Connect with us

California

California Needs to Focus on Electrifying Big Rigs

Published

on

California Needs to Focus on Electrifying Big Rigs


The California Air Sources Board (CARB) is at the moment contemplating one of the important guidelines for air high quality and local weather change in lots of, a few years. This regulation, referred to as the Superior Clear Fleets (ACF) rule, has the potential to ship important reductions in each air and climate-warming pollution by requiring the state’s largest and most worthwhile business and public fleets to transition to electrical vans, vans, and buses over time, starting in 2024. To perform that, nonetheless, the rule must adequately deal with probably the most polluting vans – Class 7 and eight tractor vans. These are the vans most individuals would possibly confer with as large rigs, semis, and 18-wheelers.

Whereas UCS and I applaud CARB’s efforts in creating such a significant regulation, there are a number of important modifications that might, and may, be made to the rule to maximise its environmental and financial advantages. I lined these modifications in a earlier weblog. One, particularly, is price revisiting right here because it has the potential to convey almost 25,000 of the state’s most polluting vans into the regulation and supercharge its effectiveness.

Regulating large rigs could have large impacts

Beneath the present proposal, fleets with annual income higher than $50 million or with greater than 50 vans can be lined below the rule. Whereas the numeric compliance threshold of fifty vans is smart for sure fleets, like these with smaller vans and vans, it overlooks the outsized air pollution impacts of sure varieties of heavy-duty vans on California roads and highways.

The ACF can solely notice its full potential to assist sluggish local weather change and supply equitable entry to scrub air if it immediately accounts for the extreme air pollution and public well being impacts of Class 7 and eight tractor vans. The rule ought to embody a dynamic compliance threshold that accounts for the huge variations in emissions from various varieties of automobiles.

Advertisement

Tractor vans make up nearly 1 % of all on-road automobiles in California. Regardless of their low numbers, these vans are chargeable for round one-third of smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions, 1 / 4 of lung-damaging superb particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions, and just below 15 % of climate-warming greenhouse gasoline (GHG) emissions from the state’s on-road automobiles. What’s extra, these vans are inclined to function close to ports and on industrial corridors, and communities adjoining or downwind from these areas–locations like Wilmington, West Oakland, and Riverside–have traditionally borne disproportionate impacts from unhealthy air high quality.

The present iteration of the rule would largely deal with a fleet of small supply vans (Class 2b for the actual truck nerds on the market) the identical as one comprised of large tractor trailer vans. It’s straightforward to imagine {that a} fleet of fifty supply vans would emit much less air pollution than a fleet of fifty tractor vans, however the numbers present the numerous extent of this distinction.

Utilizing CARB’s automobile emissions modeling software, we will see that, in comparison with a fleet of gas-powered Class 2b supply vans or full-size pickups, the identical measurement fleet of Class 8 tractor vans would emit 14 instances as a lot NOx, 4 instances as a lot PM2.5, and 4.5 instances the GHGs.

You learn that proper—the present proposal largely fails to account for the various quantities of air pollution from various kinds of fleets.

This stark comparability makes a superb argument for giving particular consideration to tractor truck fleets below the rule. What’s extra, the 2 states most definitely to undertake ACF first after California, Oregon and Washington, have signaled their intention to think about a extra dynamic threshold for future zero-emissions fleet necessities. Each states selected a threshold of 5 for fleet knowledge reporting, whereas a number of years in the past California selected a threshold of fifty for reporting.

Advertisement
A fleet of fifty Class 8 tractor vans would emit magnitudes extra NOx air pollution and PM2.5 air pollution than the identical measurement fleet of smaller automobiles.
A fleet of fifty Class 8 tractor vans would emit magnitudes extra climate-warming GHG air pollution than the identical measurement fleet of smaller automobiles.

A numeric compliance threshold of 10 vans below the ACF for Class 7 and eight tractor vans can be the best approach for the rule to assist California accomplish its air high quality and local weather targets. At this threshold, almost 90 % of emissions from California large rigs can be lined below the rule, whereas solely regulating 13 % of fleets.

This supplies a severe regulatory bang for the buck because it brings extra emissions from probably the most polluting automobiles below the rule, leaves the smallest and most weak tractor truck fleets unregulated, and wouldn’t considerably enhance the complexity of the company’s administration of the rule.

By regulating simply 13 % of California tractor truck fleets, almost 90 % of their emissions might be lined below the ACF.

By protecting the rule’s threshold at 50 for all vans, no matter their totally different emissions charges, the ACF will miss round 25,000 of the state’s oldest and dirtiest tractor vans (these from fleets with between 10 and 49 vans).

Bringing these vans into the rule is maybe one of many best and most cost-effective methods to cut back air air pollution from transportation within the state and would ship further and quicker reduction to communities struggling probably the most from air air pollution in comparison with the present proposal. CARB should account for the various ranges of air pollution of the totally different vans and a decrease fleet threshold for tractor vans is the best approach to do that. Though the present rule is an enormous step in direction of cleaner air and a secure local weather, its failure to completely account for emissions from probably the most polluting vans will make for a much less efficient rule.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

Northern California 6-year-old, parents hailed as heroes for saving woman who crashed into canal

Published

on

Northern California 6-year-old, parents hailed as heroes for saving woman who crashed into canal


LIVE OAK — A six-year-old and her parents are being called heroes by a Northern California community for jumping into a canal to save a 75-year-old woman who drove off the road. 

It happened on Larkin Road near Paseo Avenue in the Sutter County community of Live Oak on Monday. 

“I just about lost her, but I didn’t,” said Terry Carpenter, husband of the woman who was rescued. “We got more chances.” 

Terry said his wife of 33 years, Robin Carpenter, is the love of his life and soulmate. He is grateful he has been granted more time to spend with her after she survived her car crashing off a two-lane road and overturning into a canal. 

Advertisement

“She’s doing really well,” Terry said. “No broken bones, praise the Lord.” 

It is what some call a miracle that could have had a much different outcome without a family of good Samaritans. 

“Her lips were purple,” said Ashley Martin, who helped rescue the woman. “There wasn’t a breath at all. I was scared.” 

Martin and her husband, Cyle Johnson, are being hailed heroes by the Live Oak community for jumping into the canal, cutting Robin out of her seat belt and pulling her head above water until first responders arrived. 

“She was literally submerged underwater,” Martin said. “She had a back brace on. Apparently, she just had back surgery. So, I grabbed her brace from down below and I flipped her upward just in a quick motion to get her out of that water.” 

Advertisement

The couple said the real hero was their six-year-old daughter, Cayleigh Johnson. 

“It was scary,” Cayleigh said. “So the car was going like this, and it just went boom, right into the ditch.” 

Cayleigh was playing outside and screamed for her parents who were inside the house near the canal.

I spoke with Robin from her hospital bed over the phone who told us she is in a lot of pain but grateful.

“The thing I can remember is I started falling asleep and then I was going over the bump and I went into the ditch and that’s all I remember,” Robin said. 

Advertisement

It was a split-second decision for a family who firefighters said helped save a stranger’s life. 

“It’s pretty unique that someone would jump in and help somebody that they don’t even know,” said Battalion Chief for Sutter County Fire Richard Epperson. 

Robin is hopeful that she will be released from the hospital on Wednesday in time to be home for Thanksgiving. 

“She gets Thanksgiving and Christmas now with her family and grandkids,” Martin said. 

Terry and Robin are looking forward to eventually meeting the family who helped save Robin’s life. The family expressed the same feelings about meeting the woman they helped when she is out of the hospital. 

Advertisement

“I can’t wait for my baby to get home,” Terry said. 



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program

Published

on

California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program


California Gov. Gavin Newsom may exclude Tesla and other automakers from an electric vehicle (EV) rebate program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases.

Newsom proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which was phased out in 2023 after funding more than 594,000 vehicles and saving more than 456 million gallons of fuel, the governor’s office said in a news release on Monday.

Advertisement

“Consumers continue to prove the skeptics wrong – zero-emission vehicles are here to stay,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future – we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The proposed rebates would be funded with money from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters under the state’s cap-and-trade program, the governor’s office said. Officials did not say how much the program would cost or save consumers.

NEBRASKA AG LAUNCHES ASSAULT AGAINST CALIFORNIA’S ELECTRIC VEHICLE PUSH

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images, File / Getty Images)

They would also include changes to promote innovation and competition in the zero-emission vehicles market – changes that could prevent automakers like Tesla from qualifying for the rebates.

Advertisement

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who relocated Tesla’s corporate headquarters from California to Texas in 2021, responded to the possibility of having Tesla EVs left out of the program.

Tesla automobile plugged in and charging a Supercharger rapid battery charging station for the electric vehicle company Tesla Motors, in the Silicon Valley town of Mountain View, California, August 24, 2016.

Tesla and other automakers may not qualify for the proposed tax credits, according to the governor’s office. (Getty Images, File / Getty Images)

“Even though Tesla is the only company who manufactures their EVs in California! This is insane,” Musk wrote on X, which he also owns.

BENTLEY PUSHES BACK ALL-EV LINEUP TIMELINE TO 2035

Those buying or leasing Tesla vehicles accounted for about 42% of the state’s rebates, The Associated Press reported, citing data from the California Air Resources Board.

Newsom’s office told Fox Business Digital that the proposal is intended to foster market competition, and any potential market cap is subject to negotiation with the state Legislature. 

Advertisement
Ticker Security Last Change Change %
TSLA TESLA INC. 338.59 -13.97 -3.96%

“Under a potential market cap, and depending on what the cap is, there’s a possibility that Tesla and other automakers could be excluded,” the governor’s office said. “But that’s again subject to negotiations with the legislature.”

Newsom’s office noted that such market caps have been part of rebate programs since George W. Bush’s administration in 2005.

Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom

Newsom has pushed Californians to replace gas-powered vehicles with zero-emission vehicles. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images / Getty Images)

Federal tax credits for EVs are currently worth up to $7,500 for new zero-emission vehicles. President-elect Trump has previously vowed to end the credit.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

California has surpassed 2 million zero-emission vehicles sold, according to the governor’s office. The state, however, could face a $2 billion budget deficit next year, Reuters reported, citing a non-partisan legislative estimate released last week.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get

Published

on

STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Advertisement

Along with most other Democratic politicians in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom still doesn’t seem to understand what happened in the 2024 election.

For years, Newsom, along with California cronies like former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and, of course, Vice President Kamala Harris, bragged about their state being a “model for the nation.”

In one sense–not the one they intended, of course–that’s true. California became a model of what not to do.

CALIFORNIA VOTERS NARROWLY REJECT $18 MINIMUM WAGE; FIRST SUCH NO-VOTE NATIONWIDE SINCE 1996

The terrible combination of elitism and extremism that has defined Democratic policymaking in my home state for at least the last decade has delivered failure on every front.

Advertisement

Despite having the highest taxes in the nation, despite the state’s budget nearly doubling in the last ten years (even as our population has been falling, in the exodus from blue state misrule), California has the highest rate of poverty in America. We have the highest housing costs, the lowest homeownership, highest gas and utility bills, and the worst business climate–ten years in a row.

This record of failure is exactly why Democrats lost so badly on November 5th. Voters had a clear choice: between more of the same Democrat policies that raised the cost of living and lowered their quality of life, or a return to the peace and prosperity of the Trump years.

GAVIN NEWSOM TO MEET WITH BIDEN AFTER VOWING TO PROTECT STATE’S PROGRESSIVE POLICIES AGAINST TRUMP ADMIN

In many ways, the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris represented a battle between the ‘blue state model’ championed by Gavin Newsom in California, and the ‘red state model’ that has driven people and businesses out of California and into the arms of more welcoming states like Texas, Tennessee and Florida.

Of course, the red state model won and the blue state model was roundly rejected. 

Advertisement

You would think that would make blue state leaders like Newsom pause and reflect. But the exact opposite has happened. Gavin Newsom immediately called a “special session” of the California legislature to “Trump-proof” his state.

What California really needs is “Newsom-proofing.” 

Instead, California Democrats are doubling down on the exact same agenda that was defeated across the country – including in California, which saw the biggest shift from Democrats to the GOP in decades.

Here are the five things California Democrats still don’t get:

1. People want results, not lectures

Democrats and their media sycophants can do all the self-righteous, sanctimonious bloviating they like about “our democracy” and “equity”, but in the end people want the basics of the American Dream: a good job that pays enough to raise your family in a home of your own in a safe neighborhood with a good school so your kids can have a better life than you. No amount of moral superiority from the people in charge will make up for that if they fail to provide it.

Advertisement

2. Enough with the ‘climate’ extremism

“Climate” has become a religion for Democrats, and you see that especially clearly in California. But when you look at the main reason life is so unaffordable for working people, whether that’s gas prices, utility bills or housing costs, extreme climate policies are to blame. Working-class Americans can’t afford these ‘luxury beliefs.’

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

3. Who cares about Hollywood? 

This election destroyed forever the myth that fancy celebrities can sway votes. Oprah, Beyonce, George Clooney, Taylor Swift…nobody cares! The new cultural powerhouses are the podcast hosts, comedians…the raw power of UFC is where it’s at, not the decadent Hollywood elite who won’t even turn up to support “their” candidate without a multimillion dollar paycheck.

Producer and actress Oprah Winfrey holds up Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ hand as she arrives onstage during a campaign rally on the Benjamin Franklin Parkway in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on November 4, 2024.  (Getty Images)

4. ‘Little tech’ beats Big Tech

Democrats may console themselves with the knowledge that California’s Big Tech monopolies are on their side. But in this election we saw the rise of what famed Silicon Valley investor Marc Andressen calls “little tech”, the upstarts and rebels who reject leftist groupthink. They got engaged in this election in a way we’ve never seen before. It’s a massive shift and will be a huge force for the future.

Advertisement

5. Working class beats the elite 

Back in 2016, after the Brexit vote, and then Donald Trump’s victory here, shocked the world, I predicted that the Republican Party had the opportunity to become a “multiracial working class coalition.” Trump’s 2024 victory has delivered that — a revolutionary shift in our political landscape. The other part of my prediction? Democrats will be left as the party of the “rich, white and woke.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Unless Democrats come to terms with these realities and change course, they can expect to lose elections for years to come. The reaction in California – epicenter of today’s Democrat elite — shows that there is zero sign of this happening. 

They just don’t get it.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM STEVE HILTON

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending