Connect with us

Arizona

Trump nominates former Arizona attorney general Mark Brnovich for US ambassador to Serbia

Published

on

Trump nominates former Arizona attorney general Mark Brnovich for US ambassador to Serbia


play

Advertisement
  • Former Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich has been nominated by Donald Trump to be the next U.S. ambassador to Serbia.
  • Brnovich, who is of Serbian descent, previously served two terms as Arizona’s top prosecutor.
  • Trump endorsed Brnovich’s opponent in the 2022 Arizona GOP Senate primary after Brnovich refused to support Trump’s claims of election fraud.

Former Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich was nominated by President Donald Trump as the next U.S. ambassador to Serbia.

Brnovich served two terms as the state’s top prosecutor and is of an ethnic background from the southeastern European region that is now Serbia.

Trump announced the nomination March 28 on his social media platform.

“I am pleased to announce that Mark Brnovich will be our next United States Ambassador to Serbia…. As the son of refugees who fled communism, Mark will be a strong advocate for Freedom, and always put AMERICA FIRST. Congratulations Mark!” Trump said in the Truth Social post.

Brnovich ran for one of Arizona’s U.S. Senate seats in 2022, which he lost in the Republican primary to Blake Masters.

The U.S. Senate needs to confirm his nomination.

Advertisement

Here’s what we know about Brnovich and his connections to Serbia.

Brnovich comes from a Serbs background

In a 2022 interview with the Serbian Times, while Brnovich was still campaigning for Senate, he discussed his cultural background and the family he still had in Serbia and Montenegro.

“I’m very proud of my cultural background and was fortunate to grow up speaking another language,” Brnovich said.

Advertisement

While his parents immigrated to the U.S., Brnovich said his family came from the Podgorica region near the capital of Montenegro, a country that shares a border with Serbia, both formerly part of Yugoslavia, which was broken up in 1992.

He mentioned he has relatives that still live in the region and that his family tried to make yearly visits, with a trip a recent as 2021 to Montenegro.

Brnovich credits his wife, Susan, a U.S. District of Arizona judge, for embracing his cultural roots.

Brnovich and his wife had two daughters together, Milena and Sofija, and lived in Phoenix.

Advertisement

Brnovich’s time as attorney general, failed U.S. Senate race

Brnovich was elected twice to serve as Arizona attorney general, a position he held from 2015 until 2023.

Brnovich won the statewide office twice but got little traction during his 2022 U.S. Senate campaign after Trump publicly pressured him to legitimize Trump’s false claims that Arizona’s 2020 election was “rigged.”

At a July 2021 rally in Phoenix, Trump pressured Brnovich to use the Arizona Senate’s review of Maricopa County ballots to lend credence to his false claims of a stolen election. With Trump’s endorsement in the race hanging in the balance, his words took on even greater weight.

“We have to hold these people accountable,” Trump said at the time. “Hopefully — and I say this, and I have confidence in it — hopefully, your attorney general, Mark Brnovich … will take this incredible information given by these incredible warriors and patriots, and he’s going to take it and he’s going to do what everybody knows needs to be done.”

Brnovich’s office opened an investigation after the ballot review ended in September 2021, but didn’t bring any major cases stemming from the probe.

Advertisement

His staff spent 10,000 hours working on a report that found virtually all claims of error and malfeasance were unfounded, the Washington Post later reported.

Brnovich ignored those findings and instead released an initial investigative report in April 2022 that cited “serious vulnerabilities” and “questions” about the election but didn’t claim widespread fraud.

Trump and Brnovich had a previously testy relationship

Two months later, Trump endorsed Brnovich’s GOP rival Masters in the Republican Senate primary and blasted Brnovich.

Brnovich appeared repeatedly on Fox News but otherwise ran a low-profile campaign.

The day before the 2022 primary, Brnovich publicly wrote that his office had only found one instance of a ballot turned in for someone who had already died out of 282 allegedly identified by the state Senate’s ballot review.

Advertisement

Trump accused Brnovich of not supporting “clean and fair elections, or law and order.”

“Mark Brnovich is such a disappointment to me,” Trump said. 

The Arizona Republic’s Ronald J. Hansen contributed to this article.

Reach reporter Rey Covarrubias Jr. at rcovarrubias@gannett.com. Follow him on X, Threads and Bluesky @ReyCJrAZ.



Source link

Advertisement

Arizona

Arizona prisons director defends practice of lowering inmate custody level

Published

on

Arizona prisons director defends practice of lowering inmate custody level


PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Ricky Wassenaar was already serving 16 life sentences for his role in an escape attempt and hostage standoff at the Lewis Complex prison in Buckeye in 2004. For the past 20 years, he remained mostly out of the limelight, serving his time.

But in April of this year, Wassenaar attacked three inmates in the Cimarron Unit of the state prison in Tucson, killing them, and sparking a controversy over how he was able to carry out the murders and how he had access to other inmates in the first place.

“I would have killed at least seven. My goal was at least seven,” Wassenaar told True Crime Arizona’s Briana Whitney, in a phone interview. She said he seemed excited to talk about it, bragging that he had provided a service, because the inmates he killed were sex offenders.

According to Wassenaar’s inmate profile, at the end of 2024, he was moved out of maximum security, where he had been for decades, and into close custody, which is a slightly lower level of security.

Advertisement

“He was max custody and then he was put out in close custody, which means he gets to walk among them (other inmates),” said Rodney Carr, who is a former warden in the Arizona prison system.

He left the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry after Gov. Katie Hobbs hired Ryan Thornell as the new director. Thornell came to Arizona from Maine, where he was deputy commissioner of a prison system a fraction the size of Arizona’s.

“I worked for a lot of directors and not always that I agreed with. But that’s my job. Well, with him it got to the point where I couldn’t,” said Carr.

Carr and another former warden, as well as several correctional officers, reached out to Arizona’s Family Investigates with similar complaints: that the department under Thornell’s leadership was moving maximum security inmates into close custody, where it costs less and requires fewer correctional officers to oversee the inmates.

“Under the way they’re managing maximum security inmates in a closed custody environment, staff are going to get hurt,” said Carr.

Advertisement

In an interview with Arizona’s Family Investigates, Thornell said he is moving inmates out of maximum security. “That is absolutely something we are doing. Just like every other department of corrections across the country must do. It’s a practice and we are doing that here,” said Thornell.

He said 90 to 95% of inmates who are in custody will eventually be released into the community, including those in maximum security. And Thornell said keeping them in maximum security the entire time they are in prison is not good for the community once they are released. He said the effect the isolation of maximum custody has on inmates is real and often negative.

“How can I say that somebody in max custody is OK to release into local Arizona, but they’re not OK to release into a close custody yard that still has fences or razor wire?” he said.

When asked if it was a mistake to take Wassenaar out of maximum custody, Thornell said no, but he couched his answer.

“Hindsight is always 20/20, right? So, knowing what I know today, should we have moved him out of max custody? Yes, we should have. Would I do it knowing the facts that I have at my disposal today? Knowing what he did then? No, I wouldn’t. But the practice was sound. It’s still a sound practice,” he said.

Advertisement

Thornell acknowledged that the number of violent incidents in close custody has increased, but he denied that it was the result of max-custody inmates creating more problems.

“It’s easy for a warden, a former warden, to come forward and say, ‘20 years ago, that’s not how we did it.’ Well, 20 years ago, nobody cared who we were releasing back into the community,” said Thornell.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona lawmakers demand answers over Phoenix immigration court arrests

Published

on

Arizona lawmakers demand answers over Phoenix immigration court arrests


PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Some Arizona lawmakers are demanding answers on what has been happening outside a Phoenix immigration court recently.

On Wednesday, four Arizona Democrats sent a letter to the Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons. It came from Sens. Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego, as well as Reps. Yassamin Ansari and Greg Stanton.

The letter comes after tense protests last week. For two days straight, ICE agents were at Phoenix immigration court, arresting people there for routine hearings and putting them into vans. That second day turned chaotic with protestors and officers getting physical.

“That pattern of dismissal and detainment kind of slowed down towards the end of the week, but unfortunately, today we did see more people detained at the immigration court,” said state Sen. Analise Ortiz, a Democrat from the West Valley.

Advertisement

She has been showing up to immigration court to support migrants at their hearings, and says ICE was there again on Wednesday, but it was different this time. “People were actually being told they could leave the courthouse, so they were driving off of the property and then being stopped and detained down the street. Someone relayed to me that a toddler was detained. This is just horrible, and this is inhumane,” said Ortiz.

The letter poses three main questions, with the first being how many people has ICE arrested and detained at an immigration court during the week of May 19 and how many have been placed in expedited removal?

The second asks for copies of all guidance and written directives associated with this recent ICE action, and the third asks how ICE is complying with requirements for screening individuals for fear of persecution.

The letter also says the Democratic lawmakers believe tactics like this make the immigration process less fair and efficient and undermine the Trump administration’s goal of targeting criminals who are public safety threats.

“A lot of these individuals who are in deportation proceedings (or) immigration proceedings, they don’t have a criminal history,” said immigration attorney Sheree Wright with IBF Law Group.

Advertisement

She has been volunteering to advise migrants at their hearings. “When it comes to safety, these are not criminals,” said Wright.

Arizona’s Family also spoke to a former Phoenix-based ICE agent who was in the field for 22 years. He wanted to remain anonymous.

The former agent said arrests like the ones at the immigration court are not new. He also said they are safer for the public, the officers, and the detainees because there is a screening process at places like court buildings. According to the former officer, when they detain someone, they often go through what is called “custody redetermination” to see if the migrant should continue with their immigration proceedings or be placed in expedited removal.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Takeaways From Arizona State Baseball Tournament Draw

Published

on

Takeaways From Arizona State Baseball Tournament Draw


The Arizona State baseball program is officially tournament bound.

The Sun Devils – coached by fourth-year head coach and program alum Willie Bloomquist – were officially selected to be the three seed in the Los Angeles regional on Monday morning.

With that, the selection ended several days of nervous waiting after the program sputtered to end the season.

Ultimately, the rough finish is in the rearview mirror now and the Sun Devils are looking to make the most of this chance – here are three takeaways for the weekend ahead:

Advertisement

This one is obvious – the Sun Devils are in a region with the host in 15th seeded UCLA, the second region seed in UC Irvine, and Mountain West champs Fresno State.

UCLA and UC Irvine are battle-tested over the entirety of the season, while Fresno State has picked up play as of late despite only putting together a 31-29 campaign to this point.

The region will be a challenge for the Sun Devils, but it isn’t insurmountable…

The Sun Devils have the talent to win the region – and UC Irvine’s recent run of opponents leaves reason to be concerned that the Anteaters aren’t currently conditioned to compete with power four competition despite having proven they can defeat high level programs this season.

UCLA also is one of the lower national seeds that received the opportunity to host a regional – it doesn’t seem insurmountable for the Sun Devils – who boasted the best offense across the entire Big 12 – to capture some magic once again and make a serious run.

Advertisement

It feels as if a win in the opening matchup with UC Irvine is a must however, which brings the last takeaway into the fray.

This Arizona State baseball team truly has the ceiling of a College World Series squad – but also the floor of a squad that goes winless in the tournament.

While it would be unlikely for the Sun Devils to drop an elimination game to (presumably) Fresno State, a fifth loss in as many games could potentially prove to be too much for a team that entered the season with so much promise.

The opening game of the Sun Devils’ tournament experience is set for Friday night at 6 P.M. Arizona time – the game is set to be broadcast on ESPNU.

Read more about the best-case scenario for ASU in the upcoming tournament here, and listen to the recent podcast covering the ultimate selection the Sun Devils received here.

Advertisement

Please let us know your thoughts on the upcoming tournament run for Willie Bloomquist and the Sun Devils when you like our Facebook page when you click right here.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending