McWilliams famously called California “The Great Exception” in a book by that title released in 1949, a century after the Gold Rush that brought hundreds of thousands of people into the state. “California has not grown or evolved so much as it has been hurtled forward, rocket-fashion, by a series of chain-reaction explosions. (The) lights went on all at once, in a blaze, and they have never been dimmed,” McWilliams wrote.

Advertisement

But California has dimmed in the eyes of many Americans, in large part to the perception that the state is not so much a trail-blazer, but completely out of step with the values of the rest of the country — an idea that Newsom reinforces by talking about “California values,” as if they are distinct from American values.

In its annual list of the 10 worst new laws in California, the group Reform California, led by Assemblyman Carl DeMaio, included for 2025 a new law that prohibits polling stations for asking voters for proof of identification, already being challenged in court, like the law prohibiting school districts from notifying parents when a child identifies as a different gender in school. The group also called out a new law that requires potential foster parents in California to demonstrate support for “gender affirming” standards of care, which some see as discrimination against religious parents who don’t agree with the policy, let alone the terminology.

“Is California the petri dish of what America should be?” Whalen said. “No, if you’re either centrist or right of center.”

The sun rises over homes destroyed by the Palisades Fire in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles, Thursday, Jan. 16, 2025. | Damian Dovarganes

It was the law prohibiting school districts from notifying parents about gender changes that Elon Musk called “the final straw” that made him decide to pull out of California. He has also said that he tired of “dodging gangs of violent drug addicts just to get in and out of the building” when the headquarters of X was in San Francisco.

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro, who moved from California to Tennessee, along with his media company, The Daily Wire, wrote four years ago that he left his home state “because all the benefits of California have eroded steadily — and then suddenly collapsed.” Podcaster Joe Rogan has said he moved from California to Texas because the state “went nuts” and has “gone full communist.”

Despite these high-profile losses, California’s population rebounded by about 250,000 people in 2024, the Los Angeles Times reported last month, while noting, “The numbers are not all rosy. California experienced a slower growth rate than the country as a whole, particularly large states in the fast-growing South. It also experienced the nation’s largest domestic migration loss.”

Advertisement

California gained 232,570 new residents between July of 2023 and July of 2024, compared to Texas, which grew by 562,941, and Florida, which gained 467,347 new residents.

Eric McGhee, a senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California, told me, “We do see some evidence that conservatives and Republicans are more likely to leave the state.” But he said that typically people give “family, job and the cost of living” as reasons for leaving, not “I can’t stand that Gavin Newsom, I’ve got to get out of here.”

On the other hand, McGhee said, “Republicans are dramatically more likely to say that they have thought about leaving California.” But, he added, “only a small fraction of them will actually do it.”

That’s not because living in California is gradually making them more liberal by osmosis, but more likely because, as Joshua Charles, a former speechwriter for Vice President Mike Pence, put it recently on X: “Home is always home.”

“Our family has been here over 100 years, since the beginning of the 20th century. … I am convinced that reclaiming the human from the grasp of modernity oftentimes requires staying put, putting down roots, and building,” wrote Charles, who lives near Sacramento.

Advertisement

From sitcoms to punchlines

The idea that people are leaving California in droves because of its progressiveness isn’t a new one. Whalen, the Hoover Institution scholar, worked for then-Gov. Pete Wilson in the 1990s, and even then people joked that U-Haul always ran out of trucks in California, he told me.

But, he said, you can see how the image of California has changed over time in how it is represented on TV.

“You go back and look at situation comedies in the 1950s and 1960s, and what do you see? California is a destination. California is the place you want to be. It’s where the Ricardos drove and thought about staying. It’s where situation comedies like ‘The Brady Bunch’ and ‘My Three Sons’ were set. The sunny suburban parts of Los Angeles; it just looked like paradise on Earth.” Now, he said, it’s still considered a nice place to visit, not live, by people outside of the state — particularly the middle class.

California has what’s called a barbell economy, Whalen said — meaning it is heavily weighted with high-skill, high-paying jobs on one end, and low-skill, low-paying jobs on the other. “And I don’t think the middle class has ever been under assault as it is right now in California in terms of livability,” he said. “That’s what you see in the outbound migration. And that’s the challenge that vexes every governor, every lawmaker: how to make California more affordable. And nobody seems to have an answer.”

California is typically ranked as the second most expensive state to live in, after Hawaii, with costs averaging around 30% higher than the rest of the U.S., per U.S. News & World Report. The state has the highest individual tax rate and the highest gas tax, 68 cents a gallon in 2024.

Advertisement

But Schnur says that many residents are willing to pay what amounts to a “weather tax” for the privilege of living in California. “It costs more to live here but in return you get beaches and mountains and a really terrific climate,” he said, noting that it costs more to live near water everywhere in the country, be it the ocean or a lake.

Moreover, he argues that many of the things that other people consider weird about California are simply the state being a trendsetter, with the rest of the country playing catch-up. In 2014, for example, California was the first state to pass a ban on plastic bags, something which many other states and municipalities across the country have now done.

“For most of the last century or longer, many of the nation’s most notable trends started in California, starting with the aerospace industry in the post-Cold War era and the tax-cutting revolution that ultimately elected Reagan as president. Certainly, the modern-day environmental movement has its roots here. Debates over immigration, affirmative action and climate change might not be unique to California, but the case can be made that the political impact was seen here first. … You can argue that history doesn’t repeat itself, it just moves East.”

Moreover, he noted, that some of the concerns of the Trump-adjacent Make America Healthy Again movement — such as worries about food additives and toxins — have already long been addressed by California’s Proposition 65, which seeks to protect residents from “significant exposures to chemicals that cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm.”

And McGhee of the Public Policy Institute of California noted, “We had our own version of the Clean Air Act before the Clean Air Act was passed.”

Advertisement

Newsom, who has been considered a potential Democratic presidential contender, declined to be interviewed for this article. But Whalen, at the Hoover Institution, noted that if Newsom runs for president, it will essentially be a national referendum on California. And, he said, “It’s hard to see someone saying with a straight face that California is the direction in which America should go right now.”





Source link

California

GOP California governor candidates to face off at Clovis forum ahead of primary

Published

on

GOP California governor candidates to face off at Clovis forum ahead of primary


With California’s June 2nd primary election nearing, Republican candidates for governor, Steve Hilton and Sheriff Chad Bianco, are set to appear at a forum in Clovis.

The Fresno County & City Republican Women Federated is hosting its “Celebrating 250 Years of America Dinner” and a gubernatorial forum on Friday, May 22nd, at The Regency Event Center, 1600 Willow Ave., in Clovis.

The forum will be moderated by State Senator Shannon Grove.

The discussion is expected to focus on major issues facing Californians, with questions presented via video by a panel of state and local figures, including Fresno County District Attorney Lisa Smittcamp on public safety and crime; former Fresno County Sheriff Margaret Mims on border control and citizenship; William Bourdeau of Bourdeau Farms LLC on water rights and agricultural issues; California state Assemblymember David Tangipa on taxation and fiscal responsibility; Jonathan Keller of the California Family Council on parental rights and education; and Matthew Dildine, CEO of Fresno Mission, on homelessness and mental health.

Advertisement

Clovis Mayor Pro Tem Diane Pearce and Fresno County Supervisor Nathan Magsig are listed as masters of ceremonies.

Doors are scheduled to open at 4:30 p.m., followed by a social hour at 5 p.m. Dinner and the program are set for 6 p.m.

Attire is listed as cocktail or business formal. Organizers said a portion of the proceeds will benefit the Veterans Home of California – Fresno.

GOP California governor candidates to face off at Clovis forum ahead of primary (Courtesy: Fresno County & City Republican Women Federated)

[RELATED] Top-two primary could pit same-party rivals as crowded Democratic field fractures votes

Advertisement

“This forum comes at a pivotal moment for our state,” FCCRWF event organizers said. “Bringing the top Republican gubernatorial candidates to Clovis allows Valley families, farmers, and business owners to get real answers on the issues that affect their daily lives, from water infrastructure to public safety and the skyrocketing cost of living.”

Individual tickets are $150, with discounts offered to FCCRWF members.

Table sponsorships are available at the $1,500, $2,500 and $5,000 levels.

Tickets and sponsorships are available online at FresnoRepublicanWomen.org.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Amazon halts high-speed e-bike sales in California following fatal crashes

Published

on

Amazon halts high-speed e-bike sales in California following fatal crashes


Orange County’s top prosecutor said Amazon has agreed to stop California sales of certain e-bikes that can go faster than state speed limits following a series of fatal collisions.

The announcement, first reported by KCRA, comes on the heels of an April consumer alert by California Attorney General Rob Bonta that highlighted a rise in deaths related to e-bike and motorcycle crashes.

“We are seeing a surge of safety incidents on our sidewalks, parks, and streets,” Bonta said in a statement. “To ride a motorcycle or moped, you need to have the appropriate driver’s license and comply with rules of the road.”

Bonta’s alert stated that pedal-assisted e-bikes cannot exceed 28 mph. Throttle-assisted e-bikes are limited to 20 mph.

Advertisement

Amazon had continued to sell e-bikes with speeds over 40 mph. Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Electric bikes and motorcycles have become increasingly popular in the last few years, particularly among teens. But the surge has been shadowed by a spate of deadly crashes.

Orange County Dist. Atty. Todd Spitzer has charged at least three parents with allowing their children to ride electric motorcycles illegally, calling the vehicles a “loaded weapon.”

Spitzer noted in a post on X that Amazon said it removed e-bikes advertised with speeds over 40 miles per hour after KCRA contacted the company.

“The company said it has removed the examples provided and is investigating compliance for similar products,” Spitzer wrote.

Advertisement

That includes an Orange County mother, who faces an involuntary manslaughter charge after her son allegedly struck an 81-year-old man with an electric motorcycle. The 14-year-old boy had been doing wheelies on an e-motorcycle

A 13-year-old boy on an e-bike in Garden Grove died earlier this week after veering into the center median and hurtling onto the roadway. The boy was traveling at around 35 mph on a black E Ride Pro electric motorcycle, authorities said.

Amazon’s new sales limits come as the Los Angeles City Council pushes to keep electric bikes of off most city recreational trails, arguing they are a threat to hikers. E-bikes would still be allowed on designated bikeways, such as along the L.A. River.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

After exile, California tribes could help run their ancestral redwoods again

Published

on

After exile, California tribes could help run their ancestral redwoods again


Daniel Felix, 10, looks out from atop a gargantuan stump of an old-growth redwood on his tribe’s ancestral land. Once, this forest on California’s North Coast was replete with the ancient behemoths that can live beyond 2,000 years.

Only a fraction are left now, depleted by a logging company before the state acquired the forest in the 1940s.

This is unique public land, Jackson Demonstration State Forest, spanning 50,000 acres. Trees are plentiful here, but they might not live a millennium. California’s 14 demonstration forests are required to produce and sell timber to show — or “demonstrate” — sustainable practices. Money from logging — roughly $8.5 million a year — pays for management of the forests by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or Cal Fire.

Daniel’s tribe, the Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians, has pushed to rein in the cutting — spearheaded by his late great-grandmother, Priscilla Hunter. They’re part of a diverse coalition that includes environmental activists, local politicians and other tribes.

Advertisement

Now they may finally get their wish. Assemblymember Chris Rogers (D-Santa Rosa) has introduced a bill that would nix the forests’ logging mandate, instead prioritizing values such as carbon storage, wildfire resilience and biodiversity.

The bill represents the latest chapter in a region legendary for fierce battles over logging, and it marks an uncommon alliance between tribes and the environmental movement.

Under Assembly Bill 2494, there could still be logging, but it would have to support those new principles, and the forests would be funded differently.

And it proposes another significant change. It would pave the way for giving tribes a say in managing the lands for the first time since they were forcibly evicted more than a century ago, and for integrating Indigenous knowledge — like cultural burning — into the forests.

“It’s what we dreamed of,” said Polly Girvin, Hunter’s former partner and a retired lawyer focused on Native American issues. “And to have it come true? I’m used to movements that sometimes take 30 years in Indian Country to get to the justice you’re seeking.”

Advertisement

Kids play in the stump of an ancient redwood during a potluck held after the spirit run in Jackson Demonstration State Forest last month.

(Paul Kuroda / For The Times)

Some backers say the bill offers a new economic path forward for communities behind the so-called redwood curtain. With the decline of logging and cannabis, they see tourism driven by ultramarathons, mushroom foraging and other outdoor activities as a financial savior.

“If we had an increase of 10% of visitors coming to our county because of recreational opportunities, that would more than surpass all of the timber tax in our county,” Mendocino County Supervisor Ted Williams said, projecting an increase in money from a lodging tax.

Advertisement

But the push to reshape forest management is fiercely opposed by loggers and mill owners, who say their work is sustainable and provides blue-collar jobs in a region where they’ve dwindled. Already California imports most of its wood from Oregon, Washington and Canada.

“California has the most rules and regulations of anywhere in the world so all they’re doing is exporting the environmental impact to somewhere else, still using the product,” said Myles Anderson, owner of a logging company in Fort Bragg founded by his grandfather. “It’s pretty disgusting, really.”

Anderson believes the bill will greatly reduce logging, even stop it altogether. In his office, with photos of him and his father at a logging site decades ago, he points out it’s sponsored by the Environmental Protection Information Center. Why else would they and other environmental groups “support it if they didn’t see the same thing that I’m seeing?”

Tribal runners in Jackson Demonstration State Forest.

Last month, activists who have sought to rein in logging at Jackson held their first major gathering in about four years, galvanized by the bill that they see as a significant step in the right direction.

(Paul Kuroda / For The Times)

Advertisement

A new but old fight

About five years ago, community members caught wind of plans to chop down towering redwoods within Jackson, near the coastal town of Caspar. Priscilla Hunter would come out to the forest “and could hear them crying — it was our ancestors,” said her daughter Melinda Hunter, the tribe’s vice chairwoman. “Then she had to protect [the trees].”

Environmental activists and Native Americans, not historically allies in the region, joined forces to fight it. “Forest defenders” camped out high in the canopy and blocked logging equipment with their bodies. Some were arrested.

The uprising harked back to the 1980s and 1990s, when iconic environmentalist Judi Bari led Earth First! campaigns against logging in the region. Many of the old tree sitters — white-haired and brimming with stories of Bari — have come out of the woodwork for the latest battle.

For them, it was a win. Cal Fire paused new timber sales and, citing public safety, halted some that were underway — including one expected to generate millions of dollars for Myles Anderson’s logging company.

“We were left with nothing,” Anderson said.

Advertisement

Then, last year, Cal Fire approved the first harvest plan since that hiatus. It riled up the sizable, ecologically minded community.

Jessica Curl, 47, remembers growing up nearby “in a terrain of trunks” as trucks carried out logs. Now the redwoods are regrowing, “gorgeous” and gobbling carbon, she said.

“We’re so lucky to live in an area where we have this amazing climate-change mitigation tool, that if we would just leave it alone would do this amazing work that we’re trying to think of all these cool, inventive things to do.”

Isidro Chavez receives burning sage after a run in Jackson Demonstration State Forest.

Isidro Chavez receives burning sage, or smudging, after a run in Jackson Demonstration State Forest. Smudging is a ritual used to cleanse spaces and individuals of negative energy, promote calm and improve mood.

(Paul Kuroda / For The Times)

Advertisement

Tears of grief, resolve

A group of “spirit runners” — a Native American tradition of bringing prayer — sprinted through the heart of Jackson forest as rain poured through the canopy. The mid-April event marked activists’ first major gathering since protests wound down in 2022.

Attendees gathered in a circle to wait for them. Misty Cook, of the Sherwood Valley Band of Pomo Indians, read a statement as eyes misted all around:

“All the living things around us, they miss us. They miss the language. They miss our touch, our hands, touching all of the things — the water, the plants. They miss the songs. They miss the beat of our footsteps and our voices, and they miss the children’s laughter and play, which was so important. They want us to gather them, to use them and to share them. Otherwise they will get sick and possibly die.”

Cal Fire launched a tribal advisory council to bring Indigenous perspective into Jackson. But some local tribes say it’s not enough because they lack decision-making power.

When the runners arrived, the circle absorbed them. Then they continued on to the site of a controversial proposed harvest, Camp Eight. They wrapped a bandana that belonged to Priscilla Hunter around a small tree — a quiet, somber act where she took her last stand. Runners took turns embracing the trunk.

Advertisement

Redwoods at the Capitol

In March, Rogers’ bill cleared a committee and is now in the Assembly Appropriations Committee’s suspense file. A hearing is set for Thursday.

Funding is a major point of contention. Environmentalists say funding these forests with timber operations incentivizes cutting bigger trees. Cal Fire maintains decisions are driven by forest health, not industry demand.

AB 2494 would fund the forests through a tax on lumber and engineered wood products. The shift could create “[o]ngoing state costs and cost pressures of an unknown but potentially significant amount, possibly in the low millions of dollars annually,” according to a legislative analysis.

The California Forestry Assn., a timber industry trade group, says the idea is a nonstarter.

Cal Fire declined to comment on pending legislation but Kevin Conway, the agency’s staff chief for resource protection and improvement, said its nearly 80-year history managing Jackson reflects “care and attention.” Since the state acquired the forest, “we have more trees on the landscape, more habitat and those trees are trending larger,” he said.

Advertisement

For the tribes who have rallied and prayed, a burning question is whether the land will again reflect their vision, or remain shaped by decisions made by others.

Buffie Campbell, executive director of the InterTribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council — co-founded by Priscilla Hunter and one of the groups supporting the bill — said young people wouldn’t be able to fathom the significance of the legislation passing. Maybe that’s a good thing.

“Maybe they don’t need to know about all the fighting that we have to do before they get to go out and enjoy and be tribal guardians stewarding their land.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending