California
Can this state be saved? Why California is so different from the rest of the U.S.
For people who don’t live in California, the nation’s most populous state can be a little hard to understand.
Home to Hollywood and Silicon Valley, Yosemite National Park and Disneyland, Lake Tahoe and the Napa Valley, the Golden State offers some of the most desirable tourist destinations in the U.S. — and some of the most beautiful places to live. California has great food, gorgeous landscapes and temperate weather. “If there were an ‘it girl’ of the United States, it’d have to be California,” House Beautiful magazine gushed last year.
There is the American dream, yes, but there is also the “California dream,” which for decades drove people to heed Horace Greeley’s famous call to “Go West” in search of the good life.
And yet, these days, California is derided for its politics and laws, seen by those in other states as wildly out of step with the rest of the nation; this year, new laws include one prohibiting school districts from notifying parents if a student changes their gender identity at school, and another that legalizes cannabis cafes.
The wildfires that swept through Los Angeles this month brought into sharp relief the state’s progressive environmental and building laws that some say contributed to the devastation. Actor Mel Gibson, whose $14.5 million Malibu home was destroyed in the fires, said on the Joe Rogan podcast, “This might finally get me out of California.”
The state has been losing residents to other regions in recent years; more than 800,000 residents left between 2021 and 2022, with some citing high taxes, home prices and the cost of living generally. (California’s gas taxes are the highest in the nation, 68 cents a gallon in 2024.) Consumer Affairs recently named California the worst state in which to raise a family, and United Van Lines ranks California fourth on its list of states that people are moving out of, behind New Jersey, Illinois and New York. High-profile voices who have left California in recent years include Elon Musk, Ben Shapiro and Joe Rogan.
President-elect Donald Trump has just named Jon Voight, Sylvester Stallone and Mel Gibson as “special ambassadors” charged with bringing business back to Hollywood — even before the fires, headlines were proclaiming that “Hollywood is ditching Hollywood” because of entertainment companies going to places like Georgia and New Mexico, and even to other countries, to escape California’s costs.
But there are other ways in which California is an outlier, maybe even a little bit weird.
Take the “California Psychics” that advertise so heavily on conservative radio shows. It’s hard to articulate why psychics seem to belong in California, but it’s clear that “Virginia Psychics” or “Ohio Psychics” just wouldn’t have the same cachet.
And is there an American consumer alive who hasn’t been perplexed— and perhaps a little bit fearful — about why something they’re about to eat is banned in California while legal everywhere else?
“California is the embodiment of ‘a nice place to visit, but you wouldn’t want to live there,’” said Bill Whalen, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University who was a speechwriter for former California Gov. Pete Wilson.
While a state as large as California is naturally going to have a lot of churn, there is some evidence that conservatives leaving the state are seeking “redder pastures,” as the Los Angeles Times put it a few years ago. There are also nonpartisan reasons for the exodus, to include the nation’s largest risk of wildfires and tsunamis, and the nation’s second highest risk of earthquakes (after Alaska), all of which make it more expensive to get insurance, if you can get insurance at all.
State Farm, among insurers which recently reduced or dropped coverage in the state because of wildfire risk, is under heightened scrutiny because of the LA fires and has pulled its popular advertising out of this year’s Super Bowl.

All of California, it seems, was not ready for its close-up, which arrived when the Santa Ana winds hit the Pacific Palisades Jan. 7, sparking both the fires and national scrutiny.
In the coming months, California faces a reckoning on whether its proud reputation as the “Left Coast” is literally destroying parts of the state — and whether that needs to change. If there is a shift to the right, as some people are predicting in the wake of the fires, it would be a seismic change for a state that embraces its outlier status.
“It’s not just big — it’s different,” acknowledges Dan Schnur, who teaches politics and communications at the University of Southern California and University of California, Berkeley. “Most Californians see it that way and like it that way.”
That’s in part because a lot of what the rest of the country sees as California oddities are policies aimed at improving the quality of life — like the $20 minimum wage for fast-food workers — or protecting California residents from various nefarious threats, such as the notice that pops up on the GetTrumpWatches.com website that says “Notice to California consumers.”
“Under California Civil Code sections 1798.83-1798.84, California residents are entitled to ask us for a notice describing what categories of Personal Information we share with third parties or corporate affiliates for those third parties or corporate affiliates’ direct marketing purposes.”
The notice stipulates that this only applies to residents of California.
But one person’s protection, of course, is another person’s nanny state.
How many Californians voted for Trump?
Schnur moved to California nearly 35 years ago to work on a political campaign, intending to stay for only a few months, but he stayed, living for a while in Sacramento and the Bay Area, before moving to Los Angeles, where he lives now.
“What I find fascinating about Southern California is that it might be the most diverse society in the history of the planet Earth. There’s something exciting and sometimes challenging about being part of this mass experiment, of people with different backgrounds, different heritage and different beliefs, trying to make it work,” he said.

“There have been times in the past when New York or Boston or perhaps Miami represented that diversity more than any other place, but Southern California’s geographic location is what leads to such a broad range of backgrounds.”
In fact, more than a quarter of the state’s population was born outside the U.S., nearly twice the national average, and the state has been a hotbed for immigration battles. California not only has sanctuary cities, but is considered a “sanctuary state.” And Gov. Gavin Newsom has vowed to fight President-elect Donald Trump’s plans to deport immigrants living in the U.S. illegally; the Legislature approved his $50 million package to “Trump-proof” the state, with half of that money going to fight deportations.
The package was the latest volley in the long-simmering feud between Newsom and Trump, which stands to become more acrimonious in the coming months as Washington debates what aid to authorize for California, and whether there should be restrictions tied to it. Glenn Beck and House Speaker Mike Johnson are among those arguing that wildfire aid should be conditional, on California making changes.
California, however, has long been a stronghold of resistance to the GOP. Vice President Kamala Harris comfortably beat Trump in November with 58.5% of the vote, and former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has wielded power in Washington for decades, most recently being instrumental in the ousting of President Joe Biden on the Democratic ticket. As the most populous state, California has the most representatives in Congress, even after losing a seat after the 2020 census. Writing for Cal Matters, Dan Walters warned that California’s political power will shrink as its population does.
And although the state remains blue, 6 million Californians voted for Trump — roughly the population of Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico combined.
Which, Schnur points out, is what many outsiders don’t understand about California: just how large and diverse the state is. People who haven’t lived in California think of the state as an amalgam of “Baywatch,” Hollywood and Silicon Valley, not realizing it’s also the nation’s largest agricultural producer, and that parts of the state, particularly along its eastern border, “aren’t all that much different from the rest of the country.”

“But there are 40 million people here, and most of them don’t work in entertainment or technology,” Schnur said.
This sentiment is seconded by people like Mike Cernovich, a filmmaker who frequently posts about California’s beauty on the social media platform X. “No one wants to leave California. Geographically it is perfect. You can go from beach to mountains in three hours,” Cernovich wrote on X. But his photos of Golden State beauty are sometimes challenged by people who say they feel gaslit.
“We have some very serious problems here in California, and they’re being perpetuated by progressive policies. Things like needle exchange programs, open air drug markets, and the decriminalization of theft,” podcaster Michael Oxford wrote in response to one of Cernovich’s idyllic photos.
Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has talked about biking past a homeless encampment in Venice on his way to the gym, and California accounts for about one-third of the homeless population in the U.S.
It is, in fact, those sorts of images that make California a punchline on Fox News and cause people in other parts of the country to wonder why anyone would want to live there. That’s quickly followed, however, by those in Texas, Utah and other locations with, “but don’t move here and drive up our housing prices.”
Both the golden view and doomsday view of California can be true; it depends on where you’re looking.
The ‘great exception’
The late Carey McWilliams famously called California “The Great Exception” in a book by that title released in 1949, a century after the Gold Rush that brought hundreds of thousands of people into the state. “California has not grown or evolved so much as it has been hurtled forward, rocket-fashion, by a series of chain-reaction explosions. (The) lights went on all at once, in a blaze, and they have never been dimmed,” McWilliams wrote.
But California has dimmed in the eyes of many Americans, in large part to the perception that the state is not so much a trail-blazer, but completely out of step with the values of the rest of the country — an idea that Newsom reinforces by talking about “California values,” as if they are distinct from American values.
In its annual list of the 10 worst new laws in California, the group Reform California, led by Assemblyman Carl DeMaio, included for 2025 a new law that prohibits polling stations for asking voters for proof of identification, already being challenged in court, like the law prohibiting school districts from notifying parents when a child identifies as a different gender in school. The group also called out a new law that requires potential foster parents in California to demonstrate support for “gender affirming” standards of care, which some see as discrimination against religious parents who don’t agree with the policy, let alone the terminology.
“Is California the petri dish of what America should be?” Whalen said. “No, if you’re either centrist or right of center.”

It was the law prohibiting school districts from notifying parents about gender changes that Elon Musk called “the final straw” that made him decide to pull out of California. He has also said that he tired of “dodging gangs of violent drug addicts just to get in and out of the building” when the headquarters of X was in San Francisco.
Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro, who moved from California to Tennessee, along with his media company, The Daily Wire, wrote four years ago that he left his home state “because all the benefits of California have eroded steadily — and then suddenly collapsed.” Podcaster Joe Rogan has said he moved from California to Texas because the state “went nuts” and has “gone full communist.”
Despite these high-profile losses, California’s population rebounded by about 250,000 people in 2024, the Los Angeles Times reported last month, while noting, “The numbers are not all rosy. California experienced a slower growth rate than the country as a whole, particularly large states in the fast-growing South. It also experienced the nation’s largest domestic migration loss.”
California gained 232,570 new residents between July of 2023 and July of 2024, compared to Texas, which grew by 562,941, and Florida, which gained 467,347 new residents.
Eric McGhee, a senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California, told me, “We do see some evidence that conservatives and Republicans are more likely to leave the state.” But he said that typically people give “family, job and the cost of living” as reasons for leaving, not “I can’t stand that Gavin Newsom, I’ve got to get out of here.”
On the other hand, McGhee said, “Republicans are dramatically more likely to say that they have thought about leaving California.” But, he added, “only a small fraction of them will actually do it.”
That’s not because living in California is gradually making them more liberal by osmosis, but more likely because, as Joshua Charles, a former speechwriter for Vice President Mike Pence, put it recently on X: “Home is always home.”
“Our family has been here over 100 years, since the beginning of the 20th century. … I am convinced that reclaiming the human from the grasp of modernity oftentimes requires staying put, putting down roots, and building,” wrote Charles, who lives near Sacramento.
From sitcoms to punchlines
The idea that people are leaving California in droves because of its progressiveness isn’t a new one. Whalen, the Hoover Institution scholar, worked for then-Gov. Pete Wilson in the 1990s, and even then people joked that U-Haul always ran out of trucks in California, he told me.
But, he said, you can see how the image of California has changed over time in how it is represented on TV.
“You go back and look at situation comedies in the 1950s and 1960s, and what do you see? California is a destination. California is the place you want to be. It’s where the Ricardos drove and thought about staying. It’s where situation comedies like ‘The Brady Bunch’ and ‘My Three Sons’ were set. The sunny suburban parts of Los Angeles; it just looked like paradise on Earth.” Now, he said, it’s still considered a nice place to visit, not live, by people outside of the state — particularly the middle class.
California has what’s called a barbell economy, Whalen said — meaning it is heavily weighted with high-skill, high-paying jobs on one end, and low-skill, low-paying jobs on the other. “And I don’t think the middle class has ever been under assault as it is right now in California in terms of livability,” he said. “That’s what you see in the outbound migration. And that’s the challenge that vexes every governor, every lawmaker: how to make California more affordable. And nobody seems to have an answer.”
California is typically ranked as the second most expensive state to live in, after Hawaii, with costs averaging around 30% higher than the rest of the U.S., per U.S. News & World Report. The state has the highest individual tax rate and the highest gas tax, 68 cents a gallon in 2024.
But Schnur says that many residents are willing to pay what amounts to a “weather tax” for the privilege of living in California. “It costs more to live here but in return you get beaches and mountains and a really terrific climate,” he said, noting that it costs more to live near water everywhere in the country, be it the ocean or a lake.
Moreover, he argues that many of the things that other people consider weird about California are simply the state being a trendsetter, with the rest of the country playing catch-up. In 2014, for example, California was the first state to pass a ban on plastic bags, something which many other states and municipalities across the country have now done.
“For most of the last century or longer, many of the nation’s most notable trends started in California, starting with the aerospace industry in the post-Cold War era and the tax-cutting revolution that ultimately elected Reagan as president. Certainly, the modern-day environmental movement has its roots here. Debates over immigration, affirmative action and climate change might not be unique to California, but the case can be made that the political impact was seen here first. … You can argue that history doesn’t repeat itself, it just moves East.”
Moreover, he noted, that some of the concerns of the Trump-adjacent Make America Healthy Again movement — such as worries about food additives and toxins — have already long been addressed by California’s Proposition 65, which seeks to protect residents from “significant exposures to chemicals that cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm.”
And McGhee of the Public Policy Institute of California noted, “We had our own version of the Clean Air Act before the Clean Air Act was passed.”
Newsom, who has been considered a potential Democratic presidential contender, declined to be interviewed for this article. But Whalen, at the Hoover Institution, noted that if Newsom runs for president, it will essentially be a national referendum on California. And, he said, “It’s hard to see someone saying with a straight face that California is the direction in which America should go right now.”
California
California man charged with bringing explosives to Sacramento airport after repeatedly calling FBI tip line | CNN
A California man was charged Tuesday after authorities say he brought an explosive device and other weapons through a security checkpoint at Sacramento International Airport.
Kimani Osayande Jones, who also uses the last name Jackson, attempted to bring an improvised explosive device, a knife and other bladed weapons, a torch lighter and zip ties through a TSA security checkpoint on May 30, according to court documents filed Tuesday in the Eastern District of California.
Officials believe Jones, 49, repeatedly called the FBI tip line to report he was being threatened and intimidated in the months leading up to the incident.
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office bomb technicians safely removed the explosive device and tested its powder and fuse, both of which were determined to be “viable and energetic,” officials say.
Investigators said the device had the potential to damage an aircraft and cause a loss of cabin pressure.
Jones’ other luggage, which had already been through security and loaded onto an American Airlines flight to Charlotte, North Carolina, was hand-searched and examined by a canine unit upon arrival, and investigators said nothing “illegal or concerning” was found.
Jones has been charged in federal court with unlawful possession of explosive material at an airport. He faces up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine if convicted.
His attorney, Meghan McLoughlin, told CNN in a statement: “There is often more to these cases than the government’s allegations, and that the criminal process will reveal Mr. Jones’ story as well.”
Multiple cell phones and repeated FBI tip line calls
The Sacramento resident went through security on May 30 wearing a face covering and blue latex gloves, court documents say.
When officers found the explosive device and other items in Jones’ carry-on bag, he told them he was unaware the items were in his possession and said “he would be okay with just discarding them.” When authorities informed him that explosive material could not simply be thrown away, he denied ownership of the backpack.
Jones also had five mobile phones in his possession. The cameras on each phone had been covered with painter’s tape, which authorities believe was intended to prevent his surroundings from being recorded.
One phone contained a 15-minute timer ready to start and another had a message from an unknown number on the screen stating, “we will be awaiting your call,” according to court documents.
An individual police believe to be Jones made approximately 13 calls to the FBI tip line leading up to the incident, beginning in March.
On May 24, the caller reported being followed to and from a doctor’s appointment and described what he said were threats and intimidation by another individual.
He said he was “being coerced in sleep to say certain phrases through digital media” and described “hearing sounds coming through walls, window panes, or even outside, attributing the outside sounds to drones,” court documents say. The call was ultimately terminated because of its “nonsensical nature.”
On the day of the incident, the same caller again contacted the FBI tip line, alleging that several individuals were threatening him throughout the past year through “cyber means.” He also referenced exercising his Second Amendment rights while denying any intention to harm others.
The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office also noted it had prior contact with Jones, “wherein he had a history of being paranoid.”
California
California may take weeks to finalize primary results. ‘This is normal’
Hilton, Becerra lead California governor primary results
Vote counting continued after California’s primary election for governor with just over half of the results in.
Although results from California’s primary election began rolling in on Tuesday, June 2, it could take days or even weeks before the final counts are certified.
“This is normal … We have a process that by law ensures both voting rights and the integrity of elections, so I would call on all Californians to be patient,” Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber said in a June 2 news release.
The Golden State’s lengthy vote-counting process has “become a national narrative about California elections,” according to Thad Kousser, a professor of political science at the University of California, San Diego.
“In California, it takes a long time to certify votes, to verify the signatures, to then count the ballots; all of that process takes a while,” Kousser said in an interview last week. “It may take a while for us to learn who the top candidates who emerge are.”
Here are some factors behind California’s lengthy vote-counting process.
Mail-in ballots come with added verification step
With each mail-in ballot cast, elections officials must compare the signature on a returned vote-by-mail envelope to the voter’s signature on their voter registration card. Various factors go into determining whether the signatures match, including the slant of the signature, whether it is printed or written in cursive, and the size, proportions, or scale.
Vote-by-mail ballots were Californians’ preferred voting method in both the 2024 primary and general elections, with drop-off locations — such as ballot drop boxes and voting centers — the most popular way to return mail-in ballots.
During California’s 2024 primary, more than 7.7 million votes were cast statewide, and 90 percent of those were mail-in ballots. This means election officials had to verify the signatures on more than 6.8 million ballots before they could be counted. For the November 2024 general election, 80% of cast ballots, or about 13 million, were vote-by-mail.
Reviewing conditional voter and provisional ballots
California also allows for same-day voter registration, also known as conditional voter registration. Voters who need to register, or re-register, within 14 days of an election can do so at their county elections office, polling place, or vote center. These ballots will be processed and counted after the county elections office has completed the voter registration process.
In addition to conditional voter ballots, there are provisional ballots that must be verified before they are counted. Voters cast provisional ballots for a wide array of reasons, including if their name does not appear at a polling place or if they’ve made a mistake on their ballot. After a voter casts a provisional ballot, it will not be counted until election officials have confirmed that the voter is registered to vote in that county and has not already voted in that election.
Vote-by-mail ballots can be sent on Election Day
Though state officials recommend voters mail their ballots sooner rather than later, state law allows vote-by-mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they arrive within a specified window afterward, thereby extending the tallying process.
For the primary, ballots needed to be postmarked on or before June 2 and received by county elections office no later than June 10.
California is, well, big
California is the most populous state in the nation. And, as of May 18, a record total of 23,155,447 Californians were registered to vote.
While not all registered voters are expected to have voted, county election officials estimate that more than 5 million ballots were cast statewide.
When to expect final results
Under state law, county elections officials are required to report the results for most ballots by June 15, or 13 days after the election, according to Weber. However, some ballots can take counties up to 30 days to count every ballot and then conduct a post-election audit.
State law requires county elections officials to report final official results to state officials July 3. State officials then have until July 10 to certify the results of the election.
California
California’s race for governor and other key primaries remain unsettled as vote count continues
California’s crowded, protracted gubernatorial primary is going to take a little more time to settle.
The race remained too early to call Wednesday morning with 50% of the expected vote counted, according to NBC News’ Decision Desk. Three main candidates — former Fox News host Steve Hilton, a Republican, and two Democrats, former Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and billionaire activist Tom Steyer — are competing for two spots in the general election, with the candidate in fourth place, Republican Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, running well behind.
Hilton had 27% support in the all-party primary with about half of votes still left to count, while Becerra had 26% and Steyer had 20%. Bianco was the only other candidate in double digits, at 11%.
In California, all candidates run on the same primary ballot in the primary and the top two vote-getters, regardless of party, move on to the general election.
It’s difficult to say when it will be clear which two candidates advance to the November general election, however, due to the state’s protracted vote counting.
And with millions of ballots left to count, other key races in California remain uncalled as well, including the second runoff spot to face Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass one on one in November, several House races that could help determine the majority next year, and more.
In the governor’s race, all three candidates rallied supporters around the state as the evening drew on.
“We’re not there yet, but it’s looking good,” Hilton told allies. “It looks very much as if Californians really will have the chance to vote for change in November and take our state in a new direction, a fresh start for our state, which is long overdue.”
But while Hilton was narrowly in first place when he spoke, Democratic candidates were capturing the majority of the votes.
Becerra looked back at his own “underdog story,” from his immigrant relatives to his bid for governor, which took some time to catch fire.
“Almost immediately, he’s counted out, an afterthought, overlooked by many, outspent by a ton, even called along the way to drop out and save us the trouble,” Becerra recounted to his supporters. “Well, guess what? The underdog stayed in the fight. Like my parents, I never gave up.”
Steyer struck a hopeful note in his election night speech despite a deficit in the vote count.
“It might take some time to figure out where this is going, we’re going to wait till every ballot is counted, we’re going to give democracy a time to work, and we know we finished really strong,” Steyer said.
Major battleground districts
GOP Rep. David Valadao’s district has been one of Democrats’ top targets for years, but two Democrats are locked in a close race for the second spot in the November general election against the incumbent.
School board member Randy Villegas, who won support from national progressives, has a slight lead over state legislator Jasmeet Bains, 30% to 26%, with less than half of the expected vote tallied in the 22nd District. Valadao is comfortably in first place.
And in Northern California’s 6th District, Rep. Kevin Kiley — who was elected as a Republican and switched to become an independent this election cycle, as he runs in another newly redrawn district — is bunched up in a tight race that includes Democrat Richard Pan, a former state legislator, and Republican Michael Stansfield. Currently, Stansfield is running ahead of Pan; they spent much of Tuesday night and Wednesday morning trading the lead, which could have significant general election implications.
Meanwhile, outside California, Democrats think they might be able to challenge for one of Montana’s red-tinted congressional districts this fall, after Rep. Ryan Zinke decided to retire. But less than 2 percentage points separate Democrats Sam Forstag and Ryan Busse with more than 85% of the expected vote tallied in their primary in Montana’s 1st District.
Read more about Tuesday’s House primaries here.
A safe seat battle to watch
Plenty of other House districts in California — and a few elsewhere — still have unsettled primaries, but one attracted particular attention due to how nasty the campaign got.
In Southern California, where two Republican incumbents are facing off in one district due to redistricting, Rep. Ken Calvert has advanced to the general election, but Rep. Young Kim is still battling for the second spot. She leads Democrat Esther Kim-Varet in the race for second, 22% to 16%, with about half of the vote in.
Who will face Bass in Los Angeles?
While Bass is projected to advance to a November runoff in Los Angeles, it’s not yet clear whether she’ll face Republican Spencer Pratt or Democrat Nithya Raman.
Bass has about 37% of the vote to 29% for Pratt and 21% for Raman so far, with approximately half of the expected vote tallied.
Speaking to supporters on election night, Raman, a member of the Los Angeles City Council, said that “tonight may not give us a final answer on this race.”
“Many thousands of votes will be counted in the days ahead, and we may not get an answer we like, but regardless of what happens next, nobody, nobody can take away what all of us have built together,” she continued.
Pratt, meanwhile, was looking ahead to a potential matchup with Bass when he spoke to reporters.
“Now I have five months to get deep into every community that hasn’t heard my message to make them safe,” said Pratt, a former reality TV star. “So I’m actually very excited, because I felt very rushed. It’s a big city, and I was not able to talk to as many people as I look forward to talking to.”
Bass also projected optimism, telling her backers, “We got a lot more to go, but so far it’s looking good.”
-
Los Angeles, Ca1 minute agoMan claiming to be armed robs Culver City bank, gets away with $10,000
-
Detroit, MI21 minutes agoFired Detroit TV anchor Taryn Asher files sex discrimination lawsuit against old station, claims new GM protected men
-
San Francisco, CA31 minutes agoSan Francisco family devastated as they face nearly 90% rent increase
-
Dallas, TX36 minutes agoWings’ top pick Azzi Fudd hosts clinic as Cash App donates to Dallas nonprofit
-
Miami, FL43 minutes agoPatients left scrambling for care after Miami-Dade woman accused of operating an unlicensed surgery recovery center
-
Boston, MA46 minutes agoClover plans to reopen some locations after sudden closure, thanks to an anonymous investor
-
Denver, CO51 minutes agoNew report finds Denver metro home buyers and sellers experiencing ‘unattainability fatigue’
-
Seattle, WA58 minutes agoSeattle mayor grilled over public safety, affordability, CCTV