California
Before Santa Rosa Plaza, a beloved theater stood in its place
Fifty years ago, a determined group of local citizens formed a committee in an attempt to “save the Cal,” Santa Rosa’s historic California Theatre threatened by the city’s downtown urban renewal.
The old theater was built just over a century ago, with construction beginning around mid-1923 on B Street.
“It will be one of the finest theaters in any small city in the country,” said general contractor A. M. Hildebrandt in a Nov. 16, 1923, article in The Press Democrat. “In construction it meets every requirement set by San Francisco standards, the highest in the country, and in other ways it will compare favorably with any like theater.”
Originally called the Reavis G & S Theatre, the $200,000 playhouse would include 2,000 seats, blue velvet drapes, a heating and ventilation system, 17 fire-proof dressing rooms, a $20,000 Wurlitzer organ and other elaborate, modern fixtures (save for the “asbestos curtains”).
The grand opening was held on Dec. 3, 1923, with a showing of the play “Blossom Time,” to which 2,000 people crowded the theater to see, according to the next day’s Press Democrat. The theater offered varied types of entertainment over the years, from plays and vaudeville performances to films and music concerts.
In January 1926, the G & S Theatre had been redecorated, refurnished and renamed as the California Theatre under new management, West Coast Theaters, Inc.
Over 3,000 people attended the Jan. 21 reopening of the renovated theater, which included a song and dance revue called “Salad Ideas” by dancing duo Fanchon and Marco, as well as a “Charleston Contest” and screening of the Constance Talmadge film “Her Sister From Paris,” according to the Jan. 22, 1926, Press Democrat.
The California Theatre was remodeled again in 1932 as “now one of the finest (theaters) on the Pacific Coast,” boasted the Sept. 20, 1932, Press Democrat. Sen. Herbert W. Slater gave the dedication address at the gala reopening, which included a showing of the film “Guilty as Hell.”
After years of entertaining the local masses, the Santa Rosa Urban Redevelopment Agency made plans in the early 1970s to raze the landmark theater along with other old buildings on B Street to make way for a new shopping center. According to santarosahistory.com, locals formed a committee and launched a “Save the Cal” campaign on July 18, 1974, to get a proposition on the November ballot to preserve the historic buildings, which also included the city’s old post office and the Scottish Rite building.
An ad from the committee in the July 21, 1974, Press Democrat urged readers to “voice your desire and interest in saving and renovating this theatre” and “to decide the future character of their city.” In addition to saving the Cal, the citizens’ committee hoped to integrate it with a cultural arts center.
“Saving the Cal may mean saving the city from becoming a concrete jungle,” the ad pleaded.
After some years of public debate, inspections, petitions and lawsuits, Superior Court judge Joseph P. Murphy Jr. made a ruling blocking referendums from both pro-mall and pro-Cal groups due to a conflict with state law on redevelopment. The public wasn’t allowed a vote on whether they wanted to preserve the historic B Street buildings or to build a shopping mall.
The California Theatre held its last show on July 5, 1977, and the following month it sold its organ, seats, ticket booth and other items in a liquidation sale. The Cal was torn down in November 1977 and the Santa Rosa Plaza mall began construction in its place. In 1981, Macy’s department store, the first of the mall’s shops, opened where the Cal once stood.
Santa Rosa’s current, nonprofit California Theatre opened on Seventh Street in September 2022 to continue the legacy of the city’s original Cal Theatre.
California
California dad charged with incest after allegedly assaulting daughter; DA may drop case
Dad charged with incest after allegedly assaulting daughter
Makayla Rene Settles moved to California to chase her dreams. Two days later, her family says her biological father sexually assaulted her. She was 18. She died five months later. Now her family is fighting to make sure her accused attacker faces trial.
VENTURA COUNTY, Calif. – When Makayla Rene Settles turned 18, she left Raleigh, North Carolina, for a fresh start. She moved to Moorpark, California, to live with her biological father, Stephen Vincent Chavez, with plans to attend college and build a new life. Two days after she arrived, her family says she called terrified and asking for help.
“It was just the fear in her voice, her crying. I didn’t need details. I knew something was wrong, and I said, ‘I’m on the way,’” said Carolina Sandoval, Makayla’s mother.
Carolina says she rushed to Chavez’s home. When she saw her daughter, she was devastated.
“She’s barely walking,” Carolina said. “My brother picks her up and hugs her.”
Makayla was taken to a hospital, where a rape kit was performed. According to the family, the results came back positive for Stephen Vincent Chavez’s DNA. He was arrested that same night and charged with incest, taking advantage of a position of trust, and providing alcohol to a minor.
Her cousin, Crystal Sandoval, was in disbelief. She said, “I was screaming, I was crying. I just kept thinking, why would he do that to her? This is something she could not come back from.”
Crystal was right. Five months later, Makayla Rene Settles died by suicide.
“If I’m being honest, it feels like I handed my daughter to the devil,” said Carolina.
On the night Makayla was taken to the hospital, Sandoval says Chavez sent her a text message. It read, “I’m never drinking liquor again. I don’t want that blackout to happen again.”
Now, the family says they’ve been dealt another devastating blow. According to Crystal Sandoval, the Ventura County DA’s Office has told them the case may not go to trial because Makayla is no longer alive to testify.
“The DA was essentially saying, ‘We don’t know if we have a case because she’s no longer here,’ and when she told me that, I immediately said, ‘No, we’re not going to let that slide,’” said Crystal.
Determined to get justice, Crystal took to social media. Her videos went viral, drawing widespread outrage and prompting hundreds to promise to show up to Chavez’s next court hearing, scheduled for April 21 at the Ventura County Courthouse.
“It was like he took her sunshine away and just kind of broke her soul,” Crystal said.
The Ventura County District Attorney’s Office issued the following statement:
“We have seen the posts online and want to let the public know that our Sexual Assault Unit continues to prosecute the defendant for this extremely serious crime. This case has been filed since July 2025, when the evidence supported the filing of felony charges. As with any case, prosecutors filed charges based on the evidence. The court sets bail. Our office successfully moved to increase bail to $250K in July 2025 when the case was filed. The defendant requested that bail be reduced, but we successfully argued against that. The defendant has since posted $250K bail and is out of custody. With respect to the upcoming hearing, the April 21 date is an early disposition conference. This is a standard pretrial proceeding where the court and parties address the status of the case and set future dates as appropriate.”
Despite that statement, the family says they have already been told a trial is not guaranteed, and they are not backing down. Chavez has pleaded not guilty. His next court hearing is April 21 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 14 at the Ventura County Courthouse.
California
California’s leading GOP candidate for governor reacts to Swalwell’s exit from race | CNN Politics
California’s leading GOP candidate for governor reacts to Swalwell’s exit from race
Republican Gov. candidate Steve Hilton joins CNN’s Dana Bash after one of his opponents, Rep. Eric Swalwell, exited the California governor’s race amid sexual misconduct allegations. “We desperately need change. And no Democrat can provide that,” Hilton says.
California
AB 2276 pilot targets seven California counties with speed-limiting devices for speeders
FRESNO, Calif. (FOX26) — A new effort to crack down on dangerous drivers in California is gaining attention as lawmakers push forward legislation aimed at repeat speeders.
Assembly member Esmeralda Soria has introduced a bill that would require certain drivers with multiple speeding offenses to install a device in their vehicles that automatically limits how fast they can go. The measure, known as the “Stop Super Speeders Act” (AB 2276), is designed to improve road safety and prevent deadly crashes.
The program could first roll out as a pilot in several counties, including Fresno, Kern, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, San Diego, Santa Clara, and Shasta. While the proposal was initially intended to be implemented statewide, consultants recommended starting with a smaller pilot program.
The legislation is driven in part by tragic cases like that of Paul Martinez, who was killed at just 21 years old after being struck by a speeding driver in Fresno. His father, Joe Martinez, says the loss is something he lives with every day.
“Being 21 years old and suddenly your entire life, dreams, goals—everything—is just wiped out by the distraction of one person who was speeding,” he said. According to reports, the driver who hit Paul was traveling 54 miles per hour in a 40 mph zone.
Traffic safety remains a serious concern in Fresno. Data from Smart Growth America ranks the city as the seventh worst in the nation for pedestrian deaths.
“I do not want to see another father who grieves every single day because he lost his child to someone driving recklessly,” Soria said.
Under AB 2276, judges would have the authority to require repeat offenders to install Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) devices in their vehicles. The technology functions similarly to cruise control but automatically adjusts a car’s speed based on posted limits using GPS data.
“Once the technology is installed, it knows the speed limit of the neighborhood or freeway and makes adjustments accordingly,” Soria explained. “This is for those folks who haven’t learned their lesson from simply getting a ticket.”
However, the proposal has drawn criticism from some groups. Opponents argue that the bill’s language is too broad and could create unintended safety risks. Critics say there are situations where drivers may need to accelerate quickly to avoid danger, and limiting speed could make those situations more hazardous.
Supporters counter that the bill is about accountability and protecting lives on the road.
“You would think this is a no-brainer bill,” said Martinez, “It holds repeat offenders accountable.”
The bill is still in the early stages of the legislative process. Its next step is review by the Assembly Appropriations Committee.
-
Atlanta, GA1 week ago1 teenage girl killed, another injured in shooting at Piedmont Park, police say
-
Georgia7 days agoGeorgia House Special Runoff Election 2026 Live Results
-
Arkansas4 days agoArkansas TV meteorologist Melinda Mayo retires after nearly four decades on air
-
Pennsylvania1 week agoParents charged after toddler injured by wolf at Pennsylvania zoo
-
Milwaukee, WI1 week agoPotawatomi Casino Hotel evacuated after fire breaks out in rooftop HVAC system
-
Technology1 week agoAnthropic essentially bans OpenClaw from Claude by making subscribers pay extra
-
Austin, TX6 days agoABC Kite Fest Returns to Austin for Annual Celebration – Austin Today
-
World1 week agoZelenskyy warns US-Iran war could divert critical aid from Ukraine