Connect with us

California

California delayed or wrongly denied jobless benefits for millions during pandemic, report says

Published

on

California delayed or wrongly denied jobless benefits for millions during pandemic, report says


California delayed or improperly denied unemployment advantages for roughly 6 million individuals in the course of the pandemic as a result of state insurance policies “don’t prioritize getting advantages to staff shortly,” in keeping with a nonpartisan report launched Monday by the Legislative Analyst’s Workplace.

The report mentioned funds had been delayed for about 5 million individuals — as much as half of all staff who utilized for advantages in the course of the top of the pandemic. In the meantime, the California Employment Improvement Division denied advantages for 3.4 million staff throughout that point. Of the 200,000 staff who appealed these denials, practically 80% of them received their case.

“We imagine most of the staff who didn’t enchantment doubtless had been eligible, which means the state might have improperly denied 1 million extra claims,” mentioned Chas Alamo, principal fiscal and coverage analyst for the Legislative Analyst’s Workplace.

Advertisement

The report blamed these failures on the essential design of California’s unemployment program, which it mentioned is geared extra towards the companies that fund this system than the employees who profit from it.

Companies’ tax charges go up every time one among their former staff is awarded unemployment advantages. From 2019 by 2021, greater than half of the Employment Improvement Division’s choices to disclaim advantages had been overturned on enchantment. However in different states, lower than 25% of denials had been overturned on enchantment, in keeping with the report.

“State insurance policies and practices fashioned underneath this orientation would have a tendency to emphasise holding down enterprise prices probably on the expense of constructing positive eligible staff can get advantages simply,” the report mentioned.

Of the three.4 million staff who had advantages denied in the course of the pandemic, most of them had been for not offering needed paperwork on time — guidelines aimed toward stopping fraud. However throughout that point, the report mentioned the Employment Improvement Division had no system to course of unopened mail and answered lower than 1% of its cellphone calls due to overwhelming demand.

The report mentioned California denied some advantages even though the claimants had been clearly eligible. In a single case reviewed by the Legislative Analyst’s Workplace, the state denied a declare as a result of the employee was caring for her kids whereas unemployed, thus making her “unavailable for work.” State guidelines permit mother and father to take care of their kids whereas they’re unemployed, so long as they organize little one care as soon as they get a brand new job.

Advertisement

“Individually, insurance policies and actions aimed toward stopping fraud might seem justified and affordable,” the report mentioned. “Seen as an entire, nevertheless, the gathering makes getting advantages unreasonably troublesome for eligible staff.”

The Employment Improvement Division mentioned it might “rigorously overview the LAO’s concepts,” including that it had already adopted a lot of its suggestions. Earlier this yr, the state Legislature gave the division $136 million for improved name facilities, simplifying kinds and notices, developing with new instruments to higher reveal fraud and upgrading coaching for staff to get funds permitted sooner.

“Throughout the pandemic, EDD has paid over $180 billion to Californians in want,” the division wrote in an unsigned e mail to the Related Press. “The pandemic examined each profit system within the nation, exposing the necessity to ship higher methods and modernize operations.”

Michael Bernick, a former director of the Employment Improvement Division, mentioned the report was unfair as a result of it positioned an excessive amount of blame on the state. Unemployment advantages is a joint program with the federal authorities. A lot of the anti-fraud insurance policies are mandated by federal guidelines, he mentioned.

Initially of the pandemic, California officers took a number of steps to hurry up the cost of advantages. However quickly it was clear that the state was the sufferer of unprecedented quantities of fraud, with state officers estimating as a lot as $20 billion in unemployment funds going to criminals. Audits revealed tons of of hundreds of thousands had been paid within the names of demise row inmates and, in a single case, Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

Advertisement

Almost all of that fraud got here from a particular federally funded program aimed toward giving unemployment advantages to individuals who normally usually are not eligible to obtain them as a result of they’re both impartial contractors or self-employed. That particular program, which has now ended, didn’t embody many anti-fraud safeguards which are a part of the standard unemployment program.

Within the face of intense criticism, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration reacted by putting in new identity-verification software program and making different adjustments to root out fraud.

“There’s a stability between fast cost and paying out fraudulent or inappropriate claims, and it’s not true that EDD has not made getting advantages a precedence,” Bernick mentioned.

Assemblywoman Cottie Petrie-Norris (D-Irvine), chair of the Accountability and Administrative Evaluation Committee, mentioned lawmakers hope to see “main advances in how shortly the division can assess threats and resolve claims.”

Assemblyman Jim Patterson (R-Fresno) is skeptical. He famous the state was warned in an audit simply earlier than the pandemic that the state was not ready to deal with a big inflow of claims.

Advertisement

“They had been warned and didn’t do something about it,” he mentioned. “I simply don’t purchase the excuse they had been overwhelmed.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence

Published

on

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence


A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.

The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.

In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.

The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”

Advertisement

“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending