Connect with us

California

California’s proposed zero-emission trucking rules ignore years of industry concerns

Published

on

California’s proposed zero-emission trucking rules ignore years of industry concerns


In abstract

California’s air high quality regulator is poised to undertake a zero-emission truck mandate that some imagine downplays considerations over electrical car infrastructure and will erase working-class jobs.

Advertisement

Visitor Commentary written by

Chris Shimoda

Chris Shimoda is the senior vp of presidency affairs for the California Trucking Affiliation, the nation’s largest statewide commerce affiliation representing trucking.

On Thursday, the California Air Sources Board will vote on the nation’s first zero-emission mandate for trucking fleets. The proposal utterly ignores the quite a few sensible considerations the trucking business has raised for years.

In some respects, CARB regulating the trucking business is nothing new. Since 2008, California truckers have carried out their half to enhance air high quality, spending practically $1 billion per 12 months to improve their gear to cleaner know-how and adjust to the nation’s strictest environmental rules. These modifications embrace buying new engines and putting in filters which have just about eradicated diesel soot and lowered smog-forming emissions by greater than 90%.

Whereas efforts have been made by the trucking business to transition to zero-emission fleets, the know-how and infrastructure to help this transition are merely not there. There are presently fewer than 500 zero-emission business vans on the street, in response to the California Power Fee. Fewer than 90 of those are electrical semi-trucks, the workhorses of the American financial system.

CARB’s proposed rule would require greater than 518,000 zero-emission vans on the street by 2040, and as many as 1.5 million vans on the street by 2050. Assembly California’s purpose of deploying greater than half one million zero-emission business vans by 2040 would require a mean of about 38% of recent truck gross sales to be zero-emission automobiles.

This isn’t lifelike for the business trucking sector. Think about automobiles, for instance. Regardless of a long time of market growth and billions in authorities subsidies, zero-emission automotive gross sales account for roughly 7% of purchases, in response to the Alliance for Automotive Innovation. In California, they account for lower than 15%. Fulfilling CARB’s mandate would require the truck market to leapfrog the event of the light-duty market in a single day.

Advertisement

California would wish to put in as many as 800 chargers per week to energy truck fleets, representing wherever from 64 to 158 megawatts of recent charging capability – sufficient power to energy 118,000 households.

Advertisement

This isn’t a priority for the distant future, both. As a way to meet the proposed rules, greater than 2,000 vans servicing the ports in Los Angeles and Lengthy Seaside would require zero-emission conversions by 2025. This implies roughly 100 megawatts of charging infrastructure must be put in in simply over two years. 

Lower than 1% of this charging capability for port vans exists right now.

Carrying giant batteries might drive vans to shed as a lot as 8,000 kilos of their load capability, a California Trucking Affiliation evaluation discovered, rising the necessity for extra vans and extra drivers at a time when the business is already dealing with a historic shortfall of staff.

CARB’s proposed rules comprise unfair provisions, which can punish truckers for not buying vans which haven’t been constructed, and require them to simply accept vans that they can’t plug in. Some charging infrastructure tasks take years to finish and require advanced utility upgrades, however CARB solely permits fleets a one-year extension when these delays happen. Even worse, many drivers, together with an estimated 75% of port truckers, should depend on a community of publicly obtainable retail charging stations, that are nowhere close to the size required to help a complete business – not to mention the general public.

CARB has been repeatedly warned about these points for years. Consultants have suggested them to control within the areas of trucking the place zero-emission know-how has the perfect alternative to succeed – particularly smaller final-mile supply vans with centralized operations and lengthy durations to cost. These automobiles extra carefully match the capabilities of right now’s zero-emission truck know-how, and might cost in a way that can place much less stress on our overburdened electrical grid. 

Advertisement

The Air Sources Board has seemingly not paid consideration to California’s ongoing provide chain, electrical energy and affordability crises. This proposal will solely improve prices, erase working-class jobs and pressure our overburdened electrical grid by pushing for an excessive amount of, too quick.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

Caitlyn Jenner says she'd 'destroy' Kamala Harris in hypothetical race to be CA gov

Published

on

Caitlyn Jenner says she'd 'destroy' Kamala Harris in hypothetical race to be CA gov


Caitlyn Jenner, the gold-medal Olympian-turned reality TV personality, is considering another run for Governor of California. This time, she says, if she were to go up against Vice President Kamala Harris, she would “destroy her.” 

Advertisement

Jenner, who publicly came out as transgender nearly 10 years ago, made a foray into politics when she ran as a Republican during the recall election that attempted to unseat Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2021. Jenner only received one percent of the vote and was not considered a serious candidate. 

Jenner posted this week on social media that she’s having conversations with “many people” and hopes to have an announcement soon about whether she will run. 

Caitlyn Jenner speaks at the 4th annual Womens March LA: Women Rising at Pershing Square on January 18, 2020 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Chelsea Guglielmino/Getty Images)

Advertisement

She has also posted in Trumpian-style all caps: “MAKE CA GREAT AGAIN!”

As for VP Harris, she has not indicated any future plans for when she leaves office. However, a recent poll suggests Harris would have a sizable advantage should she decide to run in 2026. At that point, Newsom cannot run again because of term limits. 

Advertisement

If Jenner decides to run and wins, it would mark the nation and state’s first transgender governor.  



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Northern California 6-year-old, parents hailed as heroes for saving woman who crashed into canal

Published

on

Northern California 6-year-old, parents hailed as heroes for saving woman who crashed into canal


LIVE OAK — A six-year-old and her parents are being called heroes by a Northern California community for jumping into a canal to save a 75-year-old woman who drove off the road. 

It happened on Larkin Road near Paseo Avenue in the Sutter County community of Live Oak on Monday. 

“I just about lost her, but I didn’t,” said Terry Carpenter, husband of the woman who was rescued. “We got more chances.” 

Terry said his wife of 33 years, Robin Carpenter, is the love of his life and soulmate. He is grateful he has been granted more time to spend with her after she survived her car crashing off a two-lane road and overturning into a canal. 

Advertisement

“She’s doing really well,” Terry said. “No broken bones, praise the Lord.” 

It is what some call a miracle that could have had a much different outcome without a family of good Samaritans. 

“Her lips were purple,” said Ashley Martin, who helped rescue the woman. “There wasn’t a breath at all. I was scared.” 

Martin and her husband, Cyle Johnson, are being hailed heroes by the Live Oak community for jumping into the canal, cutting Robin out of her seat belt and pulling her head above water until first responders arrived. 

“She was literally submerged underwater,” Martin said. “She had a back brace on. Apparently, she just had back surgery. So, I grabbed her brace from down below and I flipped her upward just in a quick motion to get her out of that water.” 

Advertisement

The couple said the real hero was their six-year-old daughter, Cayleigh Johnson. 

“It was scary,” Cayleigh said. “So the car was going like this, and it just went boom, right into the ditch.” 

Cayleigh was playing outside and screamed for her parents who were inside the house near the canal.

I spoke with Robin from her hospital bed over the phone who told us she is in a lot of pain but grateful.

“The thing I can remember is I started falling asleep and then I was going over the bump and I went into the ditch and that’s all I remember,” Robin said. 

Advertisement

It was a split-second decision for a family who firefighters said helped save a stranger’s life. 

“It’s pretty unique that someone would jump in and help somebody that they don’t even know,” said Battalion Chief for Sutter County Fire Richard Epperson. 

Robin is hopeful that she will be released from the hospital on Wednesday in time to be home for Thanksgiving. 

“She gets Thanksgiving and Christmas now with her family and grandkids,” Martin said. 

Terry and Robin are looking forward to eventually meeting the family who helped save Robin’s life. The family expressed the same feelings about meeting the woman they helped when she is out of the hospital. 

Advertisement

“I can’t wait for my baby to get home,” Terry said. 



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program

Published

on

California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program


California Gov. Gavin Newsom may exclude Tesla and other automakers from an electric vehicle (EV) rebate program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases.

Newsom proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which was phased out in 2023 after funding more than 594,000 vehicles and saving more than 456 million gallons of fuel, the governor’s office said in a news release on Monday.

Advertisement

“Consumers continue to prove the skeptics wrong – zero-emission vehicles are here to stay,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future – we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The proposed rebates would be funded with money from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters under the state’s cap-and-trade program, the governor’s office said. Officials did not say how much the program would cost or save consumers.

NEBRASKA AG LAUNCHES ASSAULT AGAINST CALIFORNIA’S ELECTRIC VEHICLE PUSH

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images, File / Getty Images)

They would also include changes to promote innovation and competition in the zero-emission vehicles market – changes that could prevent automakers like Tesla from qualifying for the rebates.

Advertisement

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who relocated Tesla’s corporate headquarters from California to Texas in 2021, responded to the possibility of having Tesla EVs left out of the program.

Tesla automobile plugged in and charging a Supercharger rapid battery charging station for the electric vehicle company Tesla Motors, in the Silicon Valley town of Mountain View, California, August 24, 2016.

Tesla and other automakers may not qualify for the proposed tax credits, according to the governor’s office. (Getty Images, File / Getty Images)

“Even though Tesla is the only company who manufactures their EVs in California! This is insane,” Musk wrote on X, which he also owns.

BENTLEY PUSHES BACK ALL-EV LINEUP TIMELINE TO 2035

Those buying or leasing Tesla vehicles accounted for about 42% of the state’s rebates, The Associated Press reported, citing data from the California Air Resources Board.

Newsom’s office told Fox Business Digital that the proposal is intended to foster market competition, and any potential market cap is subject to negotiation with the state Legislature. 

Advertisement
Ticker Security Last Change Change %
TSLA TESLA INC. 338.59 -13.97 -3.96%

“Under a potential market cap, and depending on what the cap is, there’s a possibility that Tesla and other automakers could be excluded,” the governor’s office said. “But that’s again subject to negotiations with the legislature.”

Newsom’s office noted that such market caps have been part of rebate programs since George W. Bush’s administration in 2005.

Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom

Newsom has pushed Californians to replace gas-powered vehicles with zero-emission vehicles. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images / Getty Images)

Federal tax credits for EVs are currently worth up to $7,500 for new zero-emission vehicles. President-elect Trump has previously vowed to end the credit.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

California has surpassed 2 million zero-emission vehicles sold, according to the governor’s office. The state, however, could face a $2 billion budget deficit next year, Reuters reported, citing a non-partisan legislative estimate released last week.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending