Connect with us

California

California to vote on hotly debated change in rooftop solar policy

Published

on

California to vote on hotly debated change in rooftop solar policy


Dec 15 (Reuters) – California utility regulators on Thursday will vote on a proposal to scale back the speed at which households with rooftop photo voltaic panels are credited for exporting surplus energy to the grid, a step photo voltaic firms warn might gradual installations however utilities argue can be fairer for low-income ratepayers.

For many years, Californians with rooftop panels have been credited for extra energy at or close to the total retail electrical energy fee. Supporters say this incentive has been essential to the state’s efforts to struggle local weather change, however critics contend it has unfairly favored solely these rich sufficient to afford photo voltaic.

The proposal, unveiled final month by the California Public Utilities Fee, would change the so-called “internet metering” coverage by compensating photo voltaic house owners for surplus energy at a decrease fee decided by the associated fee the utility would have spent to purchase clear energy elsewhere.

It might additionally supply new credit to methods paired with batteries that will enable properties to maintain extra energy in reserve when demand is low, then feed it into the grid after darkish when photo voltaic vitality assets cease producing however demand is excessive. That may assist stabilize California’s grid, sustaining reliability throughout its formidable transition away from fossil fuels.

Advertisement

The vote by the five-member fee is being watched nationwide as a result of insurance policies made in California usually function a template for different states in search of to exchange fossil fuels with renewable vitality.

Utilities and ratepayer advocates assist the proposal, arguing the prevailing coverage pushes many of the value burden of sustaining the grid onto the shoulders of consumers with out panels, who are typically much less prosperous. Photo voltaic firms counter that the modifications would gradual new installations and threaten California’s clear vitality and local weather change objectives.

“We have outgrown this coverage and it’s not sustainable,” Matt Baker, director of the Public Advocates Workplace, an impartial ratepayer advocate on the CPUC that helps the proposed reforms.

A utility-backed group, Reasonably priced Clear Vitality For All, has stated the modifications don’t go far sufficient to alleviate the associated fee burden on lower-income households.

California’s three investor-owned utilities are Pacific Fuel & Electrical (PCG.N), Southern California Edison (EIX.N) and San Diego Fuel & Electrical (SRE.N).

Advertisement

The longstanding coverage has propelled development for nationwide residential installers like Sunrun Inc (RUN.O) and SunPower Corp (SPWR.O) in addition to a whole bunch of native firms, and made California a nationwide chief in photo voltaic installations.

The PUC has stated photo voltaic would nonetheless make financial sense after the reforms. Prospects putting in photo voltaic with a battery, for instance, would save about $136 a month below the plan, in contrast with $100 a month with simply photo voltaic.

Reporting by Nichola Groom; Enhancing by David Gregorio

Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California regulators to vote on changing how power bills are calculated

Published

on

California regulators to vote on changing how power bills are calculated


SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California regulators on Thursday are likely to change how some power companies calculate their customers’ bills, a decision that would make it less expensive for people to charge electric cars and cool their homes in the summer but would increase prices for those who don’t use as much energy.

The California Public Utilities Commission will vote on whether to let the state’s big investor-owned utilities — including Pacific Gas & Electric — add a fixed charge to people’s power bills each month. For most people, the charge would be $24.15 per month and would pay for such things as installing and maintaining the equipment necessary to transmit electricity to homes. Residents with lower incomes who are enrolled in one of two discount programs would pay less, either $6 or $12 per month.

In exchange for the new charge, the price of electricity would drop by between 5 cents and 7 cents per kilowatt hour. One kilowatt hour is how much power it takes to use a 1,000-watt appliance — a coffee maker or vacuum cleaner, for instance — for one hour.

For people who use a lot of energy each month, this could could lower their monthly bills. People who live in Fresno — where temperatures can often exceed 100 degrees Fahrenheit (37.8 degrees Celsius) — would save about $33 running their air conditioners during the summer, according to the commission. That’s because the savings they would get from the price drop on electricity would be more than the amount they pay for the new fixed charge.

Advertisement

It would also benefit people who own electric cars and use other electric appliances, such as heat pumps. They would save an average of between $28 and $44 per month, according to the commission. In 2022, California accounted for 37% of the nation’s light-duty electric vehicles, or about six times more than Florida, the state in second place, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

“The new billing structure more evenly allocates fixed costs among customers and will encourage customers to adopt electric vehicles and replace gas appliances with electric appliances because it will be less expensive,” Administrative Law Judge Stephanie Wang wrote in a proposed decision explaining the charge.

For people who don’t use as much energy, the new fixed charge could increase their bill each month. This includes people who live in smaller apartments or who live in cooler areas and don’t use air conditioning as much. That’s because for them, the decrease in the price of electricity would not be enough to offset the amount of the new monthly charge.

Opponents argue it would act as a disincentive to conserve energy, something California has been urging people to do.

“If you wanted to design a policy instrument that would send the signal that conservation doesn’t count, this would be it,” said Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group.

Advertisement

Most states already have fixed monthly charges on utility bills to pay for maintenance and infrastructure of the electric grid. But in California — where electric rates are among the highest in the nation — any move that could increase prices for anyone raises alarms among consumers and elected officials.

A group of 18 members of Congress from California have called on the commission to keep the rate low, noting the national average for fixed charges on utility bills is $11. Some Democrats and Republicans in the state Legislature have backed a bill that would cap the charge at $10 per month.

“We must do more to rein in the ever-growing cost of living in our state, not find new ways to add to it,” Republicans in the California Senate wrote in a letter urging the commission to reject the proposal.

The proposal is much lower than what the state’s investor-owned utility companies had asked for, which was a charge between $53 and $71 per month. The commission also argues the charge would not discourage conservation, noting utilities are already allowed to increase rates during peak hours.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

California

California gets moisture, needs warmth – Brownfield Ag News

Published

on

California gets moisture, needs warmth – Brownfield Ag News


News

California gets moisture, needs warmth

An atmospheric scientist says the state that leads the country in fruit and vegetable production has recovered from drought but has a different threat to this year’s crops.

Advertisement

Eric Snodgrass with Nutrien Ag Solutions tells Brownfield California needs warm weather and the accompanying heading degree units so the crops will grow. “Just to think this through, the severe weather event that’s going on right now in the central U.S., that started out this weekend in the west and they had snow all the way down to the foothills of the Sierra Nevadas.”

Snodgrass says the north-south jet stream that is bringing severe storms to the Midwest is also responsible for the chilly air in California.  He says the rest of the country is also looking at some cool nights between the 11th and 14th of May, which will also slow down growth there. “We get down there right below that 40 degree line early in the morning, and then sunshine comes out and we kind of break away towards warm. You’re not accumulating a whole lot of GDDs (Growing Degree Days) fast, in other words, as you plant the crop, it’s not like it’s going to emerge in a week. We’re going to have to get that cooler air out.”

Snodgrass says even with the chilly air in the forecast, he’s not expecting a major late frost event that would cause widespread damage to crops. As for moisture, Snodgrass says California had plenty of precipitation in December and January, and again in March and early April.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

California

Richmond urges California to cut ties with PG&E

Published

on

Richmond urges California to cut ties with PG&E


The Richmond City Council on Tuesday night passed a resolution urging California to cut ties with PG&E. 

Advertisement

The resolution calls on the state to replace the utility company as California’s main power supplier, citing PG&E’s contributions to wildfires, shut-offs and rate hikes and reasons for the proposed split.

Councilmembers said they support a nonprofit called Golden State Energy to take over.

“We’re saying that ‘We, the city of Richmond, stand behind implementation of something already in place,’” Councilwoman Doria Robinson said. 

Advertisement

The letter of support will now be sent to a number of state leaders including Gov. Gavin Newsom. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending