Connect with us

West

Blue state customers flock to Idaho gun store to find 'a little bit of freedom,' owner says

Published

on

Blue state customers flock to Idaho gun store to find 'a little bit of freedom,' owner says

This story is the fourth in a series examining the mass-migration of West Coast residents to Idaho. Read parts one, two and three.

POST FALLS, Idaho — The parking lot outside North Idaho Arms was quiet early one Saturday morning, but owner Bryan Zielinski soon expected it to fill with cars, many of them bearing Washington plates.

Most customers only travel 30 minutes or so from Washington’s eastern cities. But on weekends, Zielinski says some make the five-hour drive from the Seattle area to buy magazines and other accessories outlawed in their own state.

“We’re seeing people wanting to make the drive solely just to experience a little bit of freedom, the freedom that they lost in Washington,” Zielinski said.

Bryan Zielinski holds a rifle in his Post Falls gun store on April 27, 2024. He opened North Idaho Arms about three months ago, not long after his family relocated to the Gem State from neighboring Washington. (Hannah Ray Lambert/Fox News Digital)

Advertisement

THIS BLUE STATE’S AGENDA IGNORES THE CONSTITUTION TO ‘GET RID OF GUNS’: STORE MANAGER

Zielinski was a lifelong Washingtonian until last June and previously managed a large gun store in Bellevue. He advocated against the state’s increasingly restrictive gun control laws but to no avail, and he finally moved his family to North Idaho.

“Some of the most restrictive gun control in the United States is now in western Washington,” he said. “And that all happened in the space of less than three years.”

Washington’s crackdown on gun rights

Democrats spent years trying to ban magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds, Zielinski said. Then Democratic Attorney General Bob Ferguson, now a candidate for governor, spearheaded a ban that relied on the Consumer Protection Act, a state law meant to protect residents from “unfair or deceptive” business practices.

In 2022, Washington lawmakers outlawed the manufacture, import, distribution and sale of high-capacity magazines, but not possession itself. The next year, they passed a similar ban on the sale or import of “assault weapons” — primarily semi-automatic rifles — and many of the parts used to build them, arguing such measures were critical to preventing mass shootings.

Advertisement

“Assault weapons” were used in about 25% of mass shootings, according to The Violence Project, a database supported by the National Institute of Justice that analyzed mass shootings in the U.S. from 1966 to early 2020. The project chronicles mass shootings in which four or more victims were murdered with firearms in a public location.

A 2022 poll suggested a majority of Washington residents supported a ban on “assault weapons,” a label often applied to semi-automatic rifles like AR-15s and AK-47s. Washington lawmakers outlawed the sale and import of such firearms the next year. (Ramiro Vargas/Fox News Digital)

WASHINGTON GOVERNOR’S RACE LOSES TWO BOB FERGUSONS AFTER ATTORNEY GENERAL BOB FERGUSON ISSUES LEGAL THREATS

Washington has had eight such shootings since 1966, according to The Violence Project, the majority of which involved handguns. But semi-automatic rifles have been used in other killings in the state, including the 2016 shooting at a Mukilteo house party. Three people were killed in the mass shooting that drove Ferguson to advocate for the ban.

The Zielinski family packed up and moved to North Idaho last June, less than two months after Washington Gov. Jay Inslee signed the assault weapons ban into law.

Advertisement

“I really got to see how bad things were starting to get,” Zielinski said. “We finally reached a crescendo.”

Zielinski opened his own gun store just a five-minute drive across the border from Washington. He spoke to Fox News Digital while sitting in front of a wall of semi-automatic rifles that are now illegal to make, purchase or sell in his former home state.

WATCH MORE FOX NEWS DIGITAL ORIGINALS HERE

He can’t sell the banned guns themselves to Washington residents because they require extra processes like a background check and would need to be transferred to a licensed dealer in Washington. But when it comes to replacement parts or magazines, Zielinski says he doesn’t “card anybody for anything unless there’s a serial number on it.”

“We follow all federal laws. We follow all Idaho state laws,” he said. “But it is legal in Idaho to buy certain things as an adult that maybe you can’t buy in Washington.”

Advertisement

Similarly, Idaho plates are a common sight outside marijuana dispensaries on the Washington side of the border. No one is stopping Idahoans from buying pre-rolls or gummies that are banned in their home state, Zielinski said.

“At the end of the day, it’s on the consumer to make sure they’re not breaking the laws of their home state,” he said.

Learning from Washington’s ‘mistakes,’ and safeguarding Idaho against ‘liberal mindset’

Gun stores were abuzz this spring in Washington as they awaited a possible injunction against the state’s magazine ban. The attorney general had sued a business for continuing to sell magazines after the ban took effect, and the store challenged the law’s constitutionality.

In Post Falls, Zielinski took dozens of pre-orders, packaged them and got them ready to ship.

“The commitment to the customer was that the minute the injunction happens that we were going to get into Washington legally, import those boxes and get those mailed out,” he said.

Advertisement

Bryan Zielinski and his family moved to Idaho last year seeking more freedom and greater Second Amendment protections.  (Hannah Ray Lambert/Fox News Digital)

SEATTLE-AREA OFFICIALS WANT ‘NO LOCKS, NO CELLS’ FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS AMID RISE IN TEEN CRIME

On April 8, a judge ruled the ban violates both the U.S. and Washington state constitutions. The attorney general secured an emergency order from the state Supreme Court 88 minutes later, keeping the ban in place.

Zielinski shipped 147 boxes of magazines during that window.

“I know that we have some happy customers because we’ve heard from all of them,” he said.

Advertisement

He said he is still invested in Washington’s Second Amendment future because some of his friends and family members remain “behind the Iron Curtain over there.”

“But the main thing is, I’ve learned from the mistakes of Washington on how we’re going to safeguard Idaho,” he said. “So if I can work to help Washington and now help Idaho into the future as well, it’s kind of a win-win.”

Right now, “gun laws are great in Idaho,” he said. 

It’s one of nearly 30 states with constitutional concealed carry, has no laws regulating high-capacity magazines or semi-automatic rifles, and even allows residents to own a machine gun as long as it’s registered.

Bryan Zielinski can’t sell semi-automatic rifles or other banned guns to Washington residents, but he said he doesn’t check anyone’s ID when it comes to parts or magazines. “I am selling products that are 100% legal to adults in the state of Idaho,” he said. (Hannah Ray Lambert/Fox News Digital)

Advertisement

But Zielinski wants to see Idaho’s legislators make it illegal for the state to use the Consumer Protection Act to stifle the Second Amendment. And he said he’d like to see more unification in the state’s GOP which, like its national counterpart, has become increasingly fractured.

“If we can safeguard Idaho against this liberal mindset,” he said, “I think we could be the beacon that other conservative states see and go, ‘We want to be more like Idaho.’”

Click here to hear more from Zielinski.

Ramiro Vargas contributed to the accompanying video.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

Trump Approves Oil Pipeline Through Montana

Published

on

Trump Approves Oil Pipeline Through Montana


Oil pipelines, it turns out, are one of the few things that can still get Montanans riled up. And now, here we go again.

Donald Trump has finalized the approval of one of the largest cross-state pipelines in U.S. history, a nearly three-foot wide pipeline that will carry oil from Canada through Montana to Wyoming when built out. It means if this thing goes ahead, you are looking at around 550,000 barrels a day moving through the region. That is no small enterprise either, and it has already placed Montana squarely in the middle of a well-worn debate.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

A Debate Montana Knows All Too Well

If all of this is ringing any bells for you, you are not wrong. Montana has been here before when it comes to pipeline debates, and just like last time, people are already divided. On one side, you have folks looking at this and thinking jobs, energy independence, and perhaps, bringing some much-needed relief to the gas pump. Because in all honesty, fuel has been rough lately. Every single fill-up makes you feel like you are buying concert tickets, not gas. For a lot of people, it sounds like progress.

Advertisement

Shawn Thew-Pool/Getty Images

Shawn Thew-Pool/Getty Images

Not Everyone Is Celebrating

Then there is the other camp, and they are hardly celebrating. Once again, environmental concerns are front and center. Spills, land impact, long-term risk. Everything that tends to get brushed aside until something actually breaks. Montana is not exactly short on people who care about the land. That part is not political. That is just reality out here. So when a pipeline cuts across the state, it quickly feels like poking a hornet’s nest.

Joe Raedle/Newsmakers

Joe Raedle/Newsmakers

So Where Does This Go From Here

So where does that leave things? That is the question right now. Is this a move toward cheaper energy and greater stability, or is it another gamble with long-term consequences? The truth is, it is probably both. That said, construction crews are not rolling in tomorrow. The project still has hurdles to clear and could run into legal challenges. But the conversation is already here, and it is not going anywhere. And if history is any guide, Montana is going to have plenty to say about it.

Counties with the highest cancer rates in Montana

Stacker ranked the counties with the highest cancer rates in Montana using data from the CDC.

Gallery Credit: Stacker

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

5.2 magnitude earthquake in Nevada reportedly felt as far as Sacramento

Published

on

5.2 magnitude earthquake in Nevada reportedly felt as far as Sacramento



An early morning earthquake in Nevada on Friday was felt as far west as the Sacramento Valley.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the quake struck around 1:17 a.m. about 50 miles east of Carson City. Shaking was reported across the Reno, Carson City and South Lake Tahoe areas.

People also reported feeling shaking along the Sierra Nevada foothills and into the valley, including in Roseville and Sacramento.

Advertisement

No damage has been reported.

Map of Friday morning’s earthquake in Nevada.

USGS


The quake had a preliminary magnitude of 5.2. A magnitude 4.3 foreshock appears to have struck about two minutes before the main quake. Several aftershocks have followed, none larger than magnitude 2.7.

Advertisement

Nevada also saw a magnitude 5.7 earthquake centered in the same general area on April 13. Like Friday’s quake, that earthquake was felt in the Sacramento area.



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

Meta threatens to pull Facebook and Instagram from New Mexico over child safety trial requirements

Published

on

Meta threatens to pull Facebook and Instagram from New Mexico over child safety trial requirements


Tech giant Meta is threatening to cut off access to its social media platforms in New Mexico as a response to the state’s legal effort to compel changes to child safety protocols on the platform.

Meta and the state of New Mexico are expected to proceed to the second stage of their trial next week after a jury recently issued a $375 million award to the state after finding that the company misled consumers about the safety of its platforms and protections for children against sexual predators.

Advertisement

The next phase of the trial will concern what actions the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp must take to address those issues.

Among the remedies New Mexico is seeking is to impose a requirement that Meta meet a 99% accuracy threshold in verifying that children on its platform are at least 13 years old. Meta has pushed back on that requirement, arguing in a court filing that it’s unfeasible and would require it to “comply with impossible obligations.”

META VOWS APPEAL OF ‘LANDMARK’ SOCIAL MEDIA VERDICTS, WARNS OF FREE SPEECH EROSION

Meta is warning that it may be forced to pull its apps from New Mexico if the state prevails in requiring the social media giant to implement certain safeguards. (Arda Kucukkaya/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Meta’s legal team said in a filing that New Mexico’s “requests for relief are so broad and so burdensome, that if implemented it might force Meta to withdraw its apps entirely from the State of New Mexico as an alternative way of complying with the injunction.”

Advertisement

“It does not make economic or engineering sense for Meta to build separate apps just for New Mexico residents,” Meta’s lawyers added. “Nor could Meta guarantee the perfection the State demands, making it impractical for Meta to operate in New Mexico.”

EXPERT WARNS OF MASSIVE RECKONING FOR SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES: ‘GIANT CASE OF KARMA’

Ticker Security Last Change Change %
META META PLATFORMS INC. 611.91 -57.21 -8.55%

The company has argued that it’s being unfairly singled out in comparison to other social media platforms that are popular with young people. It also previously signaled it will appeal the $375 million civil judgment against it.

New Mexico pushed back on Meta’s assertion that it would be impractical to comply with the safeguards it’s seeking for social media apps.

META ORDERED TO PAY $375M AFTER JURY FINDS PLATFORM ENABLED CHILD PREDATORS IN LANDMARK NEW MEXICO CASE

Advertisement

Meta is the parent company of apps including Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. (Reuters/Dado Ruvic/Illustration)

“Meta is showing the world how little it cares about child safety,” said New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “Meta’s refusal to follow the laws that protect our kids tells you everything you need to know about this company and the character of its leaders.” 

“We know Meta has the ability to make these changes. For years the company has rewritten its own rules, redesigned its products, and even bent to the demands of dictators to preserve market access. This is not about technological capability. Meta simply refuses to place the safety of children ahead of engagement, advertising revenue, and profit,” Torrez added.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

New Mexico is also seeking that Meta implement safer recommendation algorithms that don’t prioritize engagement over child well-being, restrictions on end-to-end encryption for minors, prominent warning labels about the platform’s risks, permanent bans for adults engaging in or facilitating the exploitation of children, and an independent oversight regime through a court-appointed child safety monitor.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending