Connect with us

California

California Facing Three Days Of ‘Extremely Dangerous’ Blizzard Conditions In Sierra Nevada—Up To 12 Feet Of Snow

Published

on

California Facing Three Days Of ‘Extremely Dangerous’ Blizzard Conditions In Sierra Nevada—Up To 12 Feet Of Snow


Topline

Forecasters are warning California residents not to travel in the Sierra Nevada mountains for the next three days, as a potentially historic blizzard that could last through Saturday threatens a large region with up to 12 feet of snow and devastating winds.

Key Facts

Northern and eastern California will see heavy to extremely heavy snowfall on Thursday, Friday and Saturday, forecasters at the National Weather Service said, as well as heavy rainfall and wind gusts up to 60 miles per hour—creating three days of hazardous blizzard conditions.

Advertisement

The storm is expected to weaken by Sunday, but snow showers are still possible in the Sierra Nevada’s mountaintops through Monday, the agency said.

The blizzard conditions are expected to extend as far east as Lake Tahoe and parts of Nevada—including Reno and other parts of Washoe County, which could see up to 10 inches of snow by Sunday.

Advertisement

In total, California is expected to see 1 to 4 feet of snow in areas above 3000 feet, 5 to 10 feet above 5,000 feet, and 12 feet or more on the Sierra Nevada’s mountaintops.

The NWS is warning travelers of “extremely dangerous to impossible travel conditions” throughout roads in the region, which could see white-outs with near zero visibility, as well as tree damage and power outages caused by winds.

The storm system entered the Pacific Northwest and crossed the state border into northern California early on Thursday morning, the NWS station in Sacramento said in an update on X.

Advertisement

Key Background

The current storm will likely be the largest California has seen so far this year, but it comes on the heels of a historic year for snow in the Golden State. In water year 2023, California recorded its second-snowiest winter on record, with over 700 inches over the course of the season. The historic snowfall caused avalanches, flooding and mudslides, but also improved drought conditions for many parts of the state. Compared to last year’s winter season, the Sierra Nevada has experienced a significant snow drought, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported in their most recent update on the state. As of February 15, most of the mountain range was reporting less than 70% of its normal snow water equivalent. However, a recent series of storms have added significant amounts of snow to the mountain range, the Los Angeles Times reported last week, and this weekend’s storm is expected to add even more to that total.

Tangent

California is not the only part of the United States expecting early March snow this year. Central New York is also bracing for potential blizzard conditions on Thursday as lake-effect snow and high winds threaten Rochester and Syracuse. Forecasters at the NWS are currently predicting the area will see between 6 to 11 inches of snow over the course of the day. That snow will be blown onto roadways by wind gusts up to 40 miles per hour, which will create “very difficult” travel conditions. A small craft advisory was also issued for the coast of Lake Ontario, which could see waves as large as 9 to 12 feet and more heavy winds up to 34 miles per hour until Friday morning.

Further Reading

MORE FROM FORBES700 Inches Of Snow: Sierra Nevadas Face 2nd-Snowiest Season On Record-Stemming Brutal California DroughtMORE FROM FORBESNearly Half Of California Out Of Drought Following Record Snow-But Years-Long Dry Spell Isn’t Over Yet





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California cities dominate list of places with worst commutes

Published

on

California cities dominate list of places with worst commutes


(NEXSTAR) – If you’re stuck in traffic every morning and every evening, is it comforting to know you’re not alone? The average American adult spends 219 hours a year – or more than nine full days – commuting every year, a new analysis by MoneyGeek found.

The personal finance site used data from the Census, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, TomTom, plus gas prices to determine where residents have the best and worst commutes.

Six of the 10 worst places for commuters are in California, MoneyGeek found.

It’s not just that drivers in Vallejo, San Jose, Stockton, Modesto and other California cities have to sit in traffic for a long time – though they do – but they have to pay out the nose to do so. Gas prices are high all around California, and residents in further suburbs (like Vallejo and Fairfield) are often driving longer distances to get into the office. (MoneyGeek factored in the cost of gas, but not the cost of public transit, in its report.)

Advertisement

To make matters even worse, commuters who drive to work risk damage to their car – or their own safety – every time they get behind the wheel. Crash rates weren’t highest in California cities, however. Drivers in Jacksonville, Florida; Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Albuquerque, New Mexico; and San Antonio, Texas, were more likely to experience a crash during their commute, MoneyGeek found.

The study combined these factors – commute time, rush-hour speed, crash rates and gas costs – to give of the country’s 124 largest metro areas a score. The 20 worst communities for commuters are:

Rank Metro area Score Avg. 1-way commute (minutes) Avg. rush-hour speed (mph) Morning commute crash rate Annual gas cost
1. Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 0.0 34 28 0.31 $1,792
2. Stockton-Lodi, CA 5.2 35 28 0.20 $1,791
3. Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 14.3 32 27 0.32 $1,099
4. Modesto, CA 15.0 31 28 0.18 $1,582
5. Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 15.5 35 31 0.12 $1,931
6. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 19.5 28 26 0.27 $1,367
7. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 20.1 32 18 0.16 $1,042
8. Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 21.3 28 31 0.35 $1,243
9. Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 21.6 33 27 0.15 $1,133
10. Jacksonville, FL 23.0 28 34 0.54 $1,202
11. San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 24.9 29 30 0.45 $1,015
12. Birmingham-Hoover, AL 25.1 29 32 0.25 $1,161
13. Baton Rouge, LA 25.3 29 29 0.48 $1,028
14. Charleston-North Charleston, SC 25.6 30 26 0.36 $941
15. Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 27.5 33 23 0.21 $918
16. Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 28.1 33 30 0.06 $1,492
17. Albuquerque, NM 28.4 27 34 0.45 $1,167
18. Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 28.5 31 20 0.10 $1,066
19. Worcester, MA-CT 28.8 31 29 0.10 $1,239
20. Port St. Lucie, FL 29.1 31 27 0.15 $1,078
(Source: MoneyGeek)

If you’re looking for someone to be jealous of, look no further than Madison, Wisconsin. Drivers there benefit from low gas prices, rare crashes and short commute times, earning it the No. 1 spot for best commutes in the ranking.

The shortest average commute time overall was found in Wichita, Kansas. Meanwhile, drivers in the McAllen, Texas, metro area pay the least for gas every year. The award for fewest crashes was a three-way tie between Boulder, Colorado; Lancaster, Pennsylvania; and Trenton, New Jersey.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Frustration over hidden fees in California ends July 1

Published

on

Frustration over hidden fees in California ends July 1


SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) – Come Monday, changes will be coming to California as a variety of new laws are set to go into effect, including one aimed at banning hidden fees.

“We need to know. We need to know what we’re paying for,” said Kelley Day.

Thanks to Senate Bill 478, consumers will know the price of a product or service from the start — not when they get the bill.

“I feel like it makes it fair for consumers in general. You get what you get. You’re seeing the price and then it makes it so no one can complain,” said Zoe Miller.

Advertisement

Also known as the honest pricing law or hidden fees statute, the bill paves the way for transparency. It applies to the sale of most goods and services including restaurants, hotels, event tickets and food delivery service.

“If consumers see a low price at the beginning, then they are more likely to make a commitment there and then once they’ve made the commitment, they’ll have to put up then with the higher price at the end. It’s kind of a bait and switch,” said Alan Gin, an economics professor at University of San Diego.

Gin says restaurants may be among the most worried to bake the total cost of fees and surcharge into the price of what’s on your plate.

“It’s the restaurant industry particularly that’s complaining about this and they may carve out legislation that says their fees would be OK if they display them prominently on the menu,” Gin added.

Lawmakers are currently contemplating that exemption for restaurants. The law already has exemptions for taxes and things like shipping and delivery charges.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California welcomes its newest city

Published

on

California welcomes its newest city


A community of nearly 30,000 residents is set to become California’s newest city. 

Mountain House in San Joaquin County will incorporate on July 1, several months after voters showed overwhelming support for cityhood. 
•Video Above: Coverage of Mountain House cityhood vote (from March 2024)

Mountain House is in the southwestern part of the county, about 30 miles southwest of Stockton and 50 miles east of Oakland.

To celebrate cityhood, Mountain House announced officials are holding a commemoration ceremony as part of a Fourth of July celebration. 

Advertisement

Mountain House is San Joaquin County’s eighth city and California’s 483rd city, as well as the state’s newest since 2011. 

It has about 10,000 registered voters and is a growing community with about 28,000 residents. 

On the same March ballot where voters opted for cityhood, they also decided on a proposed mayor and city council and determined how future elections would work. 

A majority of voters decided on an “at-large” process to determine how city council members will be elected.

An “at-large” election means anyone who lives in the city could run for a city council seat, instead of using a system of districts with one member from each. In Mountain House, the candidates with the most votes will become city council members. 

Advertisement

Prior to the cityhood vote, Mountain House was governed by an elected, five-member community services district board. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending